TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

474
475

While traditional religions are on the decline in the developed world, people still have that urge to suspend rational thought and let dogma do the thinking for them. Feminism has replaced religion in filling that urge for many liberal Westerners. Without the proponents of feminism even realizing it, their ideology has morphed into a religion with all the same elements as Dark Age Catholicism but under different names.

The Adversary

Every religion needs some sort of struggle with an adversary who is responsible for everything wrong with the world and that needs to be overcome. In Christianity and Islam, Satan fills this role. In feminism, the devil goes by another name: The Patriarchy, an imaginary cabal of wealthy white males who are conspiring to keep down women and people of color. The patriarchy is no more real than the devil, but you will still hear it being blamed by feminists for all the world's ills.

Inescapable Guilt

In Catholicism, there is the doctrine of "Original Sin" which states that all humans, however virtuous, are always tainted by the actions of Adam and Eve in Eden where they disobeyed God. Character and deeds are irrelevant, you are human therefore you are tainted and guilty from birth and only the faith can save you. In feminism, this concept exists as "Privilege" where instead of being applied universally it is applied in racist and sexist ways, with white heterosexual males having the most "privilege" and other demographics having less.

Controlling the Narrative

In most religions, anything that goes against the tenets of the faith, whether it is some random person's opinion or the results of scientific studies, is called heresy. Heresy is to be stamped out by inquisitions and those responsible for it are called heretics and are to be punished for not conforming to the narrative. Galileo Galilei spend the rest of his life under house arrest because his discovery that the sun was at the center of the solar system was considered heresy by the church. In the cult of feminism, they call it "hate speech" and it is treated in exactly the same way. They don't limit "hate speech" to its traditional definition of blatant racism; anything that contradicts the tenets of modern feminism, however slightly, is now automatically "hate speech" as much as any speech given by Adolf Hitler. Scientists who publish papers who results suggest that there is any difference between men and women or people of different ethnicities are called bigots and their research is rejected by the cucked academic establishment regardless of the methodology with which their studies were conducted.

Conclusion

Feminism is a cult that is destroying society. You cannot reason with the members of the cult anymore than you can reason with the soldiers of ISIS or Boko Haram. Instead they are either to be mocked, fought, or ignored.


[–][deleted]  (46 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]tempolaca 77 points78 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Girls are one thing in real life and another in social network. The most submissive girl IRL can be an atrocious feminist twitter troll. Thing is, sometimes the hate crosses domains.

[–]Thizzlebot 44 points45 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is one of the many reasons I'm done with social media. It's just a place for retards to role play.

[–]eclectro 15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And the SJW political bots to astroturf.

[–]maxfoiler24 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

I was falsely accused of saying something racist by a rabidly feminist coworker. She made the claim against myself and two others as part of a move to get unemployment coverage despite quitting the job. An HR investigation ensued, and even though myself and my coworkers were exonerated, it was exhausting. It was a big part of why I left that job (and the corporate world) about six months later. Didn’t want to live under that type of microscope any more despite taking a pay cut to leave after several years. The negative effects of feminism are definitely real and emerge in these types of scenarios, plus the “guilty until proven innocent” culture that feminism has created on college campuses and now in media and government.

[–]2virusofthemind 10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This happened to a coworker of mine last year. He made a joke about how "every hole is a goal" when you date a woman and it ended up a right shitstorm. Luckily for him he was tipped off about an upcoming complaint to HR and ended up turning the tables on the complainant and she ended up being moved to another town.

Could have went either way though.

[–]cobalt1728 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Please elaborate on how he turned the tables???

[–]2virusofthemind 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The woman in question had some very strong opinions regarding muslims and their treatment of women and was quite happy to vent them both at work and on social media.

After he was tipped off the complaint was happening he made it known that he was unhappy about her racist views then the next morning typed up a note saying...

" Hi X, Z thinks you're a muslim lover and she's planning on getting rid of you somehow, just to let you know we're unhappy about this so watch your step and keep your eyes open".

He forwarded a copy of the note to head office HR anonymously asking for advice. They advised him to identify himself and her so that an investigation could take place. He of course informed them that he didn't trust that idea and he had decided to film one of her "racist rants" and put it on Youtube for the world to see.

By this time the head of HR for the country was in touch promising him total protection and strongly advising him that it would be a bad idea to take that path. By this time he had managed to get a few screenshots of racist remarks she had made on Facebook and forwarded them back.

Next day she puts the complaint into HR and he comes clean with his identity saying she's started the process of getting rid of him.

HR head office arrive the same day huge shitstorm ensues. She denies everything but a few of his colleagues confirm her anti muslim remarks and they also find some racist posts on her Facebook.

She got roasted and he was fine. The whole thing relied on the timing of getting his complaint to HR before she did so there was some luck involved, but as far as they were aware he complained about her racism first and then she tried to fuck him over afterwards.

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Trust me man they love to spout their virtue signalling nonsense when they're around lesser men and their peer group. If they see you as someone who's in charge and doesn't care for that shit they won't bring it up

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Alternatively, they’ll bring it up as a shit test to see if you are a man in charge.

[–]cesarfd 12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If feminism was just another stupid cult saying stupid things on Twitter that would be ok. The problem is that feminism owns the goverment, the mass media, has totally owned the public opinion and they are successfully removing constitutional rights from men. I know what I'm talking about, I'm Spanish.

This is not just a bunch of flat Earth idiots you can safely ignore.

[–]n-esimacuenta 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Escape to South America or Mexico

[–]2wiseclockcounter 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You've got your cart before your horse, those entities created feminism. I'll let you do your own digging on who created (infiltrated/co-opted) those entities.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. I went on 3 dates with a a girl who had a degree in women's studies. She was not an issue and even admitted that her degree was pointless as she had to get a job in some fashion shop.

I've been told in an asshole etc..etc.. but that happens to everyone never encountered the stuff you read about online

[–]standardmissile 4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Good point: the rules don't apply to you because you're likely a high SMV male.

The reality is, if you're high SMV feminism is good for you as an individual due to easy access to obligation free sex. For alpha's it plays into their sexual strategy.

It plays against beta sexual strategy. Because there's ~5x more betas than alpha's, feminisim is bad for society, because a large pool of sexually frustrated men is just a bad thing.

But if you can keep ahead of the curve with top tier SMV, financial independence etc, you're better off than ever before, from a sexual strategy perspective.

Hence: Enjoy the Decline.

[–]AllahHatesFags[S] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Even if if are a high-status apex alpha Chad, you can still get hit with a false accusation by some thot who is pissed off because you won't commit or she doesn't want to appear to be a slut or who knows why. There are numerous examples of Alphas being falsely accused, such as Kobe Bryant, Tupac Shakur, Donald Trump, and Mike Cernovich.

[–]standardmissile 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

true but it's very unlikely and with decent precautions taken fear of being thotted shouldn't slow you down.

Besides, this shit is a fad, you can tell by the way corporates have jumped on it, and the worm is turning. Check the poll jump trump got due to the bullshit the Dems tried to pull with Kavanagh.

In my experience, most women are perfectly reasonable if you're reasonable with them first, whether you reject them or not. But i'm in the UK, maybe it's worse in the US.

[–]AllahHatesFags[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree that most women wouldn't do something like that, but it only takes one to ruin your life.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

due to the bullshit the Dems tried to pull with Kavanagh.

I'm not a democrat fan, but Republicans are straight up traitors and I'm not thrilled with anyone they nominate. Both parties need banned from government.

[–]standardmissile 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Everyone at the top of US politics is a machiavellian viper. Place makes Rome look like a kindergarten.

[–]cobalt1728 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I really try to buy this "I can increase my SMV" But honestly the black pill seems to be true..... As much as I do not want to believe it, it really seems like you have to be 6'2" with chiscled face.

[–]AllahHatesFags[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Consider yourself lucky then. All it takes is one accusation and then you are treated like the supposed witches were treated during the Inquisition.

[–]eclectro 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Consider yourself extremely lucky. The one I know thinks she's god's gift to the world and completely entitled to lie, cheat, stab you in the back, and scream at people that give them a suggestion. Because, you know, that offends a god.

Like Elizabeth Warren, they get to their positions by claiming some disadvantage that allows them preferential treatment over regular joes that are slogging it out full throttle with their brow dripping with sweat just to get by. Because they have white male privilege.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve seen some real crazy feminists, but they’re fortunately a minority of women.

That said, your worldview on feminism is quite consistent with it being a cult religion, as a great many people who claim religious affiliation do so as a way to virtue signal rather than out of belief.

[–]recursoinominado 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

One time i was attacked by two female feminist friends because i jockinly said that i would feel used if i was going down a girl and she wasn't paying attention doing something else like smoking a joint. With this i suggested that they liked the feeling of dominating a men who is there only to give her pleasure like a object (isn't objectification of women that they complain so much?) and they fliped the fuck out, turned on me with shit like "fragile masculinity" trying to get under my skin and in that moment i knew what feminism is all about.

[–]TheStumblingWolf 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not in the states, but so far feminism has only meant that dates will insist on paying their share of the expenses. Some of them have bought into the whole "wamen are victims" narrative, but it's never been a problem for me. I do foresee what's going on in the us becoming a thing here slowly. We're usually a little behind.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Everyday, I do what I want, personally and professionally, and no feminist has ever gotten in my way.

Have experienced an extremely feminist mother: endless doctrine about the oppression of women, endless subtle digs at men and support of women. As usual, it's a form of cultural communism: an attempt to get special privilege for someone who can't be bothered to actually work for it.

Have come across it a little socially, and it's hilarious due to its lack of logic and how easy it is to wind up people following its doctrines.

Happily and gloriously, there is a direct correlation here. The feminists, the lazy, the unattractive, the entitled .... are all the same person.

The attractive, sex, fun and feminine women... also generally come together in the same package.

[–]Kenny_Twenty6 points [recovered] (16 children) | Copy Link

You're totally on point. You need to be careful in this sub. I believe the majority of men who post here are pretty young (low 20's) and have very little experience with actual women.

They read horror stories about women making unsubstantiated sexual assault allegations against men and they think it's a common problem irl. They also think feminism is actually a problem out there in the wild because they've barely spent any time IN the actual wild. They don't realize everything's fine and that if you become a badass who has plenty of confidence the world will bend over backwards for you.

[–]thumbyyy 39 points40 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Everything is not fine, and the men in their 20's that you dismiss out of hand are the ones actually dealing with the clusterfuck feminists that you 40/50/60 year old's spawned and handed over to the school system to parent.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I also call bullshit. I've had many jobs, been around, and it's never really been a problem. The guys who get it are usually on the line of the shit they say, or they're just flat out guilty. If you're cool, normal, and don't act creepy, you'll be fine. Some 20 year olds here take some of the shit the dummies say super literal and then cry foul when they get repercussions.

Grow up ya bunch of pussies and take some responsibility.

[–]Darthmorelock 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was falsely accused of rape in high school 3 years ago. Try going to an arts school for a couple years, you'll see the echo chambers in person.

[–]tempolaca 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As you get older, the possibility of meeting a crazy feminist girl increases. I have been burned by this and currently going trough a incredibly painful lawsuit, that even if I'm winning, made me lost several jobs and a LTR.

The girl in question wasn't even a feminist, in fact she actually hated them. But she associated with them to damage me because she hated me. Be very careful, any woman will use feminism against you, even if she herself it's not feminist.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They also think feminism is actually a problem out there in the wild because they've barely spent any time IN the actual wild.

For society at large, feminism is a problem because it undermines it every chance it gets.

This isn't just a few guys who get raked over the coals during a #metoo campaign (and most whom probably deserved it), the occasional human sacrifice to the feminist goddess in form of guys who get sacked or even imprisoned over made-up accusations, or male employees being inconvenienced because they avoid riding the elevator with a woman to dodge the risk of said made-up accusations in the first place.

Feminism is assloads of people in media, culture and politics pushing for Hillary because we finally need a female president, them mounting countless character assassinations against guys who just dare to speak against the creed (even overall really harmless ones like Jordan Peterson), companies being forced to make economically unsound decisions because they have to kick underqualified women upstairs, the war against boys at schools as described by Christina Hoff Sommers, and an entire societal narrative that aims at producing docile feminized gamma males because muh toxic masculinity.

That due to intersectionalism, feminists usually also have their lot thrown in with the far left and are completely sold on the "Islam is peace and can't be part of anything questionable"-lie, the BLM-crap and everything else in that direction doesn't really make it any better.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]btrpb 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

10% of feminists are pink haired frothing at the mouth shouty bitches making all the noise.

The other 90% are women who want to feel empowered, but also have careers, are mothers, are hot young college girls. They say they are feminists but love cock and being slutty in the bedroom as much as we like to sink into wet pussy.

Go ahead and fuck. Dunno what everyone is so fucking scared about. False #metoo accusations happen to like 0.001% of society. To those that are multi millionaires in public positions of power. For the rest of us it's negligible.

[–]gELSK 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

// , Collective action can be different from individual action, and individual females are more prone to preference falsification + in-group bias.

[–]Aazaad 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

giggle and

Only a matter of time before they bring feminism up and how men are pigs. Just like a Jesuit priest can't live without breathing religions down your throat now and then, feminists can't resist bringing it up.

[–]btrpb 115 points116 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

You can fuck feminists though.

[–]adool444 94 points95 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Biggest sluts and they like to be dominated. Most of my lays have been feminists.

[–][deleted] 69 points70 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

It's so damn hilarious. I've noticed the girls I talk to who are self proclaimed feminists are the ones that love to call me daddy and get choked in the bedroom. Hmm, I wonder why that is?

[–]4matting 71 points72 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Feminist women are usually the less desirables. Not being Chad's top pick turns them into party poopers. They shit on everyone to make themselves feel better.

But once every full moon, when Chad turns his gaze upon them, and makes them feel like they have a chance, they turn into Weresluts.

[–]tanlkula 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminist women are so submissive. They always obey and call me daddy.

[–]tempolaca 49 points50 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

You can fuck feminists though.

Better stick your dick in a wasp nest.

Good luck in 20+ years when miss feminist don't have money to feed her 50 cats, and suddenly remember how she didn't really wanted anal with you. You are fucked my friend.

[–]Kenny_Twenty22 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

Don't be a fucking pussy. Feminists love to be fucked nice and hard and spit on, like most women. Everything is fine.

[–]slam9 27 points28 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Yah, until their sex drive dies down for the month, and then they claim you raped them. Happens all the time at college campuses, and with anyone that has a high status job.

[–]Liberum_Cursor 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

There's a proper procedure to protect yourself. Get consent via text in some obvious way, record conversations if you have to, etc. Obviously keep the condom and all that too. Just don't be an idiot and you're probably fine. No sense in taking undue risks, but if you choose to there's a method to it

[–]omega_dawg93 21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"it's a woman's prerogative to change her mind," has gone waaaay too far.

[–]Kenny_Twenty-1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

and then they claim you raped them

That happens so rarely that I've never heard of it happening irl. Ever.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you been to a college campus recently?

[–]tempolaca 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Happened to me. A friend of my ex-gf claimed I raped my ex. Yes, a friend. No, my ex never said I raped her. But her friend hated me. Crazy I know. Luckily I was only accused in in a obscure chat-room.

[–]Endorsed Contributorleftajar 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Careful with that in the #metoo era.

[–]1TRPKiddo 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Amen. Some of the biggest hoes that I’ve met have been “extreme advocates toward the end of oppression for women.”

Lol.

[–][deleted] 74 points75 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Posts like this are why reddit has quarantined theredpill. TRP has broken no rules, but it coherently and logically explains why the mainstream narrative is a crock of shit.

[–]Shadowthrice 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. This is the wrongthink that Reddit is so desperate to suppress.

[–]Kenny_Twenty19 points [recovered] (20 children) | Copy Link

This post is fucking foolish.

people still have that urge to suspend rational thought and let dogma do the thinking for them

People don't have an 'urge' to suspend rational thought. People delude themselves in the interest of peace of mind. Yes, that's still stupid but it's understandable.

Every religion needs some sort of struggle with an adversary

This is also completely off. Not every religion has an antagonist. Furthermore, the reason for the proliferation of spirituality (religion) in the first place is to address death, our reason for existence, and the unexplained forces around us that we couldn't explain.

I could go on but I don't have the inclination at the moment. The OP is just doing what so many feminists do themselves - posting a bunch of malarkey that he thinks will make him appear well versed in the tenets of TRP. Essentially, he wants brownie points.

But his post is not well thought through. And since we hate it when moderate feminists refuse to denounce the crazy, irrational extremists amongst their ranks; we should be willing to denounce the men who spout out the equal, opposite horseshit on our side.

This dummy is doing nothing more than executing the first few strokes of what he hopes will become just another TRP circle jerk.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 22 points23 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

People don't have an 'urge' to suspend rational thought.

That's why religion has existed in every culture, on every continent and in every language?

Religion is as old as humanity.

Of course people want to believe in something, be that in the Thunder God, the monotheistic god, communism, feminism or democracy.

This is also completely off. Not every religion has an antagonist.

Every religion is an antagonist. For some its the person themselves, their weakness, insecurity. For others its an external adversary.

for the proliferation of spirituality (religion) in the first place is to address death

Not every religion addresses death. Some celebrate life (amongst other things like fighting the adversary) others celebrate moderation, etc.

we should be willing to denounce the men who spout out the equal, opposite horseshit on our side.

That's why I am 'denouncing you'.

[–]modTheRedPike[M] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Interesting crossroads here, right? You are responding to someone that has technically broke the rules but created a thought exercise that was productive. I usually don't nuke stuff like that if the ensuing conversational is interesting, like this is. So, Caesar, keeping in mind our other conversation--which way goes your thumb? (This is not a trap and you are in NO danger here.)

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So, Caesar, keeping in mind our other conversation--which way goes your thumb?

I say let him live. To punish needlessly is petty. A man can benefit much from adopting magnanimity.

[–]Theguygotgame777 -2 points-1 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

That's why religion has existed in every culture, on every continent and in every language?

Maybe it's because evidence for God is visible and everywhere, and different cultures interpret it differently?

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 6 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it's because evidence for God is visible and everywhere, and different cultures interpret it differently?

You assume that there is a monotheistic god when most religions where/are polytheistic. If there was one god there would always have been one god, not many.

[–]Theguygotgame777 -1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Some watches are made by one person, and some by a team. Either way, that watch didn't come out of nowhere on its own, by chance.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So you are agreeing with me that all people have religion and an urge to suspend rational thought?

[–]magx01 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh god this stupid analogy is still circulating?

[–]Theguygotgame777 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What about it is so stupid?

[–]Kenny_Twenty-2 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

That's why religion has existed in every culture, on every continent and in every language?

I explained the reason religion exists.

Every religion is an antagonist.

This doesn't make sense. If you meant to say every religion 'has' an antagonist, you're wrong.

For some its the person themselves, their weakness, insecurity.

That doesn't make any sense in the context in which you're trying to support a claim for an antagonist. The reason given was that the antagonist is a common enemy to unite against. You, yourself, cannot fill that role. That should be obvious.

For others its an external adversary.

No. The reason for religion is to reconcile the notion of death. That's it's purpose. People cannot come to terms with the concept of not existing one day so they conjure up religion for consolation.

Not every religion addresses death.

Example?

Some celebrate life (amongst other things like fighting the adversary) others celebrate moderation, etc.

None of these things preclude addressing death. I don't think you know how to follow a logical progression. You need to do a better job of thinking.

That's why I am 'denouncing you'.

You haven't done a satisfactory job of it.

lol

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I explained the reason religion exists.

And you are wrong. Those reasons you listed are not the only reason religion exists. And your explanation ignores the significance of ritual and symbolism and why humans like to turn off rational thought in the name of religion. But nice try.

This doesn't make sense. If you meant to say every religion 'has' an antagonist, you're wrong.

It makes perfect sense. I have a creeping suspicion you do no know what an 'antagonist' is.

Even in the cases you listed, there is alwags an antagonist. Clearly you dont know what you are talking about.

That doesn't make any sense in the context in which you're trying to support a claim for an antagonist. The reason given was that the antagonist is a common enemy to unite against. You, yourself, cannot fill that role. That should be obvious.

Again, it makes perfect sense. This is the basis of Christanity and buddhism. In both religions you yourself are the antagonist. In Christianity it is your sin and your struggle to overcome sin to become righteous. People unite against themselves (ie sin), they jelp each other in their own struggle with themselves.

Buddhism is a struggle with the passions and ever-present chaos of the human. It is seeking the middle way in life.

If you do not know that religion goes beyond death, then that shows how pathetic your understanding of religion is and you should not speak of it, especially in categorical terms. Go read and then come back and talk.

Example?

Greco-Roman Paganism, Slavic Paganism, zorastrianism, buddhism., etc.

These religions do not focus on death, their focus is on different things.

None of these things preclude addressing death. I don't think you know how to follow a logical progression. You need to do a better job of thinking.

They dont preclude certainly, but you make it seem that death is the main reason for religion and that all (or even most) religions focus on it. That is false. You cannot even understand that. Your reading comprehension is shit and that is said by soneone whose first language is not English.

You haven't done a satisfactory job of it.

Absolutely I have. Americucks should do more reading before 'denouncing' anyone. Good thing I am not an Americuck.

[–]eclectro 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

But his post is not well thought through.

I get that his post is a primitive formulation. But that does not make him wrong. SJWs are increasingly being seen as religious in nature.

[–]Kenny_Twenty-2 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

I get that his post is a primitive formulation. But that does not make him wrong.

You're right. But being wrong makes him wrong, which he is.

SJWs are increasingly being seen as religious in nature.

Fine. Then there must be plenty of parallels that can be accurately drawn instead of making up horseshit.

We need to hold each other accountable. This sub is turning into the male version of third wave feminism - all emotion and no reason. We need to stop that from happening.

[–]eclectro 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

parallels that can be accurately drawn instead of making up horseshit.

Clearly you did not click on my second link and already had your mind made up. You kind of proved their point - it was an academic stating that you are not allowed to talk about many of the ideas driving SJWs anymore because of the religious nature that they have taken on.

[–]LEGALIZEMEDICALMETH2 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe we could revise it and say: most ideologies have an adversary or common enemy. Christians have satan, communists have the bourgeoisie, nazis have jews, libertarians have the government, republicans have the democrats,democrats have the republicans. Any ideology has a group that they can point to and say: “We have our problems because of X”.

[–]destraht -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You have it backwards: Jews have Nazis.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What I find interesting is that feminism complains about the very men they create with their idiology. The AFC and incels are a result of their ass backwards thinking.

[–]lobstergenocide 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

that's because they're far too short-sighted to understand that they create their own boogiemen

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link

Just a friendly reminder that as TRP has been quarantined, we have developed backup sites: https://www.trp.red and our full post archive (and future forums) https://www.forums.red/i/TheRedPill. Don't forget to register on TRP.RED and reserve your reddit name today. Forums.Red is currently locked but will be opened soon.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]RedPill2018 9 points10 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

What do you guys believe is the turn of the feminist mindset in women (for those of them that ends up seeing the differences in men and women for what it biologically is)?

Is it when they notice that they will become cat ladies? Is it when they want to try something “different” to attract a partner?

[–]phishyfingers 11 points12 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Women notice a difference between the sexes when they are forced to compete against and subsequently lose to trans in sports. What will happen when women get passed over for trans for physically demanding jobs? No patriarchy to blame there.

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

society collapse

happened before amongst the Arabs. In ancient Babylon, women began entering the public sphere, politics and taking over traditionally mens jobs. That is, until the Arabs came and suddenly women stopped being 'empowered' and needed a male relative to escort them through dangerous streets.

Funny how the world turns.

[–]tempolaca 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Cherry 2000 all over again . It's a 80's movie about this exact scenario, very funny, I recommend it. The scary thing? it's set in a futuristic 2017.

[–]untonyto 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no Eastern or Western civilization any more. There is only corporate neoliberalism.

[–]tempolaca 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No patriarchy to blame there.

They fight against them. They hate trans in a way not even misogynist men hate them.

There's a minority of soft feminist that actually do help and accept trans male-to-female people. But the more radical feminist they are, the more they hate them.

[–]NrthnMonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You are getting confused between feminists and liberals SJW's. No real 'feminist' believes trans women people are men. So it would still be the patriarchy, it is the definition of such.

[–]Lostyogi 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The only thing its missing a a path to redemption.

[–]Quo210 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

the path of redemption is drilled into the skulls of all males: Be a good boy, always help women, be respectful, etc.

Just as any religion, the "prize" for being a good follower is not real.

[–]AllahHatesFags[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The only path for redemption for men in feminism is to go trans.

[–]mattizie 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem is and has always been a political one; most women just use it as shit tests. Feminism is just a new form of Marxism, with the goal of gaining power.

Kill off government programs, including loans to students, and the problems will disappear.

[–]TheImpossible1 12 points13 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

It's more than a cult. I'd liken it to the next form of Nazism.

[–]slam9 24 points25 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

A recent study showed that Nazi propaganda is literally indistinguishable from feminist talking points. They published sections of mein kamp, written in intersectional (instead of facist) lingo (replace Jews with men, Aryan with women, etc) and feminist journals not only published it, but acclaimed it.

[–]destraht 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a working model that the whitish Chosenites created and controlled Nazi ideology just as they did Marxism-etc. They packed the houses of all of the social science fields with their thinking and they generated all of our enemies as well. I went to Ukraine to meet pretty Slavic girls and I did that but I also got a naively unasked for lesson in seeing what uncontrolled whitish "Shmuwesh" influence does to a country. Then what-do-you-know its a Nazi stronghold as well. Its like they promote the flawed antibody to their flawed rhetoric (and plunder). IMO same kind of a thing how Daesh doesn't threaten the Promised Land but is all up in the area and was quite a menace to everyone else. Look at the fruits.

[–]TheImpossible1 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ah yes I've used that argument before. I knew about that. Spread it to everyone you know with indifference to feminism. They all must know how evil it really is.

It's a multi-level ideology. Most people only see the first one which is something like wage gaps, free tampons/contraception etc. but it goes far deeper and far darker than that.

I would say to read some of their material, but it's not a rabbit hole I'd advise going down.

[–]slam9 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just ask a feminist these 3 questions when they attempt to spread their BS to unaware bystanders, as if they are loving and logical:

1) How do they feel about how almost all domenstic abuse centers (many if which my tax dollars go to) don't allow adult men in, even if they are victims. How if a man is abused by a woman and calls the police, he is more likely to be arrested than helped when they show up. Include how almost all dometic abuse/rape victim hotlines will also deny service a victim if they are a man.

2) If a woman raped a boy under 18, what should happen to them? (Proceed to point out examples of how this happens very often with almost no repercussions)

3) How do they feel about women's clitorus being ripped off as a baby (female circumcision) in many non-western countries. After they give their hatred of it, ask them how they feel about make circumcision in their own society.

[–]tempolaca 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm (anonymously, obviously) in a technology feminist group. It's supposedly about improving women work conditions in tech industry. You won't believe what they talk about in their closed forum. 100% is about how men attacks them. Some, very few, are serious incidents like attempted forced sex. Most of them are just some guy having a grudge with them.

But every incident, no matter how serious or inane, is cataloged and the guy doxxed. Believe me they are sick human beings.

[–]TheImpossible1 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish someone like Project Veritas would infiltrate them and prove it.

[–]FascistStoicism 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

FeMiNisTS aRE DA RaEL NATHZIISS! - Lolbergtarians

[–]Ayrab4Trump 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s funny he calls it a cult.

I’m in the middle of a write up where by I present it as a “META-RELIGION”

Will post here when ready

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

In Christianity and Islam, Satan fills this role. In feminism, the devil goes by another name: The Patriarchy, an imaginary cabal of wealthy white males who are conspiring to keep down women and people of color.

haha so true.

There is a reason for blaming the Patriarchy rather than specific men. Patriarchy.... men in general... rape culture.... the point of these terms is that all men can be blamed for all women's problems. If she said "men who do this are bad", that would let innocent men off the hook. But phrases like this allow her to blame all men for creating or enabling oppression against her.

Following the parallels with religion, this is "if you're not with us you're against us" rhetoric. This way men who are completely innocent of any and all crimes can still be blamed for lack of female performance in the workplace, lack of ability to lock down a quality man, or whatever other form of oppression she conjurs up this week.

[–]Gimmick_puppet 12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I thought this was obvious. Religion is basically dead among upper middle class, liberal, white women who also happen to be the biggest feminists. When I go out to the rural Old Country, Mexico in my case, I see old grandmothers who stick to very old traditions that dabble in mysticism and the unknown. I'm sure every country has rural places like this. Women seem to have a natural inclination towards religion in a way that men don't. Feminists have basically replaced the mystical side of religion with something similar such as astrology, Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop, feminism, reading cards,

[–]tempolaca 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Here in my country, feminists even have symbols, mantras, etc. They use certain scarfs to identify themselves. They have phrases that repeat to each other "Down with the patriarchy", "men will fall", etc. it's so obviously a religion, can't believe people dont realize that.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Every goddamn Tinder profile with "Valar Morghulis" in the bio section like they think its cute

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What you wrote applies basically to any radical secular ideology.

The problem I am seeing is that in our democratic, liberal society such a cult gets promoted by the powers that be (most politicians, media etc.).

[–]Erramayhem89 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just look at what Stephanie Mcmahon is trying to do to WWE. She's basically emasculating the male talent every chance she gets and she wants an equal amount of male/female wrestlers lol. WWE is basically becoming a feminist product....the exact opposite of what it was before

[–]slam9 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It also has a very us against the world mentality. You're either with or against them, and if you aren't with them you are filth. It's not a surprise that oeople only join the feninist cult by indoctrination, as they are so hostile to anyone else

[–]BurnoutRS 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

History repeats itself. You can find so many echoes of the past in the happenings of today. The main difference is the internet. Statistically more people now, than ever before, have access to more information than has ever been accessible in human history. Which points towards it being likely that at this point in time we have more people who are on a higher level of awareness of the trappings of ideology, for lack of a better term, the people who are "waking up" if you will.

Although conversely you could argue that there are more people being distracted by their twitter feeds, feeding a steady drip of feminist nonesense into them. The internet can proliferate propaganda at the same rate it liberates minds

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Judging by your user name, I'm going to go ahead and say that you are not the person to be making this post. But, you are on to something, just blinded by your own indoctrination.

It isn't just feminism that has become a religion, it is politically correct liberalism. Feminism has just been given the reigns to the Democratic Party, as of late.

[–]xenigala 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You could also say that TRP is a cult, with feminists as the adversary, AWALT as the original sin, and hamstering/white-knighting/beta-brainwashing as the controlling narrative.

Most women are not radical feminists. And, as discussed a lot here, many radical feminists secretly love dominant men.

Humans like to identify enemies and define in-groups and out-groups. It's something we do. You can notice this in yourself and others, but be careful not to get too caught up in it.

[–]AlmightyPerun5 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Not at all. What you've said is the very definition of false equivalence, a logical fallacy. It might seem correct at first glance, but is obviously incorrect when given proper thought.

Simply put, TRP does not preach religious dogma, nor does it encourage the silencing of wrongthink. It's individualistic in nature, it can't be a cult. It looks at the objective reality, and teaches you how to navigate it without succumbing to lies and deception.

It teaches you to think for yourself, to never blame others, and to constantly improve if you want to be successful (within the sexual marketplace, among other things). It has no enemies, no original sin, no heresy. It isn't a religion, as it's completely based in objective reality. Practicing TRP is the opposite of being an NPC (the freshest meme around).

[–]marcusabu 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You're completely missing the point of this comment. It demonstrates that when using the same logic and reasoning as OP you could argue that TRP is a cult.

It might seem correct at first glance, but is obviously incorrect when given proper thought.

Ironically, this is the point xenigala tried to make.

[–]hearse223 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Political correctness is the new religion, feminism has just taken advantage of this.

[–]econquest 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I like your write-up a lot more than your title.

Feminism doesn't really have any religious aspects, and for being such a cult, it isn't exactly famous for leadership.

So while I find your write-up spot-on, think a better title is something like "Feminism is like religious fervor in the Dark Ages" or something.

Honestly, I don't really see any metaphysical aspects (literally religious aspects) - if anything, it's pretty secular.

[–]AllahHatesFags[S] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Except for the part about denying any science or experiences that don't conform to the belief system. Feminism does this as much as any religion.

[–]slam9 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The suggested title still fits that description. Feminism is more like astrology and mysticism than a solidified religion or cult.

[–]econquest 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know man. Take something else that might conform to this definition but isn't a religion:

I assume you and I and everyone on this or any forum probably believes more or less in Democracy (we wouldn't want a totalitarian dictator in power that 97% of people hate and who wants to stifle and limit all speech and executes everyone who speaks out against him).

But is our belief a "religion"?

I see what you're saying but I think to be called a religion it has to concern the existence or non-existence of metaphysical things like angels, God, Heaven, and so forth. A belief system that's pretty secular is missing an essential definition behind religion.

so while some of the analogy is very good we shouldn't say it's LITERALLY a religion. I mean it's not like feminists are saying that men are born inhabited by the devil (literally) and that women are born inhabited by angels (literally) - you know? It's still in the realm of the physical, everyday - of secular life. it's not exactly religious.

however the analogy and similarities are worth pointing out, sure. just don't use the word "literal" the way the title does.

[–]Soon_As_I_Nut 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those stupid fucks taking down trp

[–]NathanRav -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wrote a poem about this a week ago. If you like it check out my other work on my blog :P

https://nathanravesteyn.wordpress.com/

Reclamation rehabilitated our robust rookery

Air itself adhered to our opportunity

I am mighty in my own way!

 “You have a pretty face, but it is not your own” 

Internecine, violence erupted within the faction

Some angel’s scream contorted in reaction

A screech spread dread. Crack. Their forms crooked back.

The doomed doctrine they spout

Stomachs exploded. The harpies flew out

Her face was gaunt like glory

Her smile was hysteric like humility

Her eyes were sunken like civility

“This is what strength looks like! This is what you gave to me.”

The morning ritual. Painted skin, signs and sins.

 “No. You were both the barterer and the benefactor” 

In an attempt at harmony. The angels and harpies flew.

The true gazed at their concerning companions

A cataclysm in their convergence convulsed their climb

Their copious coquette is ignored. It’s a warranted crime

Fomented: “It’s your fault our flight faltered.” The crippled claimed to those below.

“Our wings were waned by your wickedness. You leap at the hap to desist our desire to grow”

Arboreous laughter ricocheted through the detested

 “The devils that do don’t do dubiously.” 

Categorically, equivalently they discredited misconduct

Panic settled in. Am I wrong? No that would undo me.

Abrasively, the free shall we fight.

Acerbically, we shall envenom those granted flight.

This projection is partitioned possession

“I am her truth. The only truth that she needs.”

[–]CainPrice -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

While it's true that feminism (and most political ideologies for that matter) are closer to a religion than a political organization, I don't know what the point of this post is.

While yes, radical feminists are zealots, feminism just isn't that big of a deal once you're off of the internet. Everybody out in the real world, feminist, Red Piller, and everyone else, gets out of bed and goes to work, eats, sleeps, shits, showers, works out, goes out on the weekend, has sex, and so on. People are living completely normal lives and barely spend any of their free time off of the internet thinking about feminism.

Nobody is worried about controlling the narrative or having their narrative controlled. People just go to the gym, shower, go to work, meet Tinder dates after work, have sex, do something fun on the weekend. Nobody's really dealing with feminism. It's really just an issue on the internet, and honestly not most of the internet, just the few parts where people like to argue about sex and relationships.

[–]WillKane 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I disagree. Political correctness and feminism have found their way into the real world and are impacting people’s lives - look at the Title IX cases on campus and the #MeToo movement. Look what happened to James Damore at Google. I get what you are saying that many people don’t care about it but it is tyranny of the minority.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter