Men's RightsMother rapes 1 yo son, gets no jail time. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Mgtowredpillonroids

Summary: see title

Full Story: http://www.inquisitr.com/2741404/woman-who-filmed-baby-rape-targeted-with-threats/


"The New Zealand Herald reported earlier this week that the convicted child molester would not serve any actual jail time for her crimes. The 23-year-old woman admittedly filmed herself raping her own 1-year-old son, which she sold to a pedophile for $300. She then used the $300 to buy herself a laptop, exhibiting an incredibly low price in exchange for the bond between mother and child, and the innocence of a baby."

"Her children have permanently been removed from her custody, and are now being raised by her parents — who have spoken out against her actions with great shock and disgust. They worry about the day that will come when they have to explain to the child victim what happened to him, and why he cannot ever see his biological mother."

So a mother rapes her 1 yo son and all she gets is 8 months of "home detention" and 100 hours of community service. Pussy pass anyone?

The article states further:

"It should be noted that the woman will not apparently be required to register as a sex offender once she has completed her sentence."

Mkay, so this makes absolutely no sense at all. That's beyond having a pussy pass, that's a fucking goddess pass or whatever.

In another article, the judge's justification goes as follows:

"Judge Recordon said the breach of trust was "at the highest level a mother could be involved with" but was not convinced jail was the answer.

"You're someone who very clearly has never been able to form an attachment with anyone. Your life has really been a mess until now," he told Harvey.

"Prison would be a Band-Aid covering over your issues." He said she needed psychological rehabilitation, which was best undertaken within the community."

Source: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11579355

Lessons learned:

  • A mother raping her son is somehow still a "victim" ("troubled upbringing", "psychological issues", "threats")

  • Gynocentrism is the real cancer, not feminism

  • The internet doesn't forget

[–][deleted] 285 points286 points  (29 children)

The legal system, and the greater part of the public, when a man rapes a child: "We hope he burns in hell"

The legal system, and the greater part of the public, when a woman rapes a child: "We hope she gets the help she needs"

The most distinguishing characteristic of the 'civilised world' is its insistence that women, and only women, are corrigible.

[–]ABC_Florida 15 points16 points  (8 children)

You know, I'm a man. But I don't believe that society or justice system should prefer correcting male pedophiles rather then locking them away. Of course neither should do it to women.

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (4 children)

Nor do I. I was pointing out that bad women are punished less severely than bad men, and with the understanding that bad women simply require some sort of corrective therapy, as opposed to hard punishment; while bad men are as irreedamable and disposable as soiled diapers.

No medals for guessing what a female sex offender's defense will be; surely, it will be along the lines of, 'She was sexually groomed and abused herself, as a child'. The implication being that women are basically good and angelic creatures who become corrupted only when brought into contact with toxic male sexuality; whereas men are born corrupt, hence the frequent calls for castrating male sex offenders, while nothing equivalent is ever recommended for female offenders- the only way to cure a man, is to cure him of being a man.

A sure sign of societal anomie and decadence is unwillingness to punish women as severely as men.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

The thing I still can't get past is feminism is supposed to correct this. They talk a good talk about viewing women as equals but they refuse to address things like the pussy pass. It kills me inside that so many blue pill faggots support this bullshit unironically.

[–]ITranscendRaceHombre 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Equality" is one of the realest, modern day examples of Orwellian doublespeak I can think of. Retrain your brain to understand "supremacy" when you hear the word "equality" being used for women. Feminism completely infantilises women and strips them of any agency, while simultaneously bullying the BP masses to believe they are "strong", "independent", and "equal". The sentencing gap perfectly exemplifies how we treat women like little children, absolving them from all responsibility when it comes time to punish them for (sometimes heinous) committed crimes. Not a day goes by where you'd be hard pressed to read an article about a woman in education who "seduces" or cultivates an "affair" with a minor student. You will never find the word rape in these articles. Instead, your evolved nature to protect her will be exploited as you are sold a farce of victimization and troubled indiscretion that deserves your empathy, not your judgement. Look no further than one of the highest orders of feminist propaganda dissemination - college campuses - to find even more black and white examples of agency removal / responsibility transfer. A man and woman are both equally intoxicated, have consensual sex, but since the woman was inebriated she cannot consent and therefore was raped.


Feminism is/was never about equality and always about supremacy. Whether you believe it is an isolated movement, or part of the greater globalism strategy via cultural Marxism, it is clear that its goal is to weaken men by transferring more responsibilities to them while garnering more privileges for women.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If what feminists say about rape were true- that is has nothing to do with sex, and everything to do with power, then it follows that a white, adult female in a position of power over children should be punished even more severely than, say, a black male juvenile who rapes one of his own cohort. In a more equitable and just world, such would be the case.

What feminists truly wish for, is that the basis for women's preferential treatment be based entirely upon women's preferences; which is a bit like a child negotiating her weekly allowance. There is never a question in the child's mind as to whether there should be an allowance, in the first place.

(All I would say to those blue pill faggots is this- If you do not feel superior to women, you most certainly are not, and your power is wasted. As a man, your power and privilige is evil and destructive, only when it is wasted.)

[–]Harry_Teak 12 points13 points  (2 children)

The thing to carefully note here that this woman isn't really a pedophile, at least not in the traditional sense. She performed an act of incestuous pedophilia for money, not unlike the "gay for pay" rentboy. Anti-pedo counseling wouldn't do her much good. It had nothing to do with misplaced sexual desire for her. She got an opportunity to make some quick cash and used her infant as a prop in a sex video.

Leave it to a woman to somehow make the average garden variety pedophile seem prosaic by comparison and then get a sentence that doesn't even qualify as a slap on the wrist...

[–]ABC_Florida 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You know, if you are killed by a serial killer, who does it for fun. And you are killed by a woman who doesn't really enjoy it, only does it because she was promised a laptop. Then...

It won't matter for you what your killer's intentions were, or he/she will kill other people in the future.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (2 children)

I feel that way when it comes to a teacher fucking a 16 year old student (so long as said teacher is hot). But, to be fair, this sick bitch is getting death threats, so society does hate her.

[–]2comment 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I'm for drug legalization but that doesn't mean I want teachers to be allowed to be selling drugs to students. A teacher is in a position of authority over a minor, it should be strictly hands off no matter the circumstance.

There have been cases where the adult got pregnant and the student had to pay. And there have been cases of it leading to violence because the teacher is married.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Both articles you cited didn't have pictures of the teachers, so I can't tell if actual victimization occurred or not. If they were smoking hot, then we need to get these poor ladies the help that they so desperately need. If they were disgusting pigs, well then, we should lock those depraved monsters up and throw away the key!

[–]Redasshole 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Here in France a woman killed her husband by poisoning him. The reason? He was used to hit her.

She didn't go to jail, she didn't even have to pay any money. The president himself decided she would not face any consequence. What's frightening is that his decision reflects the majority's opinion on this matter: he did this to please the people.

The thing is, French women can now get away with murder.

Of course, he should not have hit her. But she shouldn't have reacted that way. The justice system is very clear : one must not do justice themselves. Except women apparently. He should have be condemned for his actions. But you know, it was too hard to go to the police so she poisoned him.

Anyway, he got killed so he got his condemnation in a way. Now, she must face the consequences of her actions which are wrong. But she won't. And everybody now celebrates the fact that she is going to be able to enjoy her life with her children.

One more murderer on the streets.

[–]Mgtowredpillonroids[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's what they always use as a means of justification. If it's true or not, that's hard to establish. I for one ain't gonna believe a bitch unless she's documented everything along the way. And even then, she always had the option to walk away. If you've ever been friends with women in relationships, while they're in the relationship the guy is an angel, gentleman, you name it. But as soon as it ends, he suddenly was an abusive asshole all along. I'M NOT BUYING IT.

[–]Frankly_George 51 points51 points [recovered]

  • The internet doesn't forget

Sure it does! Go ahead, try to find some of the articles about stuff like this ten years after the fact. You'll end up reading old forum posts where people posted excerpts for discussion. The original articles disappear and suffer from bitrot all the time. Then when you do find an article it'll get disqualified because it's from some small regional newspaper or a more tabloid style site...

Some examples from recent memory:

  • boy statuary raped, made to pay child support.
  • Florida myspace girl lies about age and man goes to prison - twist this is her third time!
  • woman steals doctor's sperm impregnated herself and gets child support

You might find a few references, but good luck with getting anything useful in a debate of the sort we find ourselves engaged in with bluepill people. They'll flat out call you a liar or a conspiracy theorist.

[–]ABC_Florida 6 points7 points  (3 children)

[–]Frankly_George 6 points6 points [recovered]




I bow to your superior google-fu. I have in times past hunted for these during various arguments and had trouble finding them. They do disappear after a while.

I admit I never thought to use youtube to hunt for news video of cases. That myspace girl one was almost completely gone from print articles when I hunted it down some years ago. The usa today article isn't referencing the incident I was thinking of, damningly it has happened again (and again) according to the article. The one I was thinking of the boy was raped by a babysitter so it was one of the other cases.

Download the articles or archive them. I do it many times. Chrome has a pretty good built in feature.

At the times I originally hear of the cases, archive.is didn't exist. Image capture\screenshoting was available but it was difficult to get anyone to take it as face value due to accusations of the possibility of photoshop being involved.

When unable to use archive.is I've been a fan of screengrab! for Firefox and Palemoon Browser.

[–]94redstealth 1 point2 points  (1 child)

How come no one has set up a manosphere archive for this kind of thing yet

[–]Modredpillschool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/u/pussypass is a good start. But you've got a good idea, you should start archiving these articles.

[–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (7 children)

A woman rapes her 1 year old son? What in the actual fuck?

[–]OneInAZillion 34 points35 points  (2 children)

So she rapes her 1 year old and HER PARENTS get to raise her kids now, as opposed to the actual father of the children, or the father's parents for that matter.

What the fuck?

[–]DeputyDelicious 3 points3 points [recovered]

Not to fucking mention they claim she had a "troubled" child hood. If it was so fucking troubled what the fuck did her parents do? Nothing?

Why the fuck would you give the child to the parents of a clear and obvious fucked up child that they produced. inb4 this kid grows up to be a child molester too.

[–]OneInAZillion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What does a father have to do to regain custody in New Zealand, apparently..

And you know her parents eventually are going to forgive their "special little snowflake" of a daughter and let her see the kids, albeit illegally.

Not to fucking mention they claim she had a "troubled" child hood. If it was so fucking troubled what the fuck did her parents do? Nothing?

You ever notice whenever a woman does something fucked up it's because of her "troubled childhood"? The pussy pass is alive and well.

And by the way - not having to register as a sex offender - are you fucking joking?

I once read a story on reddit posted by a guy who said he had to register as a sex offender because he downloaded a huge torrent file of porn and within that vast amount of gigs of [adult] porn was 1 photograph of an underage kid - yet this bitch rapes her baby on camera for money and doesn't..

Double standards are fun.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 61 points62 points  (13 children)

Where the hell was Chris Hansen.

[–][deleted] 47 points48 points  (12 children)

Has he ever taken a female pedophile on his show?

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points  (2 children)

Chris Hansen

"We never had a female predator surface in our investigation."

Yea of course they probably are not there unless they are a teacher.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Doesn't help when all their plants are probably "hot 15 year old girl looking for older guys!"

[–]slay_it_forward 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's in our nature to want to fuck 15, 16, 17 year old girls as much as it is for young women to want to fleece older men of their resources.

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (6 children)

Predatory females have such frequent, easy access to children that it's damn near impossible to catch them. Needles in a haystack.

[–]TaylorWolf 27 points28 points  (5 children)

And I'm sure male victims are much less likely to talk or press charges than female victims

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 14 points15 points  (3 children)

This makes sense, a girl gains status from being seen as a victim, but a boy loses it. Raped men have been laughed at, some don't even believe it's possible. Ignorant and sickening.

[–]Redasshole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was once taught by a feminist that men couldn't be raped. Because, you know, if you get a boner it means you want it to happen.

[–]DeputyDelicious 1 points1 points [recovered]

Can confirm: Told some friends a woman got me heavily intoxicated and then had sex with me without my permission.

Tried to confide in friends. Got laughed at. The woman herself after admitting to it said I should be grateful....

Never talking about it openly again. Literally nobody cares.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man that's some fucked up shit. Sadly I can't say I'm surprised, you're right, nobody gives a fuck about men.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Let's see....



A friend got into this show because of the schadenfreude; it was mostly men from what I remember.

Only men would get that desperate. IRL, a woman could seduce underage boys just by being in proximity. It's not that women aren't prone to predation, it's just that they use a different strategy. Then again, it could just be more gynocentric targeting of omega males to weed them out of the herd and put them in prison.

[–]Fedora_Tipper_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's a good question that I'm curious to know too

[–]The__Tren__Train 24 points25 points  (1 child)

Meanwhile, William Mcaffery spent 5 years (of his 20 year sentence) in prison for a rape he didn't commit, because a woman wanted attention and pity.

[–]marplaneit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And unless he was pretty tough probably got beaten and ass raped in prison, lost every chance of being successful, his family, his Friends...

[–]DistantWinter 18 points19 points  (1 child)

The judges decision to give the child to the grandparents then state that for her entire life she has a disassociated personality is contradictory to reality.

A personality disorder is generally developed in the 2-3 year range and then solidified in the early teen years. Most times a person with a disorder is said to have had a traumatic event early in childhood resulting in this.

Speculation on my part, but more than likely something similar had happened to her and her parents failed her in many ways as the child grew up. The judge is placing her child into the same environment that damaged the woman in the first place.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

more than likely something similar had happened to her and her parents failed her in many ways as the child grew up.

Oh quite likely so. And we look for these excuses. But only for women. Bad men are inherently bad, bad women have an excuse.

The reality is that bad men also have a sob story. But noone cares, and noone accepts it as an excuse.

And you're right about putting with grandparents being a terrible idea, for the reasons you outline.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Guy rapes a baby and he is lucky he doesn't get lynched. (Not calling for lighter sentences on baby rapists, just for equal punishment).

The guy who consensually banged a girl he thought was 18 because she lied to him got a harsher punishment.

[–]marplaneit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Guys rapes a baby, and probably get killed in prison within 5 years range, if he is lucky enough pólice gets to him before other people do.

[–]urZarathustra 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Gag it, tie it up, and throw it off a fucking building, whatever it is that rapes a fucking child. Shows you the strength of the pussy pass.

[–]Josewasframed 15 points16 points  (3 children)

Truthfully, some people are mentally sick, do things like this, and need mental help. With that being said, just because someone needs medical mental help doesn't negate the fact that they committed a heinous crime and should not rule out civil punishment.

[–]RedPillScare 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It is my understanding that pedophiles are generally incurable. Do you know of any studies that contradict this?

[–]Josewasframed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't done any research on pedophiles so no.

[–]Endorsed ContributorProtoPill 14 points15 points  (8 children)

Luckily, in America, convictions for certain federal and state felonies do not permit a sentence of less than imprisonment. For example, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines provide that once an individual passes a certain "offense level" imprisonment is all but mandatory.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

My crimpro class hasn't gotten passed defining search and seizure yet.

How would this case get appealed or ammended? She obviously wouldn't do it and I don't think the state can appeal its own verdict.

[–]Endorsed ContributorProtoPill 0 points1 point  (6 children)

That's correct. There will be no appeal. Sentencing appeals typically take the form of reducing sentencing or modifying conditions, not increasing sentencing. Moreover, judges have near plenary authority in sentencing. This will simply stand as an outlier in the criminal justice system.

Enjoy search and seizure. There is a lot of very interesting and developing law on the subject, particularly relating to automobiles and airports.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children)

Any way to know how much of an outlier it is? There's a fuck ton of instances of women getting off for sexual crimes and it's well demonstrated that women get light sentences relative to men or often avoid incarceration all together. Is it an outlier on paper or is there a way to know if it's a real outlier?

[–]1ToSeeAndToHear 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Enjoy this article with statistics from the United States Sentencing Commission. The graph on page 121 suggests that men are 30% more likely to be imprisoned than women, with a huge (over 100%) increase in likelihood of imprisonment for drug-related offenses.

There are lots of articles addressing this sort of thing in legal journals, I know I edited a few talking about other sentencing issues when I was on my school's Law Review.

[–]Endorsed ContributorProtoPill 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Outrageous injustices are so outrageous because they are rare. There are currently over 2 million people incarcerated in the United States. Ten times that have felony convictions. The sheer magnitude of these numbers makes even 1,000 cases of inequal sentencing like that here paltry by comparison. However, that doesn't mean that the inequality is right; it most surely isn't. It's just a matter of fact that these type of outrageous cases are outliers, in the statistical sense.

All we can do is expose the outliers for what they are: aberrations that should not occur in a just society operating under the rule of law. In my own experience, I have argued during and seen many sentencing hearings. Ultimately, the process gets it right nearly every time.

Edit: To head off any misunderstanding, I am aware of the USSC's statistics on unequal sentencing as identified by /u/toseeandtohear. My statements above relate only to the sheer uniqueness of this case and how it is an outlier.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Is it worth noting that this is not objectively an outrage? Nobody other than TRPs or MRAs especially cares, and a lot of people probably even think it's okay.

[–]Endorsed ContributorProtoPill 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it is objectively an outrage. I typed in her name in Google and got a number of hits, all of which warned the public against enacting vigilante justice against the woman. Police say they are on alert after Facebook messages and tweets show the public is in fact outraged. There is even a petition of nearly 6,000 people calling for her imprisonment:

This lady needs to go to prison and do time for what she has done!!!

The article OP cites even says:

Thousands of people on social media are outraged that the rape of a child didn’t even land this woman in jail, and they believe that she’s been given nothing more than a slap on the wrist for her actions. ... Some people are even calling for her death, publicly, on Facebook and Twitter.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 14 points15 points  (3 children)

The "Women Are Wonderful" effect is so strong that women are naturally innocent and men are naturally guilty.

Anything going against this is hamstered away. Guilty women? Must be a man's fault somewhere. Innocent men? Potential rapists... #YesAllMen

Women get excused, men get blame.

[–]sunfistkid 5 points6 points  (2 children)

"Prison would be a Band-Aid covering over your issues."

Then the judge pulled out a .38 and put one in her computer.

/optimistic dream scenario

[–]sunfistkid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

By computer I mean brain, not the $300 paper weight she sold the tape of filth for.

[–]Redasshole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before leaving the court room with sunglasses on, an explosion in the background and a bad ass music playing out loud

[–]mikazee 4 points5 points  (2 children)

"Prison would be a Band-Aid covering over your issues." He said she needed psychological rehabilitation, which was best undertaken within the community."

I'm fully in support of rapists and the like being studied so that we can find ways to rehabilitate them and have them come back into society. As long as that rehabilitation happens WHILE THEY ARE IN PRISON! I'm not vindictive and I genuinely hope that we come to a world where we truly can reintegrate criminals into society.

But we aren't there yet. And until we get there, she is a danger to society. Because she never has to register as a sex offender, no one ever has to know that she RAPED HER SON. So they might let her babysit a child and they'd be none the wiser.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How the fuck do you rape a kid? Can baby have erections?

[–]mikazee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd guess digital penetration, or oral stimulation.

[–]thespaghettiincident 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is OUTRAGEOUS in so many ways, however, I wish more judges would value the power of rehabilitation and counseling in more criminal cases. Especially those involving children.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Prison would be a Band-Aid covering over your issues." He said she needed psychological rehabilitation, which was best undertaken within the community."

No fucking shit.

Except If you were a dude you'd be thrown into jail anyway.

[–]RealGucciSosa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its always the same thing. Bring a woman before a judge, and jail isn't the answer. Bring the man before a judge, and jail is always the answer.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Meanwhile, 18 year old guys that have sex with 16 year old girls in their school can be put on the sex offender's list for life.

A drunk guy caught pissing in an alleyway is put on the sex offenders list.

A woman raping her 1 year old son? Nah, that kind of punishment isn't necessary...

[–]DIDNT_READ_YOUR_SHIT 2 points2 points [recovered]

"Prison would be a Band-Aid covering over your issues."

What the ever-living fuck was that judge smoking? Prison is exactly where you put people like this.

[–]Mgtowredpillonroids[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hard to say whether it's the result of gynocentrism, feminism, cultural marxism or a mixture of those three. My personal belief is that prison is FIRST punishment, THEN rehabilitation, not the other way around. Also, some people are simply beyond rehabilitation.

[–]Momo_dollar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She is an average intelligence sociopath and gets off with a despicable crime.

[–]1PrinceofSpades 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I... Really wish I was still surprised by news like this. The medicine runs deep.

[–]Artie4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is one of the most revolting crimes I've ever read about.

[–]G2S2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The judges in these cases don't give a fuck. She probably sucked his cock in exchange for leniency, they all do. My sister in law tried to have my brother killed and she got 3 months in jail. The fucking judge was flirting with her at sentencing, it was sick.

[–]Bielzabutt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Baby's mother rapes him, so the baby is given to her parents, the people that raised a baby raper. I'll never understand this at all.

[–]xRoseable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[–]1PantsonFire1234 2 points3 points  (3 children)

How the fuck do you rape a 1 year old... and as a women..

producing the objectionable minute-long video at the request of a paedophile.

My god this wench got alpha widowed by a fucking pedophile and used her one year old son to lock down his commitment. For fuck sake.

[–]1Sir_Distic 3 points4 points  (1 child)

No. She wanted a laptop, it cost $300 more than she had. So she did something despicable.

Nothing to do with Alpha Widowing or locking down commitment.

[–]1PantsonFire1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My fault, I had no time to read the entire article. That's even worse. Yet it doesn't suprise me that women don't truly care for their children sometimes.

[–]Josewasframed 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Just read a post in r news stating that a teenage girl made up a story about migrants raping her in Germany....

[–]Mgtowredpillonroids[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is that related? There's video evidence here.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]1Sir_Distic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe she sold the film she took of her having sex with the baby for $300.

[–]Neuermann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't his ruling unconstitutional, falling under Cruel and unusual punishment?

Just the unusual part, as it is not the conviction they give to any other baby rapists.

[–]Elodrian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has got to be it: Peak Hypocrisy. Any thread beginning with "New Level Of..." anything from now on is lying.

[–]AtlRP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

23-year-old Krystal Harvey

Her name is "Krystal." That's all you need to know what kind of woman this is.

[–]Lightspeedius 0 points1 point  (1 child)

On the flip side, this female teacher was imprisoned despite it not being possible to charge a woman with rape in NZ, and despite the perpetrator's own history of being abused.

Frankly I'm not comfortable with the whiny "woe is me, life isn't fair" aspect of TRP. I like the aspect of TRP that calls for men and women to grow up, take responsibility for what we can, forget what we can't, accept what we must.

[–]MakeEmSayAyy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

pointing out that this would never happen to a male.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Greetings fellow Vee subscriber

[–]Janus_Fawkes -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Who buys a $300 laptop and not drugs like a normal person?

[–]markusmoore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly what I was thinking