Blue Pill ExampleConsequences of Modern Feminism for Women (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev

So here is another Sad Tale of the Sisterhood Spinsterhood. I happened to be on a flight into JFK yesterday and read it in the NYTimes, which was the only paper available in the languages in which I am conversant. On the one hand, I do feel a bit sorry for her. OTOH, she's likely exactly the type of "I Don't NEED No MAN!!!" liberal-feminist-protester-twat who I dislike.

I will try to keep the Schadenfreude to a minimum...and I will fail.

17 Million Frozen Sperm Await the Perfect Moment

Every other month I receive two vials of frozen sperm in a nitrogen tank, which is then emptied, the vials labeled and kept frozen until the exact time of month I’m ready for them. This window of readiness is brief: 12 to 24 hours. When I detect that ovulation is imminent, the vial is defrosted. Ninety minutes later, 17 million sperm are inserted into my uterus via a catheter.

Sounds romantic, doesn't it? /s

I do this because I am 39 and single and my craving for a child eclipses everything else, including my secret fear that this process will be successful.

So, not sure what she was doing between 21 and 39 - but she was definitely putting off marriage and family because babies are such a drag - they cut into fun time and they poop a lot - but her prime time baby-having years are in the rear-view mirror. This is a problem for young women who decide that they are "Too Cool For The Universe" and somehow they can put off until later what nature intended for them in the blossom of their their 20s.

The donor I have chosen is tall, well educated, lean, laconic, a chemical engineer who researches renewables. He’s a cyclist, they tell me, who clicks down the halls of the center in his special cycling shoes. Affable but not warm. His mother’s people are Tatars, Muslim nomads from the Central Asian Steppe. I like all that he seems to represent: intellect, precision, hardiness, planetary repair.

Her imagined Chad is a Tatar! Ok, time out for Russian guys to laugh at this. Meanwhile, note that her hypergamy is in full (imaginary) bloom...about a guy who walks down a hallway in his clicky cycling shoes to jack off so old maids can let his sperm ooze into them from catheters.

At a bachelorette dinner for a friend in late July, I met Sadie. She was loud, brash, a presence. From across the table, I overheard her describing plans to drive south for the coming eclipse, and a deep longing welled up inside me. “If you have space —— ” I said. “We may.”

There were four of us going: Sadie; her husband, Steve; and, from what I could deduce, an elderly relation named Eli. “Eli doesn’t text or use email,” Sadie wrote. “So I will call him.” They arrived early Saturday morning with a fiddle, a ukulele and Eli, who stood quietly to the side, a guitar case slung across his back. He was my height, and younger, his sandy hair thinning on top. He had a soccer player’s build, side burns, a square jaw: pleasant looking but not my type.

Not her type...yet.

Every day for me is an exercise in letting go. I have to let go of rage. I have to let go of fear. I have to let go of everything I thought my life would be and isn’t.

Reread that last sentence again: I have to let go of everything I thought my life would be and isn’t. If only she'd adjusted those expectations back in her 20s, but she no doubt deserved only the best, etc.

Sadie said, “The people in the back have to give back rubs to the people in the front.” And then, before I let myself think, I reached over and squeezed Eli’s shoulders. Through his T-shirt, I could feel the musculature of his back, his spine, its finger holds. It had been a long time since I had touched a man. Doing so now felt decadent and exhilarating. There was a hunger in my hands, an urgency.

The plight of the post-WallSPLAT! woman.

Anyway, she winds up in a queen bed with Eli, and the guy who wasn't her type...was suddenly her type.

Crawling under the sheets later that night, Eli was looking at me. For the first time, I noticed his eyes, bright blue.

Or maybe she's desperate for a baby daddy. Nah, gotta be the blue eyes. That Hamster is Hamming away....

We lay in the bed, he on his side, me on mine. In the dark I thought: “Where are you? Come closer!”

Is that love in the air? Or desperation? I think we know. At the beginning of the trip, recall that he "wasn't her type." Now, her type is "has a functioning penis", evidently.

It was a blind progression of intrepid searching, inch by inch. I bumped into him and he did not pull away. And that’s how it happens, how we find each other.*

Translation: there was a seduction of the moist and clutching sort, kind of like the kind that happens in the freshman dorms, and Eli probably fucked her in self-defense.

On Monday at dawn we drove a final hour south on empty roads meandering through mist-filled forests. The light filtered down, dim and soft.

The Literary WomanTM dresses up her getting boned by a rando with some flowery language.

Eli followed me down into the water, which was oddly warm, and I wondered, despondently, “What have we done here?” We huddled together in the shallow waters where a snapping turtle was sunning itself on a log.

A little morning-after N+1 regret.

After, I went to the restroom and peed in a cup. The circle that appeared was perfectly empty, a blank white sun.

And Eli dodges a bullet.

When I went back outside, the light had begun to change, growing dimmer. Eli was lying on his back. I lay down beside him.

Translation: "Saddle up again, Tiger!"

From the back seat, Eli reached up to touch the back of my neck.

Or maybe it was her imagination.

I wanted to live in that moment forever, to tether myself to that particular point in time. I wanted to take the moment and bend it like a ray of light, extract its color and orbit it endlessly like a sun. But our planet moves through space at the rate of 18 miles per second — 18 miles per second!

Lots of flowery words, but....

I did not hear from Eli again.

Pumped...and dumped.

This isn’t the ending I wanted

Do tell?

So we see laid bare the consequences of the "You GO GURRRRRL!" feminism of the modern West. Maybe it's a good thing, because it would act as a check on the militant Feministas if they don't breed. Beyond that, I doubt she'd have looked at Eli twice back when she was 1 and 20 and had the whole world in front of her - first, move to NYC and live the who Sex Sluts and the City" lifestyle, win a Puliltzer, third meet "Mr. Big" three days after her 30th birthday and then conceive, naturally, because everyone knows that shit is easy right? Instead she's dripping the preserved splooge of some bicycle messenger into her twat each month.

The WallSPLAT! sure depreciated the fuck (literally) out of her "golden ticket".....

[–]Questionnaire7 230 points231 points  (23 children)

How is this in the NY times

[–]fromthecrypt8 147 points148 points  (3 children)

NY times is the new Huffpost

[–]Troll_Name 8 points9 points  (0 children)

NY Times rents their offices out to make more money than staffing them.

[–]Docbear64 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Big well-written pieces don't get a million impressions and the subsequent ad revenue so society keeps dumbing shit down so that more people click on it even if it's shit quality. Ad spot purchasers care about views not content.

[–][deleted] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

I'm not gonna hold my breath for the NYTimes story about a man who put off his education and hard work and really really wants a career now that he is 40.

Seriously, the world calls him a bum and no violins play sob stories for men whose life didn't go as wished!

If bitches want equality, then I'll dole out my sympathy equally

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 53 points54 points  (6 children)

One imagines that it speaks to a decent number of their readers. Oh, and the NYT started it's long careening swan dive into the pavement years ago.

[–]wanderer779 13 points14 points  (0 children)

When the internet came it was sort of like 'the wall' for these folks. All of a sudden the old tricks didn't work as well. Reading MSM after wikileaks and 4chan is just comedy now. It's like watching a con man try to swindle you when you already know the trick. You almost start feeling sorry for him.

With that being said apparently a good part of the population still takes these folks seriously so they still have considerable influence.

[–]SPREAD_THE_LOVE_7791 2 points3 points  (4 children)

What news outlets would you recommend?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

There aren't many. Even NR isn't your dad's NR. I tend to gather information from a variety of sources, but I also understand to read critically, thus I can weed out all the bullshit in the Times or in WaPo Jeff Bezo's blog.

In terms of folks who come at things the straightest, I'd say the WSJ, the Economist and what's left of National Review. Hasn't been the same since WFB died.

[–]Westernhagen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

These days National Review is just cucks jerking off about Muh Principles and bemoaning the vulgarity of Trump.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 14 points15 points  (0 children)

There is far more money in feeding 200 million hungry hamsters than there is in telling the truth.

[–]AlphaGrad 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Standards have severely plummeted.

[–]unhealthy1 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Title should be: "Post wall woman bangs random stranger to try to have kid." jerry springer level trash right here. They dress it up in flowery language but what happened to the 22 yrs before this? Surely there was at least 1 man out of 3 BILLION men that could have met the lofty expectations of a 39 yr old woman who just wants a kid.

I have no sympathy for these women. They spent their prime breeding years banging random men, partying and focusing on career. Then at age 39 RISK endangering their child with life long autism because they suddenly feel they deserve a child at age 39. Utter Recklessness and selfishness. What about the poor boy who will risks life long autism and unhealthy lifestyle being born for this chick. She doesnt think twice about endangering child.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Then at age 39 RISK endangering their child with life long autism because they suddenly feel they deserve a child at age 39. Utter Recklessness and selfishness.

A few decades ago, the average age that an American woman had her last child was 43. Waiting to 39 and suddenly deciding you want to have a kid is crazy, but women having kids well into their forties is nothing new.

[–]Incel9876 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A few decades ago, the average age that an American woman had her last child was 43. Waiting to 39 and suddenly deciding you want to have a kid is crazy, but women having kids well into their forties is nothing new.

Those women usually were having the last of say eight to twelve or more children, each child was about a one year vacation for her reproductive system, enabling her to keep conceiving and birthing healthy babies. Putting off marriage and/or child bearing until thirties and forties is something entirely different, comparatively new, but also as old as many an advanced ancient civilization that has become decadent and near to collapse.

[–]TFWnoLTR 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It appeals to the post-wall career women who make up a large portion of their remaining loyal readership.

[–]TheReformist94 11 points12 points  (0 children)


[–]red_matrix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

NYT has been doubling down on feminism the last two years (it's started with Hillary).

[–]boo_radley_awesome 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FAKE NEWS. This is what they've become lol

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 152 points153 points  (13 children)

I tried to have sympathy, I really did.

Then I remembered how much these women cared about my dating struggles in my youth. And now I care the same amount about their struggles in their older years.

She's not completely desperate yet. There are millions of guys out there who would be more than willing to marry her and yet she is resorting to using a sperm donor because none of these men meet her standards. She'd rather be a single mother than date a tradesman without a college degree.

[–]uniquecommonguy 96 points97 points  (6 children)

I was sympathetic at first too, and then I remembered how many women were complete bitches to me from ages 13 to ~26. Now I'm single, spin plates, live alone, and I've never been happier.

Thank you ladies for being such bitches to me when you were younger. If it wasn't for your constant torment, I might have actually gotten married to one of you emotional roller coasters.

[–]MGTOWManofMystery 18 points19 points  (4 children)

You dodged a bullet! Or many bullets.

[–]wrekd 1 points1 points [recovered]

He's like fucking Neo or something.

[–]systemshock869 1 points1 points [recovered]

Are you telling me I can dodge bullets?

[–]tall_bacon 14 points15 points  (0 children)

No. I’m trying to tell you, that when you’re ready...

you won’t have to.

[–]marplaneit 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This is the state of my 4 older woman cousin, one late 20's , another early 30's and the other mid 30's. All professional, all singles, none of them is ugly or fat, but they are fucking desperate. Oh, you see "marplaneit" but guys in their 30 don't man up and settle down, they just want to date around, and party like they are 22 again. That's what they tell me at christmas every year. They all thought they could slut it up during their 20's, build a professional career, and then at 28-30, they were going to meet tall, muscular, hot as fuck, succesful doctor, lawyer, bussinesman, etc and he was going to fall totally for her a 30 year old average girl with baggage.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 27 points28 points  (4 children)

You're swinging too hard here. Tradesmen are attractive for a lot of women (in fact I'd argue they are most obtainable fantasy model). But the taller ones have plenty of attention from younger women. And the pitch of a basically 40 year old woman to "settle down with" is idiotic.

The pitch of the 40 year old woman having kids just doesn't make any damn sense. There are lots of 30 year old women to compete with.

The quality of men willing to impregnate a 40 year old woman is very poor. I mean really, think about it. It doesn't really have to do with "standards."

I mean I can sympathise with her to be honest. Everyone in her world told her she could wait and that there's nothing wrong with having children later in life. Everyone believed their own bullshit.

She has a right to be angry, it's no different than the bullshit blue pill lies sold to men, that women are honor bound etc Then you find out that basically women live in a bubble until they're 30, and the bubble fully pops by 40.

It's no different than the guy who did "everything right" and did right by his wife only to realize none of that shit really mattered, and the only thing that mattered was tingles uber alles.

It must be equally horrific to realize the only thing that really mattered for her was her youth, and everything else was superfluous.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 18 points19 points  (3 children)

Tradesmen are attractive for a lot of women (in fact I'd argue they are most obtainable fantasy model).

Sexually attractive and good for a roll in the hay, sure. Marriage material? Most college-educated women wouldn't consider marrying a tradesman due to hypergamy. Not saying it's right, but that's the way it is.

The pitch of the 40 year old woman having kids just doesn't make any damn sense. There are lots of 30 year old women to compete with.

You underestimate how many thirsty men there are out there and how strong the narrative is of "marry women who are age-appropriate". Look at Prince Harry. Meghan Markle is going to be almost 37 when he marries her. She's 3 years older than him. The dude is royalty FFS.

The quality of men willing to impregnate a 40 year old woman is very poor. I mean really, think about it. It doesn't really have to do with "standards."

The thirst is real especially in first-world countries where men generally outnumber women until they get towards retirement age and the men start dying off.

[–]Banincoming 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Their 1 kid is going to be royally fucked up.

[–][deleted] 225 points226 points  (85 children)

Feminism is incredibly damaging to men, women and society at large.

I hope you're ready because it has a long way to go and a lot more damage to do yet.

[–]Hjalmbere 36 points37 points  (1 child)

...and single 39-year old spinsters having test tube babies is just one of the effects.

[–]Sararia 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Imagine the irreparable damage it would do to get would - be child, especially if it was a boy.

Nothing worse in this world than a boy being raised by a man - hating woman who will instill in him a sense of hatred for himself.

[–]RedPilledRoaster 27 points28 points  (17 children)

I don’t know...I think feminism is finally starting its long, slow, painful death.

[–]Extremely_Photogenic 13 points14 points  (12 children)

I would agree that it seems feminism is declining, but there are two things to consider.

  1. It's decline isn't certain. I'd put a large reason for the decline on the cultural shift that has been exacerbated by a Trump presidency. He needs to succeed for this to work.

  2. Even if it does decline, it's going to cause a lot of damage on its way out.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (6 children)

It's decline isn't certain.

There are really only three possible futures at this point.

  1. Western civilization dumps the SJW fantasies that are destroying it, and returns to reality.

  2. Western civilization is taken over by an opposing masculine culture, like Islam.

  3. We all upload to robots and sex becomes irrelevant anyway.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (4 children)

How masculine is Islam dude? Its a cult about a desert roaming goat fucker, who was better at fucking goats than any other goat fucker so they made him king of the desert. He used his status as a king to upgrade feom fucking goats to fucking kids. The region has been completely void of productivity, science, military success, humanitarian values or anything else. How masculine is that?

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

How masculine is Islam dude?

A lot more than the metrosexual West.

[–]Alathon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Your criticisms of Islam are accurate. Unfortunately, Islam is in fact more masculine than the leftist west in one critical particular, they kill their enemies and take what they want. Right now, the west coasts on the efforts and sacrifice of minority praetorian class and a tech lead our ancestors ten generations back established. In our representative democracies, such a class has limited capacity to make policy, and can easily be sold out by feminist politicians and voters who are too childish and irresponsible to understand that the long term consequences of their 'humanitarian' decisions today will be their own disenfranchisement.

The pedo-prophets whole life was a parable of how to conquer. Soft words and coexistence when he had few followers, violence and coercion when he had many, ruthless massacre to seal the deal when he had superiority. Western men ask "but, dear, I know it seems extreme, but, but, um..." while Muslims build their power. If permitted numerical superiority, they will not ask.

[–]Extremely_Photogenic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's ironic how badly woman fight against 1 meanwhile the result of their success would be 2....

[–]BullshittingNonsense 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Yeah, I think in a bubble, you can feel the death throes of feminism because that's what you're hearing, but there are a significant amount of feminists out there. Some girl at my work said that she always wanted to be a single mother. I think she was raised by a single mom. So was I and I absolutely love my mom, but I would still much rather have an intact family.

[–]RedPilledRoaster 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Even in the Silicon Valley where I live things are getting a little better. Feminists are now joked at and mocked more often and the whole movement is being revealed as the bullshit it is. It’s subtle but it’s there.

[–]SPREAD_THE_LOVE_7791 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm not sure if your anecdotal evidence is enough to call a trend reversal. It's as bad as ever on my end. Women I didn't know were feminists are becoming more vocal. Pretty tough to assess as a whole. I'd say major publications are the best for gauging that and they seem worse than ever.

[–]RedPilledRoaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, all I can say is the situation seems just a bit better than before. A turnaround may be reaching but the future will tell.

[–]necfectra 18 points19 points  (0 children)

And a loooonnnng painful death it will be. So long in fact we will eventually forget it is dying. Or perhaps we as a species will be dying. Regardless, it will be very painful for everyone.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 9 points10 points  (1 child)

long, slow, painful death.

No doubt. Unfortunately there is a great deal of ruin in a nation and I think the women will keep pushing and destroying until they are stopped. When will we be willing to 'stop' them?

Even after the nation defaults on its debts and the people are starving in the streets feminism and the 87% of women in college with "gender studies" the top major, and entire physics, chemistry, and philosophy departments are disbanded they will continue to push.

Even when the West is no longer dominate but subordinate to China and the U.S. has an economy less than half the size of China, and a White population of less than 90 millions, while the Russian population is more than 300 million, and the Muslim population is greater than the Christian population, they will still continue towards their Marxist utopia.

Only when men are formed into bands and gangs for their own protection, and the army is disbanded, and the police are no longer paid will the street justice finally be meted out.

It will be like the French Revolution if we are lucky with only a few tens of thousands rounded up and hanged and beheaded or it could look like Romania and nicolae ceausescu if we are really lucky. More likely it will look like the "Great Leap Forward" which will suit our Mao loving opponents just fine.

[–]Fontess 38 points39 points  (4 children)

Although that statement is true its pretty damn easy to recognize sluts nowdays and to see what really woman are for because of pro feminism you go girl woman power movements. Its probably easiest than it has ever been. Grandmothers of these woman would probably turn in their graves if they see how their "legacy" is behaving nowdays.

[–]Omnibrad 52 points53 points  (1 child)

Grandmothers of these woman would probably turn in their graves if they see how their "legacy" is behaving nowdays.

Meanwhile the children of these women are turning in their graves aka mom's womb.

[–]BullshittingNonsense 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Hahaha that's what I think - my cousin is 27 and our grandmother had three kids at that age - 4, 3 and 2. Now that may be too early, but damn 27, a woman's clock is tick tick tocking.

[–]Alathon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If a man wants healthy children, he's more likely to get them from a woman of 23 than 33, that much is certain.

[–]wanderer779 5 points6 points  (32 children)

This may get downvoted but what do you want elites to do? If you let people breed as much as they want they will do so until you end up with wars and famines. As sad as it is this might be the best we can hope for unless we fund more habitable planets.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 20 points21 points  (23 children)

The elites seem perfectly content to let the Morlocks breed and demand that they be let in to first world countries like locusts....

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

+1 for Morlock reference.

Also good to remember Morlocks eat Eloi when given the chance.

[–]wanderer779 0 points1 point  (21 children)

again though, what would you have them do? I'm fine with not letting them in, but once they are in, are you willing to enforce a 1 or 2 child policy?

It's easy to point out problems, but what are the solutions?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 14 points15 points  (20 children)

again though, what would you have them do?

A. Pack them up and ship them back home to the 7th Century.

B. Build a Big, Beautiful Wall.

The retard Left longs to be hammered in the ass by Sand People and watch their children be raped while they say nothing because it's "payback" for colonialism.

I want to be clear on this point: I don't believe that Western Culture is superior to Islamic culture. I believe that Western Culture is VASTLY superior to Islamic culture.

I'm fine with not letting them in, but once they are in, are you willing to enforce a 1 or 2 child policy?

Pack them up and ship them home.

It's easy to point out problems, but what are the solutions?

I corrected your misapprehension about the "elites" and not needed too many people. We could do with a lot less people from the Dirt World, but nobody can say that without being "RAYYYYYCISSSST!!!" But the facts are what the facts are.

[–]wanderer779 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I'm fine with the wall and travel ban. I'm just talking about the sheer number of people. Regardless of race/creed, there's got to be a limit. If we aren't proactive it mother nature will solve it for us and she can be a bit of a bitch.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

I'm just talking about the sheer number of people.

The problem is NOT that white people are breeding too much.

[–]wanderer779 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Not now but what about before feminism?

Lets say we get the wall and a permanent travel ban from the middle east. Do you want a baby boom for white people in the u.s.? How many white folks do you want? 500 mil? A billion? At some point enough is enough.

Edit: Baby not ban.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 6 points7 points  (4 children)

At some point enough is enough.

Again, the present difficulty in population is not that there are too many white people, nor that white people are breeding at unsustainable rates...so why are you going on about it? It's like being on the 3rd floor of a house that is fully on fire and you're complaining that you stubbed your toe...or MIGHT stub your toe in the future. We have other, bigger problems.

[–]wanderer779 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I'm not going on about it - my original comment had nothing to do with race or the Kalergi plan or any of that.

[–]SPREAD_THE_LOVE_7791 0 points1 point  (11 children)

It appears you are being racist based on your comments in this thread.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 10 points11 points  (9 children)

So fun fact:

People who call me "racist" IRL: liberal white males.

People who NEVER call me "racist" IRL: people of color.

I suspect that's because people of color understand what actual racism is.

With respect to the ongoing Muslim problem, first, if I was anything, I'd be a bigot, not a racist, however, insofar as we have seen the direct consequences of Merkel's retarded "But muh FEEEELZ!!!" migrant policy, and the EU's guilt-based policy on importing Muslims from the 7th Century. From the Cannes truck attack to the Oslo truck attack to the Berlin Christmas Market attack, to the Cologne New Year's Eve attacks, to the London Bridge attack, to the murder of the French priest in Normandy, to Islamic grooming gangs in the UK, to the Charlie Hedbo attack, to the Paris theater attack, to the Istanbul Airport Attack (hint: if you see dudes wearing winter coats in July, GTFO, because, well, they might be concealing AKs underneath.)

I could go on, of course. But we are deep into the Upside Down when I simply point out that letting in a bunch of folks whose views and culture are diametrically opposed to Western values - you know, quaint ideas like free speech, secular democracy, equality under the law - and then having far too many of them act out violently in precisely ways that could have been anticipated, and out of all of this we learn that I am somehow the bad guy for telling the truth.

So the problem is that that I am a racist, the problem is that, to the radical Left, which presently controls the cultural narrative, I am a Thought Criminal, because anyone who doesn't support the radical Left's agenda is a RACIST/BIGOT/NAZI/LITERALLY HITLER or whatever. That can put one in the position of being a liberal who believes in free speech (I am the latter, but not the former) and being labeled as some sort of crypto-fascist or whatever. So yeah, we're living in a fucked up time.

[–]AnAbsoluteSith 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Person of colour here, you're not racist. People just love to blur the lines on these issues to make it appear as such.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 13 points14 points  (5 children)

They are targeting WHITE PEOPLE not to breed. Other races are free to overbreed their habitat and head North. Other races are encouraged to reproduce. White People have been targeted for extermination by these people and no, I am not kidding. You can see it in their rhetoric- white privilege etc but it really shows in their actions.

ANYTHING that helps the West or white people is bad. ANYTHING that harms the West or white people is good.

[–]wanderer779 5 points6 points  (4 children)

I'm for the travel ban. I'm just saying that the idea of women of ANY race having 6 kids ad infinitum had to come to an end one way or another.

Just because we let muslims in doesn't mean we can't brainwash their women too. It wouldn't surprise me if these muslims may find out they've bitten off more than they can chew and end up having trouble keeping their women traditional. The progressive message is everywhere. While the men are at work the women are at home gobbling it up. Kids too. This already happened to christains who presumably had pretty strong convictions about their faith.

And even if muslim culture does take over, they will eventually find themselves up against the same thing.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Just because we let muslims in

^ Let's stop the problem at this point. Don't let the cancer in. When you get cancer you need to cut it out. Or treat it with radiation. Just saying.

[–]Endorsed ContributorTaipanshimshon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all those things damage the body. And for good reason.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

may find out they've bitten off more than they can chew and end up having trouble keeping their women traditional.

They call that 'honor killing'

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hopefully those magical freedom chemicals in the water will be absorbed by all these new Americans.

[–]harkrank 1 points1 points [recovered]

Good boy, repeating the thoughts that have been planted in your soul.

[–]wanderer779 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You are right, what am I thinking? There's no principle that says a population of animals can't grow forever in a finite habitat. I must have been drunk or something. My apologies, carry on.

[–]1GreenPiller 0 points1 point  (25 children)

What more damage can feminism do? Society seems very backwards already.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 56 points57 points  (1 child)

Uh just wait. If you don't want to wait you can read. What to read? Oh something about the history of Rome. Pay particular attention to when they started letting girls decide things and gave them a voice that was taken seriously.

It can get much worse. But lately I've seen a change, what used to be a bunch of manginas uttering shit like happy wife happy life has become men starting to grab the reigns and turn the franchise around. Men are tired of being the villain, always guilty, the evil oppressor, and blamed for everything that goes wrong. It's grass roots right now, but it's building.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat 33 points34 points  (10 children)

The normalization of prostitution.

Every girl will accept money for sex, and men will be expected to turn a blind eye on this and wife them up anyway.

I fully expect a future in which "polyamory" extends to prostitution. Aka, your wife will be fucking others for money as a side-gig (maybe even as a full-time gig) and you will be shamed into compliance because "it's her right to do as she pleases with her body, and you're insecure for having a problem with it AND a monster for not being supportive of women's rights".

Oh and the normalization of cuckoldry.

In the future, you will not be able to expect your kid to be yours. She might sex her husband so he stays around and keep providing resources and support, but when time will come to have a baby, she will have full choice in who gets to impregnate her. There might be businesses offering prime genetic stock to be inseminated "naturally" (thinking a tinder-like app where women get to select their stallion for the night) or artificially (thinking stocks of sperm from Leo Di Caprio, Henry Cavill, or whoever is a super star when this world happens).

[–]Mithra9009 12 points13 points  (6 children)

That's a very interesting prediction. It lines up quite well with what I've seen others write on the return of feudalism. This whole thing about people being able to work their way up the social ladder is really just a glitch in the normality of the class divide between the rulers/feudal lords and the ruled/peasants. Slowly but surely, people's individual freedoms will be worn down. It won't be rapid. It'll be a slow, gradual erosion. Your work hours will get longer and you'll just accept it. Your wages will stagnate and you'll just accept it. The time for leisurely activities will deplete and you'll just accept it. The variety in activities for leisure will deplete and you'll just accept it. Every day just gets worse and worse and you'll just keep accepting it.

The normalisation of prostitution is in my eyes is an attempt to normalise the absence of exclusivity. It is a direct attack on the notion of private property by attacking the property men wish to privatise most. Truly, those in power wish to reduce all men into unthinking, obedient drones.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's a very interesting prediction.

It's not a prediction. It's already common place in some cultures around the world. It's a natural consequence of the decay of social order and structure. Women will use their pussies for what their pussies do best--gather resources. Without consequences and shame, there is no reason to not to be open about it. In fact, being open about it increased opportunities.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Marriage and monogamy was established to reduce the males to obedient drones by ensuring a steady supply of sex and the insurance of genetic legacy to each male (or, with an evolutionary perspective, those societies that establish marriage and monogamy thrived more than others because its population was obedient and hard-working).

The lack of sex and insurance of genetic legacy make for unstable societies. This is not in the interest of a society and those in its power.

You don't have to see the hand of the elites where you can see more evidently the hand of sexual strategies. The normalization of prostitution is not the doing of the elites. It's the doing of women as a whole who manage to manipulate their weak men as a whole (made soft by a comfortable life) into allowing them to have their cake and eat it too.

[–]Mithra9009 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The lack of sex and insurance of genetic legacy make for unstable societies. This is not in the interest of a society and those in its power.

It is when the only people in your society are a people that are not concerned with genetic legacy nor sex since they're primarily concerned with staying alive. With the coming of automation, it won't be necessary for the rulers to be so kind to those they rule. The first step however is taking your guns away. Everything comes down to violence. If your capacity for violence is neutered, you have no power and cannot instigate any kind of change. Not only that but it's nigh impossible for any police force to police a society filled with armed people willing to use those arms. The masses outnumber the police force so they must be neutered first.

There's also social engineering to consider as well. Feminism's destabilisation of the nuclear family combined with liberalism's open border advocation means that the masses are being demographically switched for low-IQ third worlders, smart enough to understand instructions and work but not so smart as to be a threat meanwhile high-IQ people generally fall for the conditioning and take a more individualised stance, opting for private hobbies over procreation. Are you familiar with the Rockefeller quote: "I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers"? Are you aware of how someone funded by the Rockefellers supported the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan? It can all be very stable.

You don't have to see the hand of the elites where you can see more evidently the hand of sexual strategies.

I see both. Women took the bait but the elites set it.

The normalization of prostitution is not the doing of the elites.

Who do you think controls all of the media outlets that push these ideas?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

It won't be rapid. It'll be a slow, gradual erosion.

Nah, there's not enough time for 'slow, gradual erosion'. Most current jobs are going to disappear over the next twenty years, and that will lead to massive social changes.

And that includes prostitution, when any beta who still has money will be able to spend it on an 18-year-old Japanese cat-girl robot who adores him, instead of a hooker.

The future is going to get very weird, very fast.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The future is going to get very weird, very fast.


The most sickening part is at 1:33 when the little junior salaryman says "You know, somebody's at home for me." <vomit>

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that guy must weigh fifty pounds if he's an ounce.

[–]AlphaGrad 19 points20 points  (0 children)

A prostitute is the most honest woman you'll ever meet. But if all women take the career of prostitution, the truth would surely be marginalized.

[–]lolypuppy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

She might sex her husband so he stays around and keep providing resources and support, but when time will come to have a baby, she will have full choice in who gets to impregnate her.

Why would a man accept that?


I get the point that we see more men concerned with the future of their culture, while whole countries are having their population replaced. However, these women are worth nothing. A man could have more pleasure, spend less money and have less headache with a hooker than with a "wife who won't have his children and who have sex with other men".

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yea there’s backwards fucked up shit happening to men all the time. Now can it get worse you ask? Well just imagine this shit becoming even more commonplace.

Remember that sperm donor in Kansas who was ordered to pay child support for the kid who was birthed with his sperm?

Now fortunately that was just 1 case that happened a few years ago and hasn’t been repeated since. Imagine shit like that becoming the norm

[–]Reformed65 4 points5 points  (0 children)

West collapses, East rises.

[–]kunfayakun 0 points1 point  (9 children)

Sheltered rich white guy probably living in one of the richest countries in the world thinks society is backwards. Pathetic. Spend a year in Pakistan or something, you might learn a valuable lesson.

[–]Endorsed ContributorUrsusG 64 points65 points  (4 children)

His mother’s people are Tatars

It's funny how she romanticizes his "hardy ancestors from the Steppe", while Russians (and other Eastern European peoples) still use "Tatar-Mongol" as a racial invective.

Especially the Russians, for whom fighting the Horde invasions for several hundred years is a major part of historic national identity.

[–]cellphon 7 points8 points  (3 children)

With that said, Tatars related to the Mongols, which had ghengis khan, which by many accounts is one of the ultimate alphas this word has produced.

[–]Endorsed ContributorPopeman79 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Emm, the same way Macedonians were once related to Alexander the Great? Sure, but it makes no (rational) sense today

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Not quite. Alexander didn't rape his way across the world. The Mongols not only raped their way across the world. They took sex slaves and harems. Millions and millions of people are directly related to Genghis Khan today.

[–]--Edog-- 26 points27 points  (0 children)

"This isn't the ending that I wanted" - what about the ending that Eli wanted? Did he know that you were trying to have his child? (Side note: if i had it all to do over again, I would get snipped and bang desperate women in their 30's)

[–]Docbear64 75 points76 points  (13 children)

The beautiful and unfortunate thing about women is how ingrained they can be to the moment . When you're the spark that gets them excited you can effectively become the sunshine that brightens their dark world of course the flip side is when they are truly unhappy or unhappy with you you can be the worst decision and human being they've ever met .

All of that flowery language amounts too an old woman who feels like she needs a sense of purpose, who now has to fight herself and her hamster to embrace any sense of sexuality or sensuality had a moment with a blue eyed sandy haired guitarist, To her Eli was a beacon of hope she could cling to as she free falls into despair and to Eli she was probably just a horny old broad who was worth fucking that night.

She bought into a narrative that told her that nobody else matters but herself and her goals and now finds herself trying to matter to somebody anybody else . Only humans would try to deny that a group of people whose bodies have been created/ evolved/ developed to have babies should hold off from having babies or maintain the responsibilities of having babies until it's virtually impossible.

[–]monkeysword88 1 points1 points [recovered]

Honestly, the plight of women in the modern West is a tragedy. They think they've got it good with feminism and all, but in real life it doesn't work in their favor. After slutting around in their prime years they'll shack up with some beta who she'll resent. It's a sad fate.

[–]freedumb123 1 points1 points [recovered]

It's a well-deserved fate because they choose to be miserable.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Not for the hapless Beta who is harvested like a living organ donor.

[–]monkeysword88 1 points1 points [recovered]

It may be what they chose, but it wouldn't be possible if weak men didn't enable it.

[–]freedumb123 1 points1 points [recovered]

There will always be weak men. Weak men are the 80% that don't get women and clean up Chad's sloppy seconds.

[–]xenigala 3 points4 points  (3 children)

She bought into a narrative that told her that nobody else matters but herself and her goals 

Isn't that something TRP encourages for men? DGAF?

[–]marlybarrow 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Men and women are different. Ergo, the advice given to men is different to that of women.

[–]Docbear64 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very true but Men and women aren't the same, Men weren't created with biological clocks and an internal need for having a child to take care of the way women were. The difference is that men have historically been the primary providers and protectors while women were the nurturers and the maintainers of the cultural fabric they established with men .

That is now lost so that we believe men and women should do all of the same things all the time and that women should outright ignore any societal ,biological, or internal desires to have children .

If you take nothing else away from this sub know that men and women ARE NOT the same . It will save you a lot of stress in the future.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Isn't that something TRP encourages for men? DGAF?

You misapply "DGAF" here. When TRP advise young men to "DGAF" it is done in terms of approaching and in terms of not being manipulated by people who want to impose their own bluepill delusion on them. The actual corollary would be if we told guys, "Just be yourself" because everything will be ok if they just keep obeying.

The problem with the author of the original piece has is not that she shouldn't have been free to pursue her interests, such as they were, but that she should have understood that putting off marriage and children, whether to ride the CC or to have a career or whatever, is not without consequences...consequences that she now knows all to well: inability to get pregnant easily, lack of access to quality male partners - certainly lesser quality than she likely could have gotten back when she was younger, more attractive and more fertile.

[–]JamzeNeu 57 points58 points  (1 child)

There is a part of me that empathises with them, but ,they chose the path ,driven by their artificially inflated ego ,to exert superiority over someone else for the sake of petty pleasure, so fuck it.

They deserve it.

The donor I have chosen is tall, well educated, lean, laconic, a chemical engineer who researches renewables. He’s a cyclist, they tell me, who clicks down the halls of the center in his special cycling shoes. Affable but not warm. His mother’s people are Tatars, Muslim nomads from the Central Asian Steppe. I like all that he seems to represent: intellect, precision, hardiness, planetary repair.

also look at this bitch, selfishly choosing Chad's sperm and over our sweet Billy beta who is really nice guy and respecs wamen. huh, life is so unfair ;(

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 38 points39 points  (10 children)

This is exactly why I don't read the New York Times. It's straight up cringe inducing garbage.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 11 points12 points  (9 children)

I had one of those long international fights, and I tend to board early in the process. The only thing I could read while I was waiting was NYT.

[–]BobLordOfTheCows 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Reading obituaries would have probably been more meaningful.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It was the international edition; obits weren't an option.

[–]hardlifeman 1 points1 points [recovered]

Read eBooks on a Kindle? That's what I do for long flights. I bought The Rational Male and ended up here...

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

On flights, I prefer to board, eat, watch a movie during the meal service, and then sack out for 4-6 hours (which is all I need). I don't bother to bring my ipad, usually - it's just more shit to carry. I tend to board early to stake out overhead space (I only carry-on) and the entertainment system isn't always on, nor is there always wifi, hence, I read the NYT while everyone else boarded.

[–]hardlifeman 1 points1 points [recovered]

To each their own. I have Kindle on my smartphone, as well. I too have been guilty of reading the crap they have lying around on a plane, such as the in-flight magazine. Swallowing the red pill has only added a big additional angle to the irreverent mockery and contempt with which I process most forms of mainstream media. I like that which you have applied here, especially the flowery attempts at poetic language.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I need to burn a half hour, and where the plane was situated there was no mobile service or wifi to graze the internet. I also dislike reading books on my phone. So basically I killed 30 minutes reading the Times.

[–]haroldpeters 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just do push ups in the isle until the plane lands. By the time we land all the hostesess can see how buff I am and give me bjs as I exit the plane. /sarc

[–]RedPillFreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly how I got through the sidebar. Downloaded the PDF & used TTS.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 54 points55 points  (13 children)

My view from 10,000 feet is that she was probably taught from an early age what a special snowflake she was but nobody bothered to fill her in about the reality of biology. Mother Nature is an uppercase G, and she doesn't give a shit about you putting things off because you're 'not ready'.

The problem for high-achieving women is that they crush it in HS, uni, grad school and sometimes work, and they make it to the top of the mountain and discover that putting in the kind of hours that men put in fucking SUCKS and then they drop out of it (if they're smart). I recall a few years ago some ivy league educated chick wrote a book about how she put in a lot of long hours and shit, while other women married men, learned to suck dick the way their husbands liked and not be too opinionated and wound up having way more free time and could chill out and get hot stone massages or whatever, and there for who was really smarter?

Now, I am certainly vulnerable to this criticism: "But Uncle Vasya, you're 50 and don't have kids, what about you?" however the difference is I'm a man, and I made myself exceptional in a couple of ways, and thus I'm tapping 2x22 y.o., a 21 year old, a 19 y.o. and a 25 year old on the regular. IOW, 5 of the most fertile things on the planet. My options have only increased over time, although certainly I will crest at some point, but so long as there are young women who dig older men, I'm in the game. Spinster Literary Hags? No so much.

[–]IwannaFocus 32 points33 points  (1 child)

Women are flowers that bloom to beauty at an early age. But consequently they wither at an early stage too (in comparison to men).

Men? I'd like to look at us as caterpillars trying to achieve metamorphosis (being alpha). Once we get wings, the choices between flowers are plenty. But wings seldom come at an early age.

[–]--____notfunny____-- 6 points7 points  (4 children)

Uncle Vasya, do you want to have little Vasyitchkis ?

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I am more or less indifferent at this point, although of the 5 women I mentioned, 19 & 21 want to have my babies, and both 22 y.o. do also to a bit of a lesser degree. 25 would rather put things off, but given my options, I don't particularly care.

[–]--____notfunny____-- 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Alright, thanks for the reply, honestly, I think you'd be an awesome father as you have been in a way for many of us, myself included, so thanks for that aswell, best regards.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Thanks. I try to help where I can. At this point, even if I knocked one of them up tomorrow, I'd be 70 when the kid was 20 - the first kid. So there's that. But anyway, as I approach geographic independence, maybe I will be more into it.

[–]UncleWarwick 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My pops was 58 when I was born.

You’re not out of the running yet old man.

[–]RedDespair 15 points16 points  (5 children)

Makes total sense.

Nature has made women lose fertility early so they have time to raise their own offspring.

Men's fertility doesn't change much. I am closing in to my 40's and it's ridiculous. Interest comes from 20's till late 30's. In fact there are a lot more 20's looking at me now than 20 years ago, it's ridiculous.

My questions are:

"Where the fuck were you 20 years ago when I would fuck anything?"


"Why choose a woman my age when they are not as physically attractive, (the smell different too) and not as mentally evolved as a man my age?

[–]macaroon18 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Our fertility does change a fair bit as we age, I just dont think we care as much as females

[–]hawkeaglejesus 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Perhaps you meant sex drive? Fertility doesn't change much for men. Mick Jagger had a baby at 73. Trump had his last son at 60.

[–]macaroon18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes but sperm quality reduces and you have less chance of impregnating. Males have a biological clock its just not as extreme as females. Also the older you conceive as a male the higher rate of birth 'defects' such as autism etc...

[–]7Tomus 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Thing to keep in mind is that even though we dont have the same biological wall as women have, you should not waste time either. When your child is born in your 30s you will be in your 50s when it becomes 20 year old. Prefferably you want to be still physically fit by that time so you can spend some quality time together.

[–]Andrew54321 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which is why you LIFT your entire life.

[–]disposable_pants 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Eh, this is only feminist in the sense that it shares a bit of feminism's "you can have it all" theme, and that's a carrot dangled in front of both men and women. That's a problem with any non-traditional approach to life. It's no different from a guy thinking he can go out and get drunk a bunch in his 20s and wind up with a good career, happiness, and money at 30. Yeah, it's possible, but the odds are against it.

This is the female version of dudes waking up at 39 with a fat wife they despise and a day-to-day life that's just a beating. Sometimes the best-laid plans go to shit somewhere and you're left to make the best of it.

[–]indivisibleremainder 33 points34 points  (0 children)

a woman fucking a guy and expecting commitment in return is like a dude buying a woman dinner and expecting sex

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (6 children)

My wifes' friend is a cunt.

An absolute cunt of a woman.

She's 34. Fat, redhead, overeducated to the point where working at the level of her degree causes so much stress that she quits within 6 months to return to her "back-up" profession. Grew up an entitled only child with overprotective helicopter parents. Wears spandex tights. REaLLy shouldn't wear spandex anything.

We've known her ten years. The only boyfriend she's had in that time I saw at a BDSM dungeon meet - without her.

She's depressed, rude, judgemental.

Guess what she decided would cure all? A crotchfruit.

Since she's incapable of maintaining a relationship long enough to receive sperm from a decent man in the original manner, she's been going and getting catheter placed sperm from unknown randos who get paid to jerk off into cups at sperm banks... you know, the creme de la creme of society.(pun intended). 3 times now. 3 fails.

Which of course has driven her deeper into depression and even more desperate for a baby to fix it all.

She even asked my wife about me becoming the father... "Fuck no!"

That's the state of your modern educated postwall single woman... Fat, entitled, broken, mean, depressed bitch who has no societal skills yet thinks that raising a child in those conditions will be the panacea for all her problems.

Poor kid.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (3 children)

haha, what did your wife say to the request? Was she asking to fuck you or just sperm donation?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child)

We laughed. I think she just wanted the sperm...

I've been snipped for ten years.

No way I'd put my dick in that pile of rotting garbage.

I've been vehemently childfree my entire life.

This cunt is the exact flavor of crazy that'd put me on the paperwork and go for support when her life got tough.

It's no secret to wife I think friend is insane and bent on fucking up two lives.

[–]ChadThundercockII 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No way I'd put my dick in that pile of rotting garbage.

I would, for a decent amount of money. srs

[–]BrownGummyBear 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Why don't these post wall baby crazy bitches don't just adopt children for fucks sake...

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I actually asked her that...

She believes her DNA is so superior that she want to "pass it on" so fuckprize has the same advantages as she did.....

Which is to only want a Chad, and not settle for anyone else, but a Chad wouldn't even consider fucking...let alone having a baby with said cunt.

Using unrealistic high standards to justify scarcity.

"The lambo dealer stopped answering my texts when he realized I don't have the money, but regular cars bore me. I want a Ferrari for the price of a civic."

[–]Diogenes-- 43 points44 points  (1 child)

God, that was great. Unlike you I don't even remotely attempt to avoid Schadenfreude. Stuff like this is porn for me.

If she conceives - a 4% chance from IVF, I read somewhere - and it's a boy (so, 2%), does she honestly think the man he grows to be will be shaped by his genes and not her upbringing? I mean he might resemble his father physically, but I can tell you all about the psychology of a man who was raised by a single feminist mother.

Abused, sexually and otherwise, as a young child. Taught to hate his father and all men, including the man he will be at 18+. Taught to hate himself. Taught hate, anger, bitterness, rage, envy, outrage and offense instead of happiness. Taught zero life skills. Used daily as an emotional tampon & substitute boyfriend - and unlike a grown man, a young boy can't extract himself from that situation.

There's a fork in the path you can take from here. You can continue along the self-loathing route. Along there you find every bluepill mangina, you find "YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE!!!", and you also get your MTF trans people that way - they're trying to escape their self-loathing, which is based on their maleness, by becoming not-male.

Or you can go the redpill route and be everything your mother hates, lol. Here's hoping she doesn't conceive, more for the sake of the child she would ruin than for the Schadenfreude. If she does conceive a boy let's hope he follows in Neo's footsteps.

[–]ScribbleTwitch 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Damn. This hit close to home.

[–]5pecial 1 points1 points [recovered]

Women would rather take a turkey baster up their cunts for chad's tall sperm than settle for a short guy in their 20s.

[–]tk421awol 1 points1 points [recovered]

Oh get over yourself and your height-based insecurity. They’re looking for the AF sperm, even if they can’t get it “naturally” anymore. This chick is a post-wall alpha widow. She’s not what any of us want, and the fact that you want some chick to settle for you shows how fucked your mindset is.

The biggest chad I ever knew was so short that when he stood in front of me, you could see both our faces. And he was the one pulling all the high quality tail. He also was in amazing shape, smooth, confident, and dressed well.

Boy, you need to

(A) read the sidebar

(B) work to improve yourself. THAT’S where confidence comes from: knowing you’ve actually done something worth a damn

(C) Abundance mentality. No chick wants the soft desperate boys. They all want the confident hardbody. Choose your own adventure.

[–]Endorsed ContributorPopeman79 3 points4 points  (1 child)

u/5pecial never said that this applies to him or that he can't get girls because he's short. He's making a general point. And, btw, you're right too, your points are valid as general advice.

I don't get why you're angry though.

[–]squarehead93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No doubt there are some short guys with serious game who do just fine, but they had to work for it in a way tall folks simply don't have to do. No, the world isn't fair, but there's no denying certain people have to put in a lot more effort to get the same results.

IRL, being short isn't the death sentence some make it out to be. But the commenter in question was talking about IVF/sperm donors. And sperm banks/women being very selective in that regard is well documented. http://www.mensjournal.com/health-fitness/articles/9-reasons-your-sperm-isnt-good-enough-to-donate-w209421

[–]andalldaytodoit 1 points1 points [recovered]

< I have to let go of rage. I have to let go of fear. I have to let go of everything I thought my life would be and isn’t.

The rage part was interesting. Who is she angry at? I can't help but think her answer would be something like, "all those men who misrepresented themselves" or something like, "were are the real men who aren't intimidated by a successful, independent woman". However, maybe, just maybe, she'll be angry at herself and how she was likely her own worst enemy - refusing to date those boring nice guys, refusing to date those lazy freeloaders who earn less than her, refusing to date under 6 feet, etc.

[–]Blackhawk2479 9 points10 points  (1 child)

However, maybe, just maybe, she'll be angry at herself and how she was likely her own worst enemy

Chance of that is slim to none buddy - women don’t do consequences, that’s why they do pretty much anything they can to avoid making important decisions.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

they do pretty much anything they can to avoid making important decisions.

this risk taking gene is only held by alpha males. betas don't have it. women don't have it. that's why all risk based jobs and high risk sports are dominated by men.

[–]beginner_ 28 points29 points  (15 children)

The romanticizing the sperm donor thing is the most funny aspect. The fact he donated his sperm means he is a complete weirdo and probably something wrong with him.

[–]monkeysword88 1 points1 points [recovered]

There's surprisingly high standards for being a sperm donor. I've done it in the past and the amount of questions and requirements they have are something else. You've gotta be tall, handsome, have a college degree, no history of genetic defects, a positive attitude and everything else. Just to cum in a fuckin cup.

[–]Westernhagen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He donated sperm because the sperm bank paid him a LOT of money to do so when he was a relatively poor grad student.

[–]Torabor64 4 points5 points  (8 children)

What's wrong about donating sperm?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How did you come to this conclusion? To me, the fact that he donated sperm means he’s willing to make quick and easy money for ejaculating into a cup.

[–]redbarrister1 1 points1 points [recovered]

Women have no intrinsic drive, interests or motivators. They don’t have the intellectual wherewithal for any kind of creative contribution and they under no circumstance take any joy or initiative to learn for the sake of learning. They aren’t capable of deeper cognition and their grasp of information ceases to exists beyond rote memorization. The only reason a girl goes on to pantomime like she’s achieving anything in terms of masculine accolades and goals is solely to shit test you. She believes herself too good to be relegated to shitting out kids and cleaning up shit and cleaning your toilet. What she doesn’t realize is that in abdicating her natural role she’s inadvertently made herself a human urinal deserving of merciless mockery and being forced to swallow Chad piss while she slowly rots alive. I dare you to find a female doctor, engineer, accountant or attorney that a) didn’t suck TA cock for dear life to pass her classes and b) that hasn’t been forced to take enough ass to mouth to realize that she isn’t exactly the hot shit she imagines and that she is in fact, the butt of the joke with her “peers,” her “friends,” and particularly with tech who has the disgusting job of ramming the turkey baster up her cobwebriddled wrinkled 30 yo + pussy.


Feminism doesn’t make you our equal ladies- feminism makes you our comedy fodder.

[–]PeggedByOwlette 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your rant gave me a hardon. I'm so confused now.

[–]_the_shape_ 14 points15 points  (0 children)

We've heard this one line before, and we continue to hear it today with respect to other retarded ideologies...

Most of us won't be alive in 100 years, but we might as well start giving future generations of men (and women) a head's up as to what they will be bombarded with once we're gone. Despite a preponderance of irrefutable evidence of feminism repeatedly failing society as a whole over the decades, causing widespread ruin and suffering on both sides of the aisle, even a non-betting man can fatten his pockets by putting a considerable amount down that feminism will continue it's scorched-Earth song and dance and insist on doubling-down on the havoc and destruction with this classic hamsterization:

"...but that wasn't real socialism feminism!"

TL;DR: it's all men's fault (and always will be)

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh my sides!

Turkey basting career shrikes basking in the glow of imaginary Chads who in real life couldn't stand their presence

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The sequel when she is 60, 17 million cats, how many can I fit in my house

[–]fromthecrypt8 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Good summary of the post-wall-amusement women provide.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Her imagined Chad is a Tatar! Ok, time out for Russian guys to laugh at this.

i didn't laugh, but i cringed when i read the article

[–]Solon64 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I'm Polish by heritage and even I laughed/cringed at this. Tatars are the inbred scum of Eastern Europe/Asia Minor. Shit is really fucked up when a woman thinks a Mongol is a good catch. Poles may have been Catholic for a long time, sort of the last bastion of Western Europe against Eastern, and even we are like "damn, we wouldn't touch a Tatar with a ten foot pole unless that pole was a spear, pointy end faced firmly in their direction."

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh man, i love them polish kurwas! i actually speak ok polish, but i can't write it for shit.

[–]TheAC997 2 points3 points  (2 children)

How good of an upbringing is that kid going to have?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

terrible... single mothers are poverty and crime factories. she's so solipsistic she doesn't ever consider the impact it'd have on the father or the child's life... only hers.

anyone who abandons a family out of anything other than infidelity or abuse, especially these women who divorce over boredom, is a terrible fucking parent. any woman who willfully has a child on her own, is going to be a terrible fucking parent.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is why I never donated sperm. I could not live with the possibility of sentencing a child, particularly a son, to being raised by some harridan career chick. /shudder.

[–]thegodfather76 2 points3 points  (2 children)

What makes a feminist? Can someone explicitly explain what makes a feminist? In today's society, most of women and daughters are raised with certain mindset and privilege, I would like to know when I am dealing with a feminist and what to look out for. Also what is a RP approved good woman worthy of LTR?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If there was any semblance of feminine traditions or respect of fertility this Woman would be able to act as a mentor to her younger family or younger Women to pass on "Women's Business" or whatever and ensure the mistakes wouldn't be repeated.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She's likely too self-involved and solipsistic for that.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This effectively sums up why feminism is poison

[–]Mr-Ed209 4 points5 points  (1 child)

It's important to emphasise the evolutionary perspective over the belief a 'societal programme'. It's easy to forget but we are living in strange times in regards to having lifestyles which are artificially influenced against human nature.

The contraceptive pill was only produced 57 years ago. Which means this current generation is among the first to actually experience it's existence as 'normality'. Womens earning potential has also risen due to the nature of more menial and less labour intensive jobs. The knock on effect of relationships is what we are currently experiencing.

It's no wonder this generations grandparents would look on in shock and awe at the behaviour of men and women in this current climates dating scene. Such is the nature of the beast.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The contraceptive pill was only produced 57 years ago.

It can be thought of as "Tinder, 1960s version".

[–]Venny_1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This isn’t the ending I wanted

Of course not! She is craving the ending where she sirens a child out of wedlock, without consideration for the well being of the potential child in question, or what the potential father has to say. Then, in due time, she will be craving some single-mother sympathy/ victimhood from the circle of people around her. She will also crave some child support money from Eli, who didn't want to have anything to do with this to begin with.


So much good in that ending she wanted!

[–]Cis_White_Harambe 5 points6 points  (17 children)

This is why men should marry women with strong Christian values and raise their daughters the same way. My wife is a stay at home mom and hates feminism and everything it stands for.

[–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 4 points5 points  (16 children)

I think your thoughts and commentary would be better appreciated over on the Married Red Pill Reddit. Join us over there- but read the sidebar first brah.

[–]bobaisdope 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I'm sorry but could you explain to me what's the fun part of Tatar? I know this is an ethnicity of Russians but have no clue beyond that fact. Thanks!

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Simple Explanation: Russians look down on Tatars.

[–]Banincoming 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Substandard Mongols who attacked the Russians for 1000 years.

[–]Solon64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically mongrel mongols.

Culturally they're very aggressive. They've been fighting Russians ever since Genghis Khan and his boys left. From what I've read they put in some work during the Napoleonic era as Cossacks, and I believe there were a few units of them fighting for the Soviet Union too.

Russia has never really accepted them as a culture. They aren't Slavs, basically. There's no good analogy for the United States. If I wanted to try that analogy, the closest I could get would be like a bunch of inbred Cajuns in Louisiana forming "militias" and unleashing terror attacks on Northerners for "oppressing them and their right to hate/kill whoever they want." Sort of like the KKK, but along cultural lines rather than racial ones, although obviously Tatars are not even racially the same as Russians either.

[–]Endorsed ContributorTaipanshimshon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, time out for Russian guys to laugh at this

made my morning. dirty people.

[–]TheBunk_TB 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What about a woman trying to get knocked up by a guy that had a vasectomy? Laugh worthy.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crawling under the sheets later that night, Eli was looking at me. For the first time, I noticed his eyes, bright blue.

I wonder if she bothered to get his name before letting him shove a couple fingers up her snatch. What a lovely creature.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm in the process of looking into something like this for men (gestational surrogacy), but I'm much younger than her and interested in it for different reasons than she is.

load more comments (35 replies)