Men's RightsEat it up - Man charged after his newborn tests positive for amphetamines and opiates (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by sajimo

Thought I'd share this...never post here but its absolute garbage


Man charged after his newborn tests positive for amphetamines and opiates Written by Brandon Lewis on February 29, 2016

A man was charged on Friday after his newborn tested positive for drug exposure in December.

Blue Earth County Human Services Child Protection reports that the child tested positive for amphetamines and opiates after birth and the mother tested positive for opiates. Authorities say 41-year old Daniel Gerald Sturdivant allegedly told them he was concerned about the woman’s meth use and did not want her to use it while she was pregnant. County Officials say Sturdivant said he felt he could not control her since he was gone with work for a week or more at a time. Authorities say Sturdivant didn’t do anything to stop the mother other than trying to limit the money she had available to spend on drugs. According to the report, the mother admitted to Health Officials in September that she had smoked methamphetamine in her second trimester of pregnancy.

Police say the newborn had to remain at the hospital due to withdrawal symptoms and was possibly going to be transferred to Rochester for further treatment of withdrawals.

Sturdivant is charged with Felony Exposure of Drugs to a Child, Child Endangerment and Child Neglect.

Blue Earth County Attorney Pat McDermott tells KTOE News that his office is considering charges against the mother.

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (4 children)

GOOD NEWS! Charges have been dropped.


McDermott says his office has also declined charges against the mother of the infant.

Pussy pass intact. I guess they realized by charging the dad they'd be forced to charge the mother as well due to public backlash (for their blatant sexism), so they're letting both off the hook instead.

[–]joseph_fuzzco_Jr 218 points219 points  (36 children)

This guy was fucked no matter what he did. He had 4 choices:

  1. Do what he did, get assfucked in jail.

  2. Break up/leave her, get assfucked by alimony.

  3. Take time off work, get assfucked by mountains of debt.

  4. Call police on wife for drug charges, get bent over and assfucked by the cops for being an accomplice, have to pay alimony, get kid taken away.

[–][deleted] 149 points150 points  (24 children)

Option 5: learn a foreign language and leave the country for good.Get assfucked emotionally by becoming an international fugitive forever isolated from his family.

[–]joseph_fuzzco_Jr 47 points48 points  (21 children)

Option 6: acquire fentanyl. Inject in wife when she's drugged out of her mind. Wife dies, he's only assfucked in jail.

[–][deleted] 76 points77 points  (7 children)

Option 7: Declare war on the government and install neo-patriarchy.

[–][deleted] 57 points58 points  (5 children)

Get assfucked by new government

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (4 children)


Unfortunately, that is they way of life.

Rinse and repeat....

[–]Firespit 4 points5 points  (3 children)

"There must be some kind of way out of here, "

[–]mcavvacm 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Nah son it's assholes all the way down.

[–]Mr_Donnerhuhn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Option 69: Become gay, just get assfucked.

[–]nuesuh 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Vasectomy + Don't get married.

[–]rockumsockumrobots 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Option 8: Save boatloads of money, improve and market yourself, live as an expat.

Working on the first and second parts of that right now.

[–]Appleseed12333 23 points24 points  (12 children)

Sadly many people can't see that a system that so obviously hates men and praises women, will lead men down a revengeful road.

[–]bluedrygrass 13 points14 points  (3 children)

will lead men down a revengeful road.

I wish. But i just don't see a bunch of frappuccino-sipping mentally emasculated "men" going to war with any government, as long as they have their wi-fi connections for the iphone to refresh their status on social medias and listen to some female pop singer

[–]Appleseed12333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In no way did I mean towards government, but the girlfriend that 'use' government. Defend your self vs her and she calls the cops, or FRA to hide her cheating, things like that will cause a man to snap.

It's like copy cat killers, you start seeing a few men snap, thats all some men need, a slight change in mind. Scary thing especially how easily most men can hurt most women.

[–]rrealnigga 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of the pop songs I like are male, though

[–]ChadThundercockII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use said wifi to penetrate power grid and shut down the first lines of defense. Then acquire arms and follow Spartacus.

[–]foldpak111 26 points27 points  (3 children)

And people wonder why men go crazy and shoot up schools and ex-girlfriends/wives. If you corner a dog in a corner and you're just beating the hell out of it, it's going to cower and wonder if it did something wrong. However, if you continue doing it over and over, said dog will go into fight or flight mode and lash back with everything it's got. I see a revolution in the next 50 years if this continues. It's a psychological war on men and men are slowly waking up. Keep pushing us, government. Keep pushing us. One day, most men here will just give up like men in Japan.

[–]TheRedStoic 16 points17 points  (1 child)

No my friend.

The dog suffers learned helplessness if it is a force he can't escape or defeat.

It's the dogs actively, attentively watching that you need to look out for. When you try to put them in the cage, you'll find they might not settle for it.

[–]Whirly315 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As much as I hate to say it, psychological research says learned hopelessness is exactly what happens to the majority. A minority will wake up, but when they open the doors to the cage these beaten dogs will continue to cower in the corner afraid of punishment

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Since most men are weak it breeds apathy not vengeance.

See: Japan. Cucked Europe.

[–]netherlanddwarf -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

I agree, I am so concerned. There are so many single mothers that are raising children by themselves. Is Chad somehow to blame too?

[–]foldpak111 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Everything is men's fault. If a woman makes a bad decision (as they often do), an evil man was behind the scenes manipulating her. If a man makes a terrible decision... Well, I don't have to cite any real-life examples for you all to get the picture.

[–]foldpak111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a plan to me. Leaving everything behind and starting over with a simple life sounds like a hell of a plan to me.

[–]5t3fan0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that's really the only choice

[–]foldpak111 11 points12 points  (6 children)

Just another one of the thousands of reasons to not get married and/or have children. I, unlike most men in this country, value freedom. I've said it once and I'll say it again, government doesn't work because it always ends up tyrannical. Men can't even have children without gambling their lives anymore. What a time to be alive... What a time.

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've said it once and I'll say it again, government doesn't work because it always ends up tyrannical.

A government controlled only by those who fund it does not end up tyrannical. It's only under universal suffrage, when the majority of voters are not the ones funding it, does government become tyrannical.

Without the moral hazard inherent in women's suffrage, government would not be able to become tyrannical.

[–]OneMoreAcct 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Government doesn't work? I prefer a 40 hour work week with fair pay and vacation time over American children working 14 hour days in shitty conditions.

[–]1Str8_Pillin 1 point2 points  (1 child)

40/wk, 8/hr day, and fair pay are because of unions. All of which were achieved by massive protests which most of the time turned into violent worker(citizen) vs police(gov't) battles.

So it wasn't just handed over easily because America is great.
We got the job thing under control, but this is a new era and a new problem. Leaving isn't necessarily the solution, but the government sure as shit isn't on your side

[–]OneMoreAcct 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing worth doing is easy. Yes, government is corrupt, but if you think no government is better than any government than you are ignorant.

[–]MrFritzH -1 points0 points  (1 child)

You are part of the problem.

[–]rrealnigga 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Damn, do I HAVE to get assfucked?

[–]joseph_fuzzco_Jr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. You do not have a choice.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 159 points160 points  (35 children)

To be clear on this:

Sturdivant said he felt he could not control her since he was
gone with work for a week or more at a time. Authorities say
Sturdivant didn’t do anything to stop the mother other than
trying to limit the money she had available to spend on drugs.

He is being charged for NOT STOPPING the mother taking drugs, even though he did try to stop her taking drugs and wasn't always able to.

Holy fucking shit.

Blue Earth County Attorney Pat McDermott

Blue Pill County Attorney more like

[–]foldpak111 56 points57 points  (0 children)

The state basically called her a child that can not make adult decisions. That wasn't very politically correct. That is a strong & independent beautiful woman who don't need no man and the state needs to realize that. Shitlords!

[–][deleted] 62 points63 points  (4 children)

Huh? The mother is an adult, not a minor. There's no way the dad can forcibly stop the mother from doing anything to herself, even if she decides to leap off a bridge (I wish she had done that).

Dad needs to lawyer up and beat this. Best if he can gains sympathy through news media.

[–]reigorius 24 points25 points  (1 child)

If justice is served by the amount of dollars you have to throw at a lawyer, then there is no justice.

[–]rundownweather 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Still better than being assfucked!

[–]fuckin_retard 14 points14 points [recovered]

ALSO, wouldn't this throw a wrench in the liberal maxim: "you can't tell a woman what to do with her body!"

[–]kireol 3 points4 points  (0 children)


[–]1favours_of_the_moon 22 points23 points  (14 children)

Is SHE charged with anything?

[–]Dr_Killpatient 83 points84 points  (0 children)

She is charged of being "a woman who will never be held accountable for her actions and is a perfect innocent snowflake just the way she has always been".

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 47 points48 points  (11 children)

According to the article, they are considering charging her with something.

You can't make this shit up...

[–]ThrowyMcGruder 46 points47 points  (3 children)

C'mon. We all know what she'll be charged with.

She'll be charged with "What made her do this?"

And they'll bring psychologists in who explain that she was abused or did it for attention and try to fix her.

Men do these things for personal reasons and are held accountable.

Women do them because something or someone made them do it and we need to find out how to help them.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Yup.... women get support and men get blame.

[–]TheSelfGoverned 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Though in this case, the man didn't actually do anything, yet is still facing felonies.

[–]feather_ink -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's quite a few cases where women have been charged for exactly this

[–]reigorius 4 points5 points  (6 children)

Well, we do promote patriarchy here and we do say women are the most responsible teenager in the house.

With us men as leaders of the family and relationships, it's measuring with two different units when we demand equal rights and at the same time claim leadership because we believe (and rightly so) men are better at being a responsible leader.

So, in this case the judge blamed the captain for his ineffective leadership. In a true patriarch society, would we hold women to the same standards when we redpillers don't do it ourselves? That would be kind of backwards.

With this said, poor bugger. System is rigged against men. But still, the way I look at it, my point holds merit too.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Captain is one thing... but it's not a captain's job to stop the ship wilfully sinking.

This guy tried... but you can't have a job and watch your woman 24 hours a day to stop her taking drugs. Some ho's just can't be saved, and a man shouldn't go to prison for that.

[–]bluedrygrass 3 points4 points  (1 child)

It's for opposite reasons to yours the woman didn't get charged

[–]reigorius -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

For the sack of my argument, I put the blame on the ineffectiveness of his leadership and the judge taking him down on that.

I understand that in reality it wasn't the case.

[–]cariboo_j 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Captain's also have authority to discipline or fire their crew if they step out of line.

In modern times husbands have no such authority so it doesn't make sense to hold them accountable for their wives actions.

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. Charges were dropped against him and CPS is "working with the family".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is where equality brings us to.

[–]ChadThundercockII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guy didn't have a proper lawyer. He fucked himself up in a way.

[–]slider162 67 points68 points  (2 children)

Charges have already been dropped.


But it hurt to just think about the mental gymnastics to bring charges to begin with.

[–]taracus 15 points16 points  (1 child)

McDermott says he reviewed the case and dismissed the charges against Sturdivant.

McDermott says his office has also declined charges against the mother of the infant.

Gotta take the good with the bad huh?

Realized that they "declined charges" against her but "dismissed" his, does this mean they never even tried to charge the mother?

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (1 child)

Charges were dropped: http://www.minnesota93.com/2016/03/03/charges-dropped-against-local-man-for-newborn-drug-exposure/

The most fucked up part, though, is that the police DECLINED to charge the mother. WTF? How can you charge the father, who tried to stop it, but NOT charge the mother, WHO IS THE ONE WHO TOOK THE FUCKING DRUGS!!!!

[–]nouveaugosse 27 points28 points  (5 children)

Minnesota is full of a bunch of progressive pussies. Story checks out.

What happened to to "her body her choice"? Pregnancies are entirely a woman's responsibility. If there's any crimes to be charged her it falls on the person carrying the child and that person alone.

[–]sweetleef 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And of course, had the woman decided to have the child vacuumed out and liquefied in an abortion clinic, she would be a "strong independent woman," and he would have had no say or rights in the matter at all. It's her decision, only; she is in control.

But if she doesn't kill the child, now she loses responsibility for her decisions and it somehow becomes his duty to stop her from causing harm to the baby. Now she has no control.

The whole thing is farcical.

[–]tb87670 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Sadly the progressive idiots leak into TRP as well. Compared to even a few months ago the posts are not near as good and a lot of replies are reeking of liberal taint. Not in the levels as the rest of the internet but still a concerning amount of it. If you think Minnesota is bad don't look at what is happening to Colorado.

Luckily for this guy a new article talks about the charges being dropped but for fucks sake the charges should never have been there in the first place. Never. Talk. To. The. Police. They are only there to slap charges on you. I was walking in the park minding my own business I was stopped and the officer wanted to see my vehicle then ran my plates and license to see if anything came up. No reason for this at all. He was looking if anything in my truck was out of place, insurance, sticker on the plate, etc. so forth and in shit like this don't talk to them. Say one thing wrong or in the wrong tone and they will continue to probe. They are only after finding charges to stick you with. That is all. The man in the article could have avoided the whole song and dance by not saying a thing or simply saying he didn't know the bitch took drugs.

[–]Chrience 3 points4 points  (1 child)

new article talks about the charges being dropped but for fucks sake the charges should never have been there in the first place.

Not only this, but his full name has been posted all over the media about this story, and the charges against him. The charges are dropped, but his reputation is likely ruined now.

And what about this 'mother'? Her names seems much harder to find, conveniently to her. The media is more willing to protect the identity of the woman TRUELY responsible for this, and to villify the man.

[–]RP-on-AF1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or when he tries to get a job, and they run a quick Google check against him.

[–]kalevolive -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure i can be a democrat and still believe in TRP. its just a set of beliefs its not black and white. You've gotta grow up to realize that.

edit: also progressing and evolving is being a man, doing the same thing over and over again expecting a differing result is insanity. i think the guy should be basically scott free but it was also his dumb ass to marry a drug addict if he wants the best carrer and family. She should be in jail he should be getting his shit togeather.

[–]MakeEmSayAyy 37 points38 points  (3 children)

Take this to the Supreme Court, there is no possible way this holds up.

[–]jmottram08 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Yeah, because the guy that takes opiates with the wife that takes amphetamines is really in a position to take anything to court.

[–]MakeEmSayAyy 7 points8 points  (1 child)

there's a bunch of supreme court cases with murderers, rapists, and junkies.

[–]jmottram08 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there are. That dosen't mean that they were the ones that decided to challenge their cases.

[–]2comment 23 points24 points  (6 children)

Here is another article: http://www.inquisitr.com/2845760/man-charged-by-police-after-his-newborn-was-tested-positive-for-drugs/

To be clear, this is a clear sign of the pussy pass if she doesn't get charged or lesser instead of higher charges.

Now what the article doesn't explicitly spell out is that it sounds like the baby had to stay in the hospital because of clear withdrawal symptoms. The hospital or a worker called police, police start questioning the parents. It's not like the dad turned the mother in for sheer concern of the child ahead of time.

Once questioning starts, the dad didn't follow DON'T TALK TO THE FUCKING POLICE, admitted he knew of the situation and thus gets whacked with felony charges.

If he said nothing, or at best shocked and said something along the lines "She promised me she was off the stuff and I thought she was, I knew nothing", he probably wouldn't be in this situation today and it would be the mother facing the charges alone if his system was tested clean.

[–]tandemlee 21 points21 points [recovered]

Yes. This.

While this story is utter complete injustice, we can learn from it and try to prevent ourselves from being trapped in a similar situation.

Moral of the story: never talk to cops regardless of whether you're innocent or guilty.

[–]foldpak111 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Whenever cops come around, just do the "hur dur" act.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Note to self: Don't get a meth fiend pregnant.

[–]ChadThundercockII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The most important lesson to take from this.

[–]cariboo_j 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what if you're also in meth and it seems like a really good idea?

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)


If there is a man somewhere who is even remotely connected to a woman's crimes then they will find a way to blame him.

[–]-Maraud3r 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Wait, someone please help me understand. How can HE be charged for something she has done, when she was an adult whom he had no authority over or could inhibit in any kind of way.

What kind of law allows for this, it seems ridiculous to an extreme extent.

[–][deleted] 5 points5 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]-Maraud3r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is still mindbogglingly stupid, not just because she's an adult and aside from calling the cops there was little to nothing he could've done, with even that option likely going terribly wrong.

Sure that guy is by no means an upstanding citizen and father from the background information but he's effectively charged for acts she commited when he had no way to actually stop her.

No idea how old these laws are but to me it seems there's some old laws back from when men had actual control over their wives colliding with the situation we find nowadays and as it's beneficial to women like her, it isn't being changed. That she apparently isn't being charged is just the cherry on top.

[–]Knowmadik 8 points9 points  (2 children)

You have to understand that addicts are manipulative to the extreme. I guarantee that while he was away the woman was swearing up and down she wasn't using.

One of my exes faked a "I can't breathe" over the phone to get me to come home when I wouldn't (BPD, psychopath). So, I called 911 and said that my girlfriend was reporting that she couldn't breathe. Fire department was sent. A cop calls me 10 minutes later and reams me out saying if I ever call 911 with a false complaint again he'll arrest me. Of course she had answered the door bright eyed and bushy tailed.

I have tons more stories like this about women, both from my own life and from lives of other men.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yeah, an like limiting her supply to money means she won't suck an fuck her way to more meth if she's that fucked up enough to take it while pregnant

[–]EBPLLRP 6 points6 points [recovered]

This can be prevented if you have a simple procedure(vasectomy).

This guy was fucked No Matter What Choice He Made.

[–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember my father telling me that his father asked him if he wanted to take him to get a vasectomy on his 18th birthday. Well, he was born in the 1940s when men were men so it's not surprising.

[–]ITS_JUST_2015_BRO 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Authorities say Sturdivant didn’t do anything to stop the mother other than trying to limit the money she had available to spend on drugs.

Under new laws in the UK this would count as "financial abuse" of your spouse: http://www.lwa.org.uk/understanding-abuse/abusive-relationships/financial-abuse.htm

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"I'm pregnant, shitlord. Do what I say, or I'll tell the police about all of the illegal drugs I've been using and you'll go to jail for it!"

[–]Modern-Day-Musashi 8 points9 points  (10 children)

Option 7: (for a younger man) Scorched Earth - Leave nothing behind, one way plane ticket to France. If you can make it to the French Foreign Legions main gates and you are willing to sign a five year contract you a fucking golden.

Once your contract is up, you either re-up, get your old passport back or your are given a new French passport. It would not be an easy life for five years, you'll either train and serve in the jungles or some shit hole in Africa..

Did some work with their elite parchute division boys during the 1st gulf war, a bunch of crazy Mother Fuckers but so were we..

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 8 points9 points  (8 children)

I looked into joining the FFL years ago when I was plotting my future. It's not as simple as it was in the old days when drunks, misfits, and outlaws could join up and assume a new name to escape from their checkered past. Now they perform background checks and make sure you aren't wanted by the law, or owe alimony or child support. Most of their recruits actually come from other militaries, guys that were in the German army or US Marines and wanted an even more insane challenge as a Legionnaire.

Handing over your life, health, and destiny to a state sounds exciting to a teenager or a young 20-something. I admit I really wanted to do it. I chose another path and I am happy that I did. As an English teacher I have made good money, it's an easy life and there is time to slay pussy and no one is shooting at me. Also if I hate my boss I can leave whenever the fuck I want and have the option to go to any number of interesting countries/cultures to make a living. No one is in control of my life except for me and there is zero chance I will die supporting to blue pill self-cuckolding withering empire.

Value your own life by not offering it up for slaughter in exchange for a few Euro or Dollars. There are so many ways to have adventures and enjoy your life. I understand the appeal of the military, I really do, but if you are craving a testosterone fueled lifestyle take up a combat sport like MMA or do an extreme sport like BASE jumping. You can travel the world and retain your freedom. Getting in with a military makes about as much sense as joining ISIS, or a militia, or a drug cartel. It's a bunch of fucking guys with guns that do fucked up shit and your life doesn't matter at all to them. The whole reason why France created the Legion is so that when the Legionnaires die no one in France will protest because they aren't French so they literally give zero fucks. A sizable percentage are said to die in training accidents, too.

Think and choose very carefully. You have ONE life to live.

[–]CumForJesus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting. But in the end I still don't care about my own life so if Military is my only way to go, i'll do it. But i'm a true french man so it won't be FFL hell hole at least.

[–]cariboo_j 0 points1 point  (3 children)

owe alimony or child support.

Jesus Christ. There's no escape.

A failed marriage will hound you to the ends of the earth.

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 0 points1 point  (2 children)

the ends of the earth.

Not to Thailand or Cambodia or many other places. There is very little in the way of actual law enforcement here. Pedophiles, dark net criminals, hitmen, spooks, and protected witnesses all come here.

There was a woman who was wanted for murdering her husband who spent nearly 10 years in the southern islands before they caught her. They did catch her, but only because of the seriousness of the charge.

The reason the foreign legion is not an escape route is because it is administered by France a gynocentric cuntry if ever there was one.

[–]cariboo_j 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Lol so you need to expatriate yourself to a near-anarchy third world country full of pedophiles and hired killers to escape. (Not that I'm knocking Thailand I'd love to visit some day lol)

Easier to never sign such a contract in the first place if you wish to maintain your freedom and autonomy in the first world...

Edit: as an aside I know a guy that joined the army and did a tour of Afghanistan to try and impress some drug addled BPD wench with a 50+ n-count into marrying him. He proposed to her multiple times over the Internet and and when he got back. She rejected him and would tell me what a dummy he was. It was a joke to her. He ended up joining the French foreign legion after deciding there was nothing left for him in our country if she wouldn't marry him LOL. I think he's stationed on the central African replubic now. I heard some French girl scammed him out of a large chunk of money while he was training there too. Oneitis is a hell of a drug. Some guys never learn...

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol so you need to expatriate yourself to a near-anarchy third world country full of pedophiles and hired killers to escape. (Not that I'm knocking Thailand I'd love to visit some day lol)

No, God dammit. You go on adventures because they make life interesting and worth living. But ideally you should do them on your own, not by joining a military to kill someone who never threatened you to prop up some corporation that doesn't give a shit about you. You should come to Thailand anyway, as a single man, but this is also the place for men who got burned by Western wives to escape to. I know many of them. They settle here and vow never to return to the evil empire that is the United States.

Anarchy is beautiful, and it works with a good culture. It's sad that Americans have forgotten what freedom is. We settle for shit jobs with shit pay and if a fun idea pops into our heads we wonder if "we are allowed to do that." SE Asians don't have the legalese bullshit ingrained in them... yet. Lawyers haven't taken over, so you will see interesting things like this because no cop will enforce the law, people don't give a shit, and they will do what they feel like even if it's dangerous or improper. This is actually how life is supposed to be.

Slowly but surely the lawyers are taking over. Just as the french foreign legion is longer an escape for men on the run, so it will be with this beautiful corner of the world. As with so many things in life it's "get yours while supplies last--first come first served."

[–]Modern-Day-Musashi -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

A message to FLFW16: I served in one of the most elite military units in the world from 86-95. I highly recommend that you take a stroll down the beach in Coronado or Littlecreek.. Please mention your views in the last section of your third paragraph, especially that part where you compare the military with the likes of ISIS, Militia or a Drug Cartel..

Let me know how that turns out for ya... And as far as the FFL guys that I served with during the 1st gulf war... Some of the most highly skilled warriors that I've had the pleasure of working with....

We gave an extremely good ass fucking to the Republican Guard.

[–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The hardest part wouldn't be the physicality of it, it would be learning the language because they don't order you around in English.

[–]ioncloud9 7 points8 points  (0 children)

So the child is the property of the mother and the father has no say pre-birth, unless she willfully endangers it herself. Then its the guys fault. So essentially a baby is like a limb on a child: yes its the childs limb but the adult responsible gets in trouble if the child tries to chop it off and the parent doesnt stop her.

[–]WarmApfelPi 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The guy's an idiot and will pay for that through life, but should go free on this. The mother should be charged with anything they can make stick, like pickles on a window.

[–]godiebiel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PSA: don't get crackheads pregnant.

[–]TheMGhandi 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The charges were dropped.

The law works in some cases, as the world isn't completely insane yet. Give it another 10-20 years and this will become reality, or Armageddon will happen then and we're all fucked.

Edit: space

[–]RP-on-AF1 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Well the law didn't work because the woman, who actually did endanger the child, was not charged.

[–]TheMGhandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Babies need their mothers and children need their fathers. It wasn't a bad idea to avoid charging her.

[–]GlennBeckAmerica 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You cant stp an addict from using. He did what he could by trying to limit the money she had access to. That's as best as he could do short of tying her to a chair.

[–]aanarchist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i like how he takes the blame for the woman being a fucking drug addict.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda wish the article was more in depth. What happened to the mother? It's BS that the father is facing charges, but is his wife getting off scotch-free or is she facing similar charges?

[–]beginner_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that happened to me all bets are off...I honestly can't say no one would get hurt in that case. Yeah would be stupid but I could just not be that stoic.

[–]spexer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]SolarPoweredSauna 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What has he supposed to do?

She wasn't a child who could be checked into a rehab program against her will.

[–]anooblol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly... This is less of a case of: Blue pill society. And more of a case of: Poor person gets fucked by bad defense attorney yet again.

Seriously... This is an easily defendable case. It was just handled poorly.

[–]Snazzy_Serval 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God I wish this story went all the way to the courts just so everybody could see how asinine the case is. The war against men needs to come up front and center.

Hell just imagine it being ruled that the man is guilty. Wouldn't that mean that he had to control what his wife does essentially making her his property?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know one sperm cell can have carry so much meth in it, to develop into a junky foetus

Or at least that's how nature should've been for any of this shit to make sense

[–]lostalex7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was this man drug tested? I have a feeling he was using the same drugs as the mother.

[–]Brewjo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All those charges are based on shit. Well, Meconium anyway....