TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

527
528

Red Pill TheoryThe Unknowability of Beta Turd (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil - announcement

An Alpha Asshole is a stone. His shape and properties are easily determined and do not change depending on his surroundings. You might not like a particular stone. It might not fit your particular stone criteria. However your assessment will in no way impact the stone. You can yell at, bite or kick the stone. The stone will remain unchanged.

In contrast, a Beta Nice Guy is a moist turd. Beta Turds take the shape of whatever stepped on them last. Their entire existence is contextual. When a woman goes on a date with a Beta Turd all of her questions will be met with attempts to conform to her expectations. At no point will she be able to get a solid definitive response from mushy turd man because Beta Turds are conformists.

This dynamic creates a crisis of authenticity. Not only is it difficult for people to definitively know Beta Turd but Beta Turds don't even know who they are themselves. Let's use Paul Elam a man who I personally believe to be the Creme De La Creme of Beta Turd as an example. Paul Elam spent years writing articles discussing masculinity and the uncaring manipulative nature of women. Then one day a pretty blond girl named Cassie Jay gave Paul Elam a call about a Red Pill Movie. Next thing you know, Paul Elam has thrown masculinity out the window and is crying on camera begging women to sympathize with his problems. So the question is: Who really is Paul Elam? What does he really believe? Does he think that women are manipulative whores incapable of empathy? Or does he believe that women should empathize with men's issues? He's taken both positions. Which one does he actually believe? Does he even know? All we can say conclusively is that Paul Elam is a mushy turd.

There is something inherently unpleasant and disconcerting about mushy Turd Men. The unnerving feeling is felt strongest by women who are naturally more suspicious then men due to their biological aversion to risk. Imagine you are a woman and your Beta husband hands you a dozen roses while telling you he loves you. Now did he really do it out of love or did he do it to manipulate you into sex? Is he apologizing for something? Is he going to ask for something in return? The inherent anxiety of unknowability destroys the feeling those roses could have created. Now imagine that you are a woman and that your uncaring Alpha jerkboy boyfriend just gave you a dozen roses. He isn't manipulating you into sex because he can cock blast your ladyhole whenever he wants. He isn't trying to influence your emotions because he doesn't give a fuck how you feel. He did it because he wanted to. When an Alpha gives roses they are roses. When a Beta gives roses they are a pretext.

The Manosphere mythos is that Alpha Jerkboys give women tingles. Discussion of the female perspective usually ends there, before the pity party starts playing it's greatest hits. The truth is far darker and more interesting. Women know themselves to be emotional impulsive and a danger to themselves. They know that without a man holding them accountable they are capable of anything from binging uncontrollably like a wild dog to giving themselves a Britney Spears haircut. The problem is that a Beta Turd can't tell a woman no. Like a child he is powerless to stop a woman from doing anything that she wants because he needs her approval to function. A Beta can't stop a woman from becoming her worst version of herself. Women know this and hate them for it.

Beta males are unreliable, undependable and unknowable. They'll tell you all about their fitness and diet regimen to gain your approval then they'll skip the gym and eat a burrito when you are safely out of sight. They'll let their wives and daughters slide deeper and deeper into degeneracy without saying a word. For a Beta it's easier to watch wifey choke on strange dick and daughter cam-whore herself then protect the dignity of the family with a firm No!

There is nothing noble or enviable about Beta Turds. They are not men. Men have thoughts, convictions and values that are held fast and only change for good reason. Betas are nothing more then what their environment tells them to be. Beta Turds deserve only suffering. Only suffering can teach a Beta to stand up for himself and say: No! Until you learn that lesson the stomping will go on indefinetly.


[–]Endorsed ContributorKeffirLime 438 points439 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

A woman's prime directive is to ascertain the consistency of a turd.

She will regularly poke and prod it, testing to see if it's moistened.

This is why it is known as a shit test.

[–]Modredpillschool 327 points328 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

A woman's prime directive is to ascertain the consistency of a turd.

She will regularly poke and prod it, testing to see if it's moistened.

This is why it is known as a shit test.

Alright, close it up boys. We finished TRP.

[–]1maverick9759 26 points27 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao this thread

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Alright, close it up boys. We finished TRP.

We truly are shitlords.

[–]BewareTheOldMan 34 points35 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"A woman's prime directive is to ascertain the consistency of a turd" - hence - "This is why it is known as a shit test."

I'm laughing at all of this, but you guys are right.

[–]Andgelyo 66 points67 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Mind=blown,

Everyday, I am learning something new here. Everyday,

[–]unknownsapient 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, i'm glad i subscribed

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain 33 points34 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately, when a woman left a beta turd high and dry, the turd won't magically harden up. Paradoxically it stays moist and start absorbing moisture from its surroundings, making it even more moist.

[–]Endorsed ContributorKeffirLime 47 points48 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is because it's in the toilet.

Just another Blue Pill piece of shit that gets flushed away to become sewage.

[–]FuckMichaelMcCoy 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Moist shit is so repulsive there is an industry created solely to remove it from existence. The toilet paper industry is basically practiced by the entire world regardless of race, age, or culture- everyone loathes wet shit

[–]RiskyRewarder 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's why the toilet water is blue

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

universebrain.png, it's all downhill from here.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just got back from my annual physical where I had to submit a turd sample.

Now you're telling me that I AM the turd sample.

[–]Endorsed Contributorex_addict_bro 18 points19 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

“She’s talking bout them diarrheas”

[–]Endorsed ContributorKeffirLime 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The most lethal of all beta turds

[–]FormerBlueFool 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Perfect

[–]Acropoe 187 points188 points  (40 children) | Copy Link

A Beta can't stop a woman from becoming her worst version of herself. Women know this and hate them for it.

wow. that's deep and it makes a lot of sense.

[–]TheDevilsAdvokaat 18 points19 points  (36 children) | Copy Link

It is interesting isn't it. The corollary is that an Alpha inspires her to become the best version of herself...

But what is the "best" version would differ depending on whether you are male or female....

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

Her best version equates to reproductive success.

[–]jihocech 5 points6 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

This is true in both darwinist or christian view. Funny. Money, career, hottest men in bed mean nothing without children.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

I know electricians and HVAC Chads getting more and better pussy then elan musk and mark zuckerberg

[–]Vynxe-Vainglory 16 points17 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Women here in Australia find tradies to be sexy. Makes sense. A rough man who literally goes to woman-free zones to build the world with his hands, performing many tasks that are not only dangerous, but that women are completely incapable of doing; sun-drenched, muscular, and socially uncouth; a masculine jerk who speaks “locker-room talk” like a second language...it’s all there.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sounds like you've been fantasizing about this for a while.

[–]Neo9ine 2 points3 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

The problem with that is it's typically low-IQ pussy reproducing with low-IQ men. Their mating strategy is one of high-volume, creating the large working-class populace of wage slaves.

High-IQ women mate with high-IQ social betas, like Musk or Zuckerberg, that are still alpha in their professional environment where today's real "hunting" is performed. They have evolved past the base animal nature of sex in favor of resource-wealth and the evolutionary advantage of the family.

Rarely will a high-IQ woman cuckold her husband if he's valuable enough. And, even so, with modern contraception, even if she recreationally re-enacts the urge with a construction worker, the odds of her allowing actual reproductive result are non-existent.

Alpha males who don't earn lots of money are a dying breed who enjoy lots of recreational sex at the expense of their own progeny and being used to perform various high-risk jobs, such as building skyscrapers for pennies or drilling oil, for the benefit of the more intelligent superior class that controls them.

Sometimes they willingly engage in open relationships, whether publicly or not: see Warren Buffet.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (22 children) | Copy Link

High IS women are still led by their feelings. More so even.

[–]Neo9ine 0 points1 point  (21 children) | Copy Link

You mean High IQ*? So, your argument is that High-IQ women are less rational and more emotion-driven than low-IQ women? That's amusing and something tells me you don't know many, if any, highly intelligent women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (20 children) | Copy Link

High IQ women are more receptive to game. They may understand that game is a game but they still like the way it makes them feel and they are confused by their feelings

[–]Neo9ine 1 point2 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

So, what you're meaning to tell me is that "Game" pulls on women's emotions, specifically those which make them feel attracted to a guy.

And that said "Game" is more effective on women who are aware they are being gamed? And less effective on the women who are unaware their emotions are being manipulated.

I wish I could agree with you but your logic seems highly flawed to me. I've found highly intelligent women really frown upon men who are knowingly gaming them, and often make fun of lesser intelligent women who constantly "fall" for game ... remaining unaware of the manipulation.

And your original point is that high-IQ like to fuck manual laborers because they enjoy being manipulated by men of lesser intelligence of whom they are aware they are being gamed. Yikes.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Legend has it that scientists were still able to pick up seismic readings on the feminist REEEEEEEEACTION to this comment even after its third trip around the world.

[–]Lib3rtarianSocialist 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't think it will differ based on being male or female. At least, I can think of no reason.

[–]TheDevilsAdvokaat 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think it would; I can't see a woman's ideal version of her self being the same as a man's idealised version of her.

[–]Lib3rtarianSocialist 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You are right that the female imperative differs from the male imperative.

[–]TheDevilsAdvokaat 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes it seems obvious.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is why training and managing your bitch is imperative, and why we emphasize treating women like children.

Without adult male supervision, women will become impetuous, self-entitled brats.

[–]HighTesticles 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Break her ass and shake her ass."

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 49 points50 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Generally speaking, I think a lot of MGTOW types are really idealists disappointed that the "Disney" version of life they were sold as schoolboys isn't reality. Yet let some TradThot post about how she wants someone to care for and a kitchen to be in and they come running, rising to the beta bait and (no doubt) sliding into her DMs. It's painful to watch.

[–]GL_QUAD 7 points8 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

I might not know what DMs stand for (Direct Messages? Dungeon Masters?), but even so, there are places like the redpillwomen subreddit - in there, they usually advocate for some healthy mix of functional A/B qualities in a man. That being said, oftentimes, those girls seem to be long-term oriented.

After all, one can have only so much sex. There are some quite well upvoted posts on redpillwomen about cooking, femininity, and stuff.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 12 points13 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

DM = "Direct Messages" AFAIAC.

RPWs are AWALT also, but it's what one does with AWALT. I don't read RPW but if others do, that's fine.

Someone put me on to Georgia Free's videos lately, and, as I see it, she's a career girl who, at 27 has arrived at the "Epiphany Phase". She seems pretty self-aware, but that's not gong to stop hypergamy, it's just that she's going to understand it. Meanwhile, while I haven't read the comments sections of her vids (well, much) I'm relatively certain they're full of (a) Angry Lost Boys, (b) lovelorn Nice GuysTM looking for a unicorn and (c) probably some normals discussing things. Just how I see the world.

[–]GL_QUAD 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Just how I see the world.

Sure. And I suppose that is the key aspect of it - if you see the world accurately, then you can make fail-safe decisions. Well, that was such a meta-comment... anyway, short story time:

There's this one guy who got himself a nice cozy apartment just now; he's also finishing a prestigious college (not an MD doctor, but decent earning prospects nevertheless). So this guys finds himself a girl through the internet. First time they meet, she cooks for him. Being quite the momma's boy, the guy is impressed with the girl from the get-go. They get to know each other for a month, and now she wants to move in with him (she'd be moving into a new city; she has no financial backbone of her own).

What is this?

  • True LoveTM that is to triumph all?
  • A girl doing what a girl does: predating on an oblivious victim?
  • A potentially shrewd guy who could see where she's probably coming from; who, in his shrewdness, could decide to keep her around for now (as long as the sex is any good, as long as no ultimatums arise)?

[–]p3n1x 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

if you see the world accurately, then you can make fail-safe decisions.

This is so fucking not true.

"fail-safe" is a non-sequitur to survival.

You can't control all the variables of the world. You might be able to make better 'gambles', but every breath you take is rolling the dice of life.

[–]BewareTheOldMan 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

If you either mention or state that some of the advice offered to women is detrimental to men, the general response is "Red Pill Women advice is presented to women, for the express benefit of women, and without concern to men."

That line alone tells you EVERYTHING you need to know about that forum. Beware of female wolves in sheep's clothing.

Edited for correction

cc - u/VasiliyZaitzev

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Correct, but that should surprise no one. First, AWALT. Second, RPWs and RPMs often have conflicticonflicting goals - and when that happens women, and therefore society, expect men to sacrifice (or be sacrificed) - The Cardinal Rule of Sexual Strategies: For one gender’s sexual strategy to succeed the other gender must compromise or abandon their own

I do not, historically, spend much time at RPW, but I wonder if what the really want could be characterized as “Building Better Betas”.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

As vasily said, men and women often have conflicting sexual strategies. why would RPW concern itself with benefiting men? Why would TRP concern itself with benefiting women?

RPW is not a unicorn school. It's a space for women to work on female sexual strategy.

[–]p3n1x 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

After all, one can have only so much sex.

Don't you put that evil on me Ricky Bobby.

Just because your testosterone runs low, you get feelz for a "unicorn", don't project it on the rest of the world.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]modTheRedPike 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

We don't talk about other subs here. If there is a specific post in another sub that you would like to make a point about, that would be ok as long as it doesn't break rules. However consider this topic forbidden now--only warning.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Compeliminator 38 points39 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

i used to be a soft malleable turd but after being left in the sun to bake i have become hard and tough

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorFieldLine 21 points22 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Congratulations?

[–]LucidTramontane 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You asking or saying you dumb fuck.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 95 points96 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If this was a Tarantino movie, this would be an opening monologue before you kill the main character and fire up a banging opener soundtrack. That was a great read and in my life very true.

Moist turds

Best gift of the holiday season.

[–]rma92 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Excellent read, and very observable. I was riding the NYC subway the other night - all the couples were the soy professor types with the fat feminist post-wall women - 3 couples, 3 convesations, each guy basically manipulated himself to...fit into his woman's hole .

Mushy turd men

Almost spit out my coffee from this!

(Edit: Bad formatting because mobile post)

[–]kylebenjaminturner62 points [recovered] (31 children) | Copy Link

One must have values and boundaries that cannot be crossed as an "alpha".

Alphas do not avoid conflict but rather decide which situations to put themselves in.

Not every girl will like you, not every boss will treat you well, not every situation needs your leadership.

Becoming alpha is about putting yourself in situations where you know you'll win.

[–]Andgelyo 30 points31 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Disagree, being alpha is some times taking risks. Yes, you will lose sometimes. You might even lose everything. However, learning from that experience, over coming challenges, and ultimately becoming greater makes a person Alpha. Challenges don't come from situations where you know you'll win, they come from facing the unknown.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Further to this I'd add it's about putting yourself in situations you can win with reasonable certainty. Psychologists sometimes call it the Zone of Proximal Development; something beyond your current ability but within reach with help from others.

Putting yourself into situations you will most likely fail isn't a good idea, nor situations you can certainly win. Challenge is perhaps more important than winning or losing and specifically, continually taking on challenges. After all success is not final and failure is not fatal. As Churchill put it; any man who can move from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm is alpha.

[–]FuckMichaelMcCoy 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

“Don’t bite off more than you can chew”

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Becoming alpha is about putting yourself in situations where you know you'll win.

Not really -- that's playing it too safe -- more appropriately being an Alpha means choosing fights worth fighting.

[–]ScroogeMcDaq 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Becoming alpha is about putting yourself in situations where you know you'll win.

It's rather being good strategist. But is it really 100% possible, to know everytime exactly where (not) to go and what (not) to say, not to get into trouble?

[–]MilkMoney111 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I used to wrestle in high school. If I went on a win streak I would get cocky and be humbled real quick. The most I ever learned were from losses. I would recognize my own weakness and implement new techniques that were used to beat me on other people.

I don't think knowing you'll win is good enough. I think knowing you're going to cause a significant amount of damage that your opponent will rather not fight you next time is a better approach. I don't mind a loss, and I don't care about size differences, because I know regardless if they are going to win, it's going to be one of the most painful wins they'll ever get.

[–]uwey 4 points5 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Chinese have a perfect saying about this mentality.

You should always strived to be the beak of a chicken, and never should you dream about being a cow’s rear.

For example, you should run a small business and be your own boss instead work for Samsung or Google as some senior manager.

You choose where to fight and wins. Choose where you loose wisely.

[–]AGallopingMonkey12 points [recovered] (23 children) | Copy Link

In your analogy, the senior manager is the cows prime rib. I’d much rather be prime rib making 500k than own my own “small business.”

[–]uwey 10 points11 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

500k salary most likely only opened for people have network and generational caste inherent social trends.

If you grew up poor people will know, no matter how polish you get, that is why Europe, Asia, and Middle East is all about family root. Japan will go so far to check any person in your family ever commit a crime.

Lot of it simply protectionism and social acknowledgement. Upper class only hang out with upper class and pass wealth in between because it will be more convenient to deal with fellow oligarchs instead.

Small business can unlock all other things that you don’t necessarily earned and skip to the top if you executed with factor you can control.

I bet you have higher chance to run and maintain the business as white, instead work to get 500k. Many tech are anti white and lots of higher echelons of company are mostly old money. They know who you are and how you get there. Do you think they don’t see million of dreamer that dream for that fat paycheck coming their way? What make you useable to them? What you bring to the table?

Of course, if you born into mid-high class family it is totally understandable to continue the social caste road, if not, small business is almost the only way for someone poor to gamble to the top.

[–]majaka1234 10 points11 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Your mentality is very Asian.

Outside of Asia you will not have a successful small business just because you are white.

This is because the western market doesn't care for gummy chummy buddies with inferior products - either you are the top dog or you are not.

Get that mentality out of your head - you'll thank me for it. It's self defeating and continues this idea that business gives any fucks about your race or upbringing (it doesn't).

In China you can get your buddy in the party to deny the competitor their business license or IP protection...

But tell me, which countries consistently produce the best businesses and products and which country plays catch up by ignoring copyright and patents?

[–]Chaddeus_Rex -1 points0 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

But tell me, which countries consistently produce the best businesses and products and which country plays catch up by ignoring copyright and patents?

Right now thats China/Japan/Korea

[–]majaka1234 2 points3 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Oh really?

Top R&D in medicine?

Top producers of technology research including the world's supercomputers and new wafer technology?

So nice to know that the likes of Huawei and Xiaomi, two of the biggest companies in China, have not at any point and do not currently copy the designs of any of the leading western companies.

No sir, the mi book air is totally original.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Top R&D in medicine?

Yup.

Recently there was a meeting in Stockholm between members of medical ministries from all over the world. The Swedish announced that they are starting a program to TRY to sequence the genome of 10, 000 people by 2025. The Chinese laughed and said they've sequenced the genome of about half of their population and have ALREADY adopted a program where they sequence the genome of newly born babies.

Moreover, look at how fast new medical gene editing technologies (such as CRIPSER-CAS) are developing in China and how much farther ahead of the US they are.

So nice to know that the likes of Huawei and Xiaomi, two of the biggest companies in China, have not at any point and do not currently copy the designs of any of the leading western companies.

Implying that companies do not copy each other - just lol. Look at the chinese tech sector, they've done things that the US hasn't been able to. For example, integrating payments/calling/social media/maps all into one small app called WeChat. Also, look at all of the new ideas coming out of China in terms of R&D for phones and shit. Also, those spy chips that they put into iphones, require a great deal of innovation to make, they went undetected for YEARS because American companies lacked the tech to catch them until now.

China is much more advanced and innovative than the media tells you. That is a Red Pill.

[–]majaka1234 1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

We Chat, Line, Alipay. Same thing different name.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Thats the case with every technology. It was copied from someone else, yes even by American companies.

Innovation is in the details and the Chinese are good at that.

[–]Neo9ine 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

China is also leading the race in quantum computing as of 2018.

The Chinese do have a "copycat" culture ('the nail that stands out gets hammered down' is a saying there), though and are notorious for their black market products, which they typically sell back to US & western consumers as economic strategy. They also were known to copy existing US business models that work, and adopt them in China, as a form of risk-aversion in entrepreneurship.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The Chinese do have a "copycat" culture ('the nail that stands out gets hammered down' is a saying there), though and are notorious for their black market products, which they typically sell back to US & western consumers as economic strategy. They also were known to copy existing US business models that work, and adopt them in China, as a form of risk-aversion in entrepreneurship.

Everything that China is currently doing is not new - it was done by Korea/Japan before them (Japan required any foreign companies on their soil to share their technologies with EVERY company in Japan - this hit IBM hard in Japan), by the Soviets before them and by the Americans before that.

It's just sound strategy - why invent something new when you can take what works and improve upon it?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think with proper dedication it is quite achievable to pull 100K+ income in US whatever the exact strategy.

I would not oppose big vs small companies because ultimately this is the same. Many forget that small companies have to cope with clients or go bankrupt (90% companies after 3 years there) so many small companies boss are just slave of their clients.

On the opposite, many forget that big companies equal to leveraging other people, that is the most effective way to gain power. You cannot do everything by yourself, you have to delegate and that exactly what you do when working in a big company. You leveverage the company in you to get to have lot of people and resources at your disposal.

[–]uwey 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

What I don’t get is there are people in denial.

Denial of social engineering.

Believe if you have X then social stuff don’t really matter. Yes it does and it always will be.

Do you think Trump win because coincident? No he born in right type of family that he grew to have right type of talent with right type of people to make right deal. All that are interconnected.

I do believe no matter how good is your product, or how the best you are in certain field, if you don’t know people you are just another useful idiot. Tesla is perfect example, even Eisenstein think he is the brightest and smartest person of the generation and Edison, a typical I know JP Morgan asshole, use the shit out of him and basically own his success.

Social ties and cronies exist way before so call marketing, best practices, or even product. You might get lucky but that is not how majority of the world works. Chinese is not unique nor universal. But they have the fundamental that American used to have but gradually lost in current generation.

Win by pay it in enemies expense. Win by have everyone in your side. Win by have best connection. Win by have largest backer in the markets.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well nothing can be ever achieved by a single person. One always depends of others to provide furnitures or service and to buy one product or services.

Somebody like Trump with the family money and family relations is given quite a head start and as our time on this earth is quite limited, this truely significant.

But make no mistake, no everybody is able to multiply the family money by a factor of 15 or to be elected as president of united states, even with right family connections.

On the contrary, somebody that is really motivated witll soon find way to prove invaluable, create a big social circle and progress at a steady rate.

If you can only value technical mastery in a field that pay well (medecine, computer science, finance...), without any significant family connection or any outstanding social or managerial skills, you'll soon be above 100K$/year.

If you manage that money just decently, you should have more than 1 million dollar on the side when you retire.

Somebody that has great social skills (not outstanding) and as the sence of affairs on top will likely manage to get 300-500K+ annual income and get arround 10 million or more when he retire.

For somebody with outstanding skill and motivation, there truely no limits.

For sure having a head start is extremely valuable, but you have to leverage it and the more you family already has, the less incentive there is to make any effort.

But to succeed you have to try first, from what I can see, we are far from 10% of people trying their best. Maybe 1-5% of the population is really trying to maximize their career and income in a meaningfull way. Maybe because they don't think it is really worth it. And they are not necessarily wrong.

[–]yumyumgivemesome 37 points38 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I truly appreciate these consistent reminders to quash my blue pill mushy turd mentality when it crops up from time to time.

[–]MatrixofLe3adership 13 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I've been critical of OP in the past. This is genius.

edited: overly critical

[–]frooschnate 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Smart dude, bit fucking hard headed at times

[–]BurnoutRS 12 points13 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

The intense desire to be liked, causes a person to, over time, develop into a form of social tofu. Adapting to each new group to be the least threatening, make the least noise, ruffle as little feathers as possible... so as to ensure acceptance and survival.

Im getting sick of people like this. I find them increasingly disingenous. I have male friends, who, Im losing my trust in, and respect for because they just tell me what they think I want to hear. What they think will keep me coming around. Its conflicting for me, cause Im not yet at the point where I can always tell if someone is just supplicating or if theyre speaking honestly. Especially since some people are sincerely retarded.

[–]destraht 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm at a point in the West where I perceive about half of all behaviour as offensive or grating. I'm relieved when I can just head nod sup a dude at a checkout line without having to go through a contrived how are you? line of fake shit. That happened to me yesterday and the memory is still fresh. It was awesome. I have very fond memories of Eastern Europe and being able to deal with a lot of people without them being fake all up in my business while trying to vampire emotions. There if someone is miserable as fuck then they get to be that and its fine. There isn't that oh someone has a case of the Monnn-days antagonistic shit. I really like that part of Eastern Europe perhaps most of all. The downside is that its made living in plastic Western places to be more difficult because I know more about how full of shit that they are. Its endemic and as naturally unnatural as breathing for them. You can't stop it. The monster creation needs to exhaust itself through its own efforts. Let the energy vampires orgy on themselves.

[edit] Fuck ya bitches! I just got my shiny new 10-year passport. I was stateless for a bit there.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I know the frustrations you speak of. When I moved cities for my education, I left behind a group of friends in my hometown who were (and still are) content with smoking weed, magic the gathering, youtube and leading a mediocre BB existence. Most of them are either stuck in a joyless relationship or are becoming burned out incels. It is no surprise to me that, now that we're all near the end of our twenties, some aready hitting thirty, that the results (or rather, lack thereof) of their decisions is catching up to them in the form of depression, burnout or overall apathy.

Getting sick of them is only the beginning. My advice to you is to stop caring about their supplication and just chill. It shouldn't affect you that much unless you let it. Either seek out new, masculine friends you can relate to or just stop caring about trying to redpill your friends, that rarely turns out well. Making friends really is as easy as asking that cool bro from your boxing gym if he wants to grab a beer afterwards.

[–]BurnoutRS 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The similarities between my old friend group and yours are almost eerie. Youtube, weed and magic.

You're right about the just chill thing. Im trying to keep myself from getting obsessive about it. I went out with one of my beta friends the other night. I took control, we went for a trail walk at first, then ate and played pool for a couple hours. There were some moments where I was a bit more introspective, more apprehensive and in my head than I usually am. Which I attribute partly to being way too attentive to how beta the guy is. Has huge personal space issues and a bit of a lack of spacial awareness. Gotta move/watch out for other people at the other tables when youre in a pool bar

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The intense desire to be liked, causes a person to, over time, develop into a form of social tofu. Adapting to each new group to be the least threatening, make the least noise, ruffle as little feathers as possible... so as to ensure acceptance and survival.

This is why I cannot stand corporate America.

[–]herrazki 38 points39 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

More, I can't get enough of this subreedit. I am going to being honest. I already red 90% of top posts in trp, the sidebar, the rationale male, illimitable man and pretty much everything. it's have been 3 years since I started reading trp everyday, now all my friends comes to me for relationship advices, also now I can even sometimes tell my friend what his girl will respond, 99% of time I get the answer yes, I only had a average history with women but when I talk about gaming and girls, people assume that I am player or some pua artiste, it's like I lived and experienced every story I read here, TRP has given me the ability to read women mind, and not only women, men also. I don't post here at all but Gaylubeoil I have red all your posts like 2 or 3 times, I want to thank you for trying to keeping trp alive.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah being adept in TRP makes women incredibly predictable. Its a Praxeology after all

[–]frameTrumpsShitTests 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You have to fail to really understand. So far, it's only a theory. Your Lizard-brain doesn't speak womanese yet.

Be careful. When you try to apply your newfound knowledge you will fail hard.

I also think it's hilarious how easy things are when you understand. No need to walk around different forbidden views and unite the remaining contradicting worldviews. I also have to thank GayLubeOil for his constant humorous reminders and investments in young men.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've been doing the same since I discovered The Red Pill a few months ago too. I've been married for almost 14 years now, and I have a good relationship with my wife, I'm a natural red pill guy. The red pill has given me a framework for understanding women and relationships in general.

[–]TRParchivist 22 points23 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Betas are unconscious mushy turds. Paul Elam isn't a mushy turd, he's more of a sneaky squirt that hides itself as a fart. He's out to get heard by any means necessary, which includes crying like a babe on camera to earn those sympathy points - no press is bad press. His use of turd behavior seems deliberate, at the very least conscious.

Perhaps, even suffering cannot save certain turds.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Who would have thought thread of the year would be just before the new year.

[–]Modredpillschool 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This thread is a fresh shit with surprise corn in it. You don't remember eating corn. Can't flush it so you might as well just get a new metaphor because I'm confused.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I seriously can't wait to call someone a moist turd. It's soooo good.

[–]Modredpillschool[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (80 children) | Copy Link

So the question is: Who really is Paul Elam? What does he really believe? Does he think that women are manipulative whores incapable of empathy? Or does he believe that women should empathize with men's issues? He's taken both positions. Which one does he actually believe? Does he even know? All we can say conclusively is that Paul Elam is a mushy turd.

When Kavanaugh was in the hot seat defending against baseless sexual assault claims, Jordan Peterson declared:

Jordan B Peterson@jordanbpeterson

If confirmed Kavanaugh should step down.

Jordan B Peterson@jordanbpeterson

I'm not certain that is the right move. It's very complex. But he would have his name cleared, and a figure who might be less divisive might be put forward.

Jordan Peterson who champions the cause of the lost boys suggests backing down to false accusations - the Achilles' heel of masculinity.. What does he really believe? Does he even know?

All we can say conclusively is that Jordan Peterson is a mushy wet turd.

[–]Flpgneves 107 points108 points  (44 children) | Copy Link

Based on one thing he said in a situation that involves politics?

I disagree with Peterson a lot, but let's not become feminist-like ideologues here.

[–]Modredpillschool 25 points26 points  (42 children) | Copy Link

Forget the politics. Consider the implications from a male strategy standpoint.

Do you recommend caving and losing your career to false allegations?

Based on one thing he said, I can conclusively say yes, he's a mushy wet turd.

[–]breyerw 20 points21 points  (39 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but you don’t even know the allegations were false. And Cavanaugh acted like a scared sniveling child on the stand.

I don’t really care about your red pill fantasy head canon of that complex situation.

jordan peele like all the “conservative intellectuals” is the definition of “i am very smart” and it’s desperate and pathetic.

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

jordan peele

Is a comedian.

And Cavanaugh acted like a scared sniveling child on the stand.

So.

Yeah but you don’t even know the allegations were false.

Doesn't matter because he hasn't been proven guilty of something that he supposedly did 30 years ago.

Furthermore, you are allowing today's standards to be applied to yesterday's actions. In the United States, we have a constitution and that document gives you the right to voice your stupid opinion, it also protects Americans from ex post facto prosecution. Specifically, it is Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3.

[–]chrisname 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Can you elaborate on how “today’s standards [are being] applied to yesterday’s actions”? Was rape/sexual assault, the crime Kavanaugh was accused of, not illegal at the time he is accused of having done it?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Well, in the early 1980's it pretty much took penetration for the standard of rape/sexual assault to be applied. Sexual misconduct was not even a standard much less a law.

[–]chrisname -3 points-2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

This might be my ignorance, but wasn’t he accused of having full-on sex with a very drunk woman?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Groping and holding her down while he was 17 and she was 15. That accusation had a witness. The second lady said that when he was at Yale 35 years ago, while they were at a frat party, he took out his penis, put it to her face, and forced her to touch it.

There you go. 35 years ago a horny male did some inappropriate shit with a woman. Surely he is not qualified to be a Supreme Court justice because he was stupid 35 years ago.

How does your past look? Can anyone in your past make a dollar telling the world that you did some bad stuff. 35 years ago!

[–]chrisname 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, I’ve got some skeletons in my closet.

[–]breyerw -11 points-10 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

a republican comedian with an agenda and a message.

Kavanaugh broke multiple laws. Even if they didn’t have proof of the initial allegations, he lied to cover it up multiple times. Making shit up off the top of his head.

why would he do that if he wasn’t scared and desperate. if he had nothing to hide or worry about he would have been cool as a cucumber. that’s not what we got.

Lucky for him his buddies were in the majority on the committee, so no justice for his current illegal actions.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

NO, Jordan Peele is the comedian from Key and Peele. See, you cannot even tell the difference between Jordan Peterson and Jordan Peele.

I'm going to guess by your argument strategy that you are female. All accusations and no facts.

[–]Modredpillschool[M] 16 points17 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Take this elsewhere. Nobody gives a shit.

[–]breyerw -4 points-3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Oh you mean YOU don’t give a shit. Because you’re a conservative. And you just turned on your fancy mod badge so you can silence my views that you happen to disagree with.

what a joke.

[–]Modredpillschool[M] 10 points11 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

You hijacked a comment thread about Jordan Peterson to babble about nonsense and tilt at windmills.

You're a joke.

Oh you mean YOU don’t give a shit. Because you’re a conservative. And you just turned on your fancy mod badge so you can silence my views that you happen to disagree with.

I don't even have an opinion about what you're blabbing about. It's off topic. Go elsewhere.

[–]Mr_KenSpeckle3 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

You do have an opinion. You repeatedly refer to “false” or “baseless” allegations. If you’re going to post stuff on here, have the sack to own it.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck off. I don't know why you lefties still hang around here (assuming you're not a troll). If your own political allies knew you commented here they would you disown you and ruin your life. How can you live with such massive cognitive dissonance? You can't be leftist and red pill. We fucking hate you and you aren't welcome.

[–]1empatheticapathetic 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This entire comment is hilarious.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

All allegations begin as false, and they remain that way until they are proven not to be.

[–]textualintercourse 17 points18 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Fucking dumbest comment here.

FBI found ZERO allegations true.

[–]five-acorn -4 points-3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

The FBI was given a limited scope by Trump who for obvious reasons loved Kavanaugh. They refused to interview key witnesses because of likely the President's orders.

The guy was not convicted in a court of law -- but I'd say odds are more likely than not he probably groped a few women in a drunken stupor. He looks and smells like a pussy but that's politics. There were too many connected pieces and constant lies. "Who is Bart O'Kavanugh" and then he literally signed a yearbook "Bart O'Kavanaugh". Just another Republican shill. Oh yeah and he doesn't want people prying into his sexual past, yet he worked with Ken Starr and wanted to ask Bill Clinton if he cummed into a waste basket, the whole works. So add hypocritical pussy to his resume.

Trump only liked the guy because he's publicly stated that a sitting President cannot be indicted, period, end of story. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why he was nominated out of dozens of other far more qualified conservative judges.

[–]MLK_was_a_commie 12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Try reading more than just MSNBC and HuffPo headlines, mate

[–]five-acorn -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I did my own research. sorry I can see an innocent man being nervous but the repeated lying and partisan hackery... he's a bitch boy

[–]textualintercourse 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"likely" "odds are"

Speculative bullshit.

I do agree that there are more qualified options than him, but [Ginsburg] is RIP, and Roberts is fucked, so Trump will have at minimum 2 more picks. If all goes to plan, he'll get even 2 more after that.

[–]Modredpillschool 16 points17 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but you don’t even know the allegations were false.

They sounded false to me. His multiple accusers either never came forward, or did and couldn't present evidence or a consistent story. From my observations, false accusations are minimal effort with maximum damage. Why wouldn't somebody do it?

I don’t really care about your red pill fantasy head canon of that complex situation.

Okay, then I guess you've got nothing to talk about on a subreddit dedicated to analyzing reality through a red pill lens.

[–]breyerw -4 points-3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No, there’s a difference between talking about red pill theory and ham fisting your minority political opinion into the discussion.

If you watched even five minutes of Cavanagh on the stand you would see him whining and crying and yelling and looking like the farthest thing from a red pill man. hence my words “fantasy head cannon” the man verifiably lied multiple times blatantly, yet he showed no strength only sad desperation.

[–]Modredpillschool 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, there’s a difference between talking about red pill theory and ham fisting your minority political opinion into the discussion.

If you watched even five minutes of Cavanagh on the stand you would see him whining and crying and yelling and looking like the farthest thing from a red pill man. hence my words “fantasy head cannon” the man verifiably lied multiple times blatantly, yet he showed no strength only sad desperation.

Never suggested anything about Kavanaugh. You're tilting at windmills.

[–]Flpgneves -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Forget the politics in a situation where politics played a major role? C'mon..

[–]Modredpillschool 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I suggested you analyze the implications from a male strategy standpoint, because it sounds like you can't handle the politics.

Feel free to look at the politics and tell me what kind of man has a backbone so fragile that he suggests kowtowing to the enemy at the very mention of a baseless accusation intended to tarnish your candidate?

It's a bad strategy from the supposed genius.

[–]p3n1x 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oneitis is a slippery slope. If you let the accuser get away with a fallacy "for the sake of the children/career" or whatever, you are being a mushy turd. You will be taken advantage of over and over again.

[–]five-acorn 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

OP's post was gold; we don't need to turn it into a sound board for Trump and the GOP.

Trust me, nothing but Beta pussies as far as the eye can see there including Kavanaugh. Most politicians are the very definition of "I'll be whatever you want me to be" and spineless.

[–]Modredpillschool[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Was that really your take away from what I wrote?

Do we need a basic reading comprehension test on TRP?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

When I read the tweet I interpreted the word 'confirmed' as referring to the accusations being proven true and Kavanaugh guilty, not to the process of being approved for the supreme court position. Either Peterson was deliberately being vague here or he's gone completely blue-pilled here.

[–]Modredpillschool 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's just a poor interpretation of context.

It was a confirmation hearing. If he wasn't yet confirmed to the supreme court, he would have nothing to step down from.

[–]3Yakatonker 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Peterson is a Trilateral Member, an elite amongst elites in the globalist hierarchy. Trilateral members being one rank above Council on Foreign Relations plutocrats(CFR).

Anything the piece of trash says is going to be smeared in the propagandist nature of Hegelian Social programming. Its also no surprise what he teaches is largely blue pilled programming. More of the self sacrificial garbage they use to inform compliance in men.

If Peterson was an actual independent, he would be rapidly anti-feminist, rabidly against utilizing controlled and scripted platforms and networks of the globalists. What we get in reality is some bastard doing mental masturbation all over the blue pilled masses.

[–]twofones 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He started out ok but there is evidence to believe that JP has been compromised and $ucked into the machine.

https://youtu.be/jcFE1zh8r_M?t=517

Think end of black mirror episode “Fifteen Million Merits”

Sorry if that’s a spoiler but you should have seen it by now

[–]Shieldless_One 4 points5 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

JBP said IF CONFIRMED he should step down. Never did he suggest he should back down under false accusations.

[–]Modredpillschool 10 points11 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Never did he suggest he should back down under false accusations.

...

IF CONFIRMED he should step down.

What do you call quitting over false allegations? Standing up?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's the ol' Ned Stark strategy. That way, when you're beheaded because you didn't seize the opportunity to claim power, at least you can have a moral victory before your inevitable execution!

[–]Shieldless_One -1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Quitting would be backing down, thats not what Peterson is saying.

[–]Modredpillschool 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

What do you think stepping down means?

[–]Shieldless_One 5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

JBP said that if the accusations against Kavanaugh are true then he should step down. He has not said Kavanaugh should step down while the argument was unsettled.

[–]Modredpillschool 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm not certain that is the right move. It's very complex. But he would have his name cleared, and a figure who might be less divisive might be put forward.

He suggested Kavanaugh step down to have his name cleared. If he's guilty, this would not clear his name. This is clearly not JP's intent.

[–]Shieldless_One 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

He suggested Kavanaugh step down after the allegations against him were confirmed to be true. That’s different than claiming JP is suggesting Kavanaugh back down under false allegations.

[–]Modredpillschool 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

To clear his name?

Are you reading what you wrote?

No, in his tweets he made no such assertion.

[–]Shieldless_One 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m talking about what you wrote in your OP.

Jordan Peterson who champions the cause of the lost boys suggests backing down to false accusations - the Achilles' heel of masculinity.. What does he really believe? Does he even know?

He did not suggest backing down.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the most retarded course of action of all. Why would he step down if confirmed?

[–]Immaculate5321 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Does the if confirmed mean that if Kavanaugh is confirmed he should step down? Or if allegations against him are confirmed? They have very different implications.

[–]Modredpillschool 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If confirmation was referring to the allegations, he wouldn't have a job to step down from.

Confirmation was referring to the job hearing.

[–]riggedved 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Whatever you might say, he's making SHIT LOAD OF MONEY.

Just Google how much he makes. He himself declares it in a video. It's insane. His yearly earnings now are more than a 100 mill USD.

[–]trey_at_fehuit 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Jordan B Peterson@jordanbpeterson

If confirmed Kavanaugh should step down.

https://jordanbpeterson.com/political-correctness/notes-on-my-kavanaugh-tweet/

Read his thoughts on it. Garners a bit more sympathy for Peterson. I'm not saying I agree with him (I think he doesn't understand how vehemently the left oppose ANYTHING Trump does, and it has nothing to do with his guilt or innocence), but it adds some context.

[–]Modredpillschool 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, reading this removes all doubt for me, JP is a cuck in cuck's clothing.

What matters is that there is very widespread opposition to his candidacy, much of it generated not by people’s belief in his innocence or lack therefore but by their objection to the manner in which both parties handled the nomination process.

The manner in which both parties handled the nomination? Does he mean how Republicans brought forward somebody and Democrats attempted to assassinate his character? "Guilty on both sides" is such a copout and gives the very veto power to the power-hungry SJWs he pretends to oppose.

It’s not a good thing when there is general discomfort with the manner in which something as important as the naming of a new Chief Justice is undertaken. It doesn’t bode well for the stability and peace of the state (and perhaps–perhaps–there is nothing more important to preserve than that).

Then you've given agitators a free gift. Anytime they want to disrupt the process, create general discomfort and override the entire system.

Perhaps the Democrat opposition would mount a similar campaign against my putative successor. But that would provide virtually unassailable evidence for the purely manipulative and political motivation of the accusers, forcing them to duplicate their strategy a second time. That would help reveal the machinations for what they were, in a manner that would be virtually undeniable.

Apparently he missed what they did to Roy Moore. There's already plenty of evidence of the purely manipulative and political motivation of the accusers. They were empowered by imbeciles thinking like JP.

This guy says a lot of words in place of critical thinking.

[–]Putins_Orange_Cock 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They weren’t false accusations.

[–]TruthSeekingPerson 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I think that's unfair to Peterson. His body of work is very impressive. In his interviews he stands in and takes punches from feminists and then returns them to devastating effect. He is very persuasive on the issues he has given a lot of thought to.

The quote you are citing was done impulsively and without much thought. It was a hypothesis and was in response to a bitch post from his friend Brett Weinstein who was lamenting the appointment of Kavanaugh.

Look, Peterson's tweet was wrong. But he's backed off of it and it was a suggestion it wasn't a fixed position.

Paul Elam is a simp though.

[–]Modredpillschool 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

He may have backed off of it for now, but what mindset lets you even utter the words?

He's controlled opposition.

[–]TruthSeekingPerson 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's the mindset of the hero myth, where Kavanaugh sacrifices himself to better the country.

The problem is it would hurt the country. I don't think Peterson understood the dirty politics that were at play. That cunt Brett Weinstein played the victim and Peterson--off the cuff--proposed a solution.

We have to let people think without condemning them as enemies. I've watched a lot of Peterson and he is right about a lot of things. But everyone is wrong at times.

Peterson was also wrong calling MGTOW pathetic little weasels but he did apologize for the shaming. These are literally the only two mistakes I think Peterson has made since I've been following him.

Peterson definitely has a prejudice towards blue pill relationships but he is standing up for men and masculinity every day so I don't understand dismissing that.

[–]Modredpillschool 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You know since he comes up so much I decided to read some of his books. I'm not finished yet but... I don't know how else to say this.. the man doesn't form complete sentences let alone thoughts.

The heroic tendency - the archetypal savior - is an eternal spirit, which is to say, a central and permanent aspect of human being. The same is true, precisely, of the "adversarial" tendency: the capacity for endless denial, and the desire to make everything suffer for the outrage of its existence, is an ineradicable intrapsychic element of the individual. The great dramatists and religious thinkers of the world have been able to grasp this fact, at least implicitly, and to transmit it in story and image; modern analytic thinkers and existential theorists have attempted to abstract these ideas upward into "higher consciousness," and to present them in logical and purely semantic form. Sufficient material has been gathered to present a compelling portrait of evil.

The fuck did I just read?

[–]TruthSeekingPerson -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He's talking about the human soul. Our true selves. What ultimately makes us get out of bed and do what we do each day. Nietzsche called it the "Will to Power."

There are people who will simply deny reality. These people are perpetual victims who go out seeking to make everyone suffer. One subset of these people are feminists.

Then he talks about how great actors tap into these mindsets--which are difficult to articulate--and present believable characters to the audience.

What Peterson is writing about there is the meaning of life. As a religious person I found his arguments about God uplifting but he also is great explaining psychology and refuting ideological politics.

Here he is at his best in an interview. He really is brilliant in this.

https://youtu.be/aMcjxSThD54

EDIT: In rewatching this Peterson definitely gives women too much credit. But I do enjoy his take on women picking betas so they can dominate them (after being unable to reel in a masculine man).

[–]Jailhouseredpilled93 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Jordan Peterson is a cuck!

[–]alxjones -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

good. ex-lobsters should have long seen this wet turd by now. glad this conversation lays on the table. goodbye jordan peterson, maybe hello Jesse Lee Peterson

[–]textualintercourse -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you!!

[–]Auxfite 4 points5 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

We don't choose who we are. I deeply believe those who have accepted the Redpill had the tendencies to become "alpha". They didn't "change". They improved themselves.

Betas will always be blind to the truth we teach men here. And there's nothing in the whole universe that can change that.

[–]Vikingcel -1 points0 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Why would god make me a beta?

[–]Auxfite 20 points21 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

God didn’t make you a beta. Your environment did. Your beta father and friends. The new age feminist culture. The bullshit lies society feeds you to believe what attracts women. Stop blaming God for your misfortunes and change. TRP already lays the blueprint on how to become a top rank alpha but modern day men have become lazy cucks who complain and make excuses.

Romans 12:2

Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Auxfite 8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Law 38: Think as you like, but behave like others.

Challenging people's beliefs only serves to isolate you. They will feel personally attacked and do whatever it takes to protect themselves and/or defeat you. It's pointless to argue, especially in the workplace. You will only offend people by not agreeing with them and how they choose to live their lives.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Da_RectumWrecker3 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

You havent read the 48 laws of power have you?

[–]2comment 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Same reason he made Joseph a cuck.

[–]Vikingcel 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He works in mysterious ways...

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Vikingcel 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I found that viscerally offensive.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That would be the correct response, but at least some guys will give you the courtesy of telling you something like this. Women? They will happily let you dig their ditches while other men plow her fields.

[–]Endorsed Contributoritiswr1tten 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are like water, taking the shape of the container of a real man. Beta damp turds mix with the water and become messy diarrhea pools. Both parties are left feeling gross after.

Next level literal shit post that articulates truth. Bravo, you're channeling Diogenes here. A man is a rock, therefore a not-man must be some other unfortunate piece of unprocessed squishy carbon. You should pluck a chicken next.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are like water, taking the shape of the container of a real man.

When you notice a woman you are with starting to subtly alter her manners of speech to mimic you, that's when you know you've got her. I love that feeling.

[–]panconquesofrito 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This was a pretty damn good read!

[–]FormerBlueFool 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

U/GayLubeOil thanks for this post. I really really needed to read this.

Earlier today I made the belated decision to cut ties with a very old friend (who happens to be the Biggest Bluest Turd I know). It wasn't an easy decision, but your post has cemented in my mind that he truly is a blue turd and isn't worthy of my continued time and attention.

[–]TheStoicCrane 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's said on this forum constantly that women are like children. What do children need to keep themselves from getting ran over or electrocuting themselves by sticking a form in a power outlet?

They need adult supervision. "Alphas" are adult males whereas "Betas" are children. Women respect men (Alphas) but they absolutely hate dealing with literal and figurative children (Betas) that isn't their own long-term.

[–]JonathanMekerset 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I really FUCKING like this analogy

[–]1maverick9759 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Deja Vu ? Is this a repost ? It's a damn good analogy. Cool reminder.

[–]IRunYourRiver 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think we all recognize this on some instinctual level. What makes TRP unique are posts like this that are willing to bluntly point this out along with resources on how beta turds can solidify. Lift. Sidebar. Fail. Try again. No shortcuts.

[–]tokegifford 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I get the idea that being a nice guy beta boy and trying to appease a girl to gain attraction doesn't work. But doesn't running game put you in the same category of mushy turd? You'reg a certain way because you want something from her.

[–]akzunamoon 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a fact often discussed, but misinterpreted. You should take the red pill for yourself, not in the intend of getting back something from world.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I had a "friend" like this once. He came to me only when needed, and when i was ready to date a hot girl he ruined the Whole thing gossiping things to her and my other friends. Busted the fucker in the mouth and sent him to the nearest hospital, but i heard he didn't learnt the lesson and now he's in the process of getting his ass kicked again. well, repetitia iuvant

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I like the violence but obviously it didn't affect anything while putting you at risk of losing a good chunk of your life.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yes, i know. but sometimes violence helps getting the point across. especially for beta turds who needs an attitude adjustment.. oh, happy new year bro :)

[–]Elfclan30 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They have something in common, they gossip a lot and usually are goofy . They are so socially unaware that he probably does not know himself about his own behavior. At least I used to be like that.

[–]DigitalDragonSlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was so annoyed when that movie came out… Fuck Paul Elam with an industrial size dick

[–]TruthSeekingPerson 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Paul Elam last I heard was living with a woman.

Also, the underlying tone of his youtube videos is one of a hurt victim who is angry at women for not treating him the way he wants to be treated.

The bottom line is he's a simp in MRA clothing and he's far too emotional to be taken as an authority on things.

[–]Unexpecter 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This was very good read. Thank you.

[–]Infla-mood 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have never read any Paul Elam articles. His articulate words in The Red Pill are enough to make me a fan. Does an imperfect delivery of his message negate his impact, as one of the few willing to stand up and say, "this is wrong and here's why." He has courage. He's not Gay Lube Oil. He's Paul Motherfucking Elam. And he has something to say.

Jordan Peterson. On numerous occasions he has publicly stated that upon reflection he was wrong. A real man listens to opposing arguments and reflects on what was said and IS WILLING TO CHANGE HIS POINT OF VIEW. He throws hubris out the window and understands that an argument is more than parroting a point of view. We're trying to get to the truth.

[–]RealMcGonzo 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I cannot fucking stand the worst of the betas. You never really know what they are thinking, where they stand, what they might do, what they might say because they hide everything.

[–]Arednor13 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Unpredictability is alpha. Betas are boring and predictable. They stand wherever the group stands and think whatever the group thinks.

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is this 60 year old hard blue beta who was pushed out of my mom's group. In the first 15 minutes of knowing him I wasn't sure if he was a next level, old school player or a major turd. In a discussion he would already side with the female collective to bank those pussy points. He would also be Mr. Fixit for more pussy points. Finally after having a nice good stash he would get drunk and grope the women and aggressively try to fuck them. He was doing this with in-group women just he same as the out-group ones. He got a reputation for being a real creep and just never seemed to be able to cash in those points. His reputation is shit but he did get to fix my mom's pool pump a few months ago. He sure is a creep but he has been a lot of help lately.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

An interesting thing I've noticed about TRP is that you lose your anger and bitterness towards women but you gain a deep revulsion towards betas that dwarfs any negative feelings toward women you ever had in your past. I seriously hate them too. Dealing with them at work is the worst. You just want to kick the shit out of them so badly.

[–]keenostreef 2 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

A lot of this is based on over generalization and even false foundations. Let me explain:

It was WOMEN who propagated the myth of "authenticity" to hide uncomfortable truths. "I like the asshole/jerk because he's authentic - he's himself and genuine," they say. If they were speaking the truth, they'd really say, "I like bad men because it appeals to my instinct to be dominated."

There's nothing "noble" about being a stone. Studies show that people low in agreeableness have a significant chance to end up in prison. They end up entering the government's frame with dog collars on their necks.

There are also many different types of betas. Some definitely have no balls and deserve scorn. Others just seem beta, but are actually people with principles which they will stand up for. There's even a popular womens' romance novel series with a "beta" hero whose appeal to women is that he's unwavering with his high ideals and respect. It does take a certain amount of strength to be a beta, when you can change. For some of these men, their "flaw" is that they are too much of a stone and will not compromise their blue pill ideals at any price.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

There's nothing "noble

There is nothing "noble" about sticking a red, engorged body part into another human and gyrating until a sticky goo shoots out of it, yet here we are.

Morality is the most false of foundations when examining people. There nothing wrong with having morals. Just don't expect your moral perspective to provide an avenue to objective truth.

And some people that are low in are high in impulse control. That's so very not a stone.

[–]keenostreef 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Morality has NOTHING to do with my post.

I was responding to the OP talking who mentioned "nobility" and playing up the "stone man" as some paragon in comparison to the beta.

You know what a man who doesn't adapt to his environment and surroundings is? A dead fish in the water. Prisoners couldn't adapt to courtrooms, betas can't adapt to clubs, women can't adapt to red pill, etc etc.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Morality has NOTHING to do with my post.

Uh huh. Get their faster. You missed what he was saying.

[–]keenostreef 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

No, you missed what was going on in the posts.

He thought I was critiquing the "be an unchanging stone" idea on the basis of morality (because I used the word 'noble' in quotations); I pointed out morality had nothing to do with my post.

Reading comp.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

As a hardened veteran of GLO initiated sperg-a-thons, I'm going to let you in on a secret here: the post wasn't about what he said. It was about what you would say.

[–]keenostreef 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I have no clue what you are talking about.

Speak directly and CONFIDENTLY, like a man. Not in vague parables. Do I make myself clear?

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was being literal. There are two head comments that said the same thing.

parables

Funny because we've been doing that for thousands of years in an effort to teach.

[–]strikethrough123 5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Authenticity is very important for women. Why do you think they spout out “be yourself” every chance they get? No, they don’t want you to become alpha. They don’t want you to become jacked and adopt alpha behaviors. They want good genes, pretending to have good genes is their kryptonite. Why do you think shit-tests exist? They want to put in you in your box. “Be yourself” is a filtering mechanism that easily weeds out the alphas and the betas if they follow it.

Every reformed beta is a threat to their SMV. Less beta orbiters, less social points. Why do you think your female friends will try so hard to keep you in your beta box? They don’t want you to change for yourself, because then you’ll put their hamster in overdrive.

[–]keenostreef 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That is true. We're not contradicting each other. What's not true is women valuing authenticity for authenticity's sake, as if they "want to keep it real." What they really mean by authenticity is: "Don't trick me about who you are."

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]strikethrough123 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s not important but yet it’s important. Understood.

[–]apskidb2 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Excellent way of explaining frame. But if an Alpha is a stone could it be that he’s too predictable?

How would you piece strong frame and a “you know what you get” attitude with managing some machiavellian traits?

[–]Arednor13 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Being a stone in a world of turds is unpredictable. No one expects to be challenged by a strong willed man in 2018.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep, they are pathetic losers, but hopefully over time they will be bred out for the most part, as now we reach a point where their betrayal of society is going to have consequences, as there's people who want death to our way of life. And women are complicit in it for the most part.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

good reason: obvious self-benefit.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a really good post. Didn’t really think about it in that context but its quite an interesting perspective on the sternness of men.

[–]judas734 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So you theory summed up in 4 words "don't be a phoney"

[–]Bear-With-Bit 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know that counter argument, the one that goes, "Well, men do that, too."

They're referring to beta turds.

In my head it's now "women and most men."

Women and most men are unreliable, deceiving, compromised, undisciplined, boring, and unfit for leadership.

To be alpha is to be the exception.

[–]Nov51605 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

UP-EFFIN-VO-TED !!

Very important distinctions that i kinda have been on the fence about regarding Paul E. & Jordan P. Now i know why i kinda approached the both of them with caution.
A lot of material they have is actually good, but yeah when you look at their entire frame of reference (the forest), the trees aren't really all that great

[–]Youngyoda89 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Incredible brother! This reminds me when Tekashi was asked who he likes for president. He said trump. The interviewer tried to sway him with - but he’s racizzssst🤪🤪🤪. Tekashi said - I don’t care if he racist.

Your post is so insightful in regards to rock hard frame. One of my favorite forms of entertainment is to watch Tekashi 6ix9ine shake up the fucking gay ass rap industry. A lot of people will attemp to discredit but the kid has fucking frame.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Being reliable and predictable is beta.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why has this been reposted? This is old...

[–]bakamoney 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"A stone is a stone. Then and now."

:D

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

"Beta males are unreliable, undependable and unknowable." This doesn't make sense to me. As an alpha you want to be unreliable because you don't give a fuck and show up late to a date. Same gist for undependable. And for unknowable its very alpha and powerfull to be unknowable. See: 48 laws of power.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 14 points15 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

You can't be a leader and be undependable. People need you. You need to be there. Alexander the great sets the standard for his army with his behavior. It's very very important to set clear standards especially the more people you lead. Otherwise it becomes a logistical nightmare.

I categorically oppose 48 Laws of power and all manifestations of Neoliberalism

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Liberalism is moral syphilis

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Red Pill is a rejection of Liberal Feminist society. Feminism is also sexual liberalism.

[–]Neo9ine 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm curious: how is the 48 Law of Power a manifestation of neoliberalism?

[–]thekidintheback 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is top cringe. Did you learn how to be "alpha" from reading "The Game"?

[–]AutoModerator[M] -3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just a friendly reminder that as TRP has been quarantined, we have developed backup sites: https://www.trp.red and our full post archive (and future forums) https://www.forums.red/i/TheRedPill. Don't forget to register on TRP.RED and reserve your reddit name today. Forums.Red is currently locked but will be opened soon.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter