483
484

Red Pill TheoryThe Red Pill is Uncompromising Rejection (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil

A lot of people come here, subscribe, and start participating without giving a serious thought to what the Red Pill metaphor means. We have a lot of cool Red Pill art, banners and symbolism. Yet hardly anyone bothers to figure out what it all means. Why? Because most people are brain dead zombies incapable and highly averse to complex thought. People would rather enact a predesigned narrative (Matrix) then independently respond to life's stimulus.

By using the Matrix metaphor we're claiming that The Red Pill can only function via uncompromising rejection of the Blue Pill. Only with full rejection are you free of Blue Pill influence and capable of truly acting freely. The Matrix film makes this point very clear, which is why we chose to use the metaphor in the first place. There are no half measures here. In other words if you're making posts about acting like an asshole without being an asshole or are concerned with what the vagina person will think of your Red Pill reading, you are a loser and an imbecile. You have failed to comprehend the meaning of Red Pill. You lack the capacity to participate and should fuck off to less intellectually demanding activities like Sports Ball, Game Of Normies and navel gazing.

How does total rejection work in the real world? Let's say for whatever reason you are being shit-tested. Some mindless vagina drone is flapping non-sequiturs out of her labia. What she's saying doesn't logically make sense and isn’t factually representative of what happened. All of the symptoms of a shit test. So before you open your mouth and keep frame, you begin by holding the emphatic belief that all women are illogical emotional child people. 99% of the time they're either hungry, sleepy or need a time out. Nothing a woman says matters by virtue of it being said by a woman. It is with this mindset of absolute chauvinism, that you should enter or refuse to enter the interaction.

Likewise the same methodology can and should be applied when dealing with women and dick-women who aggregate themselves into political movements. Feminism, Egalitarianism, Antifags, namely any ideology not comprised of macho macho men. You wouldn't argue with the Alzheimer's crew at the nursing home. So why are you concerned with the ravings of some freak who doesn't believe in gender, due to a lifelong hormonal imbalance? Occasionally societies like to make crazy people feel important by listening to them. The Greeks did it with the Oracles. Now the West is doing it with Gender Studies dykes. Your Gender Studies professor admires Che and Fidel, however if they were alive today they would gladly execute her for being a maricón. Postmodern art painted with 9mm onto a brick wall. Anyone who admires their executioners is bat shit crazy. Don't argue with them, smile and nod just like the nursing home. Emphatic Rejection.

This brings me to my last point. If you don't emphatically reject the Blue Pill, you are going to have a very bad time. In the operating room of life you are cutting with a dull scalpel. Children, women and the mentally feeble don't understand the world, so they must rely on social cues. They are the stupid kid in class who has no idea what's going on. They might not know anything about calculus, but they can definitely copy off the smart kid. Their understanding of the world is based off of others reaction to it. They are inherently dependent people. They need to test those around them in order to know who to depend on. The more you compromise with their stupidity the more they will believe in their own stupidity and in turn, the more stupidity you will have to deal with. Explaining to a child why she doesn't need the candy bar is just an invitation for more childish bullshit.

The truth is radical, it's not democratic. If the sky is blue and 99% of the population believes it to be yellow, compromising and saying that it's green isn't helping anyone, least of all you. We live in a feminist Cuck-Fag society that promotes a Cuck-Fag dating strategy and a don't offend anyone morality. The Red Pill is an emphatic rejection of both. Going half Cuck-Fag isn't going to help you. There is nothing noble about compromising with idiots. You have to go all the way. That's what the Red Pill is all about.

Follow me on Twitter

Shoot me a PM if you are interested in fitness nutrition and postural correction coaching


[–]Modredpillschool[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Don't forget to also follow GLO on TRP.RED

[–]Redteen224 91 points92 points  (6 children)

That quote about the gender studies maricón was perhaps the funniest thing I have seen you write.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 72 points73 points  (5 children)

Funny but hilariously true. How many LGBT idiots freak out at a "muslim ban," despite the latter eagerly wanting to give them flying lessons off of the tallest building in town?

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 27 points28 points  (3 children)

I've never understood that. Then you have the group who thinks Muslims do man-boy love, fast way to a head in a bucket is what that is. Screwing a 10 year old girl is ok with them though, because the prophet did. Those fuckers are hard core anti gay.

[–]blurtard 6 points7 points  (1 child)

They definitely do man-boy love. Especially the tribal barbarians living way out in the desert

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't exactly call love, what those warlord-hillbillies are doing to the boys. There have been enough incidents with the Afghan"refugees" here in Germany. It's flat out (gang-)rape.

[–]destraht 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As OP stated they aren't original thinkers by nature and so simply they are being told to follow this path. The reason why both feminists and Islamists are being used as tools is that the agenda is to destroy the current order and both of these factions want this more than anything and there is too much wealth lying around in the West for certain parties to resist making a grab for it. As the next level of more invasive looting is being prepared the ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) is quite effective at looting the territories but it doesn't really get in there to pry all of the stubborn gems from their sockets. For that they need hard bank bail-ins like Cypress and other inventive forms of outright seizure. We need to look past the street level minions like feminists and Islamists. Neither are particularly bright people capable of producing real wealth or sustaining logically constructs.

[edit] I corrected some messed up sentences since I needed to do a lot of editing to boil my point down.

[–]p3n1x 80 points81 points  (7 children)

The more you compromise

This falls right in line with "negotiation".

You can't negotiate the truth

You can't negotiate attraction

You can't negotiate your oneitis with her

You can't negotiate good health

You don't negotiate with children

Never willfully negotiate with a parasite.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I wish I had read this topic when I was trying to make my relationship work with a SJW... I mean, she wasn't that SJW right away, but there were red flags.

She always wanted me to "compromise" on stuff. Well first of all I don't negotiate much naturally, so this felt awkward. I was always wondering, how do people do it? And then I understood that there isn't any compromise with them. Their way of compromising is basically "do everything like I want 99% of the time and maybe I won't be mad at you for doing you the remaining 1%"

Parasites aren't humans anyway.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Not negotiate, educate.

To be able to educate is to be able to dominate someone such that they recognize your superior understanding/import and submit to you're inculcation by way of course.

Some women are more capable of this than others.. its our job to filter for them, but the more capable we are of educating, the more readily we recognize a natural pupil.

[–]Shaman6624 1 point2 points  (3 children)

No you can't force education on someone. But if you find someone who trusts you and looks up to you then it's powerfull and immensely rewarding to pass your wisdom.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I never said force. To be in a position of dominance is to be in a position of superiority, a position where "someone looks up to you." This isn't domineering (forcing), its dominance, to have truly superior control over, or understanding of, the domain.

This can be held in many contexts over many hierarchies. No one man is dominant in all hierarchies.

[–]Shaman6624 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Ok I understand but in the context of the OP comment:

This falls right in line with "negotiation". You can't educate the truth (to bluepillers) You can't educate attraction You can't educate your oneitis with her You can't educate good health

You DO educate children (this ones right) Never willfully educate a parasite. (it will fail)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't, because i'm not saying you should educate someone on being attracted to you, obviously that doesn't work.

But you can educate them in what a good partner is and does. If they want to be you're partner, because attraction already exists, then they can be molded into a better partner.

[–]p3n1x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your point, but you can't "teach" women!

They do not negotiate emotions.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 97 points98 points  (16 children)

Savage. And 100% on point.

You can swallow the red pill, or embrace the blue pill and wind up with a 12" red pill suppository the hard way.

Either way, most human beings will experience the "red pill of life" whether they want to or not. Whether this is some tranny who blows his brains out after chopping off his dick didn't bring happiness, or some empowered feminist that at 40 is sterile, childless, and man less, or some beta faggot, white knight feminist marching for "climate change" who gets pumped and dumped for 20 years of alimony and child support (assuming he's unfat enough to get laid), or even the clueless blooper normies that let their culture, women, and nation get raped and genocided out of existence because they didn't want to get labeled "racist." The blue pill will fuck you in the ass. Without lube. Guaranteed.

Nature and reality gives precisely zero fucks about your delusional beliefs, and has a habit of forcefully shattering flimsy belief systems into the million shards of brittle rationalizations they are constructed out of.

[–]WolfofAnarchy 12 points13 points  (11 children)

Everything here is right, except for "climate change". That shit is real and happening. If you don't believe that the climate is changing and that we are responsible for the biggest chunk of that, then not a single word out of your mouth regarding 'reality' should be taken seriously.

[–]the_one_tony_stark 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Yes, except not in the way it's being advertised.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48M-dnv5CkA

Climate is changing. Has always been changing. All things considered, global warming is better than cooling. We're at the tail end of a mini-ice age (in roman times they could grow grapes in britain). We're nowhere near to that and nowhere near to the much advertised catastrophe.

Is climate changing? Yeah, it always has.

Is human industry affecting the climate? Possibly, we're not really sure on that.

Should any country be in the paris accord? Considering according to their own data, it would halt global warming for roughly 8 months total in the next 80 years (so that it takes 80 years and 8 monhts instead of 80 years to get the same warming) at the cost of many billions of dollars.

My guess? They get to direct into which friend's pockets that money goes of the poor countries where it's aimed. They being the engineers of the climate change hysteria.

[–]WolfofAnarchy 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Is human industry affecting the climate? Possibly, we're not really sure on that.

We really, mostly are.

Should any country be in the paris accord?

Now that's politics, and I'm not going to get into that, but you look at how rapidly climate change has been happening since the Industrial Age and you see we are probably a huge cause.

[–]the_one_tony_stark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We really, mostly are.

What study shows this and to what degree we are affecting the climate?

I am open to having my mind changed. As far as I can tell from looking into it, "the hockeystick" premise is flawed and we don't have substantial evidence that current climate deviates from natural variations.

Certainly there is enough evidence (or rather lack of evidence) to put the current groupthink in regards to climate change to doubt.

https://i.imgur.com/yRm8BOb.png

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCU6bzRypZ4

The reason I brought up politics is to show that there is a good motive for people to deceive others about the exact nature of truth in regards to climate change.

For example, al gore and his people made a considerable effort to get think tanks about climate research shutdown: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGEijAFJvmQ

But if you have studies or evidence that could change my mind, I would love to hear it.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Yes. That's the only thing they tell the truth about. Everything else is a lie.

Didn't you just have a post about BPAs that you got shit on over?

So tell me more about this "settled science."

[–]WolfofAnarchy 0 points1 point  (5 children)

You mean that post I graciously apologized for and thanked the OP over, for which I got a lot of credit?

Sure, I'll tell you more about settled science. But only if you stop using these retarded comparisons to month old posts that are completely irrelevant to the point being made (climate change is heavily accelerated by mankind).

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Reminder that this is how you approached someone questioning your dogmatic beliefs:

That shit is real and happening. If you don't believe that the climate is changing and that we are responsible for the biggest chunk of that, then not a single word out of your mouth regarding 'reality' should be taken seriously.


Moving on...

You mean that post I graciously apologized for and thanked the OP over, for which I got a lot of credit?

The point is if your extensive scientific acumen led you to being hoodwinked and wrong about the science of plastics then what makes you think that you are the supreme authority to criticize anyone else's knowledge of science?

Sure, I'll tell you more about settled science. But only if you stop using these retarded comparisons to month old posts that are completely irrelevant to the point being made (climate change is heavily accelerated by mankind).

If you are as smart as you think you are then I don't have to belabor irony of this situation. Finally, that sounds like something what a "climate scientist" would say.

[–]minimalistvagabond 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Am a Materials Chemist with a focus on polymers. I'd be interested in the BPA post, can you link it?

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 0 points1 point  (2 children)

We're not allowed to link on this sub. I'd PM you but I can't figure out how on mobile.

But some extra irony... I don't think he was wrong about BPAs. 😂

[–]minimalistvagabond 1 point2 points  (1 child)

From what I understand about them, the plasticizers used mimic estrogen and other endocrine chemicals, and cause all kinds of crazy biological problems.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Exactly.

And almost every human has these pollutants in their body from drinking water contamination due to their prevalence.

[–]Red_Faust 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Nature and reality gives precisely zero fucks about your delusional beliefs, and has a habit of forcefully shattering flimsy belief systems into the million shards of brittle rationalizations they are constructed out of.

This is the beauty of truth. I'm saving these words to keep them in mind, forever.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Ever read The Way of Men by Jack Dononvan?

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No, but I've heard it mentioned on TRP many times.

Why do you ask?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It just fits. A good, short read.

[–]Disciple_of_Libertas 40 points41 points  (7 children)

Your Gender Studies professor admires Che and Fidel, however if they were alive today they would gladly execute her for being a maricón. Postmodern art painted with 9mm onto a brick wall.

I always love telling College Marxists that they'll be the first to be executed if a revolution actually broke out. They're all too Bourgeois. The cognitive dissonance it causes alone makes it worth it. Look up Yuri Bezmenov: Deception was my Job on YouTube to see how these College Marxists are the best useful idiots in all history.

[–]wsba910am 8 points9 points  (1 child)

I'm in the middle of a Stefan Molyneux video on Che Guevara and what is so interesting is that he comes from money. Like Marx he is bourgeois. Stefan makes a case that Marxists almost entirely hail from middle or upper class, don't know how to handle money, live like parasites off their parents or the system (Hillary Clinton for example) and turn against capitalism when it stops paying them despite their financial foolishness.

[–]Disciple_of_Libertas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Molyneux has some great presentations. Be sure to check out the one on Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy was actually right about communist infiltration. We're living with the effects today.

[–]lopsidedlucky 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I just told my buddies about your remark and lols where had by all.

[–]Disciple_of_Libertas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seriously, try it. When a Marxist begins talking about the revolution, ask them how they'll safeguard the revolution from subversive Bourgeois elements. Be sure to point out how it will be in possible without authoritarian measure like camps. Then ask them what they will do when the revolutionaries figure out how Bourgeois they are (assuming they're a Starbucks Marxist). Recipe for infinite lulz right here, they won't be able to answer you. If they get hostile, remind them you're only trying to ensure the success of the revolution.

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any subversive group that wants to fold part of a population in on another part of itself is in the end not going to trust ANYONE who actually is motivated enough to participate. Someone brave and stupid enough to be motivated once to be a tool against their own benefit could then be motivated a second time in another direction and so needs to be eliminated as soon as the new order is restored.

[–]Irish_Domination 1 points1 points [recovered]

Since actual Marxism is fucking impossible to make work, but the true believers don't want to hear that and want to keep pushing. Turns out kleptocrat despots are less receptive to revolutionaries than democratically elected liberal leaders, who would have guessed?

[–]Urishima 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Marx failed. His predicted global uprising of the proletariat never happened. That's why we got Leninism, Stalinism, Socialism, Facism, National Socialism, etc. All a product of the left, in response of Marxism not working out.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (12 children)

are concerned with what the vagina person will think of your Red Pill reading

Already mentioned once in the past. I talk to the woman with whatever the fuck i come up with. Mention whatever the fuck i feel like. This is however not so much determined to get 'as much pussy as possible' and rather focuses on 'Do whatever and weed out the pussy which wants you to not be yourself from the start'

If you don't emphatically reject the Blue Pill, you are going to have a very bad time.

Or to put it differently: How people still in the darkest depths of their brain beliving NAWALT, will learn AWALT!

and a don't offend anyone morality.

My hatred for PC grows daily. You can't even swear anymore without people losing their shit about how awful of a person you supposedly have to be.

[–]LosBuratnos 16 points17 points  (7 children)

I like accents of different peoples. Working in the office in the UK. Couple of times in a friendly conversation I mentioned indian food and jokingly spoke about curry with an indian accent. Was immediately labeled racist. My reasonable question whether saying 'ich liebe wurst' in german accent make me racist too, there was no answer.

Note that I have 0 racism, especially towards indians.

[–]Senior ContributorSkorchZang 25 points26 points  (5 children)

It doesn't matter if you're a racist, sexist, homophobe nazi bigot dildo and your hair is orange. What matters is that you must submit to having to self-censor and not say what you want to say next time, because someone may be offended or their feelings hurt. That changes your entire mental frame. Sincerity becomes an atavism. Your life is robbed of pleasure and meaning in a big way. Meanwhile, attacking you is easy and cheap, you defending yourself is difficult and annoying, because you'll lose anyhow. "He's defending himself, therefore he's guilty" - women's logic.

By taking away your ability to say things, the enemy wants to take your ability to think certain things (this is big), and your ability to think for yourself has to go too (even bigger). It should be replaced by a look-up table of currently acceptable things you can say. Everything else is forbidden. It works maybe about half of the time, but that's good enough for government work.

Our sin as men is not being racist or sexist, our sin is being stupid & trusting enough to care whether we are racist or sexist. Wanting to be the good guys all the time is what's killing us, that's how the poison gets in. That little instinct for goodness that normally belongs to the noble is being ruthlessly used against them to take them for everything they've got.

[–]LosBuratnos 5 points6 points  (3 children)

We're talking about men using women's logic too, right? Cause people who claimed I was racist were actually men, though heavily blue-pilled.

[–]Senior ContributorSkorchZang 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Yeah, if you ask me, it's still women's logic when men use it. Credit where credit's due, women were always the original trailblazers of this ideology, even if it eventually does take root in very masculine places such as criminal / prison subcultures etc.

Defending yourself from the position of "innocence scorned" is the red cloth that enrages the bull. The only acceptable defense is immediate overwhelming offence. Then the marxist bull might think about backing off.

[–]LosBuratnos 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Yeah and even then you will be looked upon. RedPill life is not easy.

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not, and until we turn the tide it won't get any easier.

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experiences in Ukraine, Poland and Moldova over some years I came to the conclusion that almost all forms of critical sarcasm were essentially culturally outlawed in the more beaten down of Soviet people. If you can openly mock some part of the system then you could then openly mock another part and who knows where that could lead.

What matters is that you must submit to having to self-censor and not say what you want to say next time,

Exactly, its more about simply the process of you policing your thoughts and it leads to the same rhyming destination brought to us by IMO the same people.

[–]WhorehouseVet -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What I found works for myself is to immediately accuse them of being a racist, since I'm not white. It usually gets​ these idiots to stfu. Basically using the same script against them.

In your case, you could've even made up the story that your grandmother was Indian.

[–]WolfofAnarchy 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Already mentioned once in the past. I talk to the woman with whatever the fuck i come up with. Mention whatever the fuck i feel like.

How's that working out for you? You getting plenty or do they just think 'the fuck's this guy smoking' and walk away?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

It follows quite a few teachings actually. Domination Principle by /u/MikeHaines , Transformation Mastery by Julien Blanc and Radical Honesty by Dr. Brad Blanton. - I did not change much. I simply "stopped doing what seems correct" and fully focused on doing what i would actually do.

It seems to have 2 major benefits. 1.) You will act authentic which in todays world of masks, lies and 'portay your perfect self-image' has insane value and makes people want to listen to you. 2.) It seems to disarm stuff which otherwise would fuck up your game. "I am actually nervous to come right here and talk to you, girl." This sentence if spoken fully non-chalant without shame, simply stating the absolute truth... conveys the very oppsite of what it says.

So far theory and observed benefits. I will however not state this to be the 'right way to go at it'. I fully believe in it, but my personal experiences are too few to actually without doubt sell this idea to you. I'm became dead-honest in my ways. So i am honest now in the regard i have not tested it enough to make it a technique i don't just believe to be true, but KNOW to be true.

Side-Note: If this entire explanation (as medicore as my english is) made you fully curious and invested in the idea, the reason is the very technique i described. The words describing the technique are as honest and authentic as it is the very technique preaches to be/act.

[–]WolfofAnarchy 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Wow, great reply. Thank you. I also fully agree with you! But in other words, it hasn't gotten you laid yet, then?

It does strongly follow what one of the best seduction books ever (Models - Mark Manson) wrote, that it doesn't really matter what you say, but how you say it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was on the very bottom of the food chain in the past. The cuck of cuckistan. Only girlfriends i ever had were the fat bitches. Being authentic (even before knowing the theory itself) was the first time i got a 8(maybe 8.5) into my bed.

I have to repair so much fucked up shit that is wrong in my life. One thing being i gave up Game and Gym about half a year ago cause the effort wasn't worth it. Stupid past me made it for the pussy. Smarter now me goes to the gym, fixes shit in his life for himfuckingself - which is how one should go at it.

So yeah im a fucktard who is still doing way to much theory and way to few action-taking. But im moving away from that day by day.

[–]Darth_Antonius 19 points20 points  (3 children)

There is nothing noble about compromising with idiots.

Not only is there nothing noble in engaging these raving lunatics, there is nothing to be gained. By even entertaining their beliefs, you only give them legitimacy. You can't convince them of your beliefs any more than they can convince you of yours. The fact is, you don't need to convince people that gender studies majors/SJW's are crazy, because anyone with a rational mind will figure it out for themselves. And anyone who is swayed by the SJW narrative was never capable of being red pilled to begin with, so there is no point trying to save them.

Don't argue with them, smile and nod just like the nursing home. Emphatic Rejection.

Amused Mastery 101

[–]lopsidedlucky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By even entertaining their beliefs, you only give them legitimacy.

This a hundred times over. People don't understand that by arguing with lunatics you end up giving them power and legitimacy.

[–]AlexCarlin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is hope for SJWs. It's not yours or anyones job to save them but we shouldn't give up on them. This is coming from a formed feminist.

[–]-VaeVictis- 21 points22 points  (6 children)

It always amuses me seeing the rage people feel after reading a GLO post.

The reason he speaks in such absolutist terms isn't because "muh misogyny".

Get this on your thick skulls: Unless you already are a successful man who reads people perfectly, achieves whatever the fuck he wants without trouble and doesn't take shit from anyone, there is no nuance for you. No unicorn hunting. No "not every woman is like that!".

Of course people are different, circumstances need calibration. But unless you already know how to do so pretty damn well, don't bother go looking for ways to compromise and be "the ultimate purple piller".

Stick to the basics and get your fucking shit together.

[–]Red_Faust 33 points34 points  (0 children)

If you do not have emotional control over an area of your life, then you can't compromise.

An alcoholic that can't stop after 2 drinks and ends up blacking out every time shall have exactly zero drinks.

A recovering nice guy shall show exactly zero provider attributes to be able to get out of the trenches.

No compromises.

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I think that someone suddenly blurting out whatever they want to say after a lifetime of self-censorship is going to immediately run into two huge issues;

1) When a person is living in the moment then they need to be a lot more clever than someone who is merely following a template and they are likely to go too far and to say very awkward, mean or objectively inappropriate things. Ideally we would all work this out as children under a proper mentor when it is considered socially acceptable to just be out of touch with decency.

2) The people around someone who is just suddenly beginning to express their own self are going to slap him down so fucking hard. They are going to be brutal, nasty and abusive and he won't have a network of red pill guys around him.

In other words it will be like an absolutely terrible comedian being put in front of the shittiest audience. Its not going to be fun but it needs to be gone through.

[–]GoRedBad 1 points1 points [recovered]

  1. This is my experience, but it's worth it to fuck up now and then. In the end, unless you are making a faux pas every minute of the day, people will get over your shit quickly. And since you always cares more about your own image, it's likely that other's give far less of a fuck about your mistakes.

  2. I've run into these people, especially when voicing political views, and one in a particular was a HORRIBLE CUNT who conspired to get me fired. In hindsight, I should have spotted them a mile off, and more than that I should have kept a lid on the pseudo intellectual political posturing, which is merely using red pill knowledge for blue pill ends.

LESSONS LEARNED!

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why I've chosen not to work in a typical office except as a last resort. If I'm able to completely focus on then I can crush these types but in reality they have far more time to linger on it and its very difficult for me to go from having my head in the code for hours to fighting petty political battles over nothing but gossip derived from my candid expression. Its just not worth it. I also find it depressing and stressful to censor myself through a huge filter while second guessing everyone's intentions. Just imagine that in some other culture the men in charge would just laugh in the face of this cunt, even if she was playing some games that did make you look bad. One you could explain how she was just a cunt being a cunt then the real men would just get it.

So I took a part time 15/hours job as a programmer in L'viv, Ukraine (since I was bored working solo in coffee shops only) and it was 100% men since it was a small private company. It was fucking awesome. Imagine that, no women in the work place, all going to the club as a company 1-2 times a month, someone having a birthday or some other shit twice a month on Friday. Not even a secretary!

[–]Merwebb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yep. Im culturally very different from the people i work with and even if i try to mingle im being shown very little love.

It would be like that with a redpilling dude in the midst of bluepilled people.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 20 points21 points  (2 children)

Fucking right. Been noticing a group of "nice acting dick women" in here of late. Ranting about how we are misogynistic haters, and we'd get farther by respecting girls.

Fucking clueless, plugged in, mindless drones. Yea said it better than I was going to.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still said it pretty damm well!

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You nailed it. We've been inundated with these people and worst of all they're preaching against red pill and shaming masculine men all the while thinking they're taking the pill. Delusional as fuck.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 4 points5 points  (25 children)

The problem with "reject the Blue Pill" is defining what the blue pill actually is.

You can't reject ALL your life experience. Not everything everyone has told you is wrong. It's a little more nuanced than "everything you know about women is wrong".

Now if you, GLO, are saying "red or dead", then this makes complete sense. There is no halfway house. Fuck the purple pull. I've got more respect for those choosing MGTOW or Black Pill than those who try to water down our message with crap that culminates in "If you're alpha enough it's safe to get married" or "If you always do <X> she will never cheat".

[–]BELIEVEINGODJohn812 2 points3 points  (5 children)

The problem with "reject the Blue Pill" is defining what the blue pill actually is.

Hmm. Blue Pill = everything opposite of The Red Pill.

BP: True Love exists

RP: BS!

BP: Get married, have kids and settle down

RP: PLATESPLATESPLATESPLATESPLATES

BP: Men and women are equal

RP: HA!

BP: PUA are all misogynists and woman haters

RP: HE!

BP: If you see a girl crying or who says she is the victim, believe her, you don't know her story

RP: All women do this crap, they say they were raped in a bid to get attention, they cry to manipulate your emotions in a bid to STOP you from exercising your right as a man.

Oh, I fucked Chad and now you're leaving me? Tear.

Oh no, so I walked through the city naked. So what. It's my body, i'll do what I want

Do what you want with your body outside of my home and life

TEAR.

etc etc.

[–]DoveDizzle 0 points1 point  (4 children)

If you only plan on spinning plates forever, how do you plan on procreation? Not being facetious, an honest question. I have embraced the red pill, but i also feel nature is driving me to procreate. And I'd rather have a family unit for that, as people are way too fucked from broken/single parent homes.

[–]Scymnus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Surrogate. If you get a woman involved in raising your children these days all you're gonna end up with is a broken home.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just waiting on this decline to pass before looking for partners

[–]BELIEVEINGODJohn812 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you only plan on spinning plates forever, how do you plan on procreation

You don't sir, you don't.

Odds are, in this day and age; your girl isn't YOUR girl. She had someone else before you. She is leftover meat essentially. Worthless trash so to speak.

And I'd rather have a family unit for that,

Any respectable woman who wants to have a family won't get a tattoo, won't get piercings, won't drink alcohol, smoke weed or smoke cigs, will keep her virginity in tact etc etc. Not go to college, etc. Will probably not go out to bars and night clubs etc.

If you can find a girl like this and you are certain of her virginity (her dad can vouch for her) you better lock her down ASAP.

Thing is, after marriage; she may still decide to become a slut and there is virtually nothing you can (legally) do about it. The laws are so skewed in favor of women that any man worth his salt ought to think twice about getting married.

How many women do YOU know who are like this?

If you can name a woman like this, go court her and enjoy your family. If not; spin plates my friend, spin plates. Until you can't spin 'em anymore.

Marriage is a TERRIBLE deal for men and women now, only respectable people will have kids AFTER getting married. How many do that now? How many couples get married, have kids and the marriage lasts 50+ years like it used to?

To find a woman like the one I described above is to find a unicorn essentially. MAYBE they're out there, but don't hold your breathe.

In short: Only procreate w/ respectable women who aren't whores or sluts. Near impossible to find unless you're living in Saudi Arabia or amish.

Oh, and Saudi Arabia is starting to Westernize by giving women the right to have a car, drivers license etc. So.. good luck on finding your unicorn there.

Amish women are usually not attractive, aren't exactly clean etc.

[–]destraht -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its just not in the American mentality to know different since the US government has such a powerful reach over the entire continent. I think that marriage can (until it doesn't) by having a passport from one country, money in another and the wife in another. In this context (which few live in) it starts to look a lot more like the level of uncertainty that women had hundreds of years ago and that kept them in line, as much as they ever can be.

[–]Dead__Hand -1 points0 points  (17 children)

Question - how does one reconcile the rejection of the proposition "if you're alpha enough, it's safe to get married" with the recognition of Rollo Tomassi - a married man - as a red pill prophet?

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Rollo Tomassi - a married man - as a red pill prophet

His deep understanding of men and women isn't undermined by being married. In fact it's good that some men are married and can inform others what it's like and what they're letting themselves in for.

We need married red pill men to act as a warning to others.

Marriage is still a terrible fucking idea for a man.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Didn't know we had a prophet. Considering his work is simply translation evo psyche into IRL english, I would say it's not water into wine

[–]Dead__Hand -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Sure, I absolutely agree, re: "Marriage is still a terrible fucking idea for a man."

In fact, even /u/RolloTomassi says that men shouldn't get married, despite being happily married himself.

If what you were stating was a praxeological general rule of application (e.g. AWALT), with no admission of exception or nuance until the student has become a master, then I agree.

If what you were stating was an ideological rule of absolute application, with no exceptions even for the most red-pilled alphas, then I would fail to understand cases like Tomassi.

I interpret you to have meant the former,particularly since TRP in general is a praxeology rather than an ideology (i.e. it's epistemology and metaphysics is pragmatic, rather than Platonic).

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon -1 points0 points  (1 child)

I interpret you to have meant the former

I meant the latter. No exceptions.

I mean, there ARE exceptions. Eg marrying a much richer and well motivated woman when you are poor but all your family are lawyers.

But apart from this specific case, no exceptions.

You can't use Rollo as an exception when he himself says that men shouldn't marry.

There are many TRP-aware men who are married and wish they weren't, but from their current position it makes more sense to stay married than to get divorced. That doesn't undermine the point.

It's not that marriage is "TRP on hard mode", it's more that it's just a terrible fucking idea.

Chopping your legs off is life on hard mode... doesn't make it a good plan.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This comes up often in MRP, in our annual 'would you do it again?' shitfest

It's not pro marriage, it's anti divorce rape.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone -1 points0 points  (11 children)

"if you're alpha enough, it's safe to get married"

you made it up, why ask others to justify it?

[–]Dead__Hand -1 points0 points  (10 children)

I didnt make that up - I'm responding to the commenter above who stated that it's false, and I'm asking how to simultaneously accept that with the knowledge that one of the core RP contributors is married.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 1 point2 points  (9 children)

A smoker tells you not to smoke, what do?

[–]Dead__Hand 1 point2 points  (8 children)

It's more complicated than that - it's a performative contradiction.

They say one thing with their mouth, and one thing with their actions.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Then fuck off, how's that for simple

[–]Dead__Hand 1 point2 points  (3 children)

My question was legitimate.

I was not here defending that men get married. I was asking specifically how to simultaneously accept both (1) there are some highly authoritative TRP contributors who are happily married and (2) the rule that it's never safe to get married.

I thought I knew the answer but I decided to ask an Endorsed Contributor to confirm.

My answer is: (a) it's a general rule that very, very few men are Red Pulled enough to successfully navigate the nuance (i.e. like NAWALT), and (b) it's still never safe.

Why are you going so aggro?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 0 points1 point  (2 children)

No one cares.

No one is selling you, no ones making money off this. In order to do better with life, a bunch of guys are getting together and swapping notes. fuck off

[–]Dead__Hand 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You fuck off - I'm just here trying to learn, and you're just putting me down. Fuck you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

HI . I am a married smoker.

its

the

same

shit

Quit now.

[–]Dead__Hand 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Ok - I will stop.

Is this the sort of thing that would have been better placed in Ask_TRP? I'm not interested in breaking the sub rules, but sometimes I want to get clarification on something and I'm not sure whether it is ok to ask in the comments to a TRP post.

[–]TunedtoPerfection 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Red pilled Men can not compromise with women, children, and blue pill men. Truth is women, children and blue pilled men see any compromise from a red pilled man as an invitation to continue to take until stopped. Women and children are pushed, taught, encouraged to do this from day 1. Blue pill men, see all the other people benefiting from it and try to hop on the gravy train. There is no compromising with them because they will not give up anything in return.

Because of this they no longer are worth the respect of that action until they prove they can handle it.

[–]MightyMeket 1 points1 points [recovered]

every time you post something it's just some shitty poem, just to advertise your twitter

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Idiot spotted, /u/RedPillSchool please bring down the Ban Hammer of Dawn please. Permanent because 'every time' shows this was a constant mindset. No one rational or in the top writer's group believes this, not even a little.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Too bad you can't ban upvoters, right?

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You're part of the problem man. You can't see the forest for the trees little beta. The fact you're upvoted at all is symptomatic of the beta problem we have in TRP.

[–]MightyMeket 1 points1 points [recovered]

i cringe everytime someones uses beta/alpha, really shows you are bitch yourself

[–]lopsidedlucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like princess got her cringes triggered.

Btw, you should realize with your uselessly broad ass comment you just called 90% of the endorsed contributors and mods bitches on this very forum that was built to help your BETAs like you. That was an autistic move kid.

[–]untonyto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Full of unmitigated savage humor - the kind men need

[–]TheEndlessRoadAhead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Going half Cuck-Fag isn't going to help you

I'm getting this shit framed and putting it on my wall.

[–]Shireton1928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of this poem by a favorite drunkard of mine.

Roll the Dice


by Charles Bukowski

if you’re going to try, go all the way. otherwise, don’t even start.

if you’re going to try, go all the way. this could mean losing girlfriends, wives, relatives, jobs and maybe your mind.

go all the way. it could mean not eating for 3 or 4 days. it could mean freezing on a park bench. it could mean jail, it could mean derision, mockery, isolation. isolation is the gift, all the others are a test of your endurance, of how much you really want to do it. and you’ll do it despite rejection and the worst odds and it will be better than anything else you can imagine.

if you’re going to try, go all the way. there is no other feeling like that. you will be alone with the gods and the nights will flame with fire.

do it, do it, do it. do it.

all the way all the way.

you will ride life straight to perfect laughter, its the only good fight there is.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a very complex and meta thesis. I like it a lot, your comparison is dead on and your use of the phrase "emphatic rejection" is useful and accurate.

[–]LiveAFTSOV 1 points1 points [recovered]

What is the cuck fag dating strategy ?

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 31 points32 points  (11 children)

Virtue signaling with ironic black rimmed glasses and AIDS Skrillex haircut hoping to attract a skinny, pale empowered wymyn feminist harpie.

Usually results in a lot of lonely masturbation.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (10 children)

I once pointed out to a lovely young woman that "male feminists" are often just virtue signaling. Waste of time, she wouldn't hear me. Oh well.

I guess it pissed me off because she said I'm not feminist enough for her to date these days. I was her first boyfriend and I actively supported her intellectual development for over 4 years. Her family was conservative, women were supposed to be in the kitchen....she started studying biology, added chemistry because it's more robust.....after her little brother's suicide, she switched to theoretical mathematics & computer science, which she leveraged into a PhD program at a very high end school....our alma mater is a cheap local school. She's honestly a bad ass, but I was a fucking rock and helped her tremendously....yeah, we're still friends, a 20 year age gap which takes marriage off the table really helps.

The idea that this objectively smart young woman refused to understand that my very real support is vastly more important than me making the right noises about gender honestly piss me off. No, I'm not a feminist. But I did more for her (no bitterness, love her) than 95% of the so-called male feminists out there.

[–]Red_Faust 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I'm not feminist enough for her to date these days

It's not what marks on her santa claus checklist you hit, it's how many tingles you give her. If you gave her the tingles then this would not be a problem.

But I did more for her (no bitterness, love her) than 95% of the so-called male feminists out there.

It's not what you do for her, it's how many tingles you give her.

Waste of time, she wouldn't hear me.

Women are only compliant to accept your leadership (or pretend to) when they are after your commitment. Otherwise they are inflexible in their beliefs, why would they change their mind models when they don't need to?

No pain threshold crossed no need for belief change. Thing of the guys who only come to TRP after being heartbroken by their unicorns.

I'm a natural helper as I suppose you are too. It took a long time to stop trying to help women I'm not actively fucking. And even these, I say stuff in the tone of "the world works like this", if she doesn't listen I say stuff in the tone of "you are not listening, your world view is rigid and you are rationalizing that doing what you feel like will give you the results you're after, this is wishful thinking and will not happen", and when they don't listen to this 2nd tune my helping is over.

And after doing this for several years with different LTRs and MLTRs my conclusion is: they only listen, or pretend to, when they're after commitment. Elsewhere they don't. So to be able to lead them is best to never fully commit.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Thanks for the comment, and you have a good read on the situation in my opinion.

It looks like you've squared the circle of being a natural helper and being a Red Pilled man. It's non-trivial. This is one of my weak points with women, and I know full well they exploit it. I've done a year of Monk Mode exactly because of that, to reset my behavior patterns to be about me first.

[–]Red_Faust 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The thing is, girls might need a helper to save them from their disastrous life decisions (from our perspective), but what they want is a sexy alpha male to fuck them silly.

As in, people don't buy what they need, they buy what they want.

E.g. people might need therapy to quit smoking but what they buy most are cigarettes.

So, in order to help a woman, this is what I do. I don't claim this to be perfect, and suggestions are welcome.

1 - You gotta be the sexy alpha male they're attracted to.

2 - Only give advice when they ask for it, or if they have a situation, you can say: "you know, I could help you with that" and then wait to see if they ask for help.

3 - Offer a simple, basic advice as first step and see if they follow through. As in "if this friend is annoying you, why don't you give her two days of radio silence?".

4 - If they follow through you can give more advice, if not, you can try explaining the rigid mental models thing, or just drop it.

I never argue, and I never keep pushing advice when unsolicited or ignored.

When the advice is related to things that affect me, then they are boundaries and then ignoring it has consequences. I had to learn this the hard way.

As long as there is attraction you might lead. When the attraction is gone, is like you were talking to a wall.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Man, I've seen many headline posts which weren't as useful or interesting as this conversation. I have nothing to add, but might record this conversation for a headline post (which I've promised myself not to do until I have 2 MLTR's burned in).

My unicorn never feigned weakness to gain resources from me, nor did she put herself in bad places.....I know this is dangerously close to pedestalizing but she's remarkable. She also took my advice seriously and either executed on it or modified it.

However, many women in my past have jerked on my emotions by showing weakness, real or not, to manipulate me into behaving the way they wanted me to. Further still, many women have ignored simple advice. These are serious red flags.

My perceived vulnerability has kept me in Monk Mode, and as I exit it, I'm still uninterested in women over 30. No doubt, younger women are hotter, but also far less likely to use my emotions against me. A woman my age (45) who has her shit far enough together would likely be uninterested in me. I'm the opposite of family minded.

Couple other things....now that my unicorn is off dating other guys, she reports back that men are just pathetic, needy as hell, and it's quite a turn off....this is quite consistent with TRP.

And.....I think she's still attracted, because unlike the boys who come here and say "....since swallowing the Red Pill last week..." I've been on a year long self improvement quest, starting from a pretty good place (if not, I'd never have had a brilliant smokeshow half my age on my arm). I've been lifting, upping my grooming & style, etc.

I even fucked her this past summer. During more sober times, we've talked sex....but in that instant, when she really didn't want to be seduced, in the immediate aftermath, she said I really need to fuck women my own age, implying that it's somewhat unfair to younger guys. It's like.....not my fucking problem, first of all, and secondly she's the one who got me not just hooked on younger women but believing it possible to seduce them. I mean.....I remember the day she was no longer less than half my age, but exactly half my age....between our birthdays, her 20th and my 40th.....we fucked to celebrate, so don't give me that shit lol.

[–]Merwebb 1 point2 points  (3 children)

She just made up and excuse to not be with you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Clearly you didn't read the whole comment. She's 20 years younger than I am and wants a family. She was from a conservative family and she used me to enter the mainstream world. Fair deal, from 40 to 44 I was fucking a girl in her early 20's. I was the tip of the spear for her. Whoever she marries (she's currently dating a Google engineer with a PhD who has 2 of the 3 6's, six pack & six figures, but since he's Indian and fawns over her she's unafraid of the pump 'n dump) her family will find him an upgrade over me.

Understand, my experience with her led me to TRP. This was a 4.5 year exercise in "she's not yours, it's just your turn" not to mention a host of other things.....a near branch swinging mid way through, plus brilliant women have supercharged hamsters, among many other TRP realities.

edit:

I've been lifting since she left. I was far to Beta, and she made that pretty clear. Never again.

[–]Merwebb 1 point2 points  (1 child)

That supercharged hamster is a beauty to behold

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To this day I get it spinning for shits & giggles every once in a while.

We went to the eclipse this past summer. It's amazing what a Red Pilled mindset can buy you. She went from a hardcore oneitis to a cool chick I hang out with when she's in town.

I could get very used to this lifestyle. I need to get the fuck out of Monk Mode...it's getting old. I slightly envy the young dudes who don't have 25 years of Disney relationship garbage built into their behavior patterns.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

To bow before the pussy to show affection. This can be applied to anything in that regard.

Buy drink? = Bow = Cuck
Wait for her to finish her point to show that you respect her while you would interrupt anyone else? = Bow = Cuck
Respecting the bullshit she says you don't belive in = Bow = Cuck

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You do everything for her except provide the penis in the relationship.

[–]Questionnaire7 3 points4 points  (8 children)

I shot you a pm about fitness nutrition a few months ago. Never heard back.

[–]FUCK_YEA_GLITTER 2 points3 points  (5 children)

Did u shoot him 30 bucks too?

[–]Questionnaire7 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I have seen no mention of payment anywhere

[–]FUCK_YEA_GLITTER -1 points0 points  (3 children)

Then why would he feel the need to help you? Nothing to gain

[–]Questionnaire7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the fuck would he feel the need to spend so much time posting on here? Though I do see your point. Ill find out quickly what the deal is when we speak.

[–]WolfofAnarchy -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Yeah, because fuck helping people for free.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (5 children)

This is a really good post. It's so easy to compromise your opinions in the public sphere, especially at work and around family. I still find it very hard (living in CT) to speak my mind at work when the 5 leftist fagoids who sit around me spill their mindless CNN indoctrination all day long - only because one of them is my boss. But emphatic rejection, as you call it, is indeed wisest under these circumstances. You get nowhere by arguing ideology with normies.

Try being red-pilled and having a leftist, SJW father. That's fun stuff.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 4 points5 points  (1 child)

First off don't shit where you eat.

Will this advance your career? Could it quickly end it? Then why risk your livelihood over "correcting" two-bit, low-information dipshits? There is literally nothing to gain except a brief dopamine rush of calling some losers out.

Second, workplace requires a lot more diplomacy, tact, and political maneuvering. I find the best strategy is to innocuously chip away at their belief systems to reveal a) logical weakness, b) cognitive dissonance while maintaining an air of plausible deniability.

To me that is the best, most productive way to scratch that itch.

For example, if they're chatting about the latest CNN fake news I might say:

"I heard their ratings are way down these days... Probably mostly from nursing homes." <laugh>

"What's with the Russia investigation, have they found anything yet?" <quixotically>

"Russian Ads on Facebook?" <pull out calculator to show it amounts to 0.01% of campaign spending. Chuckle.>

if they engage I just laugh and disengage.

[–]BELIEVEINGODJohn812 5 points6 points  (0 children)

logical

Liberals don't use logic, they use emotion. The best cure for the liberal mind is to ignore them, it'll hurt their feelings and they'll shift their political position in order to trigger and bait the right into paying them more attention.

[–]nazis_are_socialists 1 point2 points  (1 child)

My dad is a lot of things, but thank god one of them is not a PC left wing SJW faggot

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reading this was just what I needed to tighten my game and allow my inner asshole to assert itself.

[–]nujjj80 1 points1 points [recovered]

Totally agree with this post. Sometimes I think that one of the hardest parts of swallowing the red pill is that you gotta admit to yourself that now you're by yourself. Before, you probably thought you weren't, of course you still were, but you might have believed in this collective "goodness" and that you need to come in good terms with others to live your life, at least I did. To be truly and deeply an empath with the blue pill world is being awaken. You don't need to convince anyone of anything. Your biggest gift to the rest of humanity is your example. If others came along and want to ask shit, be open, but also be smart. You don't need to break anybody's world, you just need to believe in yourself, deeply, not waiting for your teachers qualifications, not anymore.

[–]Merwebb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im dealing with the "not needing to convince anyone of anything" part.

I do get help in the important stuff, but for the rest is just me opening my path

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I like the post about being called an asshole for following TRP.

I don't think doing what you described (emphatic rejection) is being an asshole. I think it gets you called an asshole.

But I liked this post as well as that one, FWIW.

[–]lopsidedlucky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Being called an asshole is a good thing. Usually means you're making progress.

[–]DailyChupa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Truth is radical not democratic. Soooooo fucking relevant to today's society.

[–]huge_gap 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Refreshing and re-focuses me. Thanks.

[–]shipintbrief 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck you, man. clicks upvote

[–]biggerbetterjobs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can see eye to eye here and understand the world for what it is. We're all capable of rational and logical discussion, can agree to disagree on things, ultimately what we're doing here is seeking answers to the truth.

The blue pill world however is different. They refuse to submit to allah, God, or simply the mechanics of the natural world. They cry about climate change yet continue to eat mcdonalds, drive cars, and keep buying plastic junk. They address income inequality, yet promote a victim mindset rather than an empowering mindset that encourages people to work harder for what they want out of this life. People cry about romantic partners not sticking around yet bring nothing to the table to make it worth sticking around, or perhaps they reject those romantic partners who will tolerate them for who they are thinking "I can probably do better". Ultimately the blue pill mentality is complete selfishness.

Like a sinner or an infidel.. There is simply no helping them until they accept truth and submit to allah. Until that step is taken, they will continue to live in their catch 22 cycle of self-fulfilling prophecies of "oppression" Like wondering why you get hollered at when you're wearing a miniskirt and crop top while walking through a majority black/latino working class, poor, under-educated neighborhood at night where the only "triggers" known there result in a loud clap and a body on the sidewalk bleeding out.

Personally, I just play along with their bullshit. I have no reason or desire to challenge their foolish naive beliefs. They reject 2000+ years of wisdom recorded by the greatest minds of past ages because "feels". They can't accept that their feelings and mindset might need some correction in order to harmoniously exist with the world.

I have taken gender/radical politics classes at an extremely liberal university and received A's in classes just by playing along with their games. I was in one discussion based lecture class (very small- 5 students) where I was the only male. The rest of the class didn't even give a fuck to do the readings and ironically, the only male in the class room is having an educated discussion on feminism and hegemonic orders with the professor.

There's something particularly satisfying at owning bloopers at their own philosophies. Most of these women don't even read this so-called "academic" feminist theory.. They just share memes about how they hate men and have penis envy because their simply spiritually dead and lost under the message(s) of false prophets.

So I say play their game. Own them at it, maybe once they see you as "safe" because you think the same way they do, you will gain trust amongst the herd and can then slowly step by small step guide them toward the truth and away from their snowflake "I feel it so it's right!" mentality.

[–]WolfofAnarchy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gotta say, I've often disagreed with you and thought you were nuts, but this is a really solid post.

[–]Chaos_pancake 0 points1 point  (2 children)

There are no half measures here. In other words if you're making posts about acting like an asshole without being an asshole...

can someone explain what the problem with this is ? a lot of guys get confused by "asshole" as women define the term and "asshole" as men define it. Is it not helpful to point out the distinction?

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The distinction doesn't matter because both the male and female definition is a byproduct of the Anglo West's politicaly correct egalitarian ideology. Both should be rejected.

The Red Pill is a rejection of egalitarianism. It doesn't matter what the weak think about the strong.

To use a metaphor it doesn't matter what flavor pie Diabetes Debbie ate, she shouldn't fucking eat pie she has diabetes.

[–]Chaos_pancake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok i think i get it, so then what definition of asshole do you go by? if any at all? just trying to understand.

[–]Redpillandrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Postmodern art painted with 9mm onto a brick wall. Anyone who admires their executioners is bat shit crazy.

that sounds pretty cool, tho. Gangsta Art

[–]CapitalDragons 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm not really concerned about anybody's concrete or complete ideology. Redpill helps me predict outcomes more accurately and effectively. It exposed many biases in my own thinking that were leading me down bad paths. That being said, no way of thinking is all inclusive. RP applies to more cases than not but just because I don't become your bitch doesn't mean I'm BP. Be your own man

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who said anything about becoming my bitch?

[–]FWA1o48 0 points1 point  (3 children)

It might not be best to overthink the red pill as a metaphor. If you really take it at face value, it works. If you try to really read into the matrix reference, it doesn't support your case because the red pill in the matrix is most probably an illusion of choice, just like the blue pill, as the world in which the rebellion against the machines exists is also probably a simulation. Now, applying that to game would be interesting, but I don't believe it fits well with TRP's central mentality.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The Red Pill itself is an illusion of choice because all systems including our present ideological thought system need to be challenged in order to adapt and become something else. It's all very Hagle. Just tell me how postmodernist you wanna go and shorty I will take you there.

[–]SecretlySnape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GLO is back, finally. thank you for your words, this sub has been a lot worse since we have last heard from you bro

[–]macaroon18 -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

Alot of words mate, just say 'its not what she says, but how she says it and why...'

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Looks like the Normies are here with their shitty comprehension and lack of appreciation for nuance.

[–]macaroon18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do appreciate your content GLO, this was the first post of yours I read and it didn't really land right away. I'm sure you can appreciate new readers and voices of dissent

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Intellectual inferior spotted. /u/PaperStreetVilla, ima give this one to you.

[–]Hviterev -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"oh that's a good article for once.. Oh that's GLO, of course."

[–]Reld720 1 points1 points [recovered]

This is why people don't take TRP seriously. Then again you're likely to say that everyone who isn't red pilled is an idiot. It's painfully close minded.

[–]ModeratorPaperStreetVilla[M] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

gone

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And thus The rejection of the Blue Pill this thread talks about was demonstrated by our glorious mod.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 8 points9 points  (3 children)

people don't take TRP seriously.

Clueless Bloops. Not "people." I know because I was one of them for a long, long time. Once you realize and accept the emotion based "logic"and the universal self protective nature of ALL women you start to see the truth.

We don't just use the Matrix analogy becaue it is all or nothing. We use it because it is a total and complete transformation of your life and how you see the world. When you take the Red Pill you wake up in the REAL world. You see the bodies and the chaos and the despair and you see the reasons for all of the problems. If you have not had a moment that stopped you on a dime and left you breathless then you are probably still plugged into the Matrix.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The feeling you are talking about is literally 'Cognitive Dissonance'. Not mentioning it to demonstrate the smarts. Simply so that anyone reading can read more into what the feeling of finally letting go of Blue Pill land will be experienced like.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I bought into it totally and was depressed/desperate after a 5 year LTR ended followed up with an extreme oneitis rejecting me after two dates for acting like a blue pill beta fag.

I'm now nihilistic, apathetic and sincerely don't give a fuck or have any hope for the future. I mostly fixed my back through PT and started lifting again, working on my own shit and reading red pill books to learn more and improve my game. Does the nihilism go away? It's only been a month, but I feel like I take joy in nothing anymore since discovering the red pill.

[–]nazis_are_socialists 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes it does. It may take a while but eventually you'll learn to start loving women again. This time, for how they actually are and not for how you wish them to be in your blue pill fantasy.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone who's actually swallowed the red pill cares.