TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

4
5

source 1: http://globalnews.ca/news/3082289/sexist-men-are-more-likely-to-suffer-from-loneliness-study/?sf43180900=1

source 2: http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/men-who-want-power-over-women-likely-to-have-poorer-mental-health-study/

The study is of coarse, all headline. If you read any line written in these articles, you will cringe, facepalm, get cancer, or worse. I can't even point out every problem and there is no point; it is self evident.

edit: I can't sleep. Ill list problems in the comments.


[–]Eternasphere[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Problem #1 you see how different the headlines are? Just shows what incoherent trash this is. A legitimate study has a finding that can be defined specifically.

Problem #2 "study finds men who conform to masculine norms" -wait- how are you defining masculine norms? - "The 11 dimensions are: winning, emotional control, risk-taking, violence, dominance, pursuit of playboy behaviour, self-reliance, primacy of work, power over women, disdain for homosexuals and pursuit of status."

Wait a sec... These are your norms? If they were norms, they would be present in the majority of what you would consider mentally healthy men. So much of what you listed aren't norms.

Problem #3 Those dimensions literally came out of your ass. You're really going to categorize disdain for homosexuals and violence as social norms, and then lump them in a list of things that range from perfectly fine to mildly controversial? The fuck is wrong with self-reliance?

Problem #4 "Researchers found self-reliance, pursuit of playboy behaviour and power over women were traits consistently associated with worse mental health." Okay, so what is your definition of poor mental health? "Nine of the dimensions were significantly associated with worse mental health, in areas such as depression, anxiety and social well-being." This was measured how? self reporting? Which of the nine, and how is correlation causation? If 55% of racists drink pepsi, that doesn't mean drinking coke makes you more or less racist.

Problem #4 "Traditional gender norms are a socially-constructed set of ideas that tell men and women how to behave." source please?

Problem #5 Actual scientists and researchers are quoted in this article, fucking tearing this study apart. But who reads articles? Not the white knights or feminists who share it for the headline to peddle their bullshit, that's for fuck sure

Problem #6 To think this report could tell us anything clear and substantial about men in general is a major stretch,” said Professor Connell. Think of all the fucking blue pilled cocksuckers who shared this garbage and never got to read the quote by one of the most qualified people mentioned anywhere!

[–]Eternasphere[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You guys I have never been this fucking triggered before

[–]Eternasphere[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The reverse equivelant would be "Study finds feminists are crazy and possibly retarded"

That would be easy to prove actually...

[–]Thewinsomeserpent0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Holding frame much?

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter