Dark Theme
SFW Mode

278,687 posts archived


Asia Argento has been one of the leading voices in the Metoo movement. She's also one of the first to publicly accuse Harvey Weinstein of sexual misconduct.

This weekend, The New York Times broke the story that in 2013, Argento gave alcohol to a 17 year old actor and had sex with him. The age of consent in California is 18.

The actor originally asked for $3.5 million, based on his income before the incident and its effect on his career. According to documents sent to the Times via encrypted email, Ms. Argento, who is divorced and has two children, was both a mentor and a mother figure to Mr. Bennett, and the two were intermittently in contact as he grew up. “Jimmy’s impression of this situation was that a mother-son relationship had blossomed from their experience on set together”

This development mirrors my own experience with the court system in California. While women enjoy many advantages in society, including often getting a pass for behaviors that would land a man a nearly guaranteed prison sentence; if you do your due diligence and follow procedures to the letter, the justice system works well for men against women who have wronged them, too.

[–]iloveturks 433 points434 points  (32 children)

In a serving of delicious irony, leading metoo figure Rose McGowan tweeted about this, saying:

“None of us know the truth of the situation and I’m sure more will be revealed. Be gentle.”

Right, exactly the same treatment that all the men who were persecuted by the metoo movement received.

The double standards never cease to amaze me.

EDIT: Boys this just took a hilarious turn, showing just how deep and dark the rabbit hole really goes. She’s essentially claiming that HE RAPED HER!

In a text messages to a friend she wrote: “It wasn’t rape but I was frozen. He was on top of me”.

And then my friends wonder why I’m fucking cynical about male / female dynamics. Because I know better than you motherfuckers...

[–]Tousen71 171 points172 points  (12 children)

Fucking right dude. I swear I hate fucking feminists for this exact type of shit. Louis CK got shit canned instantly off of allegations. This bitch is settling out of court and these cunts are still claiming “let’s see how the evidence plays out”.

Fuck right off with that shit.

[–]sternje 54 points55 points  (0 children)

"She would never have done it if she had not been a victim of the patriarchy for her entire life, therefore she deserves our lenience, our understanding and our help." #feministvictimactivist #womencantbewrong #hewasALMOSTanadult

[–]Lontar47 17 points18 points  (0 children)

They tell themselves that this is just retribution for the "abuses" of the patriarchy and that it's okay to treat men victims differently than women. In their view it's "corrective".

Ah, the insanity of sunk-cost fallacies and rationalizations.

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 14 points15 points  (8 children)

Louis ck didn’t even do anything wrong really

[–]Tousen71 6 points7 points  (3 children)

After the fallout dude. He made an apology after the fallout. The point is guilt is assumed before evidence when it comes to men. And when a woman is in the hot seat they immediately discredit the legitimacy of the man (ironic because they complain men discredit women as ‘liars’ when THEY come forward).

The point is EVERYONE should be held to the standard of innocent before proven guilty. Especially when careers, legacies, and lives are at stake.

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I got your point man. I was just saying on top of that, what Louis did was barely even wrong. It was weird, sure. But not illegal. And barely even harassment. Maybe not even that.

[–]Tousen71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My response was actually to sauce not you dude. Sorry for the confusion.

[–]2CasaDeFranco 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Really? He when unsolicited masturbated in front of women he knew professionally not once but several times. Secondly, I'm rather certain indecent exposure is illegal.

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Indecent exposure is in public. Louis did this in his hotel rooms (considered private space) which women willingly went to. He also did ask if he could masturbate in front of them and wasn’t rebuked. He wasn’t always given a yes, but when he got a no he didn’t do it. He also got laughter sometimes which is a nonverbal cue of at least not offense. He also wasn’t between them and the door, so he wasn’t blocking their exit or coercing in any way. It’s really just a harmless weird fetish from a guy who makes his living being a weirdo on stage. It’s a victimless non crime. These women are adults and could tell him outright no or leave anytime they wished. They were willingly in his room, not he in theirs. Often they stayed and found amusement.

[–]2CasaDeFranco 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You do realise that’s not appropriate behavior though? I can’t inserstand why a man would try to hamster an excuse.

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah i know it’s not appropriate. I just said it’s not a crime and theres no victim. But if they said yes when he asked, than it’s not even inappropriate. People have weird fetishes and it’s fine between consenting adults. Plus comedians are fucked up and this sort of stuff is somewhat expected.

[–]Saucebiz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey I totally agree these are double standards...but didn’t Louis come right out and say something to the effect of “yes I’m sorry I jacked off in front of women who were clearly disgusted by it?”

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

The double standards..... we all knew it. Its just on public record now. Good stuff.

[–]JDRoedell 22 points23 points  (2 children)

This will be a huge reveal that shows that MeToo and feminism is about supremacy and persecution of men and not equality. The question is whether anyone will give a shit and I think the answer to that is “no.”

[–]pseudo_nemesis 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Until I read your second sentence, my response was gonna be: "yeah right, buddy"

[–]JDRoedell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s sad that the hypocrisy of it all is so out in the open and yet still nothing will change. Men are still guilty until proven innocent but when it’s a woman we have to “be gentle and wait for all the facts to come out.” Sickening.

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The same old cunt who tweeted that we should all "believe victims."

Rule for thee, but not for me.

[–]tempolaca 19 points20 points  (0 children)

“None of us know the truth of the situation and I’m sure more will be revealed. Be gentle.”

Haha the hypocrisy of that is incredibly. They lost all credibility.

[–]NotLuceBree 7 points8 points  (2 children)

She's getting roasted for that tweet, FWIW

[–]TRPmc117 6 points7 points  (1 child)

And a huge portion of those roasting her are women, which is great. People in general are waking up to this BS.

[–]SKRedPill 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No that's because most women hate each other. :) Most men have a different yardstick.

[–]SKRedPill 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Double standards are not surprising if you realize that its all about sollipsism, competition and self interest at work. For all the talk of fairness, everyone really puts themselves first only.

The mistake is in thinking that people are truly logical and mean what they say. Logic is only a tool for self imperative for most people around you.

[–]TameTheRuckus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's crazy that many people are ignoring anthony's friend's and family's concerns over this woman. He fell in with the wrong woman, and we're starting to see exactly what's at the base of far too many of these stories: Predatory behavior. Now that the victims have been given power, many are abusing it. Yes, get the rapists, Yes, seek justice, but don't perpetuate the abuse

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually can't, as girly as that statement sounds

Read that garbage and I started down at my keyboard for at least one minute just trying to comprehend this all

Rose McGowan should honestly go off herself for this next level ignorant hypocrisy

[–]MikeyNYC1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"We are the many, they are the few"..the media just amplifies the ever-loving SHIT out of this tiny tiny minority. Not all women stand for that crap.

[–]Jack50517 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rose McGowan's first tweet emphasised how she had only known Asia Argentina for ten months after the Harvey Weinstein allegations.

Clearly she can't even get an angle on whether or not she wants to disown the woman or completely re-assess her own take on metoo movement.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Be gentle.", she types with a smirk..

[–]pohlrich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“None of us know the truth of the situation and I’m sure more will be revealed. Be gentle.”

we now know the best way to deal with an accusation, deny all accountablity or knowledge and tell everyone how they should behave and feel.

[–]omega_dawg93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow. how many hamsters are in her head?

[–]blownnnn 450 points451 points  (68 children)

What a disgusting woman. This is further evidence to prove she manipulated and pushed Bourdain into killing himself. She had no problem ruining a young actor's career.

Edit: Update:

The NYT has details on the settlement, Bourdain was required to make a $200,000 lump sum payment in May and $10,000 a month until October 2019.

Asia had scammed him. Just weeks after the lump sum payment she is seen frolicking and kissing in Rome with another man.

[–]slumdog-millionaire 86 points87 points  (16 children)

glad to see this hypocrisy brought to light

[–]sehns 111 points112 points  (15 children)

Not really. Reddit mods are working round the clock right now to keep this off the front page of all the major news subs. Can't ruin the narrative they've worked so hard to craft.

[–]geo_gan 34 points35 points  (12 children)

Why would they do this? Are you saying the mods are all women or feminists or white knights or something?

[–]sehns 57 points58 points  (9 children)

Not all of them - but I mean take /worldnews for example there's 97 mods. How many of those do you think are hardcore left or self-described feminists? I was banned from worldnews the other day for stating that women in saudia arabia fighting for equality are "Real feminists" and when I asked why I was being removed for stating an opinion the mods told me that they didn't believe that was really my opinion and i was just trying to stir people up to get a reaction. For real.

[–]NorthEasternNomad 35 points36 points  (3 children)

You can get banned from those subs for saying literally anything not in line with the liberal agenda. Anything. Doesnt matter what it is, or how true it is. Another few years and masculine or conservative speech will be shadow banned throughout this country...especially for young people.

I guess the internet are big fans of Venezuela and the Friend Zone...

[–]sourdieselfuel 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I got banned from latestagecapitalism for commenting on something completely unrelated to TRP while having more than 400 comment karma in this sub.

[–]NorthEasternNomad 20 points21 points  (0 children)

That sub is a literal safe space echo chamber. Its existence makes is an embarrassment to humanity. I mean, the only place their ideas and philosophies "work" is an online forum where free speech and dissenting opinions are literally banned.

It's a blue pill snowflake haven.

[–]Ivan_The_Reddish 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sounds about right. I was just banned from news for saying that the mods there routinely censored threads that didn't fit their narrative. This was in one of the threads about the black Muslims in New Mexico training kids to commit school shootings, so they were working overtime trying to lock that down.

[–]Rian_Stone 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Stop consuming media that isn't designed for you.

[–]geo_gan 3 points4 points  (1 child)

This kind of shit pisses me off on the internet. There is supposedly "free speech" but only as long as it is some sort of middle of the road, agreed-upon "won't offend the easily offended" types, type of free speech. A lot of people only want to live in an imaginary sandbox-type safe space, where everyone only says what everyone else wants to hear.

[–]wrekd 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It has nothing to do with free speech. In the US, our free speech laws are restrictions on what the government can do to people. Not what people can do to people.

[–]BrownGummyBear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t wait for a solar flare to kill humanity for good..

[–]NormalAndy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It may not seem it but trp is still a very small port in the storm of reddit fluffy kittens.

Essentially, there is a lot of 'news' out there and it's very easy to just not publish news which goes against your own predjudices or those of your advertisers.

Journalistic integrity is not something that comes easily in a world of bandits.

[–]mushroom_overlord 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He's not quite diagnosing the problem correctly, but he has the right idea. It just isn't all or even necessarily most mods; it only takes a few activists to push an agenda if everyone else is doing it by the book.

[–]Mastermatt87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally discovered this because it was on the front page.

So, not really.

[–]Ganaria-Gente 152 points153 points  (4 children)

This breaking news has puta massive smile on my face

The only thing that can compare is when Michael Kimmel (aka the world's most prominent male feminist) was also MeToo'd just a few weeks ago

God I love this circus.

Burn these witches! AHAHAHAHAHA

[–]jelly_jam 24 points25 points  (2 children)

Puta in spanish means whore.

[–]1Your_Coke_Dealer 13 points14 points  (0 children)









[–]Endorsed ContributorKeffirLime 34 points35 points  (2 children)

Also once again a prime example of a woman's inability to take responsibility for her actions.

Whoring out her body to Harvey Weinstein(repeatedly) for the advancement of her career. The self preservation hamster kicks in,

"it couldn't be me, I would never willingly do that, I was sexually assaulted!".

Now fucking a 17 year old, although this time the preservation hamster is being held by the tail. He was a minor. The law forces her to take responsibility this time.

Illimitable Men was right, she is BPD. He should get his twitter account re-instated.

[–]TheEagleAndTheSnake 12 points13 points  (0 children)

IM's twitter post about her being BPD came right into my mind after reading the news article. If you look at her photos, she's got this don't-care-if-the-world-burns look in her eyes.

[–]Jesuissimpledesprit 8 points9 points  (9 children)

What was her relation with Anthony?

[–]Ivan_The_Reddish 57 points58 points  (8 children)

She was his girlfriend. He killed himself three days after finding out she was cheating on him. Funnily enough the media seem to have a hard time drawing a connection between those two events.

[–]lotemax 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Bourdain was a fucking A list celebrity, an accomplished food writer and had several hit travel shows. Literally the 1% of the 1% of attractive social status. He could have slept with a new foodie girl everyday for the rest of his life. Bluepill goggles will drive even people who have it all to kill themselves. Its really a damn shame.

[–]xX_throw__away_Xx 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Didn’t even know this until now

[–]Ivan_The_Reddish 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Didn’t even know this until now

Just remember that that's not accidental.

[–]tempolaca 20 points21 points  (3 children)

You have to have severe mental problems to kill yourself, doubly so for killing yourself over a girl.

Saying this, the girl is obviously a BPD and we know how horrible those persons can be.

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Bourdain was an outspoken male feminist in her defence too.

[–]xX_throw__away_Xx 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not everyone reads redpill, let alone knows about it

[–]Hakametal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

>You have to have severe mental problems to kill yourself, doubly so for killing yourself over a girl.

This is why this sub exists.

[–]1swampbastard69 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Its obvious her cheating on him publicly and breaking up with him caused his suicide right? The gossip media isn't reporting this - I guess we know why. Imagine the public outcry if a boyfriend of say Chelsea Handler publicly cheated on her and then called her out in cryptic instagram posts - leading to her suicide. Hell the guy would probably be prosecuted for some made up new law like cyber bullying.

[–]ep1939 39 points40 points  (15 children)

She had no problem ruining a young actor's career.

Man, seriously, what are we, inverse SJWs?

They had alcohol, they fucked = ruining his career?

I don't like the hoe, but isn't that overblown.

Yes I agree she's an hypocrite, but I fail to see how did she done so much "damage" to him and how did she "ruin his career"

edit, re reading the news:

She gave him alcohol to drink and showed him a series of notes she had written to him on hotel stationery. Then she kissed him, pushed him back on the bed, removed his pants and performed oral sex. She climbed on top of him and the two had intercourse, the document says. She then asked him to take a number of photos.

The two had lunch, and Mr. Bennett headed home to Orange County, where he lived with his parents. As he was driven home, according to his claim, he began to feel “extremely confused, mortified, and disgusted.

Conveniently, only after he fucks her, sleeps with her, have lunch, and is going back home he feels disgusted.

And only after his own parents fuck him up of his hard earned money and he's broke he has the idea to sue Asia Argento.

Fact is that if he wasn't 18 he was never, ever, gonna win that in tribunal.

[–]p3n1x 5 points6 points  (2 children)

As OP said, sometimes you have to play the game of Law to get a desired outcome. You took the entire thing literally and not for the idea that she fucked a minor, period. If the male/female role was reversed, nobody would ask any of the questions you are raising. OPs point was, the law is technically balanced, if you know how to play the game.

[–]ep1939 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If that happened in Nevada we wouldn't even know about that since the age of consent here is 16.

Unless he wanted to prove that he was forced to do all of that, which even from his own story and his lawyers doesn't really look the case the only reason this happened is just because of where it happened rather than the morality of it.

[–]p3n1x 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There is no morality in it. Fucking Hollywood.

[–]blownnnn 14 points15 points  (7 children)

Maybe the kid was super religious and she took his virginity unwillingly. She also probably got him into drugs, under her guise as a mother figure.

The evidence is very clear tho, she preyed on a child, forced a sexual act on him, under the influence and without his consent. If you think that is right "because he got sex" then you are fucked up.

[–]tempolaca -5 points-4 points  (3 children)

She didn't ruin his career and even if she legally raped him, the harm done by a women raping a men is honestly, very little. But she's still a lying hypocritical piece of shit of a women. Add psychopath to that, killing her boyfriend and sending her ex (she dated Weinstein for years) to the wolves.

[–]malditoduende77 1 points1 points [recovered]

Rape is even worse when the man is the victim because the abuse is not as physical as it is psychological. No woman could pin you down and fuck you. They resort to fucking with your mind and then you have to comply or else... I know that women getting raped is also psychologically traumatic, but I'm sure you can imagine how forcing yourself to fuck someone can cause more psychological trauma than actually having a chance to physically fight back.

[–]1RPAlternate42 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You forgot that the legal definitions of rape is typically penis entering vagina and not vagina engulfing a penis.

They had sex and she had sexual.cobtact with a minor.

No one here was raped, but a crime was committed.

[–]tempolaca -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

the abuse is not as physical as it is psychological.

Stop being a pussy.

you have to comply or else...

Or else what. A woman can't realistically threaten you with anything. (barring a gun or knife or some other violent crazy things). If she's playing mind games with you, then the blame is on you for being so fucking pathetic.

[–]Just_Isaak 20 points21 points  (4 children)

TIL that I can’t take the word ‘disgusting’ seriously anymore because I’ve read it in so many SJW/white knight/feminist comments. Nothing personal u/blownnnn.

[–]modTheRedPike 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Gray area here. Yeah, I'm not really a fan either because it's a moral judgement and we don't do that. However, let's be honest and admit most of us had the same visceral reaction, even if we used different words. So maybe we shouldn't get caught up on the specific words while also agreeing with you that shaming is often just a bullshit excuse for not making a real case against a specific behavior.

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disgust isn’t an inherently moral emotion.

[–]cvillano 1 point2 points  (1 child)

For me it’s “gross,” just can’t take it seriously anymore. Also “problematic” but thats become less prominent

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use gross and disgusting to describe leftist bullshit all the time.

If you’re not disgusted to your core at the spectacle of our society especially this sanctimonious leftism, wake up.

[–]Hjalmbere 1 point2 points  (5 children)

I honestly don't think she did manipulate him into killing himself. Don't think she's the scheming type, more like one of those narcissistic chicks who turn everything they touch into shit.

It's all very interersting. Now I'm just waiting for something juicy on her #metoo twin, Rose McGowan. Rose is clearly mental so there has to be something.

[–]blownnnn 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Oh please, show no sympathy for this woman. Women and the #metoo movement have no qualms ripping apart men on allegations.

She just blamed this whole payout on Anthony Bourdain. What a fuckin' disgusting woman.

[–]Hjalmbere 3 points4 points  (2 children)

What I meant was that she’s ruthless but not cunning and patient enough to run a long con. Like many women.

Blaming Bourdain reminds me of a joke a lawyer friend told me:

Q: What’s the difference between a hooker and a lawyer? A: A hooker stops screwing you when you’re dead.

Guess she’s a lawyer....

[–]blownnnn 1 point2 points  (1 child)

True. The funny thing is that, Weinstein did the same shit she did to this young kid. He made Asia his "sex slave" for years, corrupted her and ruined her career. Exactly what Asia did with Jimmy.

Once she realized she had to look at herself and was getting played all these years by Weinstein, she plotted payback.

It's ironic how this story comes to light because Weinsten was doing the world justice on this disgusting woman because of what she did to Jimmy.

[–]Hjalmbere 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She alleges Weinstein raped her. Alleges. What is provable is that he paid for a nanny for her kid. I’m sure he traded it for sex, but she was an adult by then. He didn’t force her to have kids by two different guys, nor did he force her into a relationship with a fragile ex-addict who she then proceeded to publicly cheat on. But she’s the victim in the gynocentric West.

The entire metoo movement was started by unknown feminist harpies but was soon co-opted by attention whores like Asia Argento and Rose McGowan. I’m just waiting for the dirt on the mentally unstable McGowan.

[–]fifi508 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This story just keeps getting better. Asia denies having any sex with Jimmy, then the after sex photo leaks and text messages of Asia telling her friend they fucked...lol. Your right, she’s delusional and BPD.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

Proves nothing.

People can be both victims and culprits.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

But yeah. Who'd have thought the meetoo movement could ever be tinged by hypocrisy.... lol. Long time coming.

[–]BillyRedRocks -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Disgusting? You've got some high standards, m8. I'd tap that.

[–][deleted] 188 points189 points  (2 children)

Rollo called it. This chick is evil / psycho.


I hope she goes to jail but I doubt it.

[–]BostonPillParty 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Rollo a fucking mystic, I swear.

[–]Hjalmbere 186 points187 points  (10 children)

-Kids by two different dads? Check.

-Visible tattoos? Check.

-Had sugar daddy relationship with older guy? Check.

What the hell was Bourdain thinking?

One of the most useful skills a father can pass on to his son is how to spot and avoid dangerous women.

[–]blownnnn 59 points60 points  (1 child)

She was skilled in manipulation and took advantage of a man who was suicidal, sensitive and suffered from low self-esteem. His mother was the reason he become so famous, so it makes sense why he backed the #metoo movement. He put all his trust in a woman because of his mother's love and this woman destroyed him.

[–]yazen_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you look at these photos, he always follows her like a duckling. I always feel sad for him. She got him from the balls.

[–]herrLitschka 18 points19 points  (5 children)

What about this visible tattoos thing in TRP? What's wrong with it?

I mean, I get what it's about with these tattoos with a "special meaning" or tattoos that follow a trend, but why the general disapproval?

Just curious.

[–]Ivan_The_Reddish 31 points32 points  (1 child)

It's a red flag. Women with tattoos are more likely to have something wrong with them. Is this 100%? No, but the odds are greatly increased, so by avoiding such women you lessen the risk in a relationship. (Whatever kind of relationship you're looking to have.) Same with single mothers. There are some good single mothers out there, but they are incredibly rare and it's not worth the time, effort, or risk to try and find the needle in the shit-stack.

[–]WiseMonkeyGoodMonkey 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Specifically it speaks to questionable decision making skills. As you point out not every time. But often enough that it's noteworthy.

[–]Do-it-for-you 47 points48 points  (1 child)

The main reason a women gets a tattoo’s is because they want to “Feel” different about themselves, To give themselves a new identity. Which is usually due to a low self esteem.

The tattoo’s that have no meaning will tell us about their impulsiveness, lack of long term planning, and it can be a sign a mentally unstable women, she’s trying to fix something with tattoo’s, these can be the same reasons they’ll get piercings and dye their hair.

When I’m talking about these women, I’m talking about the ones with tattoo’s all over their body, arms, stomach, chest, etc. One or two hidden tattoo’s does not indicate anything I’ve specified above.

[–]NorthEasternNomad 34 points35 points  (0 children)

You know whats worse? The things they are trying to "fix" with tattoos could - at least a lot of the time - be fixed. By actual, proactive, constructive action in their lives.

Guy gets fat. Loses self esteem. Stays up watching Rocky movies all night one night. Next day, he is dragging the weight bench back out and lacing up his shoes. Six months later, he's got necks snapping to look at him. Thats how men fix shit.

Women get lazy and fat and start feeling bad? They go get a tattoo. Put it on visible display. Think its gonna make them sexy, or different, in the eyes of others. Because they are women, and we are supposed to praise their mere presence in our life, and tell them how beautiful they are whether they do anything to earn that praise or not.

Fuck this shit. You want people to think you're gorgeous and sexy? Fucking earn it. We have to.

[–]2CasaDeFranco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tattoo's a poor long-term decision. Those who make bad long-term decisions typically make short terms ones also.

[–]the99percent1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

blue pilled men dont think

[–]ozenmacher 97 points98 points  (19 children)

Asia Argento is BPD crazy-bitch. She ruins lives for fun, and she attaches herself to anything that will push her own agenda. She reminds me of Lola Montez, discussed in one of the 48 Laws of Power, abusing men and leaving a wake of destruction, all to achieve her own status and money/power. Eventually that power, in people without moral values, turns into twisted evil and narcissistic pleasures, in this case, young dick in the form of a young boy mentee who was clearly an easy victim.

I have a theory that these types of women, evolutionarily, were meant to weed out weak men from the gene pool. They have a knack for specifically targeting the same type of men; men with resources, money, fame, power, but men who are beta/bluepill and weak when it comes to the fancies of a beautiful seductress playing the damsel in distress. These types of women have existed since the dawn of time, and the stories are always the same. At the least, the destruction of the man, at the worst, destruction of entire nations/societies when they were able to sink their hooks into powerful men. One could argue that all women have such tendencies built-in, extreme hypergamy mixed with mental illness, but only a select handful have it all in one complete package. Who knows. While she may go down, and I hope she does before she can destroy more men/boys, there are more feminist crazies, frothing at the mouth under the guise of feminist equality, waiting to take her place.

[–]Senior ContributorMentORPHEUS[S] 36 points37 points  (7 children)

evolutionarily, were meant to weed out

Evolution didn't "mean to" anything. That's Creationism.

What we today call "BPD traits" may have conferred an advantage under conditions unimaginable to our peaceful modern society. Perhaps under hunter-gatherer conditions or times of severe upheaval. In stable, agrarian type societies, it is a flaw or malfunction, not a feature.

I imagine prehistoric, Dunbar's Number-sized societies being far less tolerant of their individual and group disrupting behaviors, and assisting them at finding their way out of the gene pool.

[–]lastdumra 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Evolution didn't "mean to" anything. That's Creationism.

That is just a way of speaking, not a suggestion of Creationism.

[–]Ganaria-Gente 17 points18 points  (0 children)


People here need to remember: evolution has no intent. It just does what it does, just cuz.

[–]geo_gan 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This is why actually people were pissed off with the new List in Space remake as the psycho “doctor smith” woman in it was not rooted out and ostracised from the small colony. Maybe this Argentino woman is like doctor smith...

[–]wrekd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She stole her sisters pass to get to space and stole the doctors credentials to leave when the alien captive they had went apeshit. She was an imposter and not part of the community.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

What we today call "BPD traits" may have conferred an advantage under conditions unimaginable to our peaceful modern society

I think you are wrong about BPD in specifically, but that your idea is correct in general. BDP is clearly a disorder that would not be beneficial in any time period. It destroys relationships and makes it impossible to mutually cooperate. Humans are social creatures and I cannot see any time period before or after the dawn of agriculture in which this would be a feature. It might be in earlier times that BPD people simply died because they were expelled from their tribes or villages, just like a baby with down syndrome would have been abandoned and died.

I do think that different traits can be more beneficial in different times though. I'm struck by the different personality types that rise to the top throughout different periods of Roman history. During the early Republic its the selfless virtuous citizen soldier/farmer. In the late Republic it's the consummate politician. In the early empire it's those who show loyalty to the emperor and competence. In the late empire it's the backstabbing pure Machiavellian scumbag.

[–]Senior ContributorMentORPHEUS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BDP is clearly a disorder that would not be beneficial in any time period.

That's what I originally wrote, but amended it so as not to have to fit an absolute statement to every circumstance that has arisen since Mitochondrial Eve.

"Dark Triad" behaviors are fetishized by some here, mainly because pure IDGAF can masquerade as greater than average knowledge and confidence. What underlies it in reality is a broken mind incapable of healthy pair bonding.

BPD and other Axis II disorder people may not necessarily be intelligent, but despite this they are usually incredibly crafty and shrewd. It's a grave tactical error to believe them "stupid" or that high intelligence is a fair match with them.

Source: Crazy BPD GF in the distant past.

[–]Gandalfthecool 11 points12 points  (2 children)

I think we’re all power hungry (status, money, happy etc) and some people are more wired to go after it than others. The means of achieving this power is through our biological predispositions between fight/flight - truth/manipulation....we all know which predisposition belongs to either sex on here....bottom line is there is a hierarchical structure of “excellence” as in the top 1% of either sex is the “best” at being that sex (including what would be deemed morally best pertaining to whatever culture) and then devalues farther down the “pyramid” we go....we’re all the same (man/woman) just utilize different tactics to achieve wants/needs whether they’re “good” or “bad” (morally speaking). Men are obviously more giving (in the material/physical sense) but anybody can be turned into a sucker without proper vetting in their relationships or if they lack a backbone. As a man you control your ultimate fate and who you choose to have in your life...if you let someone digs their hooks in you..it’s your own damn fault.

[–]thisishowiwrite 4 points5 points  (1 child)

A lot of the people in this thread banging on about "evil" and "craziness" should read your comment. She was just doing what comes naturally to her. No need to hate or look for wild explanations, just understand it, learn the signs, and don't let it happen to you.

[–]Gandalfthecool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. It is what it is so play with the cards you’re dealt with.

[–]Saberinbed 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You don’t need to be a feminist to be a batshit crazy life sucking hoe.

[–]NorthEasternNomad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Helen of Troy as the ultimate Red Pill cautionary tale...

[–]lololasaurus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Proverbs the seventh chapter speaks of such women.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I am loosely friends with a woman who I strongly suspect is one of these women. She is older than me (late 30's), always single, no kids, no long term relationships, and very fit. Like almost masculine kinda fitness. When I first met I was wearing cheap clothes, no watch etc, because I presumed that the group I was going to was about who you really are vs what you own (it was a meditation group) but nope I turned up and they were all flashing their gucci watches (lol) and the latest smartphones in an egoic "look at what I have" fashion. (Later experience has taught me there are more egoic / narcissistic / BPD types in spiritual groups than groups than "normality"). She looked me up and down and completely ignored me.

The next time I went I showed up in what I usually wear, smart casual, loafers, Rolex, etc. She was all over me. The only thing I changed was wealth signalling. Now when she sees me she hugs me, constantly pushes for me to ask her out on a date, etc. Unfortunatly for her she has something I can't stand - tattoos everywhere. Spiritual tattoos proudly displayed on her arms. Full body tattoos are a major red flag for me in women. And of course she latter talked about how she didn't know her Dad growing up. Another red flag. But I think she is BPD based on what her female friends have said sometimes, of which she seems to be the alpha girl. Oh and that female friend group is toxic AF. They don't have their own opinions. One person shares an opinion and immediately all of them chime in with encouragement.

BTW I think everyone has some beta inside. You can slip into it if you are not careful. You have to keep frame always which can be hard to do sometimes.

Funny aside story once I went to that group a guy takes off his watch and passes it round to everyone to marvel at. I'm thinking..this must be a patek phillipe or something right? No it was a $200 thing... I had to act impressed... and carefully tuck my jumper down over my rolex submariner..

TLDR: I got targeted by a girl just like AA. But I am RP with unconscious beta tendancies.

[–]tempolaca 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the least, the destruction of the man, at the worst, destruction of entire nations/societies when they were able to sink their hooks into powerful men.

Now I'm thinking Helen of troy was clearly BPD.

The crazy thing is that Argento is not even pretty, actually she's plain vanilla/ugly. I fell for a BPD that now I see, is really really ugly, she actually looks like a men. But I fell so hard for her, it's incredibly the manipulation power they have.

[–]kellykebab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They would not weed out these men from the gene pool unless they somehow prevented the men from procreating.

Edit: autocorrect

[–]SPREAD_THE_LOVE_7791 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy fuck this was a well-articulated comment. Gave me chills.

[–]NomadicDogDemon 13 points14 points  (1 child)

If you haven't already, watch the speech she gave at Canne's. Megyn Kelly showed a clip of it after this news broke and it made my blood boil. She calls for a witch hunt, saying, "There are many people here with us today who still need to be held accountable for their actions against women. You know who you are and we know who you are." It amazes me how someone guilty of doing what she did can talk like that. She clearly doesn't see her actions as equivalent. She thinks the rules only apply to men. Typical entitled female.

Of course, some of those feminazis will try to draw the distinction by saying this isn't the same because it isn't forcible rape. But the allegations being made against men by the MeToo movement are often not of forcible rape, including her own allegations against Weinstein. She had a consensual sexual relationship with him for years, she just claims that due to his position of power it was not truly consensual and qualifies as rape. Well then what about her position of power as an adult with a 17 year old kid? Roy Moore was being called out even for approaching 22 year olds at the mall when he was 30!

[–]blownnnn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Feminism is over. Asia scammed Bourdain to pay off this kid, then fucked another dude after he paid the bill.

The fact that they are "defending" her and keeping silent on this, shows you that it's a movement for power and the enemy is men. These women will manipulate your status, resources and your money in exchange for sex. Once you are of no use, she has every right to publicly shame/ruin you. Fuck that!

MGTOW and Incels are right: Feminism is waging a war against men.

Men, we need to fuck and chuck these plates. Denounce and discourage fellow men from any LTR until women expose their fraudulent movement to use men and get rid of double standards.

A good man Anthony Bourdain died for, this let's mobilize and get to it.

[–]CaffineIsLove 44 points45 points  (1 child)

This seems to be a trend lately, accuse others of what you have done. Maybe donate to a charity against it or start a movement.

[–]yazen_ 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Over compensation and virtue signaling, the signs of guilt.

[–]samsmith67 57 points58 points  (12 children)

Apperantly Bourdain was helping her cover it up as well. I saw the story earlier today and can't find it now. Guess it was wiped. From this i feel Bourdian killed himself after seeing those pics of her with that french photographer. Especially after knowing as well that he was being a hypocrite by helping her cover up this AND seeing her cheating on him.

[–]chocolatex 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Apparently he is the one who forked over the $$$ for the settlement to the underage boy.

[–]Flintblood 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This article shows a picture of Asia Argento and the boy she groomed together. She slathered herself allover him. Imagine a picture of a 30 or 40 something male draped allover a female teen actress and the outrage that would ensue from just the picture (not that it’s right or a good idea). Hypocrisy indeed.


[–]Work_In_Progress92 36 points37 points  (1 child)

Here is yet another example of Hollywood with another edition of "Do as I say, not as I do." These frauds preach to the masses to feel good about themselves while they cover up shit like this all the time.

There was a time I was really into films; that has changed ever since I found the Pill. The amount of bullshit that spews out of Hollywood, I just don't bother wasting my time on it anymore.

[–]the99percent1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Hollywood is a fucking blue-pill conditioning. Get off it and go out and make something of your life.

[–]Nergaal 27 points28 points  (6 children)

You did not mention she was the GF of Anthony Bourdain when he killed himself. Thinking goes he realized she was cheating on him:


[–]the99percent1 10 points11 points  (0 children)

realized? he definitely knew and he knows exactly why.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That’s a great article man. Thanks for linking it.

[–]JoshAndArielle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That article was a good read

[–]DEADFENCER 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very worthwhile read. Thanks.

[–]chambertlo 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It’s always the guilty that have the loudest voices.

[–]Imarobot2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Anyone see Asia’s follow up?


She’s blaming the dead ex-bf Bourdain. Dude can’t even defend himself. The hamster is running lightning quick to find an exit hatch.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillcad 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's almost like Metoo wasn't about protecting women from sexual assault.

Perhaps, as stated here many times by the misogynist braintrust, Metoo is about keeping beta males in their sexless place.

The undermenchen shall not expect any sex for their provisioning as they have for millions of years. Only Alphafux can have sex! And they get sex by ignoring the massive shittest known as Metoo

I am reminded of a fake news talking head (former cum bucket of mine) who never missed a chance to virtue signal her wokeness by attending whitemale hating, pussyhat, and antigun rallies and on air bashing our GodEmporor President, yet she begged me to spank, choke, and degrade her during sex. She implored me to call her my slut and she lapped up my bravado in private while publicly bashing toxic masculinity.

It's always projection with these loonylibshits

[–]SovereignSoul76 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reason seems to think that it's the state of California's fault for their "uncommon age of consent laws".

It would have been legal in 39 states, they argue. Look at that hamster wheel go! Get out those kid-gloves everyone, we have to 'punish' a woman without hurting her feelz...

[–]AllahHatesFags 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She was grooming him since he was 8; this is a very common thing for sexual predators to do. I hope this bitch goes to prison. Imagine the reaction from feminists if it were a 38 year-old man grooming a girl since she was 8 and then getting her drunk and fucking her at 17. Rose McGowan definitely wouldn't be encouraging people to "Be gentle" on twitter.

[–]paulkersey1999 3 points4 points  (0 children)

no, SHE didn't pay, she manipulated her boyfriend, anthony bourdain into paying! what a fucking cunt!

[–]Dmva100 1 points1 points [recovered]

Hey metoo, TIMES UP on that!

All women lie about sexual assault unless due process reveals otherwise.

They want to be sexually abused. Katy Perry is a feminist and her popular ET song said "...i wanna be victim..." so that means it's true for all empowered females.

[–]saibot83 42 points43 points  (2 children)

Dated a hardcore feminist who wanted me to choke her and fuck her roughly up the ass while calling her all manner of foul things (whore, cunt, slut, etc, etc). She also claimed metoo (a situation not involving me thankfully) when all that broke in the media. Women are not consistent creatures.

[–]Killing__Time_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been there. Done that. 'sex positive' is their justification for that dissonance.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Isn't that the same Katy Perry who sexually molested someone without consent with, of course, no legal consequences?


[–]srtor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. Times up for all those mofos and bitches. Enough of that shit show.

[–]Casd12 9 points10 points  (1 child)

live by the sword die by the sword

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gentlemen, modern succubus.

[–]Rian_Stone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Something weird I've noticed over this stuff. Many normal people treating celebrities as pawns in a cultural proxy war...

I wonder what we win if 8 thots go to jail? what did they win when cosby spends his last 5 years of life in one?

[–]Rebe1Ye11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The double-standard is constently growing as women who want all the opprotunities men have yet want none of the responsibities that come with it.

[–]Matacks607 19 points20 points  (7 children)

I like how the boy said he was emotionally damaged from getting a blowjob from a hot women. Yea, ok kid. I'm sure that was really traumatic. Shit for 380,000 I can be traumatized by a blowjob too. And it didn't even buy his silence! The nerve people have nowadays is unreal.

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (1 child)

He's doing all of us a favor and exposing the hypocrisy in the #MeToo movement.

[–]JDRoedell 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The question is whether anyone (in the plugged in world) will give a shit. I’d bet a good bit of money she gets off with a slap on the wrist.

[–]AlmightyPerun 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I mean, would the situation be any different if a 17 year old high school slut was involved? Of course bloody not. She'd enjoy the fuck out of being railed in the ass by a 40 year old rich daddy Chad. She'd fucking love it and ask for it again and again, because no boy her age can fuck like daddy Chad, and no boy her age has as much money.

But, of course, that is not socially acceptable, therefore she must've been raped by the evil man. The entire point is the hypocrisy. Cougars fucking young boys are doing them favors, while older men fucking younger women are pedophiles and rapists.

[–]Senior ContributorMentORPHEUS[S] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Plot twist: It's your stepmom, since boyhood, and you didn't want it.

Your hand waving of the issue contributes nothing to the discussion.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well if the choice is between a blowjob or $380K and a blowjob, I'll take the latter.

[–]fuckrbrasilmods 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like how the boy said he was emotionally damaged from getting a blowjob from a hot women

Totally hypocritical and absurd as well. It's inevitable that these ridiculous naked emperor accepted lies come crashing down because this whole metoo thing is simply riddled with inconsistencies and nonsensical premises.

[–]NEW_JERSEY_PATRIOT 1 points1 points [recovered]

Does anyone have any insight on to why older women usually in power such as a mentor or teacher have sex with much younger men?

This is something I still have no idea why it happens but every week a new teacher who is very attractive is caught having sex with their students. This seems to go against a lot of principles of the red pill and I'm curious if anyone had any good insight on it.

[–]magx01 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Strokes the ego. "I still have it." They get jealous of youthful females so if they can compete with them they can pretend they are still young.

[–]Chitlinsandgravy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nailed it. Too add to this, the sexual verification of having successfully bedded a virile young man, whilst simultaneously avoiding the reality of declining value that one would face in terms of being less desirable to older, well mentally established males.

Toss in environment/constant exposure to such virility and poof.

[–]PaulAJK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know in this case, Asia seems a totally mental Lucifers daughter type to me, but in most cases older women going for juvenile men seems like a definite kink, and there's no accounting for kink. The male equivilent would be something like granny or chubby chasing.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Holy fuck. When are people going to wake up?

[–]Ganaria-Gente 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In our gynocentric Western society, most people will refuse to accept this is anything but an exception

So I say: let's enjoy the decline! Let these supremacists suffer their consequences


[–]eaus1807 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Amazing how everyone is a hypocrite

[–]mlittman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it be more appropriate and less offensive if we said the truth,

That this older woman in a powerful workplace position, STATUTORY RAPED and underage child who could not consent and was in a position where he could lose his job if he did not allow her to rape him.?

Let's not allow the media to say that a woman MADE LOVE with her underage coworker, when she actually committed statutory rape.

[–]kamifurio 5 points6 points  (7 children)

She has serious issues on all fronts no doubt.

But a 17 yo calling been raped by a 37yo decent looking chick, its plain bollocks. When I was 16 I had a 25 yo girl friend. Me or any of my class mates would have gladly slept with 20/30yo hot chicks in a blink of an eye, probably in every sense :P.

[–]Irinam_Daske 1 points1 points [recovered]

In November 2017, a month after Argento came forward with her own accusations of assault against Weinstein, Bennett sent Argento a notice of intent to sue. In the notice, Bennett explained that seeing Argento “present herself as a victim of sexual assault was too much to bear… and called up memories of their hotel reunion,” according to The Times. Bennett asked for $3.5 million in damages for “the intentional infliction of emotional distress, lost wages, assault and battery.”

He saw her #metoo statements and the didn't like double-standards they presented, so he called her out on it.

And he probably saw a possibility to earn some extra money xD

[–]blownnnn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Asia didn't just have sex with him once. She conditioned and groomed him to be his sex slave, getting him to call him mommy. He blames her for the emotional trauma he endured because of this toxic relationship. She continued this ongoing relationship, even after the payout. It's exactly what Weinstein did to her.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When I was 18 I was sleeping with/kind of dating a 30 year old chick. Even at that age I had a sense that she was fucked up for wanting to be with someone so young. Older chicks are weird

[–]3whatsthisgarg 2 points3 points  (2 children)

But a 17 yo calling been raped by a 37yo decent looking chick, its plain bollocks.

lmao here

When I was just barely 18 my older brother's GF (she was 6 yrs older) "seduced" me and I was just fine with it, right up until I came in her mouth. When you're young, you know, sometimes your mind and body change instantaneously at the moment of orgasm.

I suddenly had some reason I had to be somewhere else. It was weird, but I never considering suing her for it.

The present case is all about money. Not really new stuff.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I suddenly had some reason I had to be somewhere else. It was weird,

Dude this is a really common phenomenon. You've never experienced this any other time? Men often report that as soon as they orgasm, they feel an overwhelming urge to be anywhere else besides where they are. In my own experience this usually happens when you bang a girl who is not attractive enough to date or has some other major flaw that precludes dating (such as her her being crazy, or being your brother's gf).

My pet theory is that this is an evolutionary adaptation. After sex and during the cuddle phase, the brain releases oxytocin. This is the pair bonding chemical that makes you feel close to her and helps transform your feelings of pure lust into romantic love so that you will stick around and help raise your offspring.

If the woman is not attractive enough for you to commit though, your caveman brain knows that you can do better and it is screaming at you to GET THE FUCK OUT OF THERE before the pair bonding chemicals glue you to this inferior female. It helps maximize your evolutionary fitness.

[–]PaulAJK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I never thought of that as an evolutionary adaption, the "lets get the fuck out of dodge" feeling after nutting a sub-par woman.

[–]Robster25 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Double-standards in action... I bet she didn't even see fault in her actions back then. Everytime something like this happens I am amazed how women lack self-consciousness. Even though, I have to admit I would love to see life for one day from a womans perspective: truly egotistical and narcissistic, only focused on yourself, no true friendships. Just living with a devil-may-care attitude.

[–]SpinPlates 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Women have no agency.

That 17 year old probably "Just caught her at a bad time" and she wasnt thinking straight.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Problem is just like it's only racist when a white person does it, it's only rape when a man does it. Or atleast this is the view of MSM and general society. Very sad.

Edit: See. When do women say "be gentle" whenever a man is accused of the same crime?


[–]SuperCrazy07 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Honestly, this is bullshit. The only reason I find it remotely interesting is that Argento and her lesbian man friend have been shouting metoo from the rooftops (while knowing this was lurking in her past).

I went away to school at 17, and while I didn't fuck any 37 year old women, I think I would have survived just fine. I ended up having drunk sex with an older chick when I was just out of college...kinda grossed me out, but I didn't blame the rest of my life on it.

That said, karma is a bitch.

[–]Senior ContributorMentORPHEUS[S] 31 points32 points  (2 children)

I went away to school at 17, and while I didn't fuck any 37 year old women, I think I would have survived just fine.

I'm old enough to have step daughters in their late 20s, and date women younger than them, so let me tell you something about boundaries.

When you're in a parent-child relationship with someone while they were a minor, there's a huge unambiguous boundary to seeing that person in a sexual light, much less acting upon the thought. Even when they have reached adulthood.

It appears that the long time ongoing role she had as a mentor/role model in his child actor years is a large part of what messed with his head when she got him drunk and turned it sexual.

[–]blownnnn 19 points20 points  (0 children)

What she did is wrong, and lots of older woman do this. Men cannot sweep this under the rug because he got sex, like any kind of sex is some privilege.

She took advantage of this child and made him his sex/validation slave. What she is accusing Weinstein of, is exactly what she did to this kid! Got molested and felt like she was at the mercy of her assaulter. All she is doing is projecting.

The kicker is: She agreed to pay out after ruining his career and future. She also stayed in contact after, what a terrible woman.

[–]FindTheBus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fucking an older woman when you're 17 is one thing.

Having a batshit BPD manipulator fuck you and your mind when you are 17 will fuck your whole world up for a long time.

[–]MarinTaranu 1 point2 points  (1 child)

That's a lot of money. Is that considered taxable income to the boy?

[–]vitalesan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re eating their own, folks!

“Hey ma! The meatloaf!!”

[–]SpecOpsAlpha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of these women are immature teen girls at heart, and love giving BJs. They never grew up.

[–]xyzadeel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope people stop believing in metoo movement.

[–]HanSupreme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a piece of shit. I fucking hate ppl like this.

[–]red_matrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything about #metoo leads back to Hollywood. It's all actors and scripts, just another show to keep the masses confused.

[–]Hjalmbere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of interesting dirt on Asia Argento in link below if you can stomach some standard leftist virtue signaling about wypipo and Trump. According to the article she and Bourdain had already broken up and were quarreling when he topped himself off. https://penthouse.com/pages/asia-argento/Toxic-Femininity.php

[–]AbdoulReborn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wanna know something even crazier? Anthony Bourdain actually payed the $380,000 settlement.

I had no words for that once I found out. Can't really say I'm shocked either after the story of his dramatic ending.

[–]fuckrbrasilmods 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a shocker

[–]BillyRedRocks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don't pay someone 380k if you've fucked him at 17. This is just another show to legitimise metoo.

Want to download the post?
Download PDF Download TXT