TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

4
5

5 Reasons Why Girls With Tattoos And Piercings Are Broken – Thoughts? (returnofkings.com)

submitted by sirmadam


[–]bsutansalt3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

For those behind work filters:

https://archive.today/l3OMO

[–]Sherlock--Holmes2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tattoos detract from the total every single time because at best they're ugly as fuck and distract from a woman's natural beauty, and at worst because they show a need to be validated and accepted.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tattoo's were cool before lil wayne and all that. Not sure what happened, but they became mainstream, not a sign of rebellion or individualism or any of that. Usually when middle class chicks start doing something that guys used to do it's no longer cool. Like old italian guys who drank wine are cool as fuck, that is until those prissy middle class chicks started getting into wine. As for the quality of women with tattoo's? Most women are broken one way or another, body modification can be an indicator but it doesn't have to be a deal breaker for me.

[–]Wolfwoodd2 points3 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Tattoos are becoming super mainstream with the current crop of 16-21 year olds. Tattoos used to be big indicator of validation seeking behavior. They still are, to a point, but plenty of normal girls get them now as well. Take this article with a grain of salt. It's basically click-bait.

Articles like this suck because they dance around the idea of screening women, but never tackle the subject head on.

Just my 2 cents.

[–]ConfidenceMatters5 points6 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Why do women get tatted in provocative spots? It's for the attention and validation.

The article is 100% accurate.

[–]Wolfwoodd5 points6 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Yes, tattoos and piercings can be considered a red flag. However, they are not the end all, be all of red flags. Anyway, red flags just mean proceed with caution and common sense.

Again, it's an article that dances around the idea of screening (which is an incredibly important topic for TRP guys), but ends up missing the forest through the trees.

Here's what good screening looks like:

Good Girls - Girls who are happy in relationships when their significant other is happy. These girls will tend to go out of their way to do nice things for their guys: cook, clean, give them gifts, play out their sexual fantasies, etc. They are the easiest type to maintain a long term relationship with because they make it fairly easy for the guy.

Freaks - Girls who are happy in relationships when they receive attention and strong emotional states. This is the type guys fall for the quickest, because they generally come off as very vulnerable. This type thrives on validation, both positive and negative. They cause a lot of drama, are more likely to cheat on you (sex is a form of validation), and usually have some form of daddy issues. These are also the type of women who tend to stay in abusive relationships. Guys, don’t get into serious relationships with these types of girls unless you really know what you’re doing. The way to make this work is for the guy to be able to inject a steady amount of drama into the relationship (or find some way to give her strong emotional states).

Hoes - Kind of self-explanatory. These girls are happiest when they are receiving material resources (money, gifts, etc) from guys. They are only interested in dating high-status guys or guys who show a willingness to buy them things. When you meet them, they will probably ask you about your job, what car you drive and/or where you live. They will relentlessly tool a guy over to get what they want. They’ll try to get you to pay for everything. The best way to have a long term relationship with a girl like this is to play the “pimp”. Don’t put up with any of that stuff.. Be clear that she’s going to have to pay for her crap if she wants any chance of seeing you. Be fine with her tooling over her orbiters or get her to tool over her orbiters for your benefit (I.e. send her up to the bar to get you free drinks from AFC‘s).

RED FLAGS (I have encountered). Proceed with caution:

• History of drug abuse and or alcoholism

• history of poor decision making (use common sense)

• seems to be in a constant state of crisis

• history of depression (un-medicated or not good at keeping up with the medication) or has a mother who’s mentally ill

• works or worked as a stripper

• unwillingness to give and/or receive oral sex (I.e. has sexual hang-ups)

• history of past sexual abuse

• thinks masturbation is gross (opinions may vary on this one)

• Assumes you will pay for everything and/or disappears to the bathroom every time a check arrives.

• No friends

• Some form of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)

• Bad relationship with her parents, especially her father

• History of eating disorder (anorexia/bulimia)

[–]Snookied1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Couldn't agree more that this article misses the point. Tattoos and piercings are everywhere now and to remain skeptical of everyone with them is ignorant. Caution should be a rule for every girl you meet anyway.

[–]ConfidenceMatters1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

The hell are you even getting at, bro?

Piercings and tats are major signs of a broken woman. That's the focus of the article. The author wanted to write up on why tats and piercings signify a broken woman. You and any other male as a Man with values who loves oneself should avoid these women at all costs for LTRs. That's all there is to it.

The article doesn't say "How To Screen Women For LTRs"

It says ''5 Reasons Why Girls With Tattoos And Piercings Are Broken''

[–]Wolfwoodd2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Does your real world experience back up this advice? Or are you just keyboard jockeying?

I'm 32, my partner count is 50+ (with very few one night stands). I've gone on hundreds of dates. I've met great girls with ink as well as horrible girls who were very conservative. From personal experience, I can tell you that screening isn't as black and white as this article pretends. Furthermore, I don't need to do a piercing/tat check to spot the bad apples. There are more effective and more accurate methods.

I am giving you my informed opinion. Take it for what it's worth.

[–]ConfidenceMatters1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Does your real world experience back up this advice? Or are you just keyboard jockeying?

uh,

DUH

And not only do I say this, but so do countless of other "Red Pill" Men.

You (essentially) saying

"screening girls for being worthy or not for LTRs who have tats and piercings is not as black and white as it seems"

is like saying "Screening girls for being worthy or not for LTRs who have in the past sucked off 100 strangers and have gotten gangbanged is not as black and white as it seems."

Stop being a whore-apologist. Stop overcomplicating your life, son. It IS that black and white. Bitches who pollute their bodies with garbage ink have issues. Period. The author was being ironic with the selfish bit, but in reality these women do 99.9% of the things they do for male attention and validation, making them attention whores. You don't have to go out "HuNdReDs Of DaTeS" to figure that shit out.

In fact, show me a female who had a masculine (red pill, whatever) father figure in her life as well as a feminine mother in a loving household who has tats and piercings.

Find me one woman like that in this world.

There is none.

[–]Wolfwoodd1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Duh.

Please provide some details. How many girls with tats and piercings have you dated/slept with? How did the relationships turn out? Give me all the gritty details. Maybe it will help me figure out why your experiences were so vastly different than mine. We're all on the same side here.

If you want to switch to PM's, then I'm okay with that.

[–]ConfidenceMatters0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I can see you're the "the past is in the past/don't judge a book by its cover" type

This exchange is a waste of my time.

[–]SpinalArt0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Been with many women. Can confirm that tattoos and piercings DON'T automatically signal a broken woman. I've read RoK before and they have bits of truths here and there but their articles seem to think we live our lives in a vacuum. A broken woman comes in many different color, shapes and forms. Tattoos and piercing CAN signal a broken woman and honestly I do take that into consideration when screening for something deeper but it's not the end all be all. These articles are getting lame.

[–]ConfidenceMatters-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me guess, fellas.

Single/divorced moms aren't all bad for LTRs.

A slutty past in college is in the past, doesn't always mean she's terrible prospect.

Overtly masculine woman with taxing career doesn't automatically mean she's a broken woman

etc.

You guys date who you want and set yall own standards too, but don't try to male-hamster low-value behavior & standards away.

[–]MetacognitiveMan0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Turn this into an article and submit it to ROK.

[–]Wolfwoodd0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a link to the original post on the sidebar of r/TRPGame. That's good time enough for me.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter