I love the way she phrases some of her statements :

Laura Witjens, chief executive of the National Gamete Donation Trust, says it does not often go wrong, but when it does, it goes "horrifically" wrong. "There are too many occurrences where in other circumstances it would be called sexual harassment or rape."

What the fuck is she trying to say? I mean literally, the syntax is atrocious and I can't work it out. I don't see how two consenting adults agreeing on a payment-for-sperm could turn into sexual harassment, especially as the woman would approach the man (and we all know woman can't sexually harass men, right?). I imagine there would be a few guys that would try and set this up in a kind of "rapey" way, but then immediately get caught because when you're thinking with your cock you're bound to fuck up; I think we can all agree on that. So both of those circumstances are slightly absurd, even though I said in an earlier post that men may try this; but then they'd get caught pretty easily and dissuade anyone else from trying it.

"But if you strip it down to bare facts, you have a man who for whatever reason feels they need to impregnate over 500 women, you have women who are comfortable knowing their children have 500 half siblings, in another setting people would be appalled. They would ask questions, find it very disturbing."

So let's apply the same logic to her business. Thousands of woman every year go to a hospital to get (often) anonymous men to impregnate them, with the intimate involvement of several strangers (doctors & nurses). They deny people the right to donate sperm based on genetic deficiancies, which then alerts the male to the fact that any kid he has naturally could be fucked up. They then charge them £1,500 a go, and out of ~50k woman , ~2k have to have it done twice. They made around £100 million on artisan jizz. In a different setting, anyone can be appalled at anything. IVF has been heavily criticised since the 80's so this lady should be a bit more open minded considering she is making bank off of wank.

It's funny that her attitude towards sperm donation is like this :

She says the language around donation is "lovey dovey" and focuses on people wanting to "help" and people celebrating successful pregnancies.

Whether she's talking about this guy specifically or the whole scene in general, her websites page on Sperm Donors has the exact things on it that she hates . Also if you get a chance to check out the "In The Media" bit at the bottom of that page, you'll notice that she wrote an article about this 7 months ago and sounds like a fucking crazy person. My favourite part is :

I know about people who are uncomfortable knowing they may have lots of half-siblings without knowing how many and where they are. In the case of this sperm donor 10 children born within 4 months, possibly within a 20 mile radius of each other. Admittedly the latter happens in UK clinic sperm donation as well but the use is monitored and capped (maximum 10 families per donor).

Maybe that's because it's the only place in the area to donate and receive sperm? It's her own fault, she actively encourages people to donate sperm into this kind of close environment, then hates on the guy that's sending his spunk across the world?

I don't know, there is just so much hypocrisy.