Briffault's Law

polakfury · 2016-04-22T07:17:05+00:00

A woman's selfishness always exceeds her empathy.

If you wish to keep a woman around it must be based on her selfish interests first and always.

Thotwrecker · 2016-04-22T15:55:25+00:00

Briffault's Law is the key to using what we know about female hypergamy, solipsism, and ability to hamster (reverse rationalize any type of behavior or outcome). It makes everything fit together.

I think it's very interesting that many comedians have touched on this subject. Eddie Murphy "what have you done for me lately?" and Chris Rock "women can't go backwards in lifestyle, if you lose your job or your way of providing her with the type of life she enjoys, you'll lose your woman." Many others that I'm forgetting.

The most important thing I would say that RP has to offer on women wisdom is Briffault's Law, because so many men project THEIR way of calculating value onto women. Briffault's Law teaches you that the past doesn't matter to her; moreover, it doesn't EXIST to her in the same way it does to you.

As men, we store the past up in the logical annals of our mind. We view her behavior as a continuum, with her good and bad over time all weighing in. So we assume that she does the same. We assume that by paying for her law school, we'll accrue some credit, that she will correctly value our contribution and remember that AFTER she graduates.

No, after she graduates, she is incentivised to FORGET how she got there. Her brain wants to forget that she received our help and our propulsion to reach her position, it wants to hamster it as her accomplishment. And more importantly, she wants to use her position and exposure to more high status males to see if she can get a better contract.

The scary thing is that this woman will legitimately NOT REMEMBER all the things you did for her. The times you studied with her and encouraged her and helped her, the sacrifices you made, the marriage and promises to always support each other. It doesn't matter if she's your wife; the past does not exist to her like it does to you.

To you, the past is immutable. It is what it is, I mean, it's already happened. It's over, it can't be changed. One must accept and deal with it.

To her, the past is malleable. It's whatever she needs it to be to rationalize doing what she wants to do. The past is very real when she needs it to be, and it's nonexistent when she needs to justify breaking up and swinging to a higher branch.

Briffault's Law really is the glue; TRP will teach you how to accrue value and how to present it to women to get their attention, sex, arousal, and so on.

But understanding Briffault's Law is how you keep the carrot in front of their nose. Once they've eaten the carrot, you're done.

Trucks_N_Chainsaws · 2016-04-22T08:07:14+00:00

In hood terms, "You're only as good as your last earn."

ToSeeAndToHear · 2016-04-22T05:06:15+00:00

Briffault's Law can be legislated against in society. In many societies through history, a woman's association was limited by culture to the man she was married to on threat of violence, and that marriage choice was made by her father.

Obviously, that doesn't mean cheating didn't happen. But like a good wall keeps a ceiling from obeying the pressures of the law of gravity and falling on your head, social mores that encourage monogamy resist Briffault's Law.

Entropy-7 · 2016-04-22T06:14:43+00:00

No fault divorce is perhaps the ultimate manifestation of this.

lurkythelurkingbean · 2016-04-22T06:34:30+00:00

In my opinion, this is the biggest oversight of feminism: that they do not accept/understand this law. Women are already more powerful than men, in terms of shaping the world, because men have to constantly achieve to keep women around. Men are the grunt laborers, the bodies to hold the weapons, while women were designed by nature to be the ones directing us from the background.

I used to see it as a financial deal, where guys are constantly making interest-only payments, only to get fucked 30 years later when you still have a huge principal. Now I've come to see it more like a movie career: a director would certainly ditch an actor who could only use lines from his last movie, and he'd be perfectly justified in doing so.

Also: Can this new-post-locked, theory-commenty-thingy be permanent? This shit is exactly what this sub needs; all information needed is already here. A solid majority of the problems people have here could be figured out with some reading and critical thinking. Edit: I know this isn't really feasible in the reddit format. Just a half-serious jab at how fucked the signal:noise ratio is on a typical day

Noolaw · 2016-04-22T17:02:57+00:00

When i joined TRP some years ago...this is the core of internalizing TRP. This is the only thing you need to know if you had access to one thing on the sidebar. I would choose this to remind me of TRP.

filitantmeminist · 2016-04-22T13:36:41+00:00

Alright let me play devils advocate. Doesnt this go both ways? If a 3D pig womyn hits on George Clooney, obviously he wants nothing from her and no relationship takes place.

I fully understand this law but do not fully understand how it is one sided.

TheDarkTriad · 2016-04-23T02:39:08+00:00

I have to admit, I've never fully understood Briffault's law. Can someone explain this to me?

Is it basically saying that the female decides who she associates herself with (romantically, sexually, etc) and if their are no benefits to associating with a particular male then she will choose not to do so?

Lenovojunk · 2016-04-22T03:30:40+00:00

Thanks for Posting it.

ransay3277 · 2016-04-23T02:07:39+00:00

Quite frankly, if you understand this law, you understand women and their actions.

TheFabledWIzard · 2016-04-24T00:00:35+00:00

Read the way of the superior man by David deida.

All__fun · 2016-04-25T12:08:31+00:00

.BRIFFAULT’S LAW - When you see it for what it is, you stop entering into covert (or even overt) contracts with women. You invest in yourself but never in a woman or a relationship because it's a depreciating asset at best.

Someone else posted this before on this topic. (Sorry I cannot give credit to their username)