559
560

MetaMore Whining about Sex Robots from the Gynocracy- They are Starting to realize that bitchy, sex denying harpy's can't compete. Time for shaming! (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor

This story has it all: Sex Robots, Feminists, and Struggle Snuggle Angst.

they also raise concerns that sex robots could increase the objectification of women, alter perceptions of consent and be used to satisfy desires that would otherwise be illegal.

Does anybody really believe this argument? Sex robots increase objectification of women??? You mean like, more than make up and miniskirts.

manufacturer claimed that if “you touched her in a private area, more than likely, she will not be to[o] appreciative of your advance”, leading some to claim that it is indulging rape fantasies.

Why...the...fuck would you buy a robot to turn you down? I guess it is still cheaper than a wife.

it is more likely to “encourage paedophilia and make it acceptable to assault children

This is the delusional claim of a hamster gone wild. Looking for anything- ANYTHING- that might stop the oncoming freight train aimed right at their soiled little stink-boxes.

Treating paedophiles with robot sex-children is both a dubious and repulsive idea. Imagine treating racism by letting a bigot abuse a brown robot.

False dichotomy. The fear is that men will find outlet to their urges and women can only control men if the men are weak and/or desperate. This will not stand!

there are particular concerns they could amplify objectification of women

Are we going to be fucking robots or are we going to be using Cylon's to objectify "real" women? The real concern is whether men will bother to even interact with women enough to even objectify them after sexbots become available. When they become indistinguisible from the "real" thing, women will no longer have any power whatsoever. THAT is the real fear.

Lessons Learned: Everything in life is about sex except sex. Sex is about power and sex robots will take away all the power of women in the sexual market place.

Expect the histrionic hysterics to increase. Expect the modern day Carrie Nation to form a group that goes door to door smashing sex bots.


[–]blitzer92 points points [recovered]

"be used to satisfy desires that would otherwise be illegal."

Isn't this a good thing? I'd rather give pedophiles and rape fetishists sex robots than have them enact their desires it on real people.

[–][deleted] 94 points95 points  (2 children)

Exactly. As if depraved urges would simply go away for being dubbed illegal.

[–]JimGusa 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Hey, it worked with drugs- oh wait

[–]comptejete 82 points83 points  (3 children)

Countless illegal activities are carried out daily in the virtual world of video games, if you're going to use this as an argument then you're going to have to ban virtually every game aimed at adults.

[–]alpagator 23 points24 points  (1 child)

Books too, can't give anyone any ideas or they might do something illegal.

[–]PremixedBox 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Might as well ban thoughts too. Can't have ideas that are illegal. That would be too harmful!

[–]Squirmme 62 points63 points  (3 children)

Ironically, women fetishize rape more than men.

[–]afkb39sdfb 27 points28 points  (0 children)

They call it "ravished".

[–]Hung_Chad 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I'm suddenly imagining an army of women buying a robot to enact their 50 Shades fantasies.

[–]lolpaulonthenet2 26 points27 points  (2 children)

Yeah, but the average person doesn't actually care whether a particular activity is harmful. Most people just enjoy telling other people what to do. See the war on drugs, gay marriage, etc.

[–]afkb39sdfb 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Alcohol prohibition. "I don't like alcohol so everyone else should not be allowed to do it."

[–]killzon32 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A lot of the times its at a corporations benefit, they use harmful activitys as an excuse to monopolize.

[–]Red-Curious 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Many a psychologist has suggested that horror movies are merely a way for us to release our murderous rage, but in a more sophisticated and detached way than buying a ticket to the Roman colosseum or smashing in another caveman's head. This isn't the first or last time this logic has come up. Sometimes it's healthy, sometimes it's not.

[–]satanicpriest13 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Same goes for the racism part (love how they specify a bigot will abuse a brown robot btw, not offense at all to brown people like myself). Isn't this a good thing? A robot to take your frustrations out on so you don't give your fellow citizens a hard time? We could also bring back slavery!

[–]CrazedHyperion 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Imagine what these robots can do for wifebeaters.... (not the white cotton ones).

[–]1Goomich 5 points6 points  (0 children)

[–]deathtokings 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Not necessarily. Like the way watching porn leads people to more and more degrading acts. It could be that sexy child robots could lead someone to chase in real life something they otherwise wouldn't have, developing a taste. I think it would need to be studied

[–]1Metalageddon 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Oh you fucked up bro.

No common sense here. Not alright. You likely cis white male you.

[–]drunksaver 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Sounds like someone needs to check their privilege.

[–]Cryxtalix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why? Nah, the infamous thread on reddit which interviews rapists made it clear that rapists are ordinary people, momentarily overcome by lust and warped thoughs managing to "justify" their actions. Any ordinary man can become a rapist just by falling victim to the mental trap of lust and false justification.

Combined with the fact we all know that lust falls after a man ejeculates due to hormones. We can give everyone the means to act on their fantasies, as well as ejeculate. This means that upon meeting a potential victim, they are either already sexually satisfied from a recent ejeculation, or they are more eager to return home to use the sexual fufilment contraption without bringing harm to another person.

Of course not 100% lust removal or any of that sort, but anyone with deviant/violent sexual tendencies would be less likely to act out in reality. I fail to understand why you think this isn't good.

[–]metalhead4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But then you have to make child sex robots which must surely cross some moral line...

[–]Bing400 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Furthermore, we can look at this from a psychological pov. Sigmund Freud spoke of repressed sexual desires, desires that would fester in one's subconscious. What if you could bring them out to light and get them dealt with with this robot?

From an economics pov, one could argue that highly sexually repressive societies such as japan fare well economically due to their current view on sex.

[–]insoucianc 218 points219 points  (35 children)

I don't know what they expected. Women have effectively reduced their only use to a man being sex. Women don't cook, clean, or care, for themselves, their lovers, or their children anymore. Men don't need women but women sure as hell need men, they starve without a masculine influence to bring them stability and security. Once sex can be bought and sold without women's interference or permission they will become as replaceable as men are, which is their true fear. I look forward to it, the tides will finally turn.

[–]Bing400 34 points35 points  (20 children)

Maybe this raises a broader topic: everything can be automated. Even people.

From there we can relate automation to cooking, cleaning, education, learning, leisure, transportation, government, military, and energy to name a few. We'll see how AI affects our world in the next 10-20 years, I'm putting my money on bionic chips in our brains that augment human consciousness. Either way, we're in for an existential ride boys!

[–]2comment 22 points23 points  (16 children)

Automation works well for known cases, not edge cases. Like if you seen something in your field 1000x over, the solution can be automated very easily. Even many doctors are just human body technicians with little novelty in their careers. That's where automation gets it foot in the door. From there, it will "solve" the low hanging fruit until it gets stuck. Then it will either stay there, various AIs in related fields collaborate to go further, or a human solves it for them. Creative problem solvers are the immediate future then in that sense.

Imo, we won't see truely futuristic automation people envision til long after we're dead, the stuff that can handle curve balls reality typically throws us. The problem is that enough people are unsuitable for anything but the disappearing easily-solved jobs themselves.

Just like 1 cashier can man 6 self-checkout registers right now, in 30-50 years, you'll have 4-6 robots acting as full stock clerks, and 1 human per shift overseeing them and doing the special cases instead of however much there are now. White-collar back-office jobs are not spared.

Since there are 70 employees right now around per average supermarket, you'll have that number decline to 20-something over time. Those jobs are just going to disappear, never to come back. Maybe 1-2 robot mechanics in the beginning replace them, but then that gets automated too.

[–]beginner_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Imo, we won't see truely futuristic automation people envision til long after we're dead, the stuff that can handle curve balls reality typically throws us

Agree. it will take much longer than this hype about industry 3.0 currently going on claims. People also need to adjust. Personally I don't like the self-checkout stuff unless it's just couple of small things. The shop just outsourced work it did for me to myself. That is actually ingenious.

Main problem people forget is how expensive IT actually is. The robots would need a huge IT infrastructure which is maintained by expensive employees. Fact is min-wage jobs are for the foreseeable future too cheap to use robots. Low-end office workers are in my opinion in larger danger. You just need a good programmer and software tools to automate their Excel stuff and if done right in a large enough company you can replace 10+ office workers with 1 programmer/IT guy.

[–]CrazedHyperion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe that we will end up with pre-order supermarkets. Imagine: no store to keep, just a warehouse. No cashiers, maybe just delivery drivers, o pickup clerks. No cash to count, no inventories to make. Amazon is taking us in that direction.

[–]Bing400 2 points3 points  (13 children)

Automation works well for known cases, not edge cases. Like if you seen something in your field 1000x over, the solution can be automated very easily. Even many doctors are just human body technicians with little novelty in their careers. That's where automation gets it foot in the door. From there, it will "solve" the low hanging fruit until it gets stuck. Then it will either stay there, various AIs in related fields collaborate to go further, or a human solves it for them. Creative problem solvers are the immediate future then in that sense.

What you're talking about, body technicians, this is essentially IBM's Watson. Take what you know and apply it, right? However, look at this diagram the red bubble is where shit starts to get blurry with creativity and AI. Machines, at that level, are more than just technicians. I was talking to this machine learning professor at the UofMontreal and I asked him if there was anything AI couldn't do, he said no, I asked him if at least creativity is something that is unique to man, same answer(1). What the fuck are we useful for then? Gosh haha.

Also, for your comment on futuristic automation. Like what? Bear in mind technology accelerates. I'd like to show you this man, Ray kurzweil and his predictions, he's google's top guy when it comes to technology. And yeah lol you might be on to something when it comes to people being useless other than the jobs we have currently. AI raises a lot of questions when it comes to existence... For the cashier thing, we might even go further and remove the cashier's role entirely. If we use robots to increase efficiency, why limit ourselves to the previous model of business by removing the human slowness? Why not increase efficiency even further? Lol check out what amazon did.. Christ..

It's not all doom and gloom that those jobs are disappearing. The whole point of robotics is to allow man to be free to do things that aren't replaceable. Thus, what does man do that isn't menial and gives him freedom?

1 this I believe is due to the fact that when you dive into deep learning, you're creating neural networks with computers. Now what is a human mind? a web of neurons, right or wrong? So the line between machine and man gets really blurred. We can even bring up Freud and his theory of the subconscious mind. What's to stop an artificial subconscious if we can create neural networks in robots? And from there, if you aren't the product of your subconscious fears and repressed sexual desires, what are you? Who are you? wAnd if an artificial subconscious with its own fears and repressed sexual desires is created, why would it be different than you?

[–]2comment 9 points10 points  (2 children)

I was talking to this machine learning professor at the UofMontreal and I asked him if there was anything AI couldn't do, he said no, I asked him if at least creativity is something that is unique to man, same answer(1). What the fuck are we useful for then? Gosh haha.

Watson is impressive, but it's still essentially a big number cruncher. And I heard this AI can do anything claim for a long time from AI prophets and read accounts of the mentality coming out of places like MIT since the 1970s, when Lisp/Lisp_Machines were all the rage. Neural networks are nothing new, although some advancements have been made, but mainly the machines now are just much faster which helps a ton. Granted, it's not my field, but it's one of those "I'll believe it when I see it things", mostly because I can get computers and their programs to fail spectacularly without even trying.

We'll get there, but let's say I'm not gonna be the first in line to buy or even ride in a self-driving car. Hell, the car companies selling simple "smart cruise control" that just has to check in front of it and apply brakes put all manner of "Whatever happens, it's your fault" small print clauses in everything. Gonna be some spectacular fails along the way and it wouldn't surprise me that a lot of companies will get sued out of existence for them.

And yes, we're just biological machines. DNA is our source code. Epigenetics studies the compiler. It should say something that after billions of years of evolution, edited via life and death, that there's still nothing approaching perfection in this rat race. Humanity isn't going to achieve anything but simplistics in decades.

And humans will be superceded in many areas, some sooner, some later. Has been that way since at least the industrial revolution... it's just now that instead of graduating to more productive jobs, many people will be relegated to the same pasture most horses went to after the advent of the car.

It's not all doom and gloom that those jobs are disappearing. The whole point of robotics is to allow man to be free to do things that aren't replaceable. Thus, what does man do that isn't menial and gives him freedom?

The distribution of productivity boosts/benefits is what it boils down to... but it can as easily go into serfdom again with a few nobles reaping the gains. Really doesn't matter the economic system, the centralization takes place in America, Russia, and China right even now. Money is agnostic in that regard. We're essentially all corptocracies to one degree or another.

This story is a bit childish morality play, especially after chapter 4, but the first few chapters basically sums it up.

[–]Bing400 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I thoroughly enjoyed Manna. In just one sentence, the last one, the author managed to change the whole mood. I definitely see why you speak of serfdom... However the opposite might also be true. What if we all become lords? We allow everyone's creative genius to flourish instead of repressing it.

[–]dpape39 1 point2 points  (0 children)

automation of jobs is an important question, but superintelligent AI is where shit is really gonna be going down.

it's near impossible to predict what will happen, most can't even agree when it will happen, but what's certain is that it will happen unless we self destroy with nukes before. we're in for a fun ride.

[–]beginner_ 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Why not increase efficiency even further? Lol check out what amazon did.. Christ..

That is technically trivial and not really AI related. All you need is an ID for you as customer, eg the smartphone and RFID tags in the products.

Problem is RFID tags are still expensive, like 10c per tag. A huge company might bring price down but even at 5c per tag imagine how much that alone costs the shop. Every single product must be labeled with such a tag, even the ones costing 10c. And that doesn't include the required IT infrastructure. So cashier now seems pretty cheap compared to that.

[–]Bing400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Though can we expect a dramatic decrease in cost? Like for solar panels

[–]RatioRegnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trolleyscan in South Africa have been working on this since the late 90s. It's coming.

[–]cnzs 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Can you expand on creativity not being unique to humans? That makes no sense just like that...

[–]Bing400 0 points1 point  (5 children)

If we understand that creativity is the association between different concepts already in your mind subconsciously. Then would it be fair to say, if you were able to create a subconscious network of ideas through in a computer, essentially an artificial neural network that is just like a person's brain, that that robot could also make those associations?

[–]cnzs 0 points1 point  (4 children)

What is your definition of creativity tho? It's not only the association but transformation of the concepts too

[–]Bing400 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Yeah but how are you transforming things? Is it not by taking something and applying ideas that are buried deep in your mind to turn it into something else? Using an artificial neural net, you could replicate this phenomenon

[–]cnzs 0 points1 point  (2 children)

No? Where are you getting that from? So your professor pretends to solve the problem of consciousness with neural networks? What a joke. What do you mean taking something and applying ideas that are buried deep in your mind? Well you're not explaining how the transformation happens at all which is the interest aspect.

[–]Bing400 0 points1 point  (1 child)

First of all, I am the one advocating the replication of the human mind in a robot, not my Prof.

Also, these are just hypotheses and discussion, no need to be like that.

Finally, what you said about how ideas are made is a reasonable point. In order to replicate the phenomenon, it's only fair that we understand it fully. How do suggest one should go about it? I started with Freud's books on the subconscious.

[–]Troll_Name 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Most of a doctor's profession is being a library - among the easiest things for a modern computer to do.

The first jobs to get automated are the ones where people work like mindless ants. The tractor's breakthrough into mass production was devastating to people who did what tractors do to earn their living - far worse of an impact than any economic downturn of recent history.

Among the last 'regular' jobs to be automated are those which involve repairing machines. They will eventually be automated when the machines are redesigned to have components pop off like legos for easy replacement.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think it'll be that easy to replace a doctor. Human instinct and imagination and perception play a huge role in diagnosing a patient, nevermind performing surgery. Robots will absolutely help and assist doctors practice medicine to a tremendous level. But it will be quite a while before doctors will be replaced.

[–]director_solon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At what point in our constant search for better and greater automation do we in fact lose the thing that makes us Humans? The prophets of automation always predict that automation will allow people to become more creative and independent. I have a sneaking suspicion that as our lives become increasingly melded with machines and their monotony and uniformity we will not become more unique and creative versions of ourselves but rather more imperfect and irrelevant versions of the machines that replaced us.

[–]1OneRedYear 8 points9 points  (12 children)

Women do all of those things. Seriously the redpill has to stop with this nonsense. I know plenty of married guys in their 30s and 40s who's wives cook, clean, take care of and help run the house and take care of their children. Sure a lot of women don't, but a lot of women do.

As for the tide turning. Honestly don't care. It's not a battle for me. I get enough sex to be satisfied and when I don't I do what I have to do or go without. I won't die.

[–]insoucianc 15 points16 points  (5 children)

Mostly talking about millennials.

[–]1EarthExile 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's fairly obvious that those aren't the women crying about sex robots. They're the ones who succeeded and are holding up their end of a stable relationship.

The women crying about sex robots are the ones who know they have nothing to offer but a squishy hole.

[–]tolerantman 2 points3 points  (2 children)

"Guys in their 30s and 40s"

Of course, of course...

Now show me one single guy in his 20s whose girlfriend knows how to do any of those things.

[–]1OneRedYear 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Okay come to my job. I work with several. You are just angry and bitter. You think in a country of 300 million it's not a single one? In a planet of billions? Fuck off mate.

[–]tolerantman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why make shit up on the internet?

Young women who know how to cook and clean? LOL

They do not even think about having children until they are in their 30s and already hit the wall.

[–]Poppenhoffer 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Seconding this. This is exactly what that woman offering a dissenting opinion in the video was talking about. the mindset that women are for nothing more than sex is a really toxic and hateful view to have.

[–]1EarthExile 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They wouldn't be freaking out about sex robots if they believed that. That's the thing, people with more to offer don't worry when new technology comes along. It's the people with no other skills who will be replaced, and they are the ones who know it.

See also, the appalachian dummies who want the government to somehow make the coal industry important again.

[–]Hjalmbere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You forgot that we need women to procreate. But I guess artificial wombs could solve that too.

[–]Endorsed ContributorObio1 207 points208 points  (28 children)

I love the fact that there are actually women out there who insist that MEN objectify women.

Open ANY fashion magazine. They are written, edited, photographed, styled and published by WOMEN. There you will find page after page of raw, objectification, materialism and superficiality which blows away anything in any men's magazine.

These women are deeply in denial about what females are.

[–]Htowngetdown 77 points78 points  (5 children)

I made the mistake of reading a Snapchat story from cosmopolitan about the writer's experience of not drinking during the summer. In her 6 sentence paragraph depicting her sober club experience, she states twice, "Men are disgusting." She offers no explanation whatsoever, so I can only assume she is judging the men simply for hitting on her and her friends at the club. Side note, she barely made it 10 days of sobriety without drowning herself in her daily bottle of wine, and seems to think that it proved her point that "she could do it."

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 4 points5 points  (4 children)

I seriously dont get what it is about how insanely female-centric snapchats stories (besides the user-generated ones) are. Literally everything is written with the reader just assumed to be a 20-something woman. I know nobody in their right mind is ever going to call them out on it, but it makes no sense to me.

Best guess is that they think strongly projecting the idea that the app is where women are at is a good way of subconsciously making beta guys associate it with women, but it wouldnt kill them to have an occasional article written from a neutral point of view.

[–]Htowngetdown 7 points8 points  (3 children)

I think it's just as simple as why there are so many trashy women's magazines. Women love that shit and will click on anything. I was trying to get some perspective on summer sobriety, but instead I got some perspective on AWALT.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 0 points1 point  (2 children)

So you think a lot of the clickbait side of the internet is driven by female users eh? Wonder if theres any data available that might confirm that.

[–]Htowngetdown 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Again, I have no evidence to back it up, but women in general are bigger "consumers" than men. They consume more media and more things. (Obviously this is stereotyping so there are outliers but in general women are much more consumer-oriented than men in my experience.)

[–]Scymnus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Iirc women purchase something like 70 % of all consumer goods, I'll see if I can find the source later because it's a really interesting observation.

[–]lukmeg 10 points11 points  (1 child)

The concept of objectification itself is stupid. It was only created to repress male sexuality. But if you try to understand it logically and assuming good faith, it makes no sense.

[–]Endorsed ContributorObio1 8 points9 points  (0 children)

True.

Male sexuality works via objectification. It's how men get aroused. It's why female humans have large breasts, etc.

[–]1sailorJery 29 points30 points  (6 children)

They're deeply in denial about the nature of reality! Listening to Jordan Peterson talks, he mentioned how we used to think vision worked. The hypothesis was that we live in a material world with objects that we see, and then our brain infers utility. But in the 21rst century when we tried to give vision to robots we found out that we first have to give the robot a body, an underlying structure, so it can have a frame of reference otherwise seeing was impossible. So instead it seems that the way vision works is we see utility, and our brains infer the objects. All that to say that when a man sees a woman in that way that men see women, he's not seeing her as though in the light of his conscious thought processes which can be arbitrary in nature, but instead that he is an animal and there is another animal of the same species that can spread my DNA. Subconsciously. So when people talk about how we see things, they're talking unintentionally about trying to change the nature of human cognition because it's somehow 'wrong'. It's a thinly veiled misanthropy.

[–]flyinglime 11 points12 points  (5 children)

Jordan Peterson is the man, got a link to that particular lecture/talk?

[–]knifpearty 7 points8 points  (2 children)

https://youtu.be/YkmXwByGmjc

He starts talking about that at around 1:30.

[–]flyinglime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

God damn that man is a genius

[–]1sailorJery 4 points5 points  (0 children)

oh man it's hard to remember I've been all about him for this past year, he mentioned it a few times. I recently got to see his bible lecture in person. Listening to this one now and he mentions the way we perceive women as being innate pretty early on.

[–]greatamericancities 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure which Jordan Peterson lecture that was but he might be talking about "embodied cognition" or "embodied mind": The idea that a "mind" only develops inside a body that can interact with the world. Good descriptions on Wikipedia and several books on Amazon with similar titles.

[–]2comment 35 points36 points  (0 children)

The way it works:

  • Desirable men appreciate women.

  • Undesirable sexless creeps objectify women.

Those magazines are there only help women learn to be appreciated, not objectified.

[–]Throwawaysteve123456 13 points14 points  (1 child)

So true. The biggest people holding back women are women. Yet for some reason a vibrator is associated with pro feminism.

[–]JimGusa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Female sex toys invited

Yeah! We're strong womenz!

Male sex toys invented

REEEEEE!!!!!!!1!!!

[–]satanicpriest13 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Any women who carry on about objectification are 500 pounds and scientifically classify as larger cetaceans. You don't hear this nonsense from fit 20 year old hard bodies Same goes for men. Only ones who make attract attention to their own weight are fat tubs of shit like boogie.

[–]_elgato 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You crossed a line there taking on boogie

[–]satanicpriest13 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Fat bastard keeps going on a about his weight and how we owe him health care. If I crossed a line, people here do not really have respectable idols.

[–]_elgato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was just a form of speaking, don't take it literally. However, even though I agree he should lose weight and it's costing money for other people, still think he is a upstanding guy and very literate.

[–]5t3fan0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but... why is the truth so misogynist?!?

[–]1ozaku7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I once read in a woman's magazine how anna nicole smith was actually a filthy golddigger who married an old dude just for his money, all the while she claimed how real their love was. Ofcourse she was spewing around in her old town how she wants to get famous by getting a rich husband and all that and getting that way into showbizz.

It is the most redpill truth of a golddigger I have ever read and it's written by women.

[–]Bing400 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Surely there's a way to manipulate women into doing what we please though instead of rightfully blaming them for shit, idk

[–]AnonymousHomoSapian 46 points47 points  (10 children)

Because a lot of spoiled women will lose their genital leverage over guys in their relationships.

[–]Bing400 5 points6 points  (9 children)

Precisely, this is a disrupting technology, like Musk's Tesla to the car industry. The trend I've seen with disruptive tech is that 1) build something that people want 2) give people incentive to use it.

I think that both of those requirements are already met. How? 1) people want their sexual needs fulfilled, they want orgasmic bliss 2) they will get to orgasm whenever they want. people go to whores for this very reason, they'll port it over to sexbots

[–]greatamericancities 9 points10 points  (6 children)

Technology disruptions are supposed to happen when the existing vendors charge too much for products that do too much. The new product does just barely enough but it's much cheaper, and early adopters are willing to make that trade. The market entrants use the initial profits to improve their product and eventually win the mass market.

In the early days, the new product isn't quite good enough and people refer to it as a "toy", not for serious use. But the new product keeps getting better until it eventually displaces the original product.

Okay, looks like a classic technology disruption.

[–]Bing400 1 point2 points  (4 children)

It's a genius strategy. However, any self respecting company would snuff out the competition before it is allowed to overtake the market. Sort of like how Volvo is trying to steal Tesla's sales by electrifying all its vehicles, or how every auto company is doing something similar.

Another example, Boeing with Lockheed and SpaceX. The latter is forcing the other two to innovate and snuff out SpaceX, which I think is inevitable unless spacex can manage somehow.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Doubtful. SpaceX has technology that Boeing and Lockheed can't replicate at the moment. First mover SpaceX will dominate the reusable (and thus cheaper) rocket space delivery market for the foreseeable future.

[–]Bing400 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Imagine if lockheed or another giant put its weight behind reusable rockets. I bet they could find a system that's cheaper and more effective than SpaceX's, effectively putting them out of business but achieving Musk's dream. I guess he's a winner either way.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What about hyperloop and Mars?

[–]DarthCallidous 49 points50 points  (0 children)

We're strong independent women that don't need no man!

Well, okay. We'll leave you alone and make robots that fulfill our sexual urges.

MISOGYNY REEEEEEEEEEE!

[–]stonepimpletilists points points [recovered]

Lol, video games cause misogyny x100.

Question I asked my girl. Lets say I get one, once they team up Asimo with RealDoll. And get a digital scan of her face, use it as the face of the doll...

Is it cheating?

Her answers would surprise you.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (2 children)

it would only shock me if she said she would feel jealous of the doll.

[–]Senior Contributoradam-l 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Not just yet, but in 10 years she well might...

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

In ten years it won't be her face he uses

[–]HardworkITrust 62 points63 points  (2 children)

If anything this is proof that women need men more than men need women, and women hate this. Didn't see any complaints when vibrators and self fucking dildos came out 10 -20 years ago.

Use this information to your advantage my friends.

[–]GermanScrewdriver 4 points5 points  (1 child)

when vibrators and self fucking dildos came out 10 -20 years ago

More like 100-200 years

[–]SlyAM 44 points45 points  (15 children)

This article is just the voice for the feminist agenda. Think about it, sex dolls/robots are a very dangerous thing for females. It'd basically make it so you could have any kind of "girl" you wanted; Big ass, Small Waist, Big breasts, Beautiful appearance, and an actual personality and AI that today's sex dolls lack. There wouldn't be any need for gaming as the robot would always wanna fuck, always love you, always be happy, never cheat, and never bitch. I'm sure that to even a Chad this sounds appealing in a way.

Once this kind of technology became available to the public, you'd see even the most nerdy, repulsive betas walking around with his 10/10 sex robot and nobody would be able to tell. Females would have to actually persue men, and obviously women don't want that! They want to be chased, they want to be provided for, they want to be dominated, but sex robots would take all of this away from them. That's why articles like this are coming out, to try to make it seem like sex dolls with AI would be a bad idea for the general public, when in reality it wouldn't be, it'd just be bad for them.

Not to mention it'd also shrink the pool of available men who rather still game real women instead of resorting to a sex doll, so those men would be getting laid like crazy. Honestly I'd buy a sex bot when they come out. Sure it'd be like 10-25 grand but that's a little price to pay for a 10/10 "women" who is always down to fuck and that I can interact with, without the fear of cheating or a case of the crazy (BPD, Bi Polar, A Sheriff). Sure, I'd still fuck real women but it just seems like a great thing for most men who are sick of how most women are nowadays (MGTOW).

I know this is long but I've been researching this shit lately and felt like I had some thing to contribute.

TL;DR: Feminists use articles like this to push their agenda, because they know that if sex dolls were released to the general public, they'd ruin their way of life (AWALT)!

[–]lolpaulonthenet2 28 points29 points  (3 children)

I think you're giving women way too much credit. I think they just picture a man fucking a robot and find it "gross." Therefore, it shouldn't be allowed. That's how dumb the average person is.

[–]SlyAM 11 points12 points  (0 children)

True, but I'm talking about hardcore feminists that believe men are (un)superior to them, women are still being oppressed, etc. They see the emergence of sex bots and it scares them right out of their panties. They know that if this technology becomes available and advances enough that their way of life is fucked, and of course they don't want that.

Why put up with a bitching, cheating women when you can spend a lump sum of money and get a super attractive, loyal, loving cyborg women. She'll never leave you, never cheat, always be down to fuck, etc. Feminists see this, and it's their worst nightmare. It's basically a better alternate to real women.

[–]Johnnyvile 9 points10 points  (1 child)

True. They see it as gross. However the average woman has multiple high tech vibrators but no one judges them hard for it. I have dated many women that have a sex toy drawer but a guy wouldn't think they are gross, just freaky. Women have sex toy parties with their friends where a rep shows them products and they buy them. That's kind of gross. Guys don't hang around talking about their toys and I don't think the average guy has sex toys. If a woman found a flesh light in a guys drawer they would think he is gross.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (8 children)

We need to push for real sex robots. Not this veiled gf bullshit. Like blatant sort by category and have everything tailored to your whim robots. Women have dildos and vibrators and what not, we deserve the same.

It is hilarious seeing feminists panic. Once the sex robots are realistic enough, they'll lose their beta army which they have by the balls. They know that once their vagina monopoly's gone, men everywhere will realize what they really are. And what's even better, sex robots can have their vaginas vibrate or increase in tightness at the press of a button. It'll literally be better than human sex once the technology passes far enough.

[–]derpalerpaderp 10 points11 points  (1 child)

"More human than human" is our motto

[–]greatamericancities 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"Commerce" is our goal here at Tyrell. Rachel is an experiment. Nothing more.

[–]SlyAM 10 points11 points  (3 children)

The second half of your comment is my point exactly. Yes, some chicks will see sex bots and think; "That's just weird, why would a man want to fuck a robot? It's nothing like being with a real girl!". But once technology advances far enough and sex bots are so life like they can't even be told apart from a real women, that is when women are gonna be in trouble, and they'll know it.

Sure it could take a couple decades, but it will happen eventually, and that's when shit will go down.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure it could take a couple decades, but it will happen eventually, and that's when shit will go down.

No man, we can make it faster. Let's gather up all the betas and incels on the internet and start a fundraiser for this research. Highlight the potential of it really well, we need like a PR team for this and we need proactive people spreading the message.

[–]Darkistco points points [recovered]

what about having a sexbot for women too? you don't think they'll be just as realistic? it makes for good discussion

all i can think of is wymn need to be led, they can have their multi orgasmic sexbot that can go for hours but girls still need men in their lives or they end up like a cat lady.

we don't need them, if we had sexbots and a strong male group that's the greatest and most dangerous thing, women's groups talk about clothes, material items, and all about their men.

[–]askmrcia 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yea keep in mind, women are emotional creatures. They WANT and NEED attention. No lifeless sex robot is going to give that to them.

Think about it. Look at how they dress when they go out. The makeup. The social media selfies. They live for men's attention.

That will go away big time. Us guys don't need that. The robots will give us great sex and that's it. Women have dildos and other toys now and that's no where near enough for them.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

an actual personality

This is the real threat, right there :)

[–]bongohai 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The presence of sophisticated sex robots will demand that women up their game. Being the lazy, entitled, self-indulgent creatures that they are, this is anathema to them.

[–]justgotalpha 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Im pretty sure these sex robots will be taken out of the market.not because they arent effective but because the moment they become mainstream feminist will start crying and it will be the 1970's again

[–]purgetheinfidels 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Its like we will never get our freedom. It is just a matter of time before the playing field is leveled. I swear this will put the kaibash on women and I bet you they will behave themselves when we have the power to throw them out on the street with no remorse or care in the world.

Edit: Its like we

[–]AllahHatesFags 59 points60 points  (5 children)

Of course, they will celebrate the male machines that come with huge dildos installed on them as "liberation for womyn" or some such bullshit.

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (2 children)

This exactly. Think of the stink they'd put out if we all of sudden decided to ban dildos, citing "objectification of men" and whatever other bullshit they use to justify this power grab. Their heads would roll right off their shoulders.

[–]Bing400 9 points10 points  (1 child)

It's crazy if you think about it. Dildos are literally objectified men. Surely there's a way to manipulate women into accepting our sexbots. Or maybe we should just go to mars, idk

[–]tyrryt 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Robots don't have money, so there's no reason for women to have sex with them.

[–]Bing400 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not only that, but they will want men to not have their sexbots. They'll find a way to have their cake and eat it too, mark my words.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 27 points28 points  (3 children)

Feminists argument in a nutshell: If Men can cum inside a cold lifeless sex robot, why would need women?

Somehow they are too retarded to see the misogynistic nature of that argument. Then again feminists were never big on logical thinking so I'm not surprised.

[–]3whatsthisgarg 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Feminists argument in a nutshell: If Men can cum inside a cold lifeless sex robot, why would need women?

Somehow they are too retarded to see the misogynistic nature of that argument.

Profound.

This is an example of an immanent argument. That is when you use your opponent's premises to show that their own argument leads to a completely different conclusion than the one they initially intended.

[–]Ninokun 4 points5 points  (1 child)

im pretty sure, sexrobots will come with heating elements,

just gonna wait fo the headline: man burns his dick inside overheated sexrobot

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whereas the headlines have been: man gets burned in court by overheated ex

[–]Essexal 32 points33 points  (3 children)

I just watched a middle age, middle weight, narwal, argue on BBC Newsnight that this is linked to child sexual exploitation and how sex toys are all male orientated.

Like, hang the fuck on love. For the last 5/10 years, ladies and the rabbit have had it all their own way.

All of a sudden sex robots are on the horizon (who wants a fat ugly wife that doesn't put out over something that's a one off payment and guaranteed to rock your world everytime(if you can get down with that)) and all of sudden it's 'think of the kids'.

Hilarious.

[–]Blueu2 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Wait a little longer and you'll get an artificial womb as well. Then watch people shit themselves like never before. It will be glorious!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Would women literally become almost extinct?

[–]Blueu2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, they'll simply have new evolutionary pressures to deal with. Online retailers didn't make brick and mortar stores vanish.

But yes, many men will simply just stop trying to make relationships with women (but not all.)

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The real concern is whether men will bother to even interact with women enough to even objectify them after sexbots become available.

Yup. Same arguments that are used against porn, VR, younger women. It's all shaming designed to get women their loyal betabucks in exchange for the possibility of monthly starfish dutysex.

Bringing in objectification and paedophilia is such a low blow.

NOT stated in the article "I fear the competition", as OP says. Amazing that there isn't even a nod to the real reason for all the fear.

[–]blkarcher77 13 points14 points  (3 children)

I love the idea of sex robots. It will take SO MUCH POWER away from women. Its going to be grand

Also, this is bullshit. You cannot stand there and tell me its going to be sexist when you know damn well that the moment sex robots are real, there will be hundred of Channing Tatum bots. Hundreds of male sexbots.

[–]jcrpta 4 points5 points  (2 children)

If you're looking for a male sexbot as opposed to the current status quo of ever-more-sophisticated vibrators - I think that's going to be a lot more complex to build than a female one.

70% of the "make yourself a better man and turn women on in the process" advice in RP is stuff you're not going to get robots doing any time soon. Understanding human emotion. Earning a good living. Kino. Knowing when to reel it in and when to push it. Essentially, it needs to know how to start the turning-on process long before bedtime.

A female sexbot doesn't really need to do that. Reasonably convincing speech synthesis (mostly a solved problem), an AI that can understand "let's go to bed" and the ability to have sex in a few different positions. We're already 90% of the way to solving many of those problems.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are they going to power them and make them move realistically instead of like mechanically

[–]Billee_Boyee 22 points23 points  (1 child)

Dunno what their beef is, they can get a sex robot too.

[–]orilyrily 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Their beef is control. They want to maintain their control. They will fight such a thing tooth and nail.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Sex robots increase objectification of women?

I will let them know the next time I come into a room and sit on a woman like she was a chair, lean back, relax, and put my feet up on another woman like she is a table.

Do these people not know what an Object is?

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That's a real fetish (human furniture). Earth has some weird motherfuckers.

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will be "objectifying a woman" as soon as I mistake one for a sex bot and try to find her power switch so that she can shut up and go away until I feel like having sex.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's all just more outrage fodder for the 'fluff monster' that lives inside the basement of every major (and every hack) news outlet these days.

If you don't feed the monster, the lights go off and you're out on your ass.

[–]FlexGunship 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"I want to be a fat, lazy, undesirable woman, but I also want a man, and I need to be empowered with sex toys so I don't need him but he can't have anything, that way he needs me. Oh, and also, he needs to be a strong independent modern feminist lumberjack. Finally...equality."

The world is full of stupid hypocrites. I'm glad not all girls are like this.

[–]redpillrobby 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I simply have zero interest in sex robots. If I'm not convincing a real woman to have sex with me, it's just interactive porn--and that just doesn't give me the same pleasure. It's the thrill of the hunt that gets me, not the eating itself.

[–]Redasshole 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Women will soon face a truth that hurts : they can't do shit. Everything that happens happens because men made it happen and allowed it to happen. Even feminism was created because of a man (Kinsey).

If men want sex robots, it will happen. And yeah, we all know how blue pill manginas are. They are the majority of people, and they will claim that sex robots are disgusting and objectifying and everything....but they will buy one and fuck it.

Just like they act nice to get some action but deep down they aren't nice, they will disaproove the sex robots but they will use them. Hey, men who have fucked with one or two partners in their life will buy one. There will be demand.

Women can't prevent this. They can't manipulate men into not satisfying their sexual urges. Companies will offer anonymous delivery. Men will find a way to fuck their sex robots without anyone knowing and they will agree publicly that sex robots are awful...before coming to their house and fucking their two sex robots in a threesome.

I just want to live long enough to see this happen everyday :

Jane : "Enough Marc, throw that thing out !"

Marc : "Or what, Jane...you won't...fuck me?" - then proceeds to go fuck his sex robot

[–]Endorsed ContributorRuleZeroDAD 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Combine this with an artificial womb to allow for true male decision making in bringing a fetus to term, and you've changed the game forever.

[–]KV-n 10 points11 points  (2 children)

dont understand neither the outrage on one side and hope on the other. Truth is seks robots` impact on the SMP will be precisely zero, nothing, none. Everything will stay as it is and seksbots will be just a fringe thing for the total weirdos that other people will make fun of, sth like tentacle hentai today

[–]ArtificialIneptness 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Well, the idea is that SMP won't matter after sex robots. If people are going to make fun of me for fucking a 10/10 sex bot I'll probably laugh with them. Then I'll go back to my place and fuck the robot again until it throws out a segfault.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It WILL HAPPEN.

Count on it.

[–]perplexedm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The fact is feminism and radical feminism brought in serious psychological divisions between men a women.

Now a man who initiate a relationship is afraid whether he will be on hook for various crimes against women. From the beginning women were in the back seat in initiating relationship with men, they wanted men to fight out and forcefully select them.

Because of these jobless psycho feminasties, not just men, but women also suffer. If this helped someone, it is those chronic population control freaks.

Robots and VR will win in this game, no matter how they try. There are already many sex robot and toys for women, so blocking it for men will not work out. Men too will suffer, but they will get better robots than current day women.

[–]Profdiddy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I notice about these articles is that they are talking about pedophiles and child robots. This is a not so subtle way to shame the entire industry and anyone who might fuck a piece of silicone rubber.

[–]Tamazin_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are we going to be fucking robots or are we going to be using Cylon's to objectify "real" women? The real concern is whether men will bother to even interact with women enough to even objectify them after sexbots become available. When they become indistinguisible from the "real" thing, women will no longer have any power whatsoever. THAT is the real fear.

I've been saying the same thing for a couple of years. Women will have such a nasty wake-up call when those kinds of robots become avaliable for less than $5000 or so. No more free drinks at the bars. No more men settling for less. No more 999 guys per every 1 girl on tinder/dating sites/when out clubbing.

I do hope i'm around to see it when it happens. Not that i will get that much out of it, but i guess it'll be something for my sons/grandsons and future generations. You're welcome kids!

[–]Vonderbear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ban dildos before you ban sex robots.

[–]3whatsthisgarg 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Idea: actually treating pedophiles. Aversion therapy.

Kind of a Clockwork Orange thing in prison treatment program, let a sex offender loose with a child robot, but the child robot completely kicks the pedo's ass without mercy.

My bet is it would only take about 5 or 6 "sessions" like that in less than a few months: cured.

[–]director_solon 4 points5 points  (2 children)

I do sort of wonder how psychologically healthy sex bots will be for men. Men for a very long time have had so strive to fulfill desires they feel towards women. When played out properly, this balance between men seeking to reproduce and women seeking to be selective with whom they reproduce is healthy and leads to stable and fulfilling long term relationships that are beneficial to both parties. We have seen in part the destructive nature of "Free Love." The traditional family has been collapsing for the last 50 years and western society has reaped chaos because of it. How much greater is the danger to society when suddenly neither men have any incentive to reproduce?

Don't misunderstand what I am saying, the OP is correct in doubting and dispelling the feminist dogma and hypocrisy behind hate for sex dolls. However, maybe there is a greater danger to such devices other than what is being discussed here. Birth rates in the western world have been declining over the past 60 years, and it would be a shame to watch the west go the same way as Japan.

[–]Cryxtalix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Humanity will work it out all over again, just like we have always done. We humans have lost the need to grow food for 10 hours a day working a farm, what will happen to humanity when the average person doesn't need to grow their own food? Answer, we specialise and do other things.

A little more recent. Humanity has lost the need to seek companionship, entertainment and play by venturing out to meet in groups, instead the rise of TVs, home entertainment, online gaming, social media etc. keeps everyone locked in their basement. Answer, we adapt and it became an acceptable part of society and rise of events like pro gaming esports.

Humanity will always be able to survive our challenges. We will always come up with solutions. Perhaps stuff of scifi, like artificial births will be inplemented. No matter what, i believe humanity will find a way to solve the problem.

The west will eventually go the way of the Japanese, since for men, relationship building is much less attractive than sex. Men and women essentially prioritize different things, but sex is much easier to fulfil than a relationship. Humanity has known how to sell sex publicly for thousands of years, yet selling relationships has only recently emerged. Examples are host clubs catering to women, "cuddling cafe" and other romantic partner renting services, all from the futuristic Japan, a country way ahead of the time. A realistic sex bot that visually moves and fucks realistically will be much easier to develop than one with a realistic personality. Women are unlikely to be sexually fulfilled by a sex bot anytime soon.

[–]Ninokun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u can already see what happens, In Japan some men get totaly obsessed with Fictional women, fromanime to hentai to collecting figurines, totally wrapped in their Own comfortzone.

what happens is that these guys become social recluses, some even stop to work and become Neets, many dont see the need to work, why do u work? to attract mates, if u can jack off to Anime that incentive is missing.

what im trying to say is, Men will definitely get a lot lazier, as there is no need to put ambition in actracting Mates anymore.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yup, they know there's gonna be no more easy mode. just imagine when they have hot, indistinguishable androids.. all the basic Instagram bitches will suddenly become irrelevant and will have to actually work for a living and not just with their holes

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think small dildos should be BANNED. They represent boy penises and women are buying them, because they are pedophiles and want to enjoy a tiny penis dildo inside them rather than a regular man-sized penis dildo.

[–]bitch_regulator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Women already have a sex robot: their CELL PHONES.

[–]beginner_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. They will use shaming and then we will get laws prohibiting sex robots. The shaming starts early. Like we are trained that porn is shameful, that going to prostitutes is shameful and pathetic (You suck so bad you have to pay for sex). Same will happen here. It will be branded and shameful, pathetic and creepy.

I'm probably too much conditioned but I actual feel that way. If a guy has a sex doll now, it is also pretty creepy. So I don't think they will have much issue getting sex robots banned by law. How can you oppose them? They will just say you are creepy and pro pedophilia. Doesn't need to make any sense.

So we at TRP need to stop dreaming about this future of sex robots that will destroy the power of women. All in all it's just a huge revenge fantasy.

If a man invests in himself and becomes truly high SMV, all the feminazi shit doesn't matter in fact it rather helps. There were less sluts around before feminism and when cheating had repercussion. A high SMV man already has power over women. Right now.

[–]satanicpriest13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

be used to satisfy desires otherwise illegal.

It's not illegal to pay a Thai hooker twenty quid to shit in her mouth. Fucking feminazis dramatising the whole thing.

[–]AwakeningLion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

False dichotomy. The fear is that men will find outlet to their urges and women can only control men if the men are weak and/or desperate. This will not stand!

Pretty sure the weak and desperate guys are the ones opting out of the gene pool by going for the easy solution, i.e. robots.

[–]tolerantman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love watching manjawed career womyn crying about sexbots.

[–]tolerantman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope sex bot technology does not develop too much, imagine a sex bot that has to shit test you before fucking you...

[–]1Entropy-7 2 points3 points  (3 children)

West World and Future World really put this on the map. What was the more recent TV show: Humans?

I have mixed feelings about this because I enjoy having a fuck toy, but I would prefer my fuck toy to be another human being.

[–]Irinir 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I feel like this a win win situation for people with these preferences also.

[–]1Entropy-7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It goes both ways as one bitch was getting boned by Chad-bot "personal trainer", much to the dismay of hubby.

[–]rand0mmm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's wrong to humanize robots in this way. AI don't care.

[–]Dravous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you know what'd be really funny? if they made the robots able to argue with the feminists on their male customer's behalf. I mean you can say "stop listening to it, it's just a robot!", but the better it's made the harder it is to dismiss. and then you have feminist harpies look on in horror as the men see validation in the robots' defense of them.

[–]pbgswd 2 points3 points  (3 children)

yet nobody complains about the fucking machines in porn, you know, the reciprocating machines with dildos on them.... nope, nobody complains when women want to fuck those things.

[–]1Sir_Distic 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I've never had one complain after she's been tied up and I used mine on her. When she's screaming as a dildo slams into her at 160 thrusts per minute she's all smiles.

[–]pbgswd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and that is as it should be!

[–]1z1z2x2x3c3c4v4v 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Sex robots + VR Technology will be the end for some men.

Think about it for a min, Kim Kardashian licenses her image (and body shape) to be displayed in VR Tech, while the sex doll handles all the "physical contact"...

Add a monthly subscription to get new images and body molds every month... some guys will never leave home ever again... and will be stuck in their Blue Pill reality for the rest of their lives...

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Add a monthly subscription to get new images and body molds every month... some guys will never leave home ever again...

So, basically WoW but with orgasms?

[–]CrestfallenWolf 0 points1 point  (6 children)

The worst part is, sex robots will be stopped. There is 0% chance that hypergamy will allow power to be so absolutely stripped away from the womans.

With a 51% female voter base. The society for the prevention of cruelty to robots. The violent reaction to anything that might hurt women. The large power of the vocal 3rd wave.

So let's be real, sex robots will never be a legal opt-out. Anything that threatens to resolve the dissonant thinking of feminism is doomed to fail. "Sex is objectification! We don't need men! We can do more them men!" Men: "ok we are going to bang robots then" "B-b-but mAh equality!?!?!? mAh marriage?!?!?! mAh babies!?!?!?"

[–]Tamazin_ 1 point2 points  (5 children)

There is 0% chance they can stop it. People will make their own in their garages or whatnot. Illegal stuff has always found a way to be purchased/used/consumed.

[–]dmanexe 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I feel like a real feminism would be supportive because you're forgetting about male sex dolls

[–]Tamazin_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that point would be that valid. Sure, they'd get pleasureable sex, but women already have tons of different toys to help them out (But sure, a male sex doll would be even better).

But most importantly, any woman with any looks can get someone to bed within less than a few hours (minutes if you live in a larger town) as it is right now. Something they'll loose when female sex dolls arrives.

[–]Raisinbrannan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Everything in life is about sex except sex. Sex is about power" that sums up certain groups of people really well. Good job.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, outside of release, I'm not sure exactly what sex-bots can offer. Not to say that isn't a desirable mechanism to circumvent issues surrounding sexual repression, intentionally propagated or not, but I think the fundamental yin and yang relationship between masculinity/femininity is grossly underappreciated and taken for granted when the over-arching subject matter surrounding sex becomes about the power struggle between the two. By both sides.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They will be outlawed before they even hit the western market. Legislation will be enacted to make importing a sexbot from overseas the same as child porn. It will be touted as "protecting wimmin" but the reality is that said laws will only protect female manipulation. It is the manipulation which is under threat. Once the incels and the MGTOWs (same thing, both just new fangled words for BETA) can buy a realistic vagina for about the price of a small new car the market value of a vagina drops by 80%. If I was them I would be fighting against it as well.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Third wave feminists have masterminded their own bed of obsolescence. Now they get to lie in it.

[–]Bing400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a counter-argument for this? I can't find one.

they also raise concerns that sex robots could increase the objectification of women, alter perceptions of consent and be used to satisfy desires that would otherwise be illegal. Does anybody really believe this argument? Sex robots increase objectification of women??? You mean like, more than make up and miniskirts.

load more comments (4 replies)