481
482
483

Red Pill ExampleMan has 800 children by meeting women on facebook and donating sperm in motorway toilets (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by 2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35262535

  • For 15 years he has donated sperm as an unregulated donor. Now has 800 kids. Aiming for 1k. Might be world record holder.

  • He has a facebook page where women can come ask for his seed. His sons and daughters also can view it and meet each other.

  • He's not exactly Ryan Gosling is he?

  • BBC article does lots of creep-shaming. Even manages to get the words 'sexual assault' and rape in there. Remember these women reach out to him...

Yeah I'm sure he could be rinsed with child support. But after you have X number of children you will never be able to pay anyway.

After a certain amount of time he should Genhis-Khan-it and help his own male kids do the same as him. Embrace the decline!


[–][deleted] 154 points155 points  (24 children)

I thought woman were all like "my body my choice". I guess that rule goes out the window if another woman is involved. Obviously she hates this guy because he's doing the same job as her, just way cheaper. Her argument is weak, all the risks you take by using this guy for his sperm are the same as having sex with anyone.

[–]Troll_Name 59 points60 points  (8 children)

In other words: the double standard is real.

[–]2comment 9 points10 points  (3 children)

Yup. If a woman donated eggs and had several hundred children, they'd hail her an all-conquering hero and the media would probably would try to gather everyone of her kids together for some mega-mother's day circus. Probably sneak in several sob stories of past relationship abuse and how she'd just want to help the world (at 5k per pop or whatever).

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children)

Oh yeah definitely, its been well established that this kind if behavior is acceptable if you're casting the opposition in a negative light. "Don't get inseminated by that man, come to us and do it instead". That being said, the guy is an idiot because he's fucking up the gene pool and increasing the chance for other dudes to attempt this, some of which may have ulterior motives (I.e actually meeting the woman in an attempt to sexually assault them).

If humans weren't so egotistical then they wouldn't need things like this, people would just adopt and be satisfied that they had a child to love and raise.

[–]cptspiffy 9 points10 points  (1 child)

If humans weren't so egotistical then they wouldn't need things like this, people would just adopt and be satisfied that they had a child to love and raise.

Let's not get crazy, the reproductive imperative has nothing to do with ego. You don't see male lions raising other males' offspring, and they don't have egos.

I'm not saying that adoption isn't awesome because it is, but wanting to pass on your own genes is not the exclusive domain of humanity.

[–]SwallowRP 21 points21 points [recovered]

No shit. Being a woman in power like that for a business gets her huge leeways. Now she can throw around "rape" and "sexual harassment" and morons will eat that shit up.

No way any male business man could say that. He'd be laughed at by everyone

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

I love the way she phrases some of her statements :

Laura Witjens, chief executive of the National Gamete Donation Trust, says it does not often go wrong, but when it does, it goes "horrifically" wrong. "There are too many occurrences where in other circumstances it would be called sexual harassment or rape."

What the fuck is she trying to say? I mean literally, the syntax is atrocious and I can't work it out. I don't see how two consenting adults agreeing on a payment-for-sperm could turn into sexual harassment, especially as the woman would approach the man (and we all know woman can't sexually harass men, right?). I imagine there would be a few guys that would try and set this up in a kind of "rapey" way, but then immediately get caught because when you're thinking with your cock you're bound to fuck up; I think we can all agree on that. So both of those circumstances are slightly absurd, even though I said in an earlier post that men may try this; but then they'd get caught pretty easily and dissuade anyone else from trying it.

"But if you strip it down to bare facts, you have a man who for whatever reason feels they need to impregnate over 500 women, you have women who are comfortable knowing their children have 500 half siblings, in another setting people would be appalled. They would ask questions, find it very disturbing."

So let's apply the same logic to her business. Thousands of woman every year go to a hospital to get (often) anonymous men to impregnate them, with the intimate involvement of several strangers (doctors & nurses). They deny people the right to donate sperm based on genetic deficiancies, which then alerts the male to the fact that any kid he has naturally could be fucked up. They then charge them £1,500 a go, and out of ~50k woman , ~2k have to have it done twice. They made around £100 million on artisan jizz. In a different setting, anyone can be appalled at anything. IVF has been heavily criticised since the 80's so this lady should be a bit more open minded considering she is making bank off of wank.

It's funny that her attitude towards sperm donation is like this :

She says the language around donation is "lovey dovey" and focuses on people wanting to "help" and people celebrating successful pregnancies.

Whether she's talking about this guy specifically or the whole scene in general, her websites page on Sperm Donors has the exact things on it that she hates . Also if you get a chance to check out the "In The Media" bit at the bottom of that page, you'll notice that she wrote an article about this 7 months ago and sounds like a fucking crazy person. My favourite part is :

I know about people who are uncomfortable knowing they may have lots of half-siblings without knowing how many and where they are. In the case of this sperm donor 10 children born within 4 months, possibly within a 20 mile radius of each other. Admittedly the latter happens in UK clinic sperm donation as well but the use is monitored and capped (maximum 10 families per donor).

Maybe that's because it's the only place in the area to donate and receive sperm? It's her own fault, she actively encourages people to donate sperm into this kind of close environment, then hates on the guy that's sending his spunk across the world?

I don't know, there is just so much hypocrisy.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

I know right? Its like this stupid bitch has to find someway to degrade what this man is doing, but since she can't fight it with rational arguments (such as the possibility of inbreeding) she just uses watered down buzzwords like "rape".

She probably uses words like rape to described the lines to female bathrooms at soccer stadiums.

I mean from her description you would think dude was running around with a super soaker full of spooge doing drivebys on unsuspecting naked spread eagle girls.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That last sentence holyshitmysides

The thing that rustles my jimmies about dangling the word "rape" in this topic is that there are legitimate rape-babies that are up for adoption right now. This woman is putting what this guy does alongside an inhuman action, both of which can have the same outcome but only one of them being a scenario where an unwanted baby could occur. In other words, she's teasing the idea that someone could get raped and pregnant which is bad because children who are products of rape are inferior in every way and should be obliterated from existence /sarcasm

[–]BradPill 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At least from that guy you know he is white - something this clinic only 'promised': https://archive.is/07D9e - so much for the professionals... Also, she donates her own eggs: https://archive.is/7bBtz

[–]TheRealMouseRat 8 points9 points  (9 children)

except that this guy seems to be making quite a lot of money so if he did something bad it would ruin his business. he also takes an STD test regularly. And they don't even have sex with him. It's much safer than having a one night stand.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I know there is no sex, but there is a genetic risk. I'm not saying we should all have Aryan babies or anything, but I'd want to rule out the chance of my kid being born with some mad disease or something. Only if it was guaranteed that it would happen though, if there was no evidence or if it was like "they'll be born with a higher chance of getting X disease" then I wouldn't care, it's just if they were like "if you two had a kid it would die 5 minutes after it was born, don't do it".

Also I should probably have added "sex with a guy for a baby" on my end sentence. I didn't say anything about STDs either, mostly my comment was a jab at how ugly and stupid he seemed, and the idiocy would get passed on to his 500 kids, like the Ghengis Khan of idiocracy.

He provides his own pot and syringe, and is tested for STDs every three months, posting his hospital certificate online.

I guessed that no sex happened because you can't inject pot, so I realised it must be a different type of pot :P Regardless, what if he got an STD a week after his screening and didn't realise, inseminated a bunch of chicks with his siphilus jizz and the babies got messed up? If that isn't even a risk when doing artificial insemination, then why is the STD test so important? What about his genetics and hereditary?

I am not defending her or her cause, I just think that his method is a little unrefined. Obviously any statements I have made are my opinion; some people may not care what their sperm donor is like and that is absolutely fine, that's the way life should be. I'm just a big advocate of adoption and I think the money that gets poured into this is kinda disgusting.

[–]TheRealMouseRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just compared it to one night stands, which people have all the time. Of course it's safer to go to a clinic.

[–]1TheReindeerGuy 2 points3 points  (1 child)

He provides his own pot and syringe

I read that as him having sex with them and him referring to his manparts as his pot and syringe as sort of joke.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At first I read it in a "he's injecting the marijuanas" way.

[–]Sirkisskindofman 5 points6 points  (4 children)

Yep, no sex goes on at all in this story.

[–]Dubsland12 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I don't know that is true. He doesn't say it but i imagine a significant portion choose the natural insertion method.

[–]seeing-red- 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Yeah I am super jealous of this guy right now. Easiest game ever - walk up with that smile on his face and offer choice of methods. If they say no to both, what does he care, there's always more.

[–]dkjfk295829 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except most of the women are probably dogs.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was my thinking; why would he get an STD check if he wasn't going to fuck them? I'm not sure if STDs can get passed through artificial insemination, but I'm not sure why you'd want to meet up in a service station bathroom to have a stranger jack off into a cup and then syringe it up your vagina and pay £50 for it.

[–]Eugenics2015 281 points282 points  (27 children)

bla bla bla save the women from themselves bla bla bla. Nauseating. When will society start treating women as adults who can make their own decisions without a big bad male coercing them?

[–][deleted] 114 points115 points  (0 children)

Men pick up hookers? Arrest them and shame them for their sexual deviance!

Women pick up men to get his sperm and get pregnant? Save them from themselves.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 38 points39 points  (1 child)

When will society start treating women as adults

It's much easier to treat men as piggy banks than it is to treat oversized children prone to tantrums like adults.

[–]Rasalom72 124 points125 points  (3 children)

When we remove their ability to influence government decisions.

[–]SpeakerToRedditors 12 points12 points [recovered]

The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations defines terrorism as "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives"

[–]1Paid_Internet_Troll 2 points3 points  (1 child)

So, "Friday night in Chicago" is now terrorism?

[–]Chrience 53 points54 points  (2 children)

When will they start treating women like the children they all mentally are and stop pandering to their bullshit? :)

[–]systemshock869 57 points57 points [recovered]

We seem to be in a weird mix of the two that nobody is allowed to talk about. The same people who say women are strong and independent blah blah, will support policies that essentially suggest that women are helpless children. Deep down they know the truth and if women were treated with true equality,* they wouldn't stand a chance. Let's just give them all the advantages the law can dictate - that will even the score, right?

Edit: *and judged by equal standards

[–]Chrience 18 points19 points  (0 children)

We seem to be in a weird mix of the two that nobody is allowed to talk about.

Thats right. It's women claiming adult responsibility.... only when it benefits them most. Every other time, society must treat them like princesses.

They want the privilage of being seen as a grown up adult, without the responsibility of it.

[–]igor_pavlov 17 points18 points  (10 children)

As soon as they're no longer the limiting factor in the species reproduction.

[–][deleted] 37 points37 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]FrugalFroggy 17 points18 points  (3 children)

Does anyone realize how huge the implications are? Not just gay men, but wealthy single men that don't want to marry for legal/fiscal reasons but also want a family.

[–]jpmullet 9 points10 points  (1 child)

wealthy single men that don't want to marry for legal/fiscal reasons but also want a family

Theres literally dozens of them!

[–]FrugalFroggy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Should have written "men with enough income to support a family"

[–][deleted] 5 points5 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]adr007 1 point2 points  (1 child)

What do you think will happen with the invention of an artificial womb? I'm seriously curious. As a scientist, I'm actually very interested to invent one.

[–]25russianbear25 3 points4 points  (0 children)

treating women as adults

when they take responsibility and accountability, so fat today they DREAD that

Its hilarious when feminists advocate for less responsibility and accountability for women because without them you're a nobody, a child.

[–]Nogoodsense 1 point2 points  (4 children)

hijacking top comment to point out what most everybody here seems to have missed from the article.

Those children will have no legal or financial claim against the donor parent

Unless I'm mistaken, this means no claims to child support to the mother.

[–]seeing-red- 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Eh, who gives a fuck what she thinks, she's president of an organization that stands to lose money from what he's doing.

As long as the law doesn't agree with her though. I'm curious whether he could be held responsible for child support. Probably not at this point, but I'd like to buy this guy a beer and ask him:

  • How he got his first few clients
  • What he'd do if a woman came forward claiming rape
  • What he'd do (or has done) to ensure no child support obligations

[–]Nogoodsense 0 points1 point  (2 children)

..what?

I mentioned this because many people in the comments here are saying this guy could get raped with child support.

I was just pointing out that this is a non-issue.

[–]seeing-red- 2 points3 points  (1 child)

She's saying that licensed sperm donors cannot have child support claims made against them, implying that this unlicensed guy could.

[–]Nogoodsense 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh ok. That makes more sense. I figured something was too good to be true about that.

[–]mercuryg 53 points53 points [recovered]

But critics say while it's not illegal, using unregulated donors puts women at risk of sexual diseases, hereditary disorders and men interested in "no strings" unprotected sex.

Note the underlying sentiment in this paragraph, it doesn't say "women putting themselves at risk", actually it completely ignores women having any responsibility for their own actions at all. It simply states that if this happens (implying if we allow this to happen), then women are being put at risk (the consequenses are somehow our responsibility), as if something is missing here. As if there's an expectation that there should be some sort of entity in place here protecting women from their own actions. What is actually being said in this paragraph, is that it's your job to take a stand and protect women, subliminal messaging at it's finest.

It even says "men interested in no strings unprotected sex" in the same sentence, completely ignoring the fact that sex has nothing to do with actual sperm donating and artificial insemination. But never mind that, who has time for common sense when we have a golden opportunity here to shame men amirite? The article just had to get that in there too, just to remind you that no strings unprotected sex is an all around bad thing, and men looking for it are evil creatures and are putting all women everywhere "at risk".

Not to mention when that woman starts analyzing this critically she starts her sentence with "But if you strip it down to bare facts..bla bla bla". Ooohhh, stripping it down to bare facts now are we? When it's about a man we're suddenly just gonna look at the facts and be super critical huh?...

How many times do you see this pattern if it involves a woman? How often are rape accusations "stripped down to bare facts"? How often are any womans actions looked upon with this level of criticism in the media? They carefully examine this guy and his motivations and conclude that he is scum and a creep, but do they ever examine any woman and her motivations with such precision? No they don't, because if they did they would expose how degenerate some of their actions really are.

Let that sink in for a moment, this is the narrative, women really don't have to take responsibility for their own actions and that's not even an overstatement.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's not just that they don't have to take responsibility, they treat them as if they are incapable of it. These women are not only being sexist against women, they're too stupid to realize it.

[–]FJHUAI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is the narrative, women really don't have to take responsibility for their own actions

I would tend to agree with you on much of this, but FTA a caption on one of the pictures states

"Laura Witjens says women should think more carefully before using unregulated donors "
The rest of the article places blame on men you are correct.

[–]cmdrNacho 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Thousands of years from now , historians are going to look at the genome in the UK and think this man was some sort of modern Khan.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 29 points30 points  (1 child)

Sounds like the artificial insemination industry is gearing up the agitprop to ease the passage of legislation it's drafting to protect its sordid little racket.

[–]1Paid_Internet_Troll 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah, the cold light of cynicism... and brutal realism.

Sadly, you're most likely correct.

[–]bearslikeham 120 points120 points [recovered]

I know a lot of people will disagree with me, but this guy is a fucking genius. I always desired to have a massive number of kids like he does. This is pure motivation.

[–][deleted] 88 points88 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]HAMMURABl 73 points74 points  (14 children)

right. i have no problem in women wanting to enjoy their freedom and fuck any man they want and raise children alone.

but making me pay for their retarded behaviour literally makes my blood boil. the introduction of the welfare state has completely decoupled the gratitude that once existed for the ones who actually pay for this crap. even worse, those ungrateful vermin think they even deserve all the money they steal from me.

[–][deleted] 10 points10 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]rondarouseyy 4 points5 points  (6 children)

I mean what man wouldn't want to impregnate thousands of women with no strings attached?

i wouldn't, i would be way too worried about my kids, would you trust these women to raise yours children?

[–]1Paid_Internet_Troll 1 point2 points  (3 children)

i wouldn't, i would be way too worried about my kids, would you trust these women to raise yours children?

Devil's Advocate here ;)

If you have zero children, then your (nonexistent) children have zero chance of fulfilling lives.

If you have 1,000 children, then even if they're being raised by a population that's full of weirdos, even plain old random chance will guarantee that at least 50 of your 1,000 children are leading decent lives, and maybe 1 or 2 are leading freaking awesome lives...

...which is 2 better than if you had no children.

Now, go forth and populate the Earth ;)

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]ErenYeager91 16 points17 points  (3 children)

He plans on having "a big bbq party when they've all grown up" if I understood him correctly. Now imagine 800 persons in one place, and every one of them is your son/daughter. That's hilarious.

[–]Skater_Goy 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I'd hold a competition to see which son looked the most like him. Have them bring their SAT scores (or British equivalent thereof) since SAT is a good estimator of IQ (the 1600 scale SAT had about a .8 correlation). I'd be wicked curious of the distribution of their various traits.

Hell, if my career is where I want it to be at that point I could probably get myself invited to do shit like that.

[–]1Paid_Internet_Troll 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was a French-Canadian movie about that exact same thing, called "Starbuck"

[–]PlayerXz 12 points13 points  (0 children)

From a biological perspective a mans goal in life is to reproduce and spread his genes. You could say that this guy is doing a pretty good job at that.

[–][deleted] 8 points8 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Libertarian-Party 5 points6 points  (4 children)

In my defense, knocking up a girl would be a terrible idea. However, knocking up a hundred girls would be awesome, no matter what the consequences. Knocking up a thousand girls from Nutting inside them would be genghis tier legendary.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]account_rp -2 points-1 points  (10 children)

Not a genius, the women can claim child support on him.

[–]Phokus1983 37 points38 points  (1 child)

OTOH, there would be so many women, it wouldn't even be worth it to hire a lawyer to take him to court lol.

[–]Libertarian-Party 28 points29 points  (6 children)

If child support in the UK is anything like it is in USA, then his income will be capped at half for child support payments. Honestly with 800 kids, half my pay doesn't seem too bad.

[–]Momo_dollar 17 points18 points  (0 children)

"But critics say while it's not illegal, using unregulated donors puts women at risk of sexual diseases, hereditary disorders and men interested in "no strings" unprotected sex"

Because women are never interested in no strings sex! Night clubs, Tinder etc are nothing but a cockfest

[–]arealbigboss 18 points19 points  (2 children)

Good Englishman keeping the English people in the fight. You can see the hunger of tea and global domination in his eyes...

[–]Skater_Goy 5 points6 points  (1 child)

His small town sized brood will form an army, and their empire will be so vast that the sun never sets in it!

[–]arealbigboss 7 points8 points  (0 children)

British Empire is back in the game, and they're even more inbred then before!

[–]recon_johnny 70 points71 points  (6 children)

When I was in my late 20's/early 30's, I thought of donating. I figured I could help out some folks (No, seriously. My boys swam very well), maybe get a couple-bucks for wanking into a cup.

My LTR at the time was aghast. Aghast, I tell you. She came up with BS reasons, shaming me on this-that-the-other, moral reasons here, what about kids coming back to find you there, child support, blah, blah, blah.

Now I understand she didn't want any other woman to share in my DNA. Someone else could get my great genes with no commitment, and she couldn't have that.

Joke was on her in the end, though. I 'donated' my sperm to as many women as I could. Was much better the old fashioned way.

[–]animalpoo 62 points63 points  (3 children)

My LTR at the time was aghast.

Haha I've done the same, she was being a "special princess", demanding extravagant gifts for her birthday.

I thoroughly convinced her I had to donate sperm to pay for her presents. What a way to ruin someone's birthday .......

[–][deleted] 47 points48 points  (2 children)

Major black knight points. She feels bad but has no idea why.

[–]southernmost 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Honey, I donated as often as they'd let me. Over and over again. I even needed the super hot nurse to massage my prostate one time I couldn't finish. IT WAS AWFUL!!!

[–]account_rp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The difference between you and the guy in the article is that with you the women can't claim child support, with him they can.

[–]deepfriedcocaine 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Might be world record holder

He still has a decent amount of work left to catch up with Genghis Khan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_the_most_children

[–]furmensakume 20 points21 points  (2 children)

What would you bet all these women are married and got his sperm just to be able to a baby on their current husband or boyfriend?

[–]Tom_The_Human 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Some of the husbands and boyfriends know.

[–]doveenigma13 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sexual harassment or rape? There is no way you can look at what he's doing, regardless of what you believe, and see that as rape...

[–][deleted] 8 points8 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (5 children)

I think he jerks it in the bathroom and give them a syringe/turkey baster of fresh sperm.

[–]darkrood 15 points16 points  (2 children)

I am sure 8's and 9's are lining up for his service.

[–]crackalot 10 points11 points  (1 child)

At some point it just doesn't matter. Blind luck will bless a minimum of 5% of his progeny with excellence, and 5% of 800 is 40.

Four zero.

Forty.

Children.

[–]stfarn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

prolly a couple of them will get oscars before dicaprio

[–]RP-on-AF1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They mention he bring his own "pot & syringe", but also that he gets regular STD checks. Makes me think there's a little of both going on.

[–]yumyumgivemesome 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What is stopping these women from coming back to the guy and demanding child support?

Also, if he's not fucking these women, why are so many guys in this thread envious? Yes, I want to make babies one day, but that's mostly because I'm excited to see how they'll turn out. Not only will he never meet most of them, but he doesn't even get to fuck the women. Yay.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Guy fathers 800 kids with willing and consenting women and he's an irresponsible perv.

Thousands of women have kids with unknown fathers to get access to welfare benefits and they are strong independent women.

My hat is off to this guy for not only beating the system but also making it his bitch.

[–]quietthomas 30 points31 points  (6 children)

Meh, within 3 generations your genes are pretty much randomized anyways. Think about it - for every breeding only 50% of your genes can get in.... so you've got pretty fine odds.

The problem is that humans think in terms of family names, and blood lines, and inheritance. We think in very personal terms, but evolution doesn't. Evolution is just looking for what gene clusters co-operate and work best together; whether they came from you, or somone with that same gene complex - evolution don't give a fuck. Evolution works on the species and gene level. Not on the level of the family line, as families breed with other lines almost every single time.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Fire generation = 400 clones if you add them, second generation even more as long as they have more than 2 kids each. In the end he will have tainted the blood of all living humans.

[–]Viklove 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ghengis Khan already fucked us then.

[–]jaysire 5 points6 points  (0 children)

On the other hand, the biological imperative can't afford to be concerned with (much) more than the next generation.

[–]detachedbymarriage 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Evolution is just looking for what gene clusters co-operate and work best together;

Hell, evolution doesn't even do that. It has no mind or real goal. It's hard for us as people to grasp this b/c we only see the outcomes of positive evolution, which makes it look like it purposely selected those genes.

In reality, evolution will spit out a random selection of genes and if they happen to match well, then that set of genes will move on...if not, it dies and no one knows any different.

[–]1grubek 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It does not really matter, if you instinctuallly want to spread your genes and it makes you feel good to do so.

[–]berryfarmer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

this is the ultimate agree and amplify

[–]Sks44 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Donating sperm in English motorway toilets got George Michael arrested.

[–]1favours_of_the_moon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

From the article:

Laura Witjens says women should think more carefully before using unregulated donors

Wow, she better be careful, that's awful close to slut shaming! Hahaha, anyway TRP says you should have interesting hobbies.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This guy is literally my hero. I have been doing all the sperm bank hoop jumping shit and its a pain in the pass.

I am going to do it. I am going to start a facebook page and do what this guy does.

Even if I only get a few that would still be awesome.

I would request the girls have a little red dot tattooed on the kids heel so they could identify each other and avoid one of my bastards knocking up one of my bastets.

[–]angryomlette 24 points25 points  (15 children)

Yikes...800 kids from unknown single moms...15 years down the line those 800 kids have greater chances of sibling incest...worst part of it is more in-breeding=more crazy...gives me shivers already

[–]iliketreeslikereally 22 points23 points  (1 child)

Lol the UK has 64 million people, considering people used to live in tribes of a few tens, I think they'll be fine. Plus many of his clients are internationals.

[–]Code_Bordeauxx 15 points16 points  (9 children)

The incest shouldn't be too much of a problem since they should easily be able to trace whether they are half-siblings or not by checking the guy's register. I'd say the single parent households are a far greater issue.

[–]Tom_The_Human 8 points9 points  (8 children)

Because the first thing you do when starting an LTR is checking if you're related to the other person.

[–]Code_Bordeauxx 23 points24 points  (4 children)

If you know you have 800 siblings, yeah, asking about the other's background might be a logial thing to do Mr. Sarcasm.

[–]Tom_The_Human 7 points8 points  (3 children)

I doubt many of the parents will turn around and say "by the way, you have ~1000 siblings". A large amount of them will never know.

[–]elevul 2 points3 points  (2 children)

This hit the BBC news, so I'm not sure of that.

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 4 points4 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Tom_The_Human 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wasn't complaining ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°).

[–]AEther_Flux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You underestimate some people in this world.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]cdtCPTret 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't forget that only half will be the other gender as you. So that's 500 of the 1000 goal

[–]ChadThundercockII 8 points9 points  (2 children)

This guy is giving me a purpose.

[–]NiceTryDisaster 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Damn you wanna mother his kids too now Chad?

[–]chances_are_ur_a_fag 4 points5 points  (0 children)

haha this guy is a fucking boss

[–]account_rp 15 points16 points  (18 children)

The dumbest thing about doing this is that the women can claim child support at any moment, and the paternity test will show him being the baby's daddy.

[–]Dylan_Tnga 8 points9 points  (15 children)

lol 2 kids cost me $140.00 a week in CS payments.

This guy would have to pay $56000.00 per week with that math XD

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (7 children)

Plane ticket from the UK to another country- 24.99

[–]brownishRed 15 points16 points  (0 children)

the look on her face when she realizes "no child support" - priceless

[–]Tom_The_Human 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Which "other country" is that? Ireland?

[–]Veqq 13 points14 points  (3 children)

With Ryan air, you can go all around Europe for about 20 Euros.

[–]account_rp 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Damn, I can't even get a flight from Seattle, WA, US to Spokane, WA, US for that much.

edit. At this time of the year the mountain passes are blocked by ridiculously deep snows and avalanches so it's either fly or go around the snows.

[–]Veqq 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Yeah, much as people talk about European taxes, prices and general socialism, everything's actually much cheaper. Hell, visiting family in the US for Christmas, I got a $200 flight from Berlin to NYC and back. (Norwegian Airlines)


That's weird though... I went to school in Ellensburg for a bit and there was a shuttle bus always running. Or maybe I was always lucky?

[–]Moldy_Gecko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, cheapest ticket I got from Japan to SEATAC was $800, 10 years ago. Haven't paid less than $1200 since.

[–]seattleron 5 points5 points [recovered]

WTF do you do for a living, water plants at Wendy's for 10 hours a week?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Well, Going by the Ontario (I live there, so let's use that) guide lines he is making $39,000 a year.

$39,000/520 hours a year would be $75 an hour. I will keep your plants in tip top condition for that amount. Where do I sign up? That would make for a great second job!

[–]seattleron 2 points2 points [recovered]

Just shocked you pay so little. I figured you had a part time job since you pay so little. Things must work much different in Canada. I know a guy in the US who make that amount and pays $600/month for one kid. That is not a typo, either.

[–]RemyPrice 2 points3 points  (3 children)

My child support for two kids is $2,000 + private school + health insurance...

Plus half of all after-school activities, and half of any additional medical costs.

I win!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Well, it goes to your kids, right... Is it really that bad?

[–]RemyPrice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much all of the cash goes to housing.

[–]flyercomet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can't get blood from a stone.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (3 children)

In a thousand years his genes will have dominated all of ours. Regardless of what you think of him, he is winning at evolution on a global scale.

[–]bluedrygrass 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Psychos always does. It's why the society is so fucked up and hopeless.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a relatively recent development. Society has removed all the safety measures that used to help keep society healthy. There used to be "shotgun weddings" to force the less responsible guys from running out on their prego girlfriends. Teen mothers were forced to give her child away to a stable family or relative to raise. Marriage was permenant and divorce was looked down on by all. The children were raised by the mother and grandmother and not farmed out to minimum wage workers that don't give a shit about the kids.

We are on a run away train now. Each subsequent generation is becoming more and more dysfunctional. Single moms are the norm and their kids are becoming strippers or criminals.

I guess all we can do is enjoy the decline and get the easy sex while the getting's good.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this guy is doing men in general a service. If it wasn't for him 800+ men could be sperm jacked and hit with child support.

This is just the beginning if men get even more birth control options. Women will be going crazy with baby rabies you can bank on it. He might even be able to up his rate with all the demand.

[–]ktchong 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which is why men should not date single mothers. You may end up raising his children.

[–]Natural_RP 12 points13 points  (6 children)

You know what the worst part of the article was besides single skanks getting pregnant? The fact that they say the cost is prohibitive and they quote the high end at 1000 pounds which is about 1500 US for each cycle of treatment.

Even if it takes 10 cycles who the fuck plans to bring a child into the world if they can't afford 15 grand? Like holy shit a child can cost you more than that in their first year!

So many levels of fail.

[–]iliketreeslikereally 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Most of the world is not used to paying thousands tens of grands for any kind of medical service, especially one that can be done for free by anyone.

[–]apetresc 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This isn't "thousands of grands", it's a couple of grands at most.

[–]iliketreeslikereally 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Uh, I meant tens, actually. And I meant to say that because Americans are used to paying tens of thousands, they think of what you lightly call "a couple of grands at most" as an insignificant sum, whereas paying a thousand for anything health-related in countries with universal health care and non-inflated costs is a few steps away from being absolutely outrageous.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Why spend money on all that stuff if you don't have to? Also, you better believe that sociopaths are gaming that industry; guys bribing the low-paid staff personnel to make them rocket scientist athletes. At least this way you know exactly what you are getting.

[–]darkrood 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feeling trumps all rationale every time.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Women have no shame. No shame at all. This is just the beginning of crazy...

[–]TruePr0l0gue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a lot of boys are about to grow up with single mothers...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm sure he could be rinsed with child support. But after you have X number of children you will never be able to pay anyway.

Wow, that's incredible.

Like in having a secret, and not wanting to be found out for it, so you share it with everyone so no one can hold it against you...

[–]ransay3277 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think of all the goodies he gets on fathers day!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bet he just did it for the fathers day presents. He would need to have a skip bin out the front of his house. $20 present per kid x 800 kids. All tax free!!

[–]Locastor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The truth is present in this article for all to see:

Very few women are eligible for artificial insemination on the NHS as the criteria are very strict. Private licensed clinics cost between £500 and £1,000 for each cycle of treatment. Men are allowed to father no more than 10 children. Mr Watson charges £50 for his services - the "magic potion pot" - and most of his clients find him on Facebook.

No forms, minimal cost, total anonymity. It's no wonder the post-wall private sperm bank bitch quoted later on loathes him, he's destroying her monopoly with better service at lower cost.

[–]gccmelb 1 point2 points  (3 children)

But with an unlicensed donor a woman can ask for child support at any time - and the man could claim paternity.

Not necessarily. There was a court case I believe in Australia, where a woman tried suing for child support from an donor she found online, but lost because they didn't do the physical deed but just got his sperm in a jar.

[–]bluedrygrass 2 points3 points  (2 children)

On the other hand, a man had to pay child suppoert because his bitch went to find an used rubber in the trash can and impregnated herself with it

Or that other woman that used the sperm she got in her mouth after a blowjob

[–]gccmelb 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I think it's bullshit how Men are automatically made to pay child support. It should be a opt in system. If you opt not to have anything to do with the child, then you pay no child support.

[–]reecewagner 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm confused, was he fucking all these women or just syringing it into them?

[–]Skater_Goy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He must have been reasonably intelligent to find a bizarre niche in the modern sexual market wherein sperm actually is valuable.

I'm impressed with the guy, but there's no way I could have a single child without having him raised well and in my community. I wouldn't donate sperm unless it was to close friends or to the wives of my male family members.

[–]gregsapopin 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What the fuck? If it was a eugenics thing I would understand, but who would want to bring so many kids into this shitty world.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not in favour of single motherhood because of the well known reasons. So I don't like this.

[–]seeing-red- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This guy is #winning evolution

[–]ghostbrainalpha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2 of his kids are going to meet someday.... and fuck.

[–]WolfeBane84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder what this will have on the genepool.

Kind of like how like 12% or something (too lazy to google) of people in asia are related to Genghis Khan.

[–]wont_tell_i_refuse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does he boff them or what? Turkey baster?

load more comments (14 replies)