Red Pill ExampleExample: Stop trying to be agree-able and shit (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by verily_rp

Help, I Can't Stop Hooking Up With Trump Supporters

http://archive.is/uyRtv Red pill example, straight from the horse's mouth. Are you ready? Here we go.

It’s the one where I started arguing with a Trump supporter at a bar and then before I knew it, I was waking up the next morning in his bedroom. There were flags everywhere: Ronald Reagan's face was emblazoned on one of them, “Don’t Tread On Me” made an appearance on another. I say it was the “worst” not because the sex was bad, but because, well, see above.

A common mistake beta boys and nice guys make is trying to agree with her on every little shit. They wouldn't dare make her mad "offend" her in fear of missing out on that pussy. But here's the thing; the whole thing is a shit test, even if she doesn't realize it. Men are masculine, confrontational, not afraid of having opposition. Women are agreeable, naturally want to fall into a man's frame, and afraid of confrontation. Who do you think will get the pussy? The chad who doesn't give a fuck if she likes Hillary and sticks to his values, or beta bob who will change his viewpoints (even if only just for show) to avoid risking upsetting her?

This was in early 2016 and—while it doesn’t excuse my choice of partner—it was before Pussygate, before the suggestion of violence against his opponents,, and before the realities of a Trump presidency really set in. So while I found a lot of his comments abhorrent, hooking up with one of his supporters wasn't quite the moral conundrum to me that it would become a few months later.

Blah blah blah. This shit is just incoherent hamstering. What she's really saying is "I know it's bad but TINGLES!!" She doesn't really give a shit if you like Trump. Likewise, she wouldn't give a shit if she's a femnazi and you're a mysoginist pig who's idol is Gavin McInnes. I can attest to this personally.

To my own surprise, we kept hooking up and—despite the fact that our political opinions were diametrically opposed—it didn't feel weird. When we texted, we'd naturally argue about politics, but also about other things, like if corn or flour tortillas made for the best tacos, or whether Drake or Kendrick Lamar was the better rapper (I said Kendrick, of course). When we met up in person, that pent-up anger would turn into frustration, which would turn into a sort of competitive tension that resulted, inevitably, in sex.

...aaaaand here we have it, gentlemen. As long as you have frame, do the proper push/pull, and fuck her good, she WILL come back for more of that delicious sex. It's not rocket science. This guy knew that all he had to do was press the right buttons. Be attractive. Don't be unattractive. Agreeing with her on everything will raise a red flag. This is why people tell you to "just be yourself". What they really mean is "don't be agreeable". Don't be a nice guy.

I knew we'd never be anything more to each other than a hookup, but I didn’t care. The sex was hot, and it was uncomplicated in the sense that neither of us expected—or even really wanted—any strings attached. And since I was confident in my political convictions, all that witty banter about tax codes, emails, and border walls was the foreplay I never knew I needed.

Now she's just repeating herself.

Plus, in an odd way, sleeping with Trump supporters reaffirms my own political and personal values.

Her hamster must be in overdrive.

Takeaway: Stop giving a fuck and just game her. You can and SHOULD disagree with her. This shit creates tension, and tension is sexy. Remember, she's not looking to hook up with a woman in a man's body. She wants a Real Man™ .

[–]SanJustSan 242 points243 points  (3 children)

The bloke telling the same story:

"Got laid".

[–]1AfterC 68 points69 points  (2 children)


"Hey sorry I bailed last night boys, had a little adult sleepover"

The broad:

writes a 2000 word article.

So what's the lesson? We are a rationalizing species, not a rational one. Pursue what you want and the rest will fall into place.

[–]ArabSigma 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Really ? Because we are in a subreddit where redittors tend to type elaborate and "evo-psych"-ridden write ups where the sexual act and the hotness of the woman are both exaggerated.

[–]1AfterC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I'll give you that. But that also evidences my conclusion

[–]Dat_Chad 196 points197 points  (13 children)

OK man I'll stop being agreeable.

[–]Sasuke_F_Uchiha 34 points35 points  (2 children)

Also see : the recent episode of Joe rogan podcast with sir Jordan Peterson and Brett Weinstein. They elaborate on this specific topic. Really helpful.

[–]BullshittingNonsense 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Jordan Peterson - one of the greats living today. His classes are just fucking life advice

[–]ChadThundercockII 7 points8 points  (0 children)

sir Jordan Peterson

Lord of the Underworld, Protector of the buckos, and slayer of the gender pronouns. That man saved his father from the belly of the whale indeed

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree completely with OP and you, Chad.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 215 points216 points  (8 children)

To your genes, attraction is right. Your hindbrain's priority is reproduction. So when ideology confilcts with arousal, your brain solves this cognitive dissonance by overriding your cerebrum via rationalizing. Principles and moraity are viewed as hinderances to your amygdala. This is why women defend guys they're fucking that are mean to them or violent, or a loser.

You don't have to like them to want them. Always talk to the vagina, not the vagina person.

[–]AlphaGrad 97 points98 points  (4 children)

Always talk to the vagina, not the vagina person.

This needs to be framed somewhere.

[–]D4rkr4in 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I'm putting this on my wall

[–]ImHereAtLast 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I don't think I truly appreciated this fact until I read this article:


Just remarkable... It's like everything we were ever told on how to be a good person was falsely conflated with how to be attractive...

[–]BewareTheOldMan 23 points24 points  (2 children)

Classic Scenario: I hear what you say, but I see what you do.

Pay attention to her actions, NOT her words. The Rationalization Hamster is working overtime to explain her behavior. Stay Red Pill Aware gentlemen.

[–]1TrenGod37 2 points3 points  (1 child)

There's another lesson to be learned here. It's doesn't matter what you say. How many times have you heard. Don't talk about politics, religion, education etc. (talk about FORD not RAPE) it don't fucking matter.

Say what you want to say and mean what you say

[–]BewareTheOldMan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. Great Point - Virtually ALL the Dating/Relationship "specialists" say to AVOID these particular and other controversial topics. These specialists also say to avoid financial topics (student loans, credit rating, spending habits, etc.)They couldn't be more WRONG. MANY a relationship or marriage has ended as a result of these major topics everyone is told to avoid. If a woman is genuinely attracted to a man, the "rationalization hamster" will override all common sense, logic, and resistance for sexual interaction.

Sex WILL happen, the only conflict at that point is WHEN she will allow it. The conundrum lies in that if a woman allows sex too soon...she's a whore. If she holds out too long, she risks the man's losing interest.

This is where women get it wrong by being coy, cute, and indirect regarding communication. Just state "I'm attracted to you" and make UNDOUBTEDLY CLEAR of said attraction. This will not guarantee a high value man becomes exclusive/stops Spinning Plates, but AT LEAST he's aware and might consider her a future prospect. Women communicate indirectly/covertly. Men communicate directly - at least REAL MEN anyway...as we CAN'T allow room/latitude for error or misinterpretation.

Women...ALWAYS shooting themselves in the foot...

[–]Fulp_Piction 73 points74 points  (0 children)

To paraphrase Jordan Peterson:

Girls are attracted to guys at the top of the dominance hierarchy. Disagreeable people rise to the top of the dominance hierarchy, and make more money.

This a no brainer.

[–]okkyle 107 points108 points  (26 children)

You can fuck the SJW out of a girl and turn her into an alt-right Nazi if your frame is unwavering and you meet her attractiveness threshold. Leftism is almost always a symptom of a woman's desire for a strong male to implement boundaries anyway.

My Tinder bio says, "My Harley is loud and I voted for Trump"

Hispanic girls LOVE it, feminine white girls like it as well, but what's really surprising is the short-haired, lefty white women who match me. They always open me and say this like, "You're cute but I didn't see that you voted Trump :(" HAHA totally a lie, she read my bio before.

I never cuck and usually reply with simply, "We're gonna build that wall" I'm not gonna say I convert them all into dates, but I do get their numbers much of the time.

BTW Gavin McGinnes is a faggot

[–]clint_bronson 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Gavin McGinnes a faggot? I won't be matching you in tinder! good day sir!

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 29 points30 points  (12 children)

Be careful you dont attract scuffed blue-haired feminists with daddy issues because thats what i fear you'll attract that way. Anyway, carry on lad.

[–]GunsGermsAndSteel 25 points26 points  (8 children)

So put a fuckin' hat on them and let them call you daddy while you buttfuck them. Who cares?

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 11 points12 points  (1 child)

So put a fuckin' hat on them

Youre gonna need more than a hat to make one of them fuckable

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Sure if you pump&dump them then thats fine.

[–]spassa 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Why would you even? pussy is not that important, also there should be others without that kind of attitude

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I wouldn't. But 10 minutes of action isn't gamebreaking. Without what attitude? Mine?

[–]spassa 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Theirs. SJWs have an agenda detrimental to ours. they want to control us and you are validating them with your attention and sex. Let them be miserable, let them fuck with beta chumps, let them realize that no guy that makes her wet would ever lay hands on her, as long as she is working against them.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes thats a good point. But that really depends again... Like i wouldnt bang a blue-haired feminist, but if it was a hot chick with leftist values sure pump&dump and it still makes them realize that they cant hold on to a man because of how they are. A chick youd bang once is alot different to one you girlfriend up.

Personally i wouldnt waste time on that kind of women, not even for 10 min action.

[–]hyugafan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funniest thing I'm going to read this morning.

[–]dumnem 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Daddy issues ain't no issue when it's temporary.

[–]JFMX1996 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Mental instability is.

Who knows what the fuck these SJWs will do.

I've heard of cases where they'll then claim they were raped and get you in deep shit.

Best to vet for somewhat mentally stable fucks.

[–]dumnem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what fake names are for.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Example of your first sentence: lacy green

[–]nolanite 1 points1 points [recovered]

Why do you say that about McGinnes?

[–]Gaze73 1 point2 points  (2 children)

He literally shoved a dildo up his ass on his cucked show.

[–]CameronBronson 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Dude, I'm stealing that Tinder bio and changing Harley to Camaro.

[–]okkyle 3 points4 points  (1 child)

As long as you're not in S. FL, Atlanta or Dallas, we won't run into any turf wars. Have at it!

[–]boboliboliobli 2 points3 points  (0 children)

lmao just dont get stabbed by some cunt or get STI-sniped. be safe out there!

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (11 children)

What about think as you like, behave as others?

[–]1empatheticapathetic 23 points24 points  (1 child)

It applies when you have something great to lose; scarcity.

A job, social prospects. Not a fucking hookup who can find any bullshit reason to disregard you.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A job, social prospects. Not a fucking hookup who can find any bullshit reason to disregard you.

Comes back to dont shit where you eat as well

[–]-VaeVictis- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember the reversals. No law is set in stone.

[–]TalesAbound 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I was thinking about Law 38 in this context too. I've had a rough year socially this past 12 months because of forgetting about Law 38. I'd love to see some thoughts on this.

[–]follow_that_rabbit 2 points3 points  (3 children)

That's one of the most controversial if not the most law of power, at least for me. I think for the fact it contrast with what OP wrote.

The conundrum is: if think one way (TRP) and you behave the opposite, what about frame?

Wish one of the EC of TRP would weigh in on this.

[–]rukken 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Quoting u/sorceryofthetesticle

In an attraction context, behave as others hurts you. In a context where expressing your real opinions about things unrelated to the task at hand is of no benefit to you (like talking about politics at work), then behaving like others lets you get your shit done with minimal conflict.

In settings like work that can really impact your quality of life either negatively (like getting fired, not getting a raise,...) or positively (promotion), you say what has to be said to get ahead and you don't polarize the people who can get you there. The goal is money.

In dating, confidence (and looks) are key. It's a lot easier to be confident in shit you actually believe in. Women smell confidence and it can override any beliefs they may possibly have. There is also a lot less risk involved. Maybe a cuss here and there but that's it.

I get the confusion but I don't think frame is part of the question.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Law 38 is a survival mechanism. It isn't wrong. It should be the default state for people. However, nothing great ever came from it. Great things come from taking risks. Breaking law 38 is risky. Risk is something to be managed. Sometimes it is worth it. Sometimes it is not.

Now, I'm pathologically incapable of keeping my mouth shut. I break it regularity. Here is my (lengthy) personal experience; take it as you will:

1) It is absolutely critical that you never backtrack. There is little profit in attacking a man that absolutely won't change his mind; it is a fight you cannot win and banging your head against a wall looks retarded. There is great profit in destroying someone that holds an opposing opinion. You get to crow that victory day and night. Most people that try to break you down will give up after a couple tries. The rest will just make fools out of themselves. Stay strong.

2) Don't be a dick. They will immediately stop attacking what you said and start attacking you. Be polite, pleasant and tolerable. Allow them state their opposing option and fog the ever living shit out of them. Most people will fall back to a "agree to disagree" position and everyone will feel ok about the situation. Some will start looking like dicks themselves. Let them.

3) Don't be creepy. Stay away from topics that lend themselves to this. For instance, I think the whole concept of a sex registry is idiotic; if these people are dangers, they should be in prison. Public shaming only removes people from proper participation in society and outcasts create trouble. This is an argument I'd never make in public. Most people would immediately associate it with creepiness.

Note that the more attractive you are the more topics you can approach without creepiness. For instance, a couple years ago I was visiting an old friend at his workplace. He's very attractive and quite charming. I went to lunch with him and bunch of his workmates. At one point the conversation turned to how he accidentally got a rub and tug while on a night on the town while on a business trip with someone else that worked there. It was a rather detailed telling. A half dozen women at the table thought it was hilarious. If Beta Bradley told that story he would be behind doors with HR within an hour.

4) Be tolerant. These conversations have no judge. There is no jury. There is no convening authority. Don't argue with them. Don't try to change their minds. Say what you think. Listen to them. If they start arguing, stand your ground, but don't argue back.

5) Don't be dogmatic. Most people have trouble with confrontation. They find it far easier attacking a side than a attacking specific person. The former is abstract and won't punch you in the face if you go to far with it. (Oh and don't do that--punch people in the face.) Your opinion should be yours, not a collection of one-liners you read off political posters.

Having a playful personality can help. If your interactions don't start adversarial, then people will look for reasons to keep it that way. If you lead with conflict, people will look for reasons to fight.

[–]follow_that_rabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a "never keep the mouth shut" guy this resonates. There's a bunch of good rules in your comment i will try to live by

[–]GunsGermsAndSteel 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What about it? I really never accepted that; I do what the fuck I want, behave the way I want, and accept whatever consequences come of that. It's been working well so far. 43 years and counting.

[–]dogfck 87 points88 points  (15 children)

It works both ways, too. My wife believes dinosaurs didn't exist and are actually dragons from the dark ages. I don't care, as long as she cleans the house and cooks dinner.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 29 points30 points  (10 children)

I hope shes brilliant at that then to justify wifing her up..

[–]dogfck 12 points13 points  (9 children)

Not really the point I was making, but after 12 years and two kids she still looks great and doesn't bitch when I get drunk and bang escorts.

[–]Supreme__IceCream 52 points53 points  (5 children)

Lmao you're a shit role model to your kids bud

[–]vipernick913 10 points11 points  (1 child)

This. Thank you for saying it.

[–]grondjuice0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tbh he probably shouldn't have bred in the first place.

[–]Kingofdeadbedroom -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

Agreed. He would be a much better father if he was a nice guy, had no sex and got divorced.

Way to go, teach your son's to be men.

[–]vipernick913 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There's a limit. He's just a shitty role model all around. Being men has nothing to do with sex and being divorced. You're comparing apples to oranges.

[–]AsianGurlsHawt 24 points25 points  (1 child)

She know you bang escorts? Do you think she is banging other guys on the side or at least considers it if she does know you are cheating?

[–]185poundsofhatredWIP 33 points34 points  (0 children)

You're not supposed to tell him that.

[–]jtrette77 25 points26 points  (2 children)

I don't know who is dumber, her or you. Fucking crazy is one thing but marrying crazy is the dumbest thing a person can do.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 6 points7 points  (1 child)

The trick is, ya gotta find the one so crazy that when she calls the cops on you for looking at her under the wrong moon, she makes so little sense that they figure its a prank call

[–]Patriarchysaurus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And thanks to the Duluth model, they arrest you anyway.

[–]1ObserverBG 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Women want the things they can't have. This is why they like to "sin" and betray their group.

[–]spinalmemes 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Can confirm, have always been an unabashed Trump supporter. Vocal about it. Still hooked up with anti-Trump chicks. It just didnt matter. One of them was even mexican and her parents came here from mexico. Huge anti-Trump girl.

[–]SilentAlpha 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Its just the simple truth that agreeing on everything is not necessary for attraction and thereby arousal. Common sense. The problem I see in your analysis is that BECAUSE there is disagreement that makes it easier to get laid. Not true. Its simply that agreeableness or not has nothing to do with it.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  • "Plus, in an odd way, sleeping with Trump supporters reaffirms my own political and personal values."

You couldn't even make this shit up. Watch what she does, not what she says.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 29 points30 points  (39 children)

Donald Trump is red-pilled as fuck. If he was young, handsome, better looking and more subtle about it he would slay absolute everything with the beliefs he has. Well he could still any way but thats more because power, money and those other great attributes he has, i just mean if he was a "regular kid" like the rest of us.

Chances are, if you are red pilled, practicing common sense, are rational, then your views are more likely to align with Donald Trumps than anyone elses. If you are a beta-boy you are more likely to be a PC blue-haired virtue signalling cancerous cuck of an SJW.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 12 points13 points  (1 child)

If he was young, handsome, better looking and more subtle about it he would slay absolute everything with the beliefs he has. Well he could still any way but thats more because power, money and those other great attributes he has, i just mean if he was a "regular kid" like the rest of us.

I was halfway through swallowing the pill during the 2016 election and it was just baffling. I couldnt figure out for the life of me why A, the left couldnt fucking stop talking about Trump when it was obvious that the attention was only making his strategy work better and better, and B, why there was so much focus on his physical proportions; his hair, his being overweight (ironic coming from the same people who push fat acceptance), the colour of his skin, his fucking hands ffs.

Now it all makes sense

[–]Pokeylaw 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Dude true af, I used to be a hard core Bernie bro, like super hardcore. Then I found TRP on complete accident bc I couldn't understand why a girl pick a "asshole" over me. Then I asked why on TRP it all clicked immediately and that was also during the time I started liking Trump and rooting for him. Good times dude

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds awesome. Get after it dude.

[–]ITS_JUST_2015_BRO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact: the_Donald subreddit was started and controlled by theredpill posters through much of 2015 and early 2016. Eventually they got forced out or stepped down because of drama and extreme posts they had made

[–]Bunky76 33 points34 points  (22 children)

I definitely agree Trump often ACTS red-pilled, but it's clear what is driving his behavior is a deep and abiding insecurity. How else do you explain his unending fixation on crowd sizes and ratings, as well as his compulsive need to watch hours of TV everyday in order to hear what people are saying about him. A true alpha male would not give a fuck about all that.

[–]okkyle 40 points41 points  (5 children)

Trump is a billionaire, famous TV personality, married several European models, five children, and became fucking PRESIDENT of the most powerful country in the world on his first try running for office all while bullying career cuck politicians like little boys. If that isn't alpha, then I don't want to be alpha.

You don't have to like the guy, but at least give credit where credit is due, sheesh.

[–]Bunky76 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Not denying at all that his RP-like behavior has enabled those achievements--I'm certain it has. He plays the public part of an alpha well. I just think it all comes from a place of weakness, not a man confident in his own frame. It doesn't seem he's driven by any internally-derived set of goals, but rather by an insatiable need to be popular. Spending hours a day fixated on cable news coverage, talking nonstop about his crowd size/ratings, needing to see his name mentioned in intelligence briefs in order to be convinced to read them, etc...these are not the hallmarks of a self-confident man.

[–]KirklandCamber 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not from the US are you? I ask this because you're spouting off very outdated anti-Trump leftie talking points. If you're not in the US and don't see the nuance of his actions it's easy to label it as "coming from an insecure place".

[–]do_you_even_liftbro 10 points11 points  (0 children)

FYI, this wasn't Trump's first time running for office.

[–]IrocD 14 points15 points  (0 children)

As much as I despise the man, I have no choice but to agree with this sentiment in its entirety.

[–]tmccar20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He ran a few times. Once for the reform party.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 8 points9 points  (0 children)

How else do you explain his unending fixation on crowd sizes and ratings, as well as his compulsive need to watch hours of TV everyday in order to hear what people are saying about him.

The guy has made a career off of making people think hes the shit when hes not. Of course hes obsessed with his reputation and public image, its a practical concern for him.

[–]francisco_DANKonia 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He is a branding expert. That is why he does all of those things.

[–]themanbat 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Trump beat Hillary, with no political experience, spending half as much money. Before Hillary he absolutely embarrassed and devastated every Republican opponent. All lifelong politicians. He did this by being a publicity hog, dropping red pill style unpleasant truths, hilariously pointed zingers, holding frame, and never apologizing for hurt feelings. Virtually everything he said successfully kept all eyes and commentary on him. This earned him Billions in free publicity, and as he was the only candidate with a clear message, unless you think Hillary's "I'm a girl and it's my turn," nonsense counts as a meaningful platform. Instead of wasting time defending himself against the buzzword cookie cutter insults of, "racist, sexist, misogynist," he immediately attacked, mocked, and crushed everyone and everything that opposed him, all the while tooting his own horn and pounding home his message. Every move aggressive, every play a power grab, every word an attention getting device. He absolutely dominated every second of the campaign season. This isn't the only way to behave as an alpha, but it is the best way to establish yourself as The Alpha in a popularity contest. Remaining stoic can beat one woman's shit test, but it won't do you any good if your opponent has everyone in the room laughing at you and talking about the cruel nicknames he gives you.

He perfectly framed the media as a joke, traditional Republicans as morons, Hillary as a criminal, and himself as the unstoppable juggernaut of masculine energy. Five rallies in five states in a single day. Constant interviews. Took the press head on and smacked them down, while Hillary refused to answer any questions directly and spent her time picking out drapes.

Now is he an amazing genius, who in spite of deep seated insecurities, somehow managed, through cold hard calculation and control, to never flinch and reveal his weakness? All while half the nation and virtually the entire media was attacking him? Or is he a natural super alpha, who has lived his entire life by ingrained aggressive alpha principles, and road them all the way into the White House? Hell, in reality, its's probably both. A natural alpha with a near perfect understanding of how average people really act and think in the real world, and an amazing ability to play the media against itself. Trump didn't have his finger on the pulse of the American public. He grabbed the public by the pussy, and the public immediately squirted for him. Hell, his poll numbers with women actually went up immediately after the pussy grabbing comment reveal. Now he's leading his supporters by the pussy, and balls deep in his opposition's ass, riding high at the top of the heap, indisputably the most powerful man in the world. It's painful for some, pleasurable for others, but now that he has exactly what he wanted, how the hell are you going to sit there with a freshly raped asshole, and tell me that he's not really a "true Alpha?"

[–]Potomato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

if anyone on here denies trump as an alpha, they do not know what an alpha is, despite his political positions, whether you love or hate them, he is an alpha.

Go read the 48 laws of power, trump was following a lot of those laws.

He spent way less than half of hilldog, and even less when he was in primaries. Small staff, barely any commercials, just rallies.

Frankly i was not going to get cucked by the policies of the democrats to give minorities, women and non citizens an artificial advantage over us evil white males. I am 100% for equality of course but no one group should be given special privileges over another at the hands of government.

[–]Pokeylaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He has to show the MSM that no matter what you say his supporters know the truth and support him 100%. If the mofo had a rally near me I would go there in a heartbeat probably use a sick day if I had to work to lol

[–]makeshift98 6 points7 points  (8 children)

How else do you explain his unending fixation on crowd sizes and ratings

Because he's a winner, and winners compete.

A true alpha male

Come on man, do you honestly think you, a random internet person, knows what alpha is better than a billionaire playboy who pulled his dick out, slapped everyone in the face with it, and said, "make me president"?

[–]Bunky76 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Lol. "Winners" shouldn't need to soothe their egos by constantly reminding others how popular they are. They just win and then go about their business. And by the way, he "won" nearly three million less votes than his historically weak electoral opponent did. Which of course is part of what makes him so insecure.

[–]okkyle 1 points1 points [recovered]

He brags about his wealth, successes, and crowd sizes because he's a cocky dude, first of all, but mainly because the man is a sales/PR genius. Any salesman or PR man worth his weight knows that self-promotion is vital. Are you gonna tell Conor McGregor he's an insecure bastard too? How about Mohamed Ali?

[–]Bunky76 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Again: not denying he has been very effective at crafting a confident public persona that many people find compelling. But I am not talking about his "PR" tactics on TV, I am talking about his private behavior. For example, he currently requires his staff to provide him, twice a day, a folder of only positive press articles/tweets/cable news screenshots about him. Who does that? Why would he need that? Another example: he won't read an intelligence brief longer than a paragraph unless his name is written into it! No previous president has needed that- why does he?

[–]themanbat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're buying into media hit pieces that have no other proof or sources besides, "inside sources say," or "officials say."

[–]themanbat 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Wake up. When you look to the popular vote to somehow validate your whinging, you sound like a child who lost at chess, whining about how you have more pieces left on the board than your opponent, after you have just been checkmated. The object of the game was not to have more pieces remaining at the end. The objective was to checkmate your opponent.

No one was playing the popular vote game. Everyone was playing the electoral college game, and Trump blew Clinton out with a lead of 77 points. Yet after an embarassing and resounding defeat, you feel it's somehow unjust because we won't change the rules after the fact?

A campaign to win the popular vote would involve entirely different strategies, thus the popular vote in an electoral college election means absolutely nothing. Trump skunked Hillary under one set of rules, and you have no reason to exppect that he wouldnt skunk her again in achieving a different set of objectives.

[–]Bunky76 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You miss my point entirely. His loss of the popular vote doesn't bother me, but it clearly bothers him. Why is that?

[–]UnFisico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I think I've had enough of these spurious-sounding claims. Sources or shut up

[–]2dogsandpizza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And we get to the crux of the argument. Take the chip off your shoulder and have a bit more of an objective look at how trump plays the game.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You dont act like he does if you are "insecure" wth are you rambling about. And he needs to care about media and all that stuff because hes the PRESIDENT, its obviously way different.

[–]ksande 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perception management - the man's been a media expert for decades, he knows the psychology behind human perception, drives, beliefs etc

Ie. If you think things like social proof only apply to women...

[–]cookin_breakfast 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Trump has the money, the fame, and now the power to act however he wants. If you try acting as wrecklessly self interested as trump, it might burn a few bridges... Especially if you are trying to stay employed in anything other than a commissioned sales job at a car dealership. Some assertiveness and confidence goes a long way, but it can definitely be over-done if you can't back it up with looks, money, power, or status. Just because your views align with his doesn't mean you can automatically adopt his swagger and pull it off, especially if you want to frequently proclaim your conservative ideals to people you meet. Discretion is advised.

[–]GunsGermsAndSteel -3 points-2 points  (5 children)

Sure, he has red pill attributes. So do (or did) a ton of other people who should not be in positions of power. I mean, Charles Manson is red pill as fuck; so was Ted Bundy.

Someone sharing the methodology by which we get laid does not qualify them to lead nations. Let's keep this in perspective: red pill is a sexual strategy.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Charles Manson wasnt red pill as fuck, Ted Bundy wasnt red pill as fuck either. Wrong. Just like the locals on the bar anesthetizing themselves with alcohol and being loud-mouthed aren't redpilled either just because they can run their mouth and arent afraid of getting into a physical altercation.

[–]185poundsofhatredWIP 2 points3 points  (3 children)

How did Manson not have red-pill attributes?

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 9 points10 points  (2 children)

You are not red pilled if you can't control your emotions and you act on impulses - thats what girls do and thats what Manson did. Mansons mom was a heavy drinker and didn't give a fuck about him and he didnt have a father figure to look up to either who taught him how to behave, how to be a man, how to be independant, how to improve your self and get around in life.

[–]francisco_DANKonia 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Some of the best players I have witnessed act on impulse. It's not necessary, but it doesn't make their behavior not red pill. The only important thing is controlling the frame, which being impulsive can accomplish.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you mean act more spontaneously and just 'going with flow' which is fine and good. Most bad-players they want everything set in stone they want a clear plan in terms of what to do and they have a rigid frame of mind.

What i mean instead is being able to control your emotions and needs when you have to. Lets say you become horny and aroused, the solution isnt to go out on a rape spree to fix this, if you get angry and mad about something the solution isnt going out on the street and beat the fk out of the first guy you encounter.

Thats just a mental breakdown that girls experience weekly, although this is a violent one of the kind. And that happens because you lack all the control of your inner self.

[–]vorverk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be honest, I would fuck a feminazi if she was hot. There are none though...

[–]1ObserverBG 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Women go for the winning side.

After Trump won, suddenly lots of women started doing videos "why i'm not a feminist"

[–]VictxrSenpai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well every beta orbiter and weirdo that hit up women, try to be agreeable, nice and sincere, in a pathetic attempt to get on their good side (in their pants). Most women can already spot these fake and insincere attempts so when a real motherfucker comes around and doesnt really give a shit what a bitch thinks , they take notice more than they would had you try to act like every other POS. Shit, id imagine some of these bitches would even get off on fucking/submitting to a man who they can argue and get mad at.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

all that witty banter about tax codes, emails, and border walls was the foreplay I never knew I needed.

Yeah, it's called a man that isn't a supplicating little bitch that doesn't beg for sex by participating in the hive mind.

[–]_MysticFox 1 points1 points [recovered]

What happened to "think as you like but behave like others"? If I ever face an opposing belief I just hit it with "okay cool" and change the subject, unless they persist of course, which happens extremely rarely.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (9 children)

I guess it depends on the context

[–]Cptn_Jib 3 points4 points  (2 children)

As a democrat in the south hooking up with republican girls is the same way

[–]Pokeylaw -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You a Democrat in the south you like the KKK to LMAO

[–]MKSsystem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another thing is that if you have to hide what you think from a girl like this, you'll be in for a bad time. She'll tell you all sorts of things and you'll just keep your mouth shut and seem like a bitch. Best to lay it all out there and not give a fuck

[–]Nerian99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and the weasel tactic is disgusting, and the women can smell it a mile away.

[–]willard_swag 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? Stop being agreeable? I think you're wrong about that.

...wait a second..

[–]Maelshevek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Illusion of consensus and groupthink do not a good relationship or situation make.

It's okay to disagree with people and having differing views. It's not okay when people are wrong and try to push that on others. That's where boundaries come into play. We can't control others, and we certainly aren't obligated to stay around people when they willfully act wrongly. Walking away is often a good life choice.

If we all agree, we'll never learn anything new. If we pretend we agree, we set ourselves up for later, worse conflict.

Most of the time we can choose to make peace with little things that people do, as leaving leaves nothing resolved.

I advocate making peace with some small things, confronting wrongs and working out agreements, and leaving behind those who persist in bad behavior. The key lies in not letting excessive emotion drive us into doing what we would otherwise not want to do.

[–]TheLadyLawyer 1 points1 points [recovered]

What the fuck is she complaining about? I wish could find a Trump supporter!

[–]1empatheticapathetic 15 points16 points  (3 children)

Please gentlemen, this lady needs 100cc of validation, STAT!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Reddit is generally a good place to find beta males who are willing to shower anyone who claims to be a woman with approval. TRP however, is not.

[–]1empatheticapathetic 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Let me link you to another example of this b

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit is generally a good place to find beta males who are willing to shower anyone who claims to be a woman with approval. TRP however, is not.

[–]DoxBox -1 points0 points  (3 children)

Anyone who is concerned about "beta boys" and "nice guys" is not an "alpha male" of any kind. I await my ban.

[–]1Sir_Distic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So tell me, what is an alpha male? Since you offer the opinion I'd like to know what you qualify as an Alpha male.

[–]laere 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I don't believe anyone is concerned with them. It's more of using Beta's and Nice Guys as an example of what not to do. Especially for those who are new to unplugging.

[–]DoxBox -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, it's more about the entire view of "betas" and "alphas" being completely and utterly hogwash. Even actual wolves do not function on an alpha/beta/omega system. Humans are even more complex. Ridiculous oversimplication that exists only to salve the egos of men who clearly have some kind of problem with women.