Building PowerCollege is a breeding ground for blue pill cucks (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by [deleted]

Encounter One

Picture this. You’re in your first semester of college studying business. The subject and the lecture are fairly tame; then again, it’s a first-year subject that you could breeze through without spending too much time on.

The next slide pops up and your eyes are immediately diverted to the last line of text, which is coloured differently from the rest of the text on the slide: “Most CEOs are male, white, well-educated and from rich families.” You don’t think much of it because it’s true. Yet what your professor discusses next leaves your head shaking in pity.

Despite what it already says on the screen, the professor still asks the characteristics of most CEOs. The audience calls out and lists all the traits on screen. The professor agrees and taps his clicker to the next slide. In front of the whole lecture theatre, the ratio of male and female directors of the top five companies are presented. Naturally, the ratios vary from 2:1 (males and females respectively) to 4:1. Out of seemingly nowhere, he drops this bombshell:

“Are white males from elite families better leaders?”

One blue pilled cuck in the front row says that the industry favours their bias and promotes them accordingly. He agrees and amplifies.

“There is a social bias at play which, despite the law regarding racial and gender discrimination, tends to be biased in favour of people with these attributes. Not because they’re necessarily better leaders, but because it’s so deeply embedded within our assumptions, attitudes and values that it’s difficult to overcome.”

There’s an image on the screen depicting women in the floor below an executive meeting room, and the floor is obviously made of glass. He explains the definition of the glass ceiling and how women cannot progress beyond a certain point when climbing the corporate ladder.

Then the rest of the lecture proceeds without any more feminist propaganda forced down your throat.

Encounter Two

A few weeks later, you’re sitting in an accounting lecture. Your other subject was a left-wing management subject which most of the females in your course would major in. So, you relax your shoulders knowing that this subject will be void of transmitting feminist sludge into the subconscious of your fellow students, right?


Midway through the lecture, your professor minimizes the PowerPoint and brings up a photo of a woman in her sixties.

“Can anyone tell me who this is?” he asks the lecture room, consisting of around two hundred people. Nobody answers, except for you who reads the search query at the top of the screen.

You call out her name, and the professor immediately thanks you. Then he explains to the audience more about her, saying how she is an accountant, a director at a large bank, an executive at the college and most importantly, a woman. To quote the professor:

“This is a remarkable woman who has fought sexism and every barrier in her way to be in the position she currently is in now. I admire her ad infinitum, and there's no reason why every female in this room shouldn't have the opportunity to become an accountant.”

After that brief intermission, he continues where he left off.


Some would ask why one wouldn’t intervene mid-lecture and debate with the professors. After these ordeals, I was considering emailing my first professor the article written by a female Harvard economist explaining the myth of the wage gap. And I thought of speaking to my second professor and explaining, since he was such a firm supporter of equality, that a highly effective male role model could also be shown on screen.

But I didn’t, because of Law 38: Think As You Like But Behave Like Others.

Based on my earlier readings of Carnegie’s ‘How to Win Friends and Influence People’, there really was no point in trying to change somebody’s mind. Ironically, feminism has become so entrenched within our social fabric that it has become difficult to resist.

There might have been other redpilled men who may have spoken to or thanked me after the lecture if I had stood up for my beliefs, but I highly doubt it. I weighed up the consequences and decided that it simply wasn’t worth stirring controversy when I was still new at the college. Hell, it didn’t even work for a four-year Harvard graduate with a PhD at Google. After those lectures I realised my academic goals: graduate from this university as soon as possible and resist every feminist indoctrination I’m exposed to with every fibre of my body.

TL;DR: On two separate occasions within my first year of college, my professors blatantly promote feminism, the wage gap and the glass ceiling in unjustified circumstances.

[–]snarkcommenter 1 points1 points [recovered]

My manager sends out emails from 6 am till 6 pm most days. I know he works until 9 pm each night and he works weekends. He also responds to emails when he's on vacation.

As a male I don't want to work that hard. There is no glass ceiling stopping me, or any women. Just an incredible demand on anyone's time to be a manager , and a very small number of positions.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 84 points85 points  (24 children)

I was an NCO in the military. I rarely had a day off because with ten subordinates and only two worked with me on the same shift, plus a bunch of other duties, I had to be there well after my shift ended at 0700 and my actual days off were taken up by shit during the day. Say something about it and you get more shit to do. Do an excellent job with minimal resources and you're expected to do it that way every time. Your guys get in trouble, you are in trouble even if you were deployed and haven't worked with them in a year.

The more people you have under you the more work it is, and more responsibilities. The better you are at it the faster you move up in some places, in the civilian world it's all about kissing the right ass. You can be incompetent and get promoted if you suck the right cock in the corporate world.

[–]red_matrix 50 points51 points  (2 children)

You can be incompetent and get promoted if you suck the right cock in the corporate world.

You nailed it. Corporate America is revolting.

[–]EdAnt 20 points21 points  (1 child)

It took me way too long to realize you meant revolting as in "revulsion" and not revolting as in "having a revolution".

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

This is one benefit of start ups. We've gone from 5 people to about 22 in our department in the last 3 years. We have let go of incompetent people. If we had not, we would not have succeeded.

I'm lucky that I get to do varied and important work without too much corporate overhead. Of course, it's trending that way. At least I have a hand in designing it.

Definitely getting somewhat restless.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Doing a great job with minimal resources is actually the worst thing you can do stress wise lol

[–]RedPimpin 6 points7 points  (2 children)

i cant speak for the military, but generally i learned that in the 'civilian world' it works like this:

if you have people under you, all you have to do is tell them what to do and manage those people, then all you do is sit back and earn more money than them because you have 'responsibility'

the higher up you are, the less work you do and the more money you earn

[–]Kingern 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the higher up you are, the less work you do and the more money you earn

I think this is often in direct correlation to the size of the company

I used to work at a small-middle sized Financial company where the commission-based investment guys would frequently outearn the salaried Managing Director who we'd frequently get emails from at 3 in the morning after four hours sleep when he'd gotten out of bed to take a piss and decided that it was actually the perfect time to start his working day

[–]RedPilledGodEmperor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That does make a lot of sense. What I will add is that many times, you do have to possess more knowledge when you are higher up and before you get to that position, you had to do the "grunt work"

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (13 children)

I'm a recently discharged military officer.

My military experience seems to have been the exact opposite of yours. Just wondering: when did you serve?

[–]ImHerWonderland 18 points19 points  (12 children)

You were an officer. He was an NCO. Two completely different things, of course your experience differed.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (11 children)

My experience in the military was this: a bunch of whiny babies with corporate-like gender training. Tons of obviously false allegations of sexual assault and women being treated far better than me. Basically, women could get away with murder.

Sounds like the corporate world except you're trapped there. And it wasn't a much different experience for myself vs. NCOs that I worked with.

I was simply asking him when he served because many of the older guys that I served with told me that things were WAY different even 10 years ago. I served in active duty for 4 years during this decade.

[–]DoobieEx 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I served in the Navy from '07 - '11 and it changed a lot in just 4 years. I can only imagine what It's like today.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Yeah that's pretty much what I heard. I was in from 2012-2016. Most people told me that there was a massive change that started around 2009. This seemed to be the beginning of Obama using the military as a social experiment.

It's pretty horrific now. Not a place I would ever send a son to harden them up.

[–]DoobieEx 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I saw the biggest change around late 2010 through 2011. We were deployed through '09 and most of '10 on back to back deployments. It was rough, but it most definitely hardened me up.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Depends on where you go. In 2010-2011, there was way more combat than there is now. My deployment was really relaxed, less stressful than my stateside job.

Unfortunately, I witnessed the aftermath of a false sexual assault allegation while deployed. That was one of two allegations that I witnessed (closely) in my 4 year military career.

This is the new military, my friend. That and paying for sex change operations for trannies.

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its really just a matter of the quantity of years before the US goes fully broke and needs to pull its military back in dozens of locations. They'll certainly rebrand it as the kinder gentler thing in order make it less embarrassing. Then it will be full of all sorts of miscreants and playing weird internal games. Still even then its all quite irrelevant since nobody would attack us in our sphere through conventional means.

[–]ImHerWonderland 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Yeah ten years ago in the army I've been told the culture was completely different. Around 9/11, it was a complete 180 from what it is now. Watch what words you use, be accepting of everyone, etc. It's a giant political hugbox now. They were even going to compromise unit integrity by allowing transgender in until Trump struck it down. This is from only 7 months ago.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

When I was on the way out in early 2016, they were not only about to allow trannies in the military, but they were discussing paying for their sex changes out of taxpayer money.


Sounds like Trump put an end to that, thank goodness.

[–]ImHerWonderland 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I believe it was very very close. We had a battalion briefing on it, and then a week later Trump stopped it completely. But yeah, the army refused to pay for braces but would pay to cut your dick off.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this was a constant complaint from my friends when I was active duty.

No one that I knew in the military supported this, even the most liberal idiots.

[–]2Dmva100 47 points48 points  (25 children)

Easiest way to identify Blue Pill wage cucks. You said it all. Field supervisor in my career field is the same way and is the most hardcore Beta I've seen to date. He dipped out of a meeting last week because his wife called and 'I'm sorry I gotta take this or she's gonna kill me.'

[–]morexel 23 points24 points  (5 children)

Taking a family call over a work meeting is in no way beta. What the fuck.

[–]WastedPotential 18 points19 points  (3 children)

The "I'm sorry" and "or she's gonna kill me" are.

[–]morexel 6 points7 points  (2 children)

She's going to kill me could be a joke or satire. You guys read so much into what is and isn't alpha that I'm beginning to wonder who really posts here.

[–]xenigala 4 points5 points  (1 child)

It is really sad to see how many men are dominated by their woman. Imagine if a woman "joked" that her husband would physically hurt her if she didn't immediately take his phone call. Men call also be psychologically abused.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a woman took a call because "my husband's gonna kill me," I wouldn't think anything of it. I'd assume she's joking.

[–]Shaman6624 11 points12 points  (5 children)

She's gonna kill me is often said as a joke though.

[–]whuttupfoo 6 points7 points  (4 children)

There’s a truth in every joke.

[–]Shaman6624 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Yeah or it's funny because it's absurd and everyone knows men are stronger. Saying "she's gonna kill me" about your wife is the same as saying it about a kitten.

[–]Aktiv8r 1 point2 points  (2 children)

You aren't very powerful while you sleep. Haha

[–]Shaman6624 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yeah ok a kitten can also theoretically kill you by biting the vein in your neck. What you mean when you joke about she'll kill me is that she will be upset. And in this case it might be used as an excuse to get out of a work meeting by using your wife as reason (which is generally socially accepted)

[–]Aktiv8r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get the context in which it was used. Also there are accounts of women who have actually done this, so it's not theoretical at all.

[–]Reefer-eyed_Beans -1 points0 points  (12 children)

You should stop saying "cuck" it's cringy as fuck. The only reason this even became an insult is because people are too stupid to know what it means.

[–]fromthecrypt8 5 points6 points  (10 children)

You're wrong about the insult part. People should still view it as an insult given its real meaning. Cuck is short for cuckold. A cuckold is a man whose wife commits adultery. How is being a cuck not an insult?

Even though she's never yours, its only your turn, being cheated on with another man is the epidomy of devaluation and humiliation of a man.

[–]wendysNO1wcheese 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Someone should how to delegate some work.

Here’s what I’ve come to realize in my 15+years in the work force.

The higher up you are, the less real work you actually do.

People always find something to bitch about with their job no matter what

The people that always say they work super hard do not work super hard. The people that always seem busy when you are around are not busy when you leave. I’ve found it extremely entertaining over the years to hear people straight up lie right to my face about how much they do and how hard what they do is.

[–]whuttupfoo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is real. I didn’t know until I got hired for something big. I basically brought on someone else to do the dirty work and made them pay for it. I worked like 3 days and made $12k, he worked on it for 3 weeks. When I say “I worked” I mean I did the fun part. My role “Lead Developer” where I actually did no development work because I didn’t know how, made him do it instead.

[–]1empatheticapathetic 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My boss is the same. And my brother. They have wasted huge chunks of their life being so committed to one frankly unfulfilling thing.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 17 points18 points  (1 child)

As a male I don't want to work that hard.

Frankly, it's compulsive. I don't idle well. I get agitated if I don't have something to do. The other side of it is that the clock doesn't drive me. I'll show up for meetings or events, but other than that I live on my terms.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I have to stave off boredom to. No one disagrees in being productive, just the specific ways in manifests.

I don't want to work that hard either. I do want to be engaged in things that improve my life

[–]Lighthouse_77 7 points8 points  (2 children)

This is exactly what needs to stop being overlooked. It’s not that you work at a job for however long, and get promoted for tenure and your job gets easier and pays more.

What’s overlooked is that you need to excel and show initiative to get promoted and once you get there, you have to work even harder. Most of these positions require a near life sacrifice to keep. They are extremely demanding and require working smarter to get everything done correctly in time. I’ve met a few women in those positions and they are ruthless and widely feared/ respected. A job like that takes a toll on you emotionally and you gotta be tough as nails to withstand it.

[–]whuttupfoo 6 points7 points  (1 child)

And at the same time you’re still someone’s bitch. Just a cog in the CEO’s money making machine, exchanging hours of your life for a small percentage of his money.

Work in that company long enough to learn how it works, and start your own business. Don’t get stuck trying to “rise” in a company.

[–]Lighthouse_77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. Even the CEO has to appeal to the shareholders. Starting your own business is great but you’ll need capital. You’ll also need to work your ass off even more after work to get it off the ground.

[–]biggerbetterjobs 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah my aunt is in a similar position to your manager. Her work is practically her lifestyle. She's in a pretty high up position working in government bureaucracy. I've never heard her utter anything ultra feminist or anti-male in her life nor has she ever expressed any notion of being held back by the patriarchy or whatever.. She just put in the work and succeeded.

Meanwhile I see chicks with great jobs on IG playing hookie from work and going out to brunch with the girls just because they get a paid day off. But fuck, at the end of the day who am I to really judge.

[–]bigboilerdawg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same for my boss. And his female boss. And her boss. Above that is a VP, who reports to the CEO. They never stop working.

[–]thrownawaysince1997 1 points1 points [recovered]

It's also a hunting ground for two types of males.

"Rapists" and Sugar daddies.

Red pilled 61 days flat after the first pack of wolves ate me alive in a police "investigation." No justice for the innocent.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 109 points110 points  (10 children)

sugar daddies are huge this days for young college women. Girls are basically prostitutes these days and have the audacity to shame us for trying to game the old fashioned way.

[–]Omnibrad 104 points105 points  (4 children)

They have always been prostitutes.

30 years ago they got a lot more for their sex. I saw one UK woman get a cool half billion divorce settlement. Now they get some money for schooling. The schooling teaches them they are strong independent women who don't need no man.

These are levels of irony that make the mind boggle.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 39 points40 points  (3 children)

The schooling teaches them they are strong independent women who don't need no man.

as if women needed more reasons to be absolutely out of their minds. they're like little kids who run around pretending to be superheros.

[–]plainposter 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Scary part is, we're all little kids running around pretending to be superheros.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 5 points6 points  (1 child)

maybe you are and if that's the case stop fucking around and sort yourself out

[–]2Dmva100 17 points18 points  (4 children)

Sad and funny but true. Some will be susceptible to shaming tactics if you play it right. Got a free dinner and a BJ the other night because I pressured flipped a girl about being transactional with sex and I saw her as 'hookerish.' Ate it up.

[–]Potomato 13 points14 points  (0 children)

after a actually fun date i had in awhile she kind of just left me when i took her home, i was like whatever and left, about a week later she texts me and wants to hang out and i decided to go for the kill, we grab some fast food and on the way back to her place she says she needs to pay her 300 ticket for suspended license, i instantly knew where it was going and she kept talking about it and i just ignored, finally we are chilling with a movie, i go in to start kissing and grab that ass she shut me down so quick and harsh, i was getting all the signals too, way out of left field, she was a 5 so i thought it was easy pickings, nope. so i get up and just leave, she texts me as i get in my car, ''i need some money for my ticket and then we can do something'', sent her back a "lol'' and GTFO.

The thing was this all came out of nowhere really the first date she was super cool and i was having a decent time, now she though in her mind that i was about to hand cash for pussy, like she did not feel any shame doing that. these women are changing more and more.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 15 points16 points  (2 children)

haha you're SMV must be higher than mine bro. I shit you not I said something similar to this chick and she told me I had the mentality of a 15 year old. Teachers are banging 14 year olds these days not like it would matter.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 11 points12 points  (1 child)

And do you notice that it's always female teachers? WTF?!?! The constant "you-go-girl" social validation has seriously warped their already irrational little minds. They've come to believe their own bullshit - that their entitled and that nothing can stop them.

[–]red_matrix 28 points29 points  (3 children)

I heard over 50% of the seeking arrangement girls are college girls. But it's okay because it's female empowerment. Progress...LOL.

[–]2Dmva100 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They don't need no man...but they love a good Daddy! Dick Daddy, or Daddy Dollars!

[–]Dragon_Garoo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

College girls. Going to the school of hard cock$. lol.

[–]whuttupfoo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What I don’t understand is how that shit is legal. It’s prostitution.

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I life adjacent to one college campus and go to another. At 45, I'm no Sugar Daddy because I won't pay for it.....so, more of a "Rapist" I guess.

I recently got kicked out of one of the local bars, really more of a nightclub, for no apparent reason. I think it was because I was there to chase tail, and the girls needed to be protected.

The previous time I was there, I got them all dancing.....they would have anyway, but I let the charge and jammed with everybody. I walked off the dance floor and a girl I don't recall ever seeing, never mind talking to, grabbed me and started making out with me.

I think these girls know what the fuck they're doing.

[–]Reformed65 51 points52 points  (7 children)

I go to Sixth Form and majority of the students, even the white ones, are playing the "white old male are evil!" cards but the most disgusting part is that one of the teachers, who's the head the Politics department, feeds on that when teaching us politics.

She'll go "oh this news just goes to show the privileges of white males."

So I wonder what universities have in store.

[–]red_matrix 17 points18 points  (4 children)

The University system is rapidly changing before our eyes. It used to be a place of radical ideas and feminism has always ran wild on campus - but it was always contained to its own area. Now it's been uncaged, Pandora's Box has been opened - this is new territory and anything is possible at this point.

[–]Sonic324 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Exactly. We've crossed the threshold of what was once considered social degeneracy into brand new territory. In 20 years, what are opinions on topics like transgenderism going to be? How much further can the left drive our social values before something actually breaks from our well established and biological social norms?

[–]red_matrix 5 points6 points  (1 child)

We're definitely moving towards a 1984ish thought control/Ministry of Truth era. As long as college kids keep begging for more authoritarian rule, this will be our fate unless a massive change in the public happens. The problem lies in Silicon Valley - they now control the social narrative, and they seem hell bent on squashing any dissent.

[–]plainposter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Silicon Valley, China, Korea, Russia, fuck man there's a few thousand billionaires all pushing their own agendas, fighting for global power and we're all the casualties..

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

can confirm, my uni has changed rapidly in terms of the SJW insanometer from about maybe 10-20% about 3 years ago all the way up to about 75% today. Still not nearly as crazy as some campuses in the area, but Im glad I got out before it got any worse.

[–]re3al 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Depends on the college, but I was inundated with that shit left right and centre.

[–]wanderer779 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you don't care about your grade you can have some fun pointing out how well Jews are doing and ascribing it to in group preference.

[–]victor_knight 93 points94 points  (4 children)

According to a couple of college professor friends, a lot of college chicks these days are willing to do just about anything (other than actually study) for a good grade.

[–]red_matrix 38 points39 points  (3 children)

Some things never change. It's the oldest profession for a reason.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 12 points13 points  (2 children)

I just wished they acted more professional.

[–]red_matrix 4 points5 points  (1 child)

You can't expect 'kids' to act like professionals.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 2 points3 points  (0 children)

then hoeing is not really a profession it's arts n crafts

[–]TheOriginalWasBetter 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Of course, it's a big way in which the government and those who support it to maintain and increase their power.

People raised in intact families tend to be much more self-sufficient and more intellectually thoughtful and open because the aren't completely brainwashed by the government. Getting men and women to be at odds with one another helps reduce the number of marriages and families, and increases the number of people needing government support and who go through government schools without a mother or father to teach them how to think critically about what they're being taught.

Unfortunately the professor and students don't care what you think, so speaking up won't change their mind on anything. Best case scenario they just make fun of you, worst case they fail you. If you really want to change someone's mind you need to get to know them first and engaged them 1 on 1 or in small groups. The classroom is their safe space where everyone thinks the same as they do and even when they're wrong they're still right.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Counterpoint (and certainly not the rule):

In college, I learned about Nietzsche and to despise a life of contemplation, holding up the life of action instead.

Also, mathematics and finance.

But even my admitted Marxist Political Science professor was a hard core model builder. As long as the model was thought through and the issue analyzed in light of it, she would give full credit.

But the multiple of anecdote is not data.

And fuck accounting, they don't even know what net income is.

[–]ramjaz 25 points26 points  (4 children)

Had a similar experience in my Psychology class just a bit over a month ago. The dumbass professor talked about two different women who are "honorable" in psychology. Wanna know who they are? One was the first to get a PhD in Psychology, and the other was the first female president of some random psychology lab or whatever.

Useless information that was ALSO on the test! Seriously, what fucking significance do those two bitches have besides being the first female to do something in Psychology? We briefly touched on Freud, Skinner, Maslow, and many other reputable Psychologists when we should've learned about Freud's experiments or Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.

Hilariously enough, I was at a cafe talking about this exact situation with a SO of mine, and two bitches were looking at me as if I had offended them.

Real-Life example of how pussified Western culture is.

[–]plainposter 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I caused so much ruckus in my psychology class it was atounding. Had a triggered girl leave the class one time after I held my frame and wouldn't back down. A girl screamed at me once. I always disagreed with gender pronouns etc etc propaganda and all that. Multiple occasions of all the girls all saying i'm wrong etc etc.. never ever backed down.. it was like stockholm syndrome I missed a couple classes and everyone was quietly happy I was back hahahaha they asked for my input anytime something controversial came up.. hold frame gents, hold frame even if your life is on the line. actually, especially if your life is on the line, that way you die with dignity.

[–]2Dmva100 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Should raised your hand and starting speaking without waiting for him to call on you and say:

'Wow she's the first woman to do that? About time! How about praising them after they've done something a man hasn't done?'

[–]ramjaz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If I could go back in time I would definitely do that.

[–]MGTOWIAN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't ever mention the need for females to invade male space, that's sexist.

[–]hawkeaglejesus 21 points22 points  (0 children)

[–]1GreenPiller 59 points60 points  (11 children)

It's funny, I sometimes drive by college campuses and all I see are skinny nu male faggots, fat feminists and hot chicks. Makes me wonder who's fucking the hot chicks.

[–]TunedtoPerfection 65 points66 points  (9 children)

Guys like me who attend 1 class a semester for the tax break and could give a fuck all about getting above a C because I already have a career and no one asks about your GPA when you have 5+ years of top of your field experience.

[–]_vend7u 22 points23 points  (5 children)

Wait? Why do you go to college then? Sounds like a huge waste of money

[–]cr7stianoronaldo 31 points32 points  (1 child)

Not if your company pays for it

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 20 points21 points  (0 children)

this. I essentially got a 25k bonus from my org, which I could write off in taxes

[–]plainposter 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To fuck the hot chicks... you totally missed the header there hahaha

[–]themanwhosaid 1 points1 points [recovered]

Hey, how many women does it take to change a light-bulb?

Answer: Who needs a light-bulb when you've got a glass ceiling?

But, nah really don't worry. Think of it this way: This sub has over 200 thousand subs across the English speaking world. It seems to grow by about 100 thousand every two years. It may not seem like much right now, but one day like minded people might be a viable sociopolitical force.

[–]WhySoRuff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

like minded people might be a viable sociopolitical force.

This will never happen. Women will congregate but men are out conquering solo, they don't have time to meet in groups with other men that they are literally in competition with.

[–]ThatOneDrunkUncle 72 points73 points  (15 children)

The rabbit hole goes so deep in western universities. I was naturally alpha growing up. Captain of sports teams, new girls every few weeks, alpha father. I came into college a big swinging dick and crushed my first year. Then I took the mandatory "diversity" classes and little by little my balls disappeared. I bought into progressivism and feminism wholeheartedly. I felt bad for the way I treated women in the past, like fucking them and stuff. I pissed away 3+ years of my life, turning down sex from double digit women because I thought they were just making a mistake sleeping around, and I didn't want to be a part of it. Cringe. If it weren't for TRP, I would still be jerking off pining away for girls who "would come around eventually" Fuck universities.

[–]re3al 42 points43 points  (3 children)

I had the mandatory diversity training too. They try to heap shame on male sexuality wherever they can, and worship female sexuality. The hypocrisy is astounding.

[–]ThatOneDrunkUncle 39 points40 points  (1 child)

It's ludicrous. I couldn't graduate without 3 feminism based classes and one racial diversity class. For a law and business degree. They're echo chambers that shout you down for having any dissenting opinion. I can't believe I actually had to pay to be told how much of a scumbag I am for being a white male. But jokes on me for believing it.

[–]britishcow 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Holy shit dude. My University has none of those requirements. I even had a female management teacher shut down a girl trying to say the masculine vs feminine dimension of Hofstede was sexist.

[–]plainposter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it's basically a brainwashing propaganda center.. like the nazi concentration camps.. i was taking a shit the other day and there's literally a poster inside the door of the bathroom stall showing two dudes half naked, and it's all about "saying no". so basically if one guy wants to fuck the other guy and the other guy doesn't want to, he should say no. I'M LIKE -- WHERE THE FUCK IS THE NORMAL SEX?? WHERE'S THE GUY AND GIRL?? it's the gay agenda dude i swear to god. there's a rainbow crosswalk on campus too.. seriously

[–]jewishsupremacist88 12 points13 points  (3 children)

This is why we call you goyim.

[–]plainposter 1 points1 points [recovered]

We have almost eliminated the goyim.. we are close.

[–]Sonic324 1 point2 points  (1 child)

How did you every buy into the feminist bullshit if you were alpha before? Generally curious; going to University as a beta I knew what they taught was bullshit. It's so illogical and ass backwards it's amazing people get sucked in

[–]2awalt_cupcake 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He was a natural which implies he was alpha by upbringing and habit; not by his own reasoning. Uni threw a few curve balls into his social script and he went off the rails.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 23 points24 points  (5 children)

You’re in your first semester of college studying business.

Stay in school, but be aware that they've largely stopped teaching people how to run businesses and instead kinda teach people how to use debt facilities to stay afloat.

the professor still asks the characteristics of most CEOs.

Except for Fortune 200 companies, people greatly overrate the power and compensation of most CEOs. The vast majority of them are stand-ins for the shareholders and investors. People like the idea of kings. This is just another romanticized powerful king to them.

Then he explains to the audience more about her, saying how she is an accountant, a director at a large bank, an executive at the college and most importantly, a woman.

I look forward to her doing the "Lehman Walk of Shame" out of the building with a box of her belongings during the next debt implosion. Just because you hold a position doesn't mean can actually do it. SJW fucktards focus on titles, not accomplishments. Like so, how did Marissa work out for Yahoo? It just took some well placed blowjobs at GOOG to get her that gig.

[–]2Dmva100 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Let's not forget the musician at equifax either.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the idea that the pay of the next level of management is really just there to motivate those below.

[–]plainposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right. "People like the idea of kings" SUCH a true statement. They need a leader figure.. when in reality they're never the ones actually in power.. it's always the more sinister dude behind the scenes manipulating the king for his own benefit

[–]Quigley61 0 points1 point  (0 children)


A couple women from my uni got these high flying jobs and they can't even do the basics of the role. They got employed just to meet the diversity qouta and to help fight "inequality".

[–]RealMikeHawk 14 points15 points  (2 children)

3 must do's for college:
1. Join a top tier fraternity (if your school has greek life)
2. Focus on yourself (grades and fitness mainly)
3. Don't get a GF

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are there any alternatives where frats just dont exist?

[–]HobbesTheBrave 24 points25 points  (5 children)

“Most CEOs are male, white, well-educated and from rich families.”

Go to a better university.

If they don't do the math on why 'Most CEOs are ...', then what are you doing there?

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (3 children)

This is cultural Marxism. Almost every single university in the US is like this, it's hard to escape.

[–]HobbesTheBrave 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Then find a good one. Or get into a trade.

Why the fuck aren't you dropping out of that hellhole, if they think it's a bad thing? Why the fuck are you there, if not for a good, sane, classical western education? If you're merely trying to get laid, get your tinder in order.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I'm not at University right now. Actually went to trade school for a semester but it wasn't for me. Probably will go to UH for mechanical engineering or the Air Force first then engineering. Not sure yet.

[–]HobbesTheBrave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good thinking. Hopefully, you'll understand my choice of words, for the sake of everyone else.

I'd recommend men to avoid every university where courses in feminism and other bullshit is mandatory.

Because men vote with their money on good products, with their dicks on hot girls, and likewise, they avoid universities which make feminism mandatory.

[–]plainposter 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yup. Your university should be teaching you how to become a white male CEO with wealth, not shaming them. You're in a university funded by some institution with an agenda -- learn the necessary bits and gtfo of there asap. Find a better environment.

[–]plainposter 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Wow. Good work. You mentioned two very powerful books that have changed the way I think about interactions with other people for good. Thank you for posting this, I appreciate your efforts very much.

I have noticed the same thing you have; that most colleges are promoting this agenda. I just pray that every person, male or female, grows to be the best at their passion and change this broken world for the better. That's all we can do. "Enjoy the decline" seems to be a common motto here, and that is the least we can do. You all want to change this broken world for the better. You were born to be the best you can be, so go do it. You will be a strong, confidence person with tons of self esteem and use your redpill knowledge for the good of all. Goodness spirals into more goodness; and evil begets more evil.

TLDR; You will use your redpill knowledge to sneakily better the people around you. You will feel better for it and other people will benefit too.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. I could not agree more with your second paragraph; encouraging others to succeed is a great habit to develop. While sexual strategy is often competitive in nature, we should always strive to promote success in our endeavors, whatever they may be.

[–]1Entropy-7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Business or STEM provides some insulation but if you are doing a BA your profs - in ninja like fashion if not overtley - will be SJWs.

[–]jewishsupremacist88 13 points14 points  (3 children)

alot of you entering the workforce will see that corporate america gives full time jobs to dindus and women while pushing off all the real work that needs to be done to white men who work as contractors.

[–]helloamahello 2 points3 points  (2 children)

white men who work as contractors

No, they outsource it to India, mexico, and other foreign tech companies. And then Asian men contractors usually.

[–]jewishsupremacist88 0 points1 point  (1 child)

i know lots of huhwhites who work as contractors as well.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 8 points9 points  (6 children)

there's no reason why every female in this room shouldn't have the opportunity to become an accountant.

Hey fuck twit! There are considerably more female accountants than male accountants.

emailing about the wage gap

DO NOT DO THIS. It would be like texting your priest with evidence that Zombie Jesus didn't exist. It doesn't matter what evidence you present. The cultural assumptions on which the research questions were conceived provide ample evidence of the horrible, horrible, horrible conditions that poor, poor, poor women are forced to endure. The mass rapes, the cliterectomies, stealing all their land, forcing them to stay at home and care for children. You are arguing for the death camps as far as they are concerned.

That makes you a Nazi and you can do anything you want to stop a Nazi.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Naaah. You can debunk the wage gap pretty easily w/o causing offence. Explain it thusly: What the study shows is that if you take all the money that all of the women make and put it into one pile, and then do the same for all the money that all of the men make, and compare the size of the 2 piles, the female pile will be 77% of the size of the male pile, because a lot of women don't work at all, like my mother when I was growing up. She stayed home and took care of me until I went to school, then she went to work. Women have better options than work.

You don't want to volunteer, but you can explain if asked, that this contradicts the way that this study is commonly quoted to claim that women in the same field/occupation as men get paid less. "If that's true," you say, "I'm gonna make a freakin' fortune by just hiring women and paying them only 10% less!!! Most profit margins are around 10% or so, and I just doubled mine by hiring women!" Of course this doesn't happen, because the premise is false.

[–]WhySoRuff 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Perception = more valuable than truth broham

Precisely why the myth persists.

[–]yeshras 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Interesting. What about the 5% that isn't explained by those choices? Even Christina Hoff Sommers, the noted feminist critic, admits this in both her video for the AEI and her video for Prager U. What do you think causes this? Is it possible that it might be direct discrimination, something everyone who studies this and isn't bought and paid for as right-wing shills tend to admit?

This unexplained idsparity ranges from 5 to 12 depending on which study you consult.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 0 points1 point  (2 children)

There are literally an infinite number of variables that could explain it. Sexism is one of the possibilities, but not likely. The market does a pretty good job of weeding out irrational discrimination.

[–]yeshras 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Any evidence for that last claim? I get the feeling that's just another commonsensical neoliberal justification for not investigating discrimination.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evidence? Just sound micro-economic logic.

And I'm Libertarian Anarcho-Capitalist (so is my reasoning), not neo-liberal scum.

[–]OSaraiva 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Nothing new, Universities in Europe are post-modernist, social marxist brainwashing machines. It is disgusting. One must know how to defend himself from this relentless attack or else you're bound to a lot of misery.

[–]redbarrister1 1 points1 points [recovered]

When girls are young they're moist warm holes that need to be subordinated, not groomed for everyone to pretend that they are anything but warm moist holes, with small soft brains that exist to be subordinated. It is biggotted and sexist to assert that women can lead in any capacity. It's offensive and outrageous as fuck to try and subvert the natural order. It should be dealt with the same way that lefty cucks ascribe the mantle of Nazi to anyone who expects women to assume their natural role. They are the bigots. Engage in subterfuge. In my Med school cohort we relentlessly humiliated the intellectually subpar females who usurped their slots in our program from more qualified men. We made their experience a masculine gauntlet of pain and degradation. While any man would flick the stunts we pulled as being shit tests, we got everyone of those simple minded tits with feet to quit. They are not ever forged the mettle to lead and they need to be ripped up and plucked out of any opportunities that humor them as being your equal. They breed. They emote. They serve. Be the change you wish to see in the world. Life is your birthright! Serving, obedience and procreation is theirs.

[–]GoblinsStoleMyHouse 1 points1 points [recovered]

Is this a joke? Or are you actually this mentally damaged?

[–]coinclink 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Reads as incredibly narcissistic, delusional and insecure to me. Spent a significant amount of time supposedly knocking female colleagues down instead of working on himself. I would bet a boatload of money one of them turned down his advances too.

Funny thing is, if any of what he says is true, I would actually classify it as beta behavior. Interesting how many upvotes he has received...

[–]helloamahello 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]bigboilerdawg 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Were all the women in your med program unqualified? Or just some? I ask, because I have had some excellent female physicians and PAs.

[–]redbarrister1 1 points1 points [recovered]

They were unqualified. They didn't have the passion to stick it out and they validated everything we insinuated about them.

[–]alphaperfect 1 points1 points [recovered]

This deserves its own extended post

[–]redbarrister1 1 points1 points [recovered]

I'm sick to death of men having to deal with the career cunt scourge. They're annoying as all fucking get out as dependants but their actually a societal threat when allowed to have financial agency. They have no drive, originality, creativity, passion, introspection, ethical fiber or cerebral cognition of any worth. They only engage with life to be have like the rebellious annoying cunts we've allowed them to become. At what point does the griping on here convert to something actionable. It's time for bigger picture than just wetting your dick in them. That's the easy part. It's formulaic and effortless once you put the red pill in your mouth. Swallowing the pill mandates action. They are insufferable as fucking dependants and so we fucking allow them to live as men with autonomy??! It makes no sense whatsoever. It's time to root the fucking problem and excise the cancer. Feminism is offensive not because it tars men with spurious ridiculous female slights, it's offensive because it does what it was intended to do which is integrate females into well paid, dignified masculine positions that they aren't designed for. Full stop. The argument shouldn't be that they're struggling in a meritocracy and that's why they aren't equally represented at the top. The argument should be that they have no representation at the top because the ceiling was never broken. They were given masculine titles and salaries as pity tributes. They've achieved nothing and we've fucked off long enough pretending that they are endowed with masculine abilities. They are not. They are not ambitious, courageous, stoic, interesting, competitive, strong, strategic, smart or forward thinking. They like shoes and they like whatever interests Chad fucked into them. The offense of feminism IS the demand for equal opportunity. Think about what that entails and the wasted resources and what it takes away from men. She shouldn't have ever been given a seat at the table. Not only is it unconscionable in the marketplace it is a desecration of natural law in the home. She needs to be relegated to obligate dependant. Yes, fucking Middle East style. You have no power in your own home when she has the financial wherewithal to nullify your decrees.

[–]MGTOWIAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does the upcoming generation of doctors have any common sense regarding not swallowing big pharma's manufactured studies and PR?

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preach brother, preach.

Go to microsoft word and work on this manifesto of yours. Get it all out. Then post it here. Take your time. Make it perfect.

[–]plainposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'd upvote you more than once if i could. i'd probably give you a billion dollars to radically change the world as it is

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of what Darwin said about bashing religion.

He said that what's most important is to tell one's own story and let the chips fall where they may.

Regardless of whether or not your points are true, I don't think they advance the cause of male sexual strategy.

Of course, I don't think your points are true, based on my own experiences.

[–]drummergrl1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You actually don't sound interesting. What happened, did mummy slap you one too many times for dribbling? Whilst i agree with you in part abour women in powerful positions being annoying, plenty of men are too. Especially those who use their 'position' to get sex because they can't get it any other way.

[–]Jonlife -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is very true. I have a friend doing his residency right now and he says all the women who came up with him have zero drive. They're basically in this for the money/credibility/looking to marry a doctor status. They can't wait to quit and stay at home

[–]jewishsupremacist88 8 points9 points  (1 child)

yep, women do not belong in any leadership positions at all.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was beautiful.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That did not fucking happen. More women enter med school than men, and going against the feminist doctrine in med school would destroy your chances at a career. Quit dreaming

[–]whuttupfoo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t normally toss this word out, but you sound like a misogynist. Maybe your message will come across better without some of this weird language you’re using.

[–]vast_rightwing 1 points1 points [recovered]

Marxists will ultimately be physically removed. If they win, the useful idiots are almost always the first to die. In order for society to win, they would also have to be removed. Remarkable that these educated individuals haven't noticed the unbroken pattern throughout history.

[–]Alathon 5 points6 points  (2 children)

While this statement is accurate, I take little joy from it. Communism/Socialism can pretend to function for decades, as it did in the Soviet Union, if there are suckers willing to work for the cause and/or wealth to spend down. The United States has quite a bit of wealth and no lack of suckers.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is a great deal of ruin in a nation.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soviet Union only lasted because the West supported it financially/economically through its entire existence. Read Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony Sutton. Or a good history of Skull & Bones.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You have to know history, and you have to view it rationally and learn from it. If you cherry pick the good parts and ignore the massive evidence that it's a completely fucked up system, it looks great to those who haven't earned a fucking thing in their life.

[–]uebermacht 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You‘re a smart man, OP.
Only a few people actually follow the lectures from important books.

[–]AmeriStasi 12 points13 points  (1 child)

the red pill is a breeding ground for people taking the purple pill and pretending they took the red pill. You pussies aren't even able to take on the subject of race.

[–]Cesare_MA 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This is one of the reasons I'm glad I went into engineering. When half your teachers are from a different country, and the curriculum is hard, nobody cares enough/has the time to go on a political rant.

[–]F_Dingo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel blessed to have been able to pretty much avoid the communist liberal indoctrination that many universities suffer from. I had one class where the teacher was this liberal woman. She was a miserable person, in her 50s, no children (shocker!), and had NEVER been married or in a relationship (shocker!). Thankfully I and like two of my classmates would shoot her down along with her goons in class.

Sadly not everyone is as lucky as I am.

[–]warburgio 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Im on uni in the UK. Same thing here, maybe to a bit lesser extent. Politics - gender is a construct, economics- taking the rich and giving the poor is the fairest and more honest, history- hitler, far right (ive asked how smth with socialism in name can be far right but Ive been shouted at by rest of the class) - bad, stalin and communists not so much, and so on and so forth. Disgusting. I've even tried talking with the economics course coordinator ( thirty something, short haired woman) that it is super biased and that her goal should be to at least try to be objective- she didnt even see my point!

[–]5maldehyde 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cmon man. Do you really expect people to believe that you remembered what he said verbatim? To put it in quotes is to basically discredit yourself. This read like the antithesis of a shitty tumblr post.

[–]hardly_incognito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess I dodged the bullet here.

Grew up in a highly conservative state, most of my professors were conservatives. Top this with the fact that I was in a STEM field, making it pointless to bring up feminism when we're discussing subject matter such as stereochemistry or kinematics.

[–]professor_mcamateur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scandi's are taller and better businessmen. Height advantage allows them to be more assertive without overtly asserting themselves, and since they probably feel genuinely sorry for short people they are often humble - not a bad leadership trait.

Also being tall makes it harder to be extremely muscular so they depend on people skills more to get them by, and when they are muscular it is the result of more hard work and dedication rather than having a shorter frame that is easily buildable with weight training.

[–]ClamHammer91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup I went to Webster University and it turned me into a pussy.

[–]Jonlife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Colleges all over the US are full of communists. Feminism comes from communism. Crazy how these are business school professors though. Most business schools have teachers who are actively working in the private sector. This teacher of yours sounds like they've never had an actual job let alone owned their own business to be trying to teach this fake wishful thinking garbage

[–]beginner_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After these ordeals, I was considering emailing my first professor the article written by a female Harvard economist explaining the myth of the wage gap

You could always send it anonymously using one of the 1-time email services. Maybe it will have an effect maybe not. But yeah, probably not worth your effort or time.

Besides that maybe some of these professors are actually the impersonation of Law 38. Play their role as feminists cucks while banging the hot young college girls on the side.

[–]oracleoftemple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as college goes, it's totally for cucks. I mean, why can't we just accept that men should be able to do whatever to whomever whenever they want? That's the way it has always been since time immemorial. Anything that tries to change that is from liberals. We may just have to wait until civilization collapses to reclaim what is rightfully ours. Once that happens we'll be able to drag women around by the hair like we know we should. Have you guys looked into sex robots yet? They look like women, but they don't think for themselves. You can do anything you want to them. You can have sex with them, yell at them, beat them, burn them - sky's the limit. They're amazing. We could all use a sex robot or six.

[–]GoGetting 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was of the opinion that a professor was getting paid good student money to teach, not engage in political activism at his leisure. That seems to be a more important issue than the specific content of his lecture.

This phenomenon is rather simple to fix, in theory. People close their wallets. The real question is how to convince them? Adults need to give young people a superior alternative in life than simply "go to college". It's like they don't even care.

[–]whoismikejoneswho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hear that kids? Don't go to school. Work at the warehouse with Gooch and T-Bone complaining about rich people, women and the government. Stick it to those beta cucks! Hey, you can even comment on TRP during your smoke breaks. Stupid cucks.

[–]30fretibanezguy 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I'm a Psychology student. Very politically correct in modules like social psychology etc. Im there for the clinical, but anyway.

Literally yesterday we had a lecture saying that from a famous study by Hoffman (2011), where 2 tribes were compared on their spatial abilities, one led by men and one by women, which found the female ruled tribe did much better. The lecturer concluded that matrilineal societies must be better or something.

This completely ignores the fact that they compared the Khasi tribe (2 million population, highly westernized in culture and technology, decent education) with the nearby Karbi tribe (400k in population, live in forests, no tech, complete hunter-gatherers.) But hey, they're also run by women so I guess that's why theyre smarter.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Clinical? You should go into experimental. Read Robin Dawes House of Cards. Social psych has a lot of RP stuff in it. Read Roy Baumeister.

The lecturer concluded that matrilineal societies must be better or something.

Ask the prof why it didn't stick around then. How come they all, literally all, 100% got conquered/absorbed by the patriarchy? Which of these 2 tribes has a better standard of living? Life expectancy? Guarantee you that the matriarchy has a vastly higher death-by-violence rate than does the other.

[–]30fretibanezguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do appreciate and take interest in experimental, but I can't deny my passion for studying psychosis and schizophrenia. Clinical involves a lot of research too as I'm guessing you're aware as you seem knowledgable.

I've watched a conference by Roy Baumeister. I liked it, I'll consider looking through his books then thank you.

Don't know those figures about the study you asked for sadly but I would imagine the same as you to be honest.

[–]SaintHolland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember doing a literature elective at uni and I kid you not every class was about the oppression of women and feminism.

[–]TheRedditGod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm taking a US History class this semester (I'm a freshman). Instead of learning about our founding fathers, or the values America was built on, we have class after class discussion the oppression of women and slaves. My professor attacks capitalism a lot, so I always make my responses as egalitarian as I can, and he eats that shit up.

[–]abyfrz -1 points0 points  (1 child)

The fuck are you on about? This absolutely never happened in any of my accounting or business courses. Honestly just reads like more deluded right-wing fantasies from people who've never set foot on a college campus. I'm surprised you didn't throw in a marine, Jesus, and a fake Einstein quote to make the bullshit sandwich complete

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've got a recording of the first lecture (which I've paraphrased in my post). If you're interested, PM me and I'll send the part about the CEO. I also have the accounting one but it mentions the chairman's name and the organisation she works for me, which destroys my anonymity.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jesus. Leftists have too strong a hold on academia. They need to focus on educating and not indoctrinating. What is it about the education field that draws so many pseudo-Marxists?

[–]jefeperro -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say Redding ground... more of a circle jerk

load more comments (9 replies)