Summary: see title
Full Story: http://www.inquisitr.com/2741404/woman-who-filmed-baby-rape-targeted-with-threats/
"The New Zealand Herald reported earlier this week that the convicted child molester would not serve any actual jail time for her crimes. The 23-year-old woman admittedly filmed herself raping her own 1-year-old son, which she sold to a pedophile for $300. She then used the $300 to buy herself a laptop, exhibiting an incredibly low price in exchange for the bond between mother and child, and the innocence of a baby."
"Her children have permanently been removed from her custody, and are now being raised by her parents — who have spoken out against her actions with great shock and disgust. They worry about the day that will come when they have to explain to the child victim what happened to him, and why he cannot ever see his biological mother."
So a mother rapes her 1 yo son and all she gets is 8 months of "home detention" and 100 hours of community service. Pussy pass anyone?
The article states further:
"It should be noted that the woman will not apparently be required to register as a sex offender once she has completed her sentence."
Mkay, so this makes absolutely no sense at all. That's beyond having a pussy pass, that's a fucking goddess pass or whatever.
In another article, the judge's justification goes as follows:
"Judge Recordon said the breach of trust was "at the highest level a mother could be involved with" but was not convinced jail was the answer.
"You're someone who very clearly has never been able to form an attachment with anyone. Your life has really been a mess until now," he told Harvey.
"Prison would be a Band-Aid covering over your issues." He said she needed psychological rehabilitation, which was best undertaken within the community."
A mother raping her son is somehow still a "victim" ("troubled upbringing", "psychological issues", "threats")
Gynocentrism is the real cancer, not feminism
The internet doesn't forget