460
461
462

Red Pill TheoryMen vs Women in a short gif: Equality is a Falsehood (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by BowlOfCandy

Gentlemen, please analyze the following gif: https://gfycat.com/HopefulWetAlaskanhusky

In this gif we see a woman, who is attending a Bernie Sanders rally, faint and fall down. Do you notice something about the nearby response from people?

Not a single woman exhibits an instinctual reaction to help. It's as if they get caught in a deer-stuck-in-headlights trance, watching helplessly as others jump to action.

The men, on the other hand, react immediately. And even when a few guys are already on top of it, you still see more men continue to approach to help. They do no concede their opportunity to help.

Men are adventurers, capitalists, risk-takers and entrepreneurs. Women are passive, socialists, insecure and concerned with safety.

We are not necessarily better, for lack of a better word, but we are different. VERY different. And this has very serious implications when it comes to dynamics involved with leadership (see: business, family, military, etc.). Edit: we are most definitely better leaders.

Equality is a falsehood. The differences between the sexes need to be recognized and embraced. You do not get a day off as a man.


[–]no_face 150 points151 points  (17 children)

Equality is a falsehood

Equality in terms of political terminology means that everyone has the same rights and responsibilities.

Modern feminism has conflated equality with uniformity.

Hence the movement went from "we have the right to vote" to "we can do anything men can".

The truth is that no two individuals are uniform. No two sportsmen from different sports are uniform in their skills at any sport. No two people have a uniform tolerance to UV rays or spicy food.

We are non-uniform in ability but we are equal in rights

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Equality in terms of political terminology means that everyone has the same rights and responsibilities.

And that is a falsehood.

Society will never hold women as individually disposable as it holds men. Due to that, society will refuse to hold women to the same level of responsibility, and therefore there is no case for equal rights.

We are not equal in rights. Men are second class citizens due to the lie of politically equality being possible.

[–]Endorsed ContributorTheeRyanGrey 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Equality is cruelty. Equality is why socialism and communism never work(amongst other reasons)

If I work harder and better than you I deserve more stuff. I'm better than you. Sure we're not allowed to say it but we're not allowed to pretend it doesn't exist.

people like me because i'm better than you. women fuck me because i'm better than you. I get better jobs and better chances because I'm better than you. I get respect because I'm better than you.

Forcing me into equality forces me to stoop down to the lowest persons level because no one is going to work harder for less stuff.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

If I work harder and better than you I deserve more stuff. That's equality. Those who understand it differently have had the meaning of the word corrupted.

[–]Endorsed ContributorTheeRyanGrey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and that's the point: the past 2-3 generations, 45 years worth, have been inundated and brainwashed with theis type of thinking.

It's a Brave New World

[–]malignantbacon 7 points8 points  (10 children)

You're over-complicating it. The classically liberal ideal of equality refers to equality of opportunity. Nuance is lost when people don't think about their principles and this allows people to start referring to equality of outcome, which is where the authoritarian left starts to dig in its claws.

[–]RubikTetris 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Lol youre the one overcomplicating things

[–]Hoodwink 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're saying the same thing as he did, but you're using some recent buzzwords.

I like his version better because it is universal and draws upon some classic utopian/dystopian stories. It is easily digestible and gets the same exact point across.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Incorrect. The liberal ideal is equality of OUTCOMES. The rational right ideal is equality of OPPORTUNITY.

[–]malignantbacon 10 points11 points  (1 child)

You either didn't read or didn't understand my comment. "CLASSICAL" is the operative word. There are more types of liberal than the simplified left/right axis most people consider, way back in the times of the Greeks and the Romans "liberal" did not mean the same thing it's used for now.

[–]Corndog_Enthusiast 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why not just start off with that then? What you wrote above is half rhetoric.

[–]1Entropy-7[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The complicated things further by introducing formal equality and substantive equality. The latter basically means giving everyone opportunities that lead to equal outcomes.

[–]choomguy 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I think liberals believe in equality of both opportunity and outcome. And I'm pretty sure that's how they define "fair". Which unfortunately is all very flawed. So for example they think everyone should have the opportunity to be in a combat role, they lower the standards for some, then when they get killed disproportionately, something is wrong so it needs to be made fair.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

no, you can't have both equality of opportunity and outcome unless you're dealing with identical actors. If all actors are identical then equal opportunity will give you equal outcome over the long haul.

A typical example would be women comprising 10% of STEM fields. So, you first determine this to be arbitrarily "bad" and then you decide to put in encouragements by giving scholarships based on gender with a floor of 50% women. On day one this means that a woman has 10 times the opportunity of a man in terms of this type of scholarship at the bottom line. The goal being to even the outcomes.

Except that it doesn't do anything because women are not failing to enter STEM because of lack of financing. If money was what they were thinking about then they would be entering. It's not fulfilling to most of them so they don't go in. No amount of throwing money at them will make them change what they think is a fulfilling career.

[–]hunkerd0wn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. This is exactly how I feel.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (2 children)

Did....did you just post a dank meme in TRP and get away with it? BRAVO SIR.

[–]BowlOfCandy[S] 22 points23 points  (1 child)

Straight from The_Donald my fellow centipede

[–]RedMoonAscendant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...centipede? I think I missed some memo.

[–][deleted] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Ex firefighter here. Having worked countless emergency scenes, unless a female has received specific training in how to deal with emergency situations I have found it a universal truth that during emergencies women AT BEST are in the way. At worst they react/ overreact in totally the wrong way.

[–]ramaga 220 points221 points  (13 children)

I hope that young lady is okay. I really do. But, let me address the elephant in the room. (Hint: I just did.)

[–]Hughtub 163 points164 points  (2 children)

Umm, it's the current year. Obesity is now healthy or some bullshit.

[–]Dopebear 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Excuse at every fact? Oh oops, health at every size.

[–]2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I would address the elephant in the room, but she covers about 6 postcodes

[–]flyercomet 13 points14 points  (5 children)

To me that looked like fainting from hypoglycemia. She may be diabetic.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (3 children)

More likely vasovagal syncope

They had to be standing there for a long time. Hypoglycemia would hit you in other ways first. She would become weak, exhausted, and confused that she would have needed to sit down long before fainting.

Vasovagal syncope will hit you all of a sudden.

[–]upupvote2 6 points7 points  (2 children)

From memory this why they suggest standing with slight bent knees. Something about blood flow being blocked when you're standing straight up and you're knees are in a locked position.

[–]speed3_freak 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yep. Grandpa said people used to do that to get out of PT on really hot days when he was in Korea.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

yes it's true that standing upright and not moving a long time can cause this. Doesn't help that she's fat as fuck because it requires a lot higher blood pressure to pump through all that meat.

[–]showhadoing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably not. She'd likely be displaying other symptoms before actually passing out. I was thinking dehydration, they're at a rally probably with limited access to water, she's been standing there for an hour or two and maybe it's hot and she's fat so she sweats a lot. And I can infer from her weight she probably "hydrates" with sugar water, like coke and gatoraid, and I bet she's usually fairly dehydrated.

[–]hhamama66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"STOP OPPRESSING ME!!!"

proceeds to eat an entire family sized bag of potato chips

[–]aDrunkenWhaler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Burst out in laughter over this. Good one, sir.

[–]malthuswaswrong 55 points56 points  (14 children)

The genetic reason for this is men are not valuable to reproduction. Any man will do. A colony of 100 women an 1 man can survive. A colony of 1 woman and 100 men is doomed.

Women have evolved to stay safe. Men have evolved to protect women. Tribes that didn't follow this rule didn't survive to the modern age.

[–]no_face 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I have lost the reference to the research, but someone once determined that only 20% of the males in each generation need to survive to repopulate the next generation with sufficient genetic diversity to avoid birth defects.

Historically 80% of women reproduced but only 40% of men did.

[–]devilkingx2 3 points4 points  (7 children)

um... 1 man and 100 women isn't very workable either

[–]disposable_me_0001 10 points11 points  (6 children)

If there was 1 man and only 100 women left in the universe, they'd find a way to make it work.

[–]devilkingx2 1 point2 points  (4 children)

lots of inbreeding will eventually result though

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Sure, but this is about survival, not the optimization of a species.

[–]devilkingx2 0 points1 point  (2 children)

i think a few generations of inbreeding would render the whole species sterile and they'd all die out anyway, not a scientist here though

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Do you have any sources to show how true that is?

I thought the biggest problem was susceptibility to a single factor or disease that affects the entire population due to not enough genetic diversity.

Like if everyone left on earth was a ginger, and some bacteria made your skin ultra super sensitive to skin cancer, enough that it kills all gingers.

[–]devilkingx2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well i just googled it, supposedly you'd only need 80 men and 80 women to repopulate the earth

http://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask113

[–]Redasshole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends, if they are feminists they might chop his dick off to free themselves and the future generations from male oppression.

Oops

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

A clan of 100 women and 1 man will be raided by a clan that has more than 20 men. Their women will be raped and the genes of the 20 males will reproduce, while that 1 man will be killed.

A clan still needs men to thrive.

[–]theDarkAngle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would revise the numbers to be 500 women and 100 men so that it actually is plausible, but I think the point is that the other clan is all dead. In fact, some of your 500 women probably came from that other clan, perhaps with some sons that will come of age in the next few years, if you can accept them and avoid the whole infanticide angle.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean a clan with more than 2 men?

[–]putin_vor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A colony of 100 women and 1 man cannot survive. Not enough genetic diversity.

[–]Endorsed Contributorcholomite 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Women and feminists can preach about how we are all equal, but in any high stress situation that causes us to react instinctually the truth comes out. Natural law is ingrained in our DNA. Men handle shit in stressful situations, we are better at it and women's deep brain realizes this and they instinctually step aside or look to men to react. Even the most ardent feminist will revert to looking for a man's reaction in a situation that invokes an instinctual response. You can't shut off millions of years of evolution because you read an article or a tumblr post.

[–]Endorsed ContributorInvalidity 103 points104 points  (60 children)

To be fair, I would prefer women to stay out of matters where they may potentially compromise the situation more than it already has been.

And besides, I would prefer women to be passive, rather than actively trying to meddle in every single affair. Aggressiveness in women is the reason that we have the plague that is known as feminism.

[–]colucci 190 points191 points  (15 children)

Why do we evacuate women and children first?

So men can think of a solution in peace.

Haha I'll be here all night folks!

[–]fokum8 16 points17 points  (14 children)

That's one of the best jokes I've heard

[–]colucci 27 points28 points  (13 children)

It's a shit stirring joke. Use it sparingly.

[–]1lurkingtacopiller 9 points10 points  (11 children)

Yeah, definitely can't use that anywhere I frequent (university, kill me).

[–]thrway1312 3 points4 points  (6 children)

If you're in STEM there are some areas where women virtually never appear; in my experience the electronics lab and machine shop are a non-mandated albeit virtually women-free zone. Coincidentally they are the only areas on campus in which I can make crude jokes (such as /u/colucci's) with virtually no repercussions.

[–]1lurkingtacopiller 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Even then, the number of white knights and feminist assholes that exist still scare the shit out of me. I feel like I'm one hilarious joke away from being reported to the campus authorities for insensitivity or some bullshit (I wish I was exaggerating).

[–]thrway1312 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel you. I'm sure there's a few betas in there that would jump at the opportunity to drag me down but that's why you have to test the waters over time and as soon as a new face is present, drop it back down.

As my dad taught me from his corporateland experience: let others demonstrate their shit talking first, then you both know you're on the same level.

[–]eccentricrealist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, I'm glad that shit doesn't go down as much in Mexico. I'm the generation's cynic, and it's awesome.

[–]colucci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of my best friends grew up to be a fiery SJW. We radically disagree with eachother on pretty much every political issue, but we grew up together so we respect eachother. Anyway, it happened that I went out quite a bit with her and her little gang of feminists.

Frankly, if you make it obvious that it's a joke and you flaunt your anti-SJW reputation in a playful manner, you can say very dire shit around feminists.

YMMV though. Some of them were great despite their weird views and I still hang with them. Others were ultra feminist and ended up hating my guts. But who cares, fuck em.

[–]hhamama66 0 points1 point  (2 children)

My English professor can't seem to go a day without subtly mentioning the patriarchy or the oppression of women. She constantly exaggerates stories of her childhood and how her mother was abusive, and her dad was a dick, and her sister is an oppressive conservative Christian.

[–]Redasshole 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Nowadays, teachers tell girls to suck dicks and to piss on the word "virtue".

God, what have the world become?

[–]hhamama66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what happens when kids listen to liberal adults make fun of conservatives as if they're somehow a bunch of deranged children. Women are more depressed than ever, and men are checking out of society more often, so maybe just maybe, free sex and teaching guys to be more feminine while at the same time teaching women to be more masculi-excuse me, I meant empowering didn't turn out to be so good at all. Maybe, the "strong independent mothers who don't need a man" feminists have been shoving down our throats aren't capable of creating functional members of society. So maybe, it's time to go back to conservative ways of thinking and start thinking about the family rather than our selfish short term desires.

[–]Endorsed ContributorMarsupian 22 points23 points  (38 children)

We are different in a good, complementary way. Its disgusting how regressives want to erase this beautiful duality.

[–]1EarthExile 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I second this. I work in a catering kitchen and there's nothing worse than when the flock decides they need to have input on something or god forbid, "help" me with my work.

[–]MakeEmSayAyy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

first 15 minutes spent deciding how to decide who gets to talk first

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

Jesus, how many new endorsed are there lately?

I thought I had all you marked, but lately theres just tons of ya

[–]Endorsed ContributorInvalidity 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I've been endorsed for over a year.

[–]fokum8 8 points9 points  (1 child)

They're clearly reacting first so they can molest her while she's down!

[–]Endorsed ContributorUrsusG 28 points29 points  (5 children)

To be fair, the woman with the short hair on the right is the first to react and grabs the fatso trying to stop her from falling.

The men are second in order to notice her falling, and react.

The women on the left are last to notice that something's happened, and by that time there are already 4 guys standing around Moby Dick's carcass.

If I were late to notice the event like those women were, I'd have stood still too. No need to make a crowd, and four people helping is enough.

I know op is eager to see the world through his newly acquired red lens, but this is not the best example.

[–]ddy4sissy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pfft she reached out to giver her a little comfort. But she was damn careful not to drop her little flag.

[–]the_trp_dude 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I've been thinking about this since that video of the olympic lifter made the rounds: https://www.instagram.com/p/BDg28psw1E8/

Better angle: https://www.instagram.com/p/BDhFkO2Q1Os/

Also, DadReflexes in particular this: https://i.imgur.com/8RQtRcc.gifv

[–]code5fun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That reaction was completely illogical, like what was going to stop that thing from rolling? Her praying? And the dadreflex too, she was sitting right next to the baby. You can see how big the differences are.

[–]Lyradex 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I always liked this clip of the dolphins beaching themselves and all the people watching immediately helping.

Wait, I meant, all the men help. The women just stand there and watch. https://youtu.be/ekmMD8oYtJ0

As with life, men do, women don't.

[–]showhadoing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EMT and long-time lurker here.

EMS and to a point medicine in general (there are many nurses, mostly female, who freak out when shit hits the fan and become useless but that's more or less few and far between) attracts a variety of female that is very hands-on, and can take the lead and have a steady hand. Not ALL women have the dear-in-headlights reaction these females demonstrated.

I'd also point out that the female who fainted appears morbidly obese and probably has a myriad of health issues associated with that, especially considering she's no spring chicken. Passing out like that certainly should be checked up on, but rarely constitutes an emergency, unless she hit her head or otherwise hurt herself falling, or if she doesn't regain consciousness in the next minute or so. I bet standing for an hour or two watching that speech is more exercise than she's had in months, and her body couldn't handle it. She could also be dehydrated, seeing as she's at a rally where she has less access to water, and she's overweight so she probably mostly drinks sugar water aka coke.

What's really interesting to me is most the Bernie supporters I meet are very beta, usually college kids, feminist white-knight types. It was surprising to see a few of them jump in and take the lead like that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Human Beings vs Human Doings

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

[–]AzzyMcGee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people are new, some people NEED TRP to be justified.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 9 points10 points  (32 children)

We are not necessarily better

Actually we are better by any conceivable metric that you care to name.

[–]FinallyRed 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Women are better at Machiavellianism and navigating social landscapes, at least insinctually. If you've got that going for you why would you need to be good at anything else? It's practically essential being the weaker and more vulnerable sex to be able to leverage the skills and labor of others.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Would you like your wife to be as courageous as you? If your wife and your child are in danger without you, would you rather that she run and escape or confront and fight?

The point is to say that often times the good qualities in women are bad qualities in men, and vice versa.

[–]Swanksterino -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I would expect her to eat the baby and keel over.

Edit: Da fuq you idiots downvoting?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (5 children)

I hate when dudes on trp try that "they're not inferior, just different. Don't hold them to mans standards" BS.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 7 points8 points  (4 children)

It's purple pill weakness.

I believe in equality of opportunity and equality of rights. But equality of skill/quality/ability/value... "same but different" requires a lot of hamstering and is provably untrue.

Different can never be equal in the sense it is meant. Just can't be done. Some traits are just more important than others.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

And yet every time I say shit like that, I'm called an angerphaser. Makes no sense when I'm down voted for saying the same shit ECs agree with. Must be the EC tag.

I agree. Everyone has the same opportunity. I don't believe women should have the same rights as men. In my opinion, if women aren't completely subject to male authority and superiority at all times (e.g. Islam), a culture will break down. The civilization cannot thrive. Male Superiority-Centric patriarchy is the best bet for any civilization. I believe women's ambition should be ignored, and they need to be raised as housekeepers/reproducers. Bout it. And totally. Nobody on this earth is equal, and women will never be equal to men. They're the inferior gender for a reason.

[–]MakeEmSayAyy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And Europe is proving you right every day. They let their women run amok and have committed cultural sepuku.

[–]NotUpToAnythingGood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm all for equal under the law, equal in standing (as a person) in society. Those are basic civil liberties and such there.

Equal in capability? Capacity? Merit? Outcome? Pay?

It's impossible to equalize those as they are individual traits governed by education, skills, interests, aptitudes, and choices. You cannot equalize them.

There's a story from a long time ago I read that talked to everyone being equal. It was written by Kurt Vonnegut. The story title is Harrison Bergeron. I suggest people read it to see what an 'equal society' could look like.

I would much prefer an egalitarian society driven by merit; a society where differences are celebrated for the uniqueness they bring. We should enjoy the colors of the rainbow instead of mixing them all together into a drab grey.

Yes, I know I mixed colors for lights and paints. Deal with it.

[–]WeHaveIgnition 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I am going to try to think of something. Hang on I'm going to google a bunch of shit.

[–]G4RRETT 0 points1 point  (16 children)

Comments like this, especially from a "TRP endorsed" user, are the reason everyone thinks this sub is misogynistic. Just think about it before getting all defensive please.

edit: changed chauvinistic to misogynistic

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Chauvinism: 1) exaggerated or aggressive patriotism, 2) excessive or prejudiced support for one's own cause, group, or sex.

If in fact we can point to many (as in the majority) of traits where men are objectively better, is it still 'excessive or prejudiced' or simply stating a fact?

Feminists are, and always have been, chauvinists by this definition, with little to no justification, yet they call us (and in fact all men) chauvinists. Pot, meet kettle. Personally, I don't care if they call me a chauvinist, or sexist, or misogynist. None of these petty insults holds any sting.

[–]G4RRETT 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The point is we, as a subreddit and group, should be discussing issues men face and strategies to help us, not spouting out how men are so much better than women. I mean come on.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we are not that far apart, in that there are some stupid things said recently which conform neither to reality nor red pill theory generally, and it helps nobody. However, taking the red pill is about facing reality, whether it is popular, approved by women, liked by us, whatever. Because to be effective in a situation it helps to have a clear and accurate understanding.

If we say that men and women are 'equal', not just in a political or legal sense, but in all senses, this is just delusional. Two different things cannot be 'equal'. How does it make sense to do some sort of calculus of things men are better at, things that women are better at, things where there is no sex difference, and somehow come to the conclusion that it all exactly balances out? This isn't putting women on a pedastal (above us), but it is seeing them as better than they are.

So, I see that men are, on average, better at physical things requiring strength or speed (but somewhat worse at those requiring fine motor control/small fingers), have more high-end intelligence people (but the average is only a couple of points better), better able to control our emotions, more loyal to our friends and partners, better at creating business in the small scale, and civilizations at the large scale, have a better developed sense of justice, and I can go on.

Perhaps you can come up with a balancing range of thing that women are better at, because I really struggle to find it.

So the point is, saying men are 'better' than women on the whole seems to be to be acknowledging objective reality, and not excessive. Given that this is the reality, it effects our strategies, eg in having no qualms about saying that men should lead in a relationship.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 6 points7 points  (7 children)

You are fast to criticise me, but slow to think of counter-examples to my point.

[–]G4RRETT -2 points-1 points  (6 children)

can't believe I even have to make this argument, but on an individual level, there are plenty of women who are better than men at particular things. Example: Ronda Rousey can totally kick my ass. She's a superior fighter to most men on earth. Serena Williams is a better tennis player than most men on earth. Stop generalizing entire groups, look at the individual.

And to respond with something that women as a group are better at than men: Manipulation. And that counts for A LOT.

As a subreddit we should be discussing men's issues and strategies to help, not just spouting off about how much better men are than women. Come on.

[–]RedMoonAscendant 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You actually came close. You should have stuck to the "manipulation" angle. Or, just pick any number of things that are proven:

  • Women are quicker to move on after a tragic mate-death.
  • Women are more social and quicker to come up with group solutions to problems.
  • Women are the most mature teenagers in a given group.

Admittedly, MattyAnon is implying "any metric I would want someone to be better at," but you could pretend not to notice that and still do okay.

[–]cashmoney_x 0 points1 point  (2 children)

can't believe I even have to make this argument

Well, I can't believe I have to make this argument: Individual exceptions do not speak to the larger rule.

You just clucked like a hen but said nothing.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

TRP IS CHAUVINISTIC. Fuck what people think. Chauvinism is just seeing women how they are. Men > Women.

[–]G4RRETT 0 points1 point  (1 child)

women are far better at manipulation, and that counts for a hell of a lot.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

+1 true that. What else?

[–]DaphneDK 1 point2 points  (1 child)

What does it matter what everyone thinks? Let them think its misogynistic. So what? Fuck them.

[–]G4RRETT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, I want more people to understand this sub and not think it's just a bunch of misogynists.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We are very clearly better. I hate all this "were different" bs on top. MEN > Women. Yes, we are different. Men are also superior. Superior and different.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

[–]TheRedStoic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The only exception is if the crowd alpha drops.

Women will come running, screaming, crying, but doing nothing useful for miles.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]DaphneDK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Hard to say who is most ugly when they're all rather ugly.

    [–]Spidertech500 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    The only time Bernie Sanders will ever appear on this subreddit

    [–]RedSugarPill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Unless he gets elected. Then there will be a flood of blue-pill examples right up to the supreme court.

    [–]1nzgs 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    I agree with your point but I would hardly describe the "men" at a Sanders rally of being adventurous capitalists. More often than not they are highly estrogenic, effeminate, sensitive, cowardly, and stuck in academia or government jobs.

    [–]MakeEmSayAyy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    and even these numales did something while the women didnt

    [–]Pastelitomaracucho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    m-maybe you are over-analyzing, mang....

    All I can see is that all women in the gif are fucking fat

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    All the women were like "aww hell no I can't pick that chick up!"

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    MEN> WOMEN

    Women absolutely should be dichotomized like this. Mother Hen Career Whore (You know, most career women) who takes too much pride in her own opinion and demands her co-captainship should be punished. She is mentally diseased with penis envy, like most feminists.. Women are not equal and when we say they are "different" lets get real, that is just a euphemism for inferior. There's nothing wrong in admitting this. They are as a whole less intelligent, unethical, irrational and incapable of reciprocating love with an adult male. They know this. We know this. Yet somehow we continue to give these grown up-children a seat at the table. Why?

    [–]BAMbaca 3 points4 points  (10 children)

    Umm the lady on the right that try's to stop her from falling is the first to react...

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 25 points26 points  (6 children)

    She reacts a tiny little bit, then stands around helplessly while others dive in.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    Yeah, what can she do? A bunch of other men got there first, eager to help.

    [–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    That didn't stop the man from 3 rows back.

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    I mean, this is one example. It's hardly representative.

    But there is little doubt that in this case, the guys are wayyyyyy more helpful than the women.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Moneyley 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      She's just empowered, you seem intimidated.

      *Fuck, I couldnt write you that without laughing

      [–]autoNFA 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      Or they can see, accurately, that the men are handling it and that there's no slack to pick up. That's a heavy woman who just fainted. It's better for men to help rather than women in this scenario. Men are more capable here, and these women know it.

      [–]jasonmiles2014 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Did she faint or did her knees just finally say, "Fuck this."?

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Not just 'here', I don't think they were standing there logically calculating her body mass, they just didn't react. Meanwhile, the guys immediately jumped in. You say 'the men were handling it', but I think the point is the men went in to handle it. In that same moment the women could have too, but that was not their instinctive reaction. The woman to her right did try to grab her (ineffectually), but other than the black guy to her left all the people closest to her were women, yet it was men who got in there.

      It isn't a great example, but the initial split second response to a situation like this is quite telling. Of course, if there were no men there, the women would have stepped forward and helped; I think it was the fact that there were men present that caused them to hold back and let the men handle it, which is telling in itself.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Lol, all I could think about were parades. There was always a 100 pound girl in each one who would pass out, because they didn't eat breakfast, and didn't wiggle their toes.

      You think we would be good at standing for an hour. Some guys would too, usually because they were hung the fuck over from a night of drinking.

      Women = Man post drunk hangover.

      [–]Caucasian-African 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This is one of my pet peeves. Anytime I get light-headed, I squat down. This increases blood pressure, and I feel better in a few seconds... Doesn't everyone know this? It happens to me a few times each year, and I've never fallen over like that.

      Oh, and you're right, I'm amazed that the women did nothing inspite of their being the "more empathetic" sex...

      [–]quelques_heures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Men are adventurers, capitalists, risk-takers and entrepreneurs. Women are passive, socialists, insecure and concerned with safety.

      This is the fallacy of feminism. Men not only conquer but are expected to conquer. They're the ones that have to put their lives on the line when the wolf is at the door, while the women and children are safe and protected.

      [–]jamesbond0512 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Well then we have that one on a million woman that reacts and the other women want to take pride in her.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Same thing on a youtube video that will be the top hit if you search there for

      dolphin rescue.

      There are many beached dolphins and the women sit around with their hand to their mouth or taking pics while the men immediately save the whole pod. Some women in the comments actually notice this as well and call the women out.

      [–]Icohunter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This is exactly right, there's a reason men evolved to be larger and stronger. We are supposed to be the pack leaders and be a step above women, its not sexism just the natural order!

      [–]Ericgzg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Let's be fair, all the people closest and adjacent to her were men. The women who were closest looked concerned but probably figured (rightly) that any more people "helping" would just amount to extra people in the way. We're not feminists here its ok to be reasonable in our assessments of women.

      [–]ghee99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Actually, it does look like the woman next to her tried to help her as she was falling (although as the woman next to her was a sort of butch lesbian type, perhaps it was her manly side that caused to want act in a helpful was to a woman in distress)

      [–]nevva_Again -5 points-4 points  (3 children)

      We are not necessarily better, for lack of a better word, but we are different. VERY different.

      WE ARE BETTER.

      Who are you scared of?

      Its true that we are different, but we are better.

      Even women women agree that men are better.

      [–]psychocutiepie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      What is your evidence for this?

      [–]BowlOfCandy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Men are most definitely better leaders, but I cannot agree that we are better in all regards.

      We are better than them the same way the King is better than the Queen, but you can't accurately claim that the King is better than the Queen at every facet of life.

      load more comments (5 replies)