Red Pill TheoryDon't buy a rental car (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by [deleted]

You work at a car rental place, at an international airport. You go to work every day, do your thing, but there's been one car you've had your eye on.

It gives a twinkle in your eye. It's shiny, when you drive it round, it purrs. It seems to be everything you ever wanted.

You'd never buy it though. It's got roughly 180,000k's on it. Since it was a design on a piece of paper to where it is now, it's been through hell and back. You've seen people rent it, throttle it, seen it serviced countless times for ongoing issues. It breaks down when you need it most, and you don't know what will go wrong with it next.

Don't buy a rental car. Don't marry a woman with a high partner count. You know everyone has had a good throttle with her, and you don't know what will go wrong next.

[–]maadkekz 220 points221 points  (47 children)

Don't marry. Period.

Marriage is an antiquated tradition that predates feminism and female sexual empowerment. If you get married in 2016 yuk deserve everything that is coming to you.

[–]MeLlamoBenjamin 86 points87 points  (25 children)

Just to clarify, you're talking about legal marriage and its associated risks in 2016, not pair-bonding or cohabitation, right? What if I want kids? In all seriousness, every study on earth shows that a stable male-female pair in their life is ideal for human development. Avoiding legal marriage, keeping finances separate....all that, I'm on board with. But if you toss out pair-bonding because good partners are hard to find, our species is going to go the way of the dodo.

At least that's where I'm at, right now. Anyone have thoughts?

[–]remyseven 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree that America is one of the worst places to get married - what with divorce economy being a real thing. But, as you get older and stop being a testosterone/estrogen sexually liberated kid (abortions and condoms afford us ZERO responsibility and so we act like it) you start to figure your life out and that may involve another person that not always includes a revolving door. Cohabitat and be sure you're on the same page about having kids or not. But beware of common law in your state.

[–]maadkekz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course. Whilst I cohabitate with my own LTR, I've made it clear to her that there will be no joint accounts etc and any children will carry my own family name, not hers.

It's possible to find common ground, live together and be happy without a bit of paper that, these days, isn't worth the paper it's printed on...except to happily divorced women with full or partial custody of children, who are free to get back on the CC and start 'living' again.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Cohabitation can work, as long as you're aware of the increased challenge and increased risks. You're going to struggle to maintain an alpha frame when she sees you every day, and dread game becomes that much more difficult.

If you're a veteran and you know what you're doing, it's potentially worth the risks, especially if you're considering children. Be mindful that in some places (like Canada), cohabitation is for all intents and purposes marriage, and just as shitty.

[–]1james-watson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

as long as you're aware of the increased challenge and increased risks.

What in god's name have we come to. Men used to take challenges and risks by pushing the boundaries of human achievement. Now we take risks by engaging with the feminist industrial complex.

No thank you. I'll save my risk taking for things that matter. Things which transcend our primate origins, not succumb to them.

A sad state of affairs when such thinking becomes the accepted norm.

[–]joshbeoulve 23 points24 points  (15 children)


Even this is a bad idea. I was too beta to see this before, but cohabitation negative effect on a relationship overall. It breeds over-familiarity and consequently increases resentment, kills your mystery factor, and overall gives you too many chances to break frame.

[–]MeLlamoBenjamin 59 points60 points  (5 children)

You do understand that reproduction is sort of essential to a biological species' survival, right? You can't define a code of ethical oughts that lead to all the best men's genetic material dying on the vine. That would be a failure.

I don't really care about indefinite maintenance of frame if it comes at the cost of a good setting to raise offspring.... I'm trying to have kids who, themselves, have the best chance for success in life. We're a pair-bonding species, and while cultural Marxists may be doing their best to unravel that, I don't need to participate in that. TRP is descriptive of the world we live in, not necessarily prescriptive.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 21 points22 points  (2 children)

You do understand that reproduction is sort of essential to a biological species' survival, right?

You do understand that you are not here to serve evolution, right?

You can't define a code of ethical oughts that lead to all the best men's genetic material dying on the vine. That would be a failure.

Who said anything about ethics? This is about what's good for you. Minimize your risk and maximize your happiness.

If the society you live in collapses because it is too short-sighted to incentivize men to be productive, that isn't your fault.

If evolution fails to find balance between success of an organism and success of a species, why would you give a runny shit? It takes generations for these kinds of consequences to impact at the genetic level. Your great-great-great-great grand children won't live to see it.

We're a pair-bonding species, and while cultural Marxists may be doing their best to unravel that, I don't need to participate in that.

This is true. But you need to be mindful of women's nature. Hypergamy isn't a product of cultural Marxism - it's a product of the same process that led to our pair bonding instincts. And while both are programmed in to us, in the end a woman's hypergamy will always outlive her motivation to stay put.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 14 points15 points  (0 children)


Evolution is a description of what happens, not a set of ethical imperatives.

The universe does not come with instructions. There's no set of goals carved in tiny letters on neutrons, or woven out of vast ribbons of galaxies that make up the Sloan Great Wall.

If you want existence to have a point, you gotta pick it yourself. If your choice makes you unhappy, then it's you who screwed up.

[–]joshbeoulve 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I agree completely on the importance of a raising kids within the context of a cohesive father-mother family unit. My point was meant to be a cautionary admonition against cohabitation for its sake which a lot of the plugged-in and recently unplugged are prone to making (myself included).

[–]Eliteknives 14 points15 points  (6 children)

So youre saying it sucks to know the real you

[–]new_alpha 21 points22 points  (3 children)

Sucks to see that you are not alpha 24 hours a day

[–]antariusz 32 points33 points  (2 children)

No one is. Thankfully you don't have to be 100% all alpha all the time for a LTR. Like 80% alpha, 20% beta (applied at only appropriate times) works just fine.

Like if you're a dick to a girl pms'ing, you're just going to create drama, but if you do the same thing literally one week later, her panties will be wetter than niagara falls. Learning to identify when and where to apply different techniques was the key to me to maintaining control in my relationships. I used to use a period tracker, now I don't even need to. I think most guys can as well with enough training of what to look for.

If you've been with your girl for a few months, you'll be more attracted to her and you may not even be able to pinpoint why when she's ovulating. Once your default mode is being a dick, it just is so much easier in life.

[–]new_alpha 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The thing is, I am a dick, a complete emotionless motherfucker to girls (this is not who I am inside, but this is how I appear to girls, I just avoid showing any emotion to them and get really cold naturally) AFTER I am in a relationship with a girl. Before that I am a "beta" in a lot of ways. This really fucking sucks. If only it was the other way around.

[–]joshbeoulve 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nah man, I'm saying that when she lives with you there's absolutely no way you'll end up on top no matter how alpha you are. She will find a way to nitpick and nag and add more drama into your life in an attempt to grab frame. In fact, by agreeing to live with her you already relinquish frame to an extent.

I think this sums it up more eloquently than I can.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not sure why you're getting downvoted, this is an intelligent point.

[–]1Entropy-7[🍰] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Legal marriages - for all their instability - are far more stable than common law arrangements or similar things. You are upping the ante but it is less likely that you will separate.

You can have a prenup or cohabitation agreement to deal with your mutual finances but those documents don't address child custody and support. I have heard of something called a "parenting plan" which, supposedly, you can file with some government office but I have no idea about what they are specifically, where they are allowed, and how enforceable they are.

The issue for me will come to a head in the next year because after that - at age 50 - I either have kids or I don't. If not, then marriage has no point as far as I am concerned.

[–]useyourmouth 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Divorce rates for women with a 0 notch count are extremely low. The problem is, they shoot up exponentially if she has had even one or two partners. Then, the rate basically doubles again for rental car hoes (7+ notch count).

If your personal definition of happiness is marriage with kids, the stats say you have a good chance of having a divorce-free, more traditional-type marriage if you find a more traditional-type girl (0 notch), hold frame, and maintain badass status throughout your marriage. Good luck finding a zero-notch-count girl in the current year, though.

[–]askmrcia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

don't really care about indefinite maintenance of frame if it c

Sounds impossible. Finding a girl with 0 notch?

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you toss out pair-bonding because good partners are hard to find

No one is tossing it out. Modern women have and the alterations we have made to society for them have made it impossible. Male intentions are irrelevant. The entirety of western civilization has made it so that women feel no consequences for jumping from cock to cock. In such of an environment, they will NEVER abide by the fundamental cornerstone of pair bonding--female devotion to a single male in return for commitment and resources. They don't have to, so their instincts to improve their resource situation will drive them from branch to branch.

It is over. Enjoy the decline.

[–]satanicpriest13 25 points26 points  (14 children)

Marriage is obsolete in current year. I mean come on. Feminism killed it. There is no need to get married anymore, in fact marriage is a high risk gamble with no returns. You can enjoy women in this day and age with money, looks, and game. You can still have a kid without sighing your life away.

[–]EmergencyVolunteer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I can't tell if that is a typo or not - either way is accurate though!

[–]maadkekz 5 points6 points  (9 children)

My sentiments exactly. If you draw up a simple Pro/Con table for marriage, I'll wager you would struggle to put anything in the 'Pro' column.

Seriously, can anyone think of any pros to marriage these days?

[–]Short-changedChad 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The ONLY pro for getting married in this day and age is that your wife and future offspring might bear your name, but this is hardly assured depending on the woman you choose.

This is of particular importance to me as I am the last surviving male of my lineage. Not sure how to tackle that one yet to be honest, but it won't be by getting married.

[–]maadkekz 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I'm in the same boat. Find a girl who is willing to accept her role (they do exist), and, when the time comes for children, you won't need to explain a thing.

Most Western women are aware that children inherit the father's name, as has been tradition for millennia in human society.

The trick is to avoid those with any inclination towards feminism. I remember the story in the front page a while ago now of the guy who took his female finance's family name; he was getting patted on the back by the SJWs...

[–]Short-changedChad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recall that guy. It made me ill.

That is the trick, however issues are encountered when you want the mother of your children to be intelligent, educated, and from an emotionally and financially stable family. These types of girls are more often than not encoraged into tertiary education and subsequently a career. This leads them to lean towards some feminist ideology or another even if they aren't rampant SJWs. I suppose sufficient levels of dread are the best course of action.

[–]Redasshole 4 points5 points  (4 children)

But bro, you save money when you get married !

(the most common reason why girls say to their boyfriend they should get married, hilarious!)

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

How in the flying fuck do people actually think this, when the ceremony, ring and reception alone cost thousands of dollars?

[–]Redasshole 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Well, in my country you pay less taxes when you are married.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

True, but if/when divorce happens, you pay through the nose in many cases.

[–]Redasshole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course.

bot bot bot bot bot bot bot

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, they say tax benefits. Although if you are making good money, it's not really going to make a crazy difference.

[–]SudoAptGetMeASammich 0 points1 point  (1 child)


What is this?

[–]satanicpriest13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any extreme of one these attributes will allow you to do that. Good on you.

[–]dick_long_wigwam 1 point2 points  (1 child)

"Yuk"? Did your unconscious leak?

[–]maadkekz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the new Telepathic Swype keyboard. It reads my subconscious so it knows what I want to say before I say it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Modern women have lots of incentive to get married but no incentive to be a good wife.

[–]agarmend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen to this guy. Please do it. It will save you shitloads of pain AND money.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 90 points91 points  (4 children)

Don't marry a woman with a high partner count

Don't marry

There, fixed that for ya. Even the new cars harbour desires to be used.

[–]toxicgreencapsules 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Bought a new car, even though the test drive felt good.

Started to hate it after a couple of weeks later, after noticing undesirable behaviours, and lack of specific features.

[–]Moneyley 4 points5 points  (1 child)

you put so much maintenance and hard work on it but sometimes it decides it just doesnt "feel" like turning on.

[–]MakeEmSayAyy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

15 shots ring out and car swerves off for not repaying your debt to me

[–]Starcruiser28 83 points84 points  (40 children)

Don't Marry and don't cohabitate, if you decide to cohabitate do not co mingle funds and each pays their own way and their own bills. This allows you to keep things as room mates in the eyes of the law.

I still say live on your own.

[–][deleted] 102 points103 points  (32 children)

I actually miss cohabiting.. We had separate bank accounts of course, but after a certain age it's nice to have someone there

[–]Moneyley 77 points78 points  (12 children)

pretty ballsy to say something like that here. I wont disagree with you because having sex available at almost any time is great. The problem is that as men, its one of the few things we really ask for in a relationship. So when women claim they are "too tired" or "aren't in the mood" we immediately think "then what tha fuck are you doing here?"

I love me some good company but I've been very happy living by myself these last few years (Im 33 now)

I have nobody to get mad about my bills other than me, I set the temp to what is comfortable for me. I go running then hit the gym. Come home late, read (with no interruptions), sleep very well. Every now and then I can meet up a chick at the bar or txt up a plate and have company. Coming from a typical Mexican family background, there is this stigma that I need to be with somebody. Over 95% of my family is married and so I always get told I need to do the same. Then I see the same women (my family included) bitch at their dude, laugh at them and see how much they can get away with.

The rental car analogy is accurate. You aren't missing anything special

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (7 children)

Big difference between marriage and cohabitation.. The option to leave gives the man most of the power if he's willing to use it..

I never had any major problems. The last one was getting that way, so we parted ways. Course had we been married things would've been ugly

[–]Moneyley 8 points9 points  (6 children)

here in Texas women have legitimate rights to claim you as the husband if you live with them for 6 months (Common law marriage) all she has to do is present you as the husband a few times at family events and you're in. Of course, when she just finished giving you amazing head or you just had a sex romp, the guy is usually "yea yea, im her husband" she elects to ditch you later and she can now use those same people in court against you saying you are married. Kinda fucked up.

Im ok with cohabitation periods here and there, but usually women want marriage shortly after and it dissolves any good friendship between the two. Hope your laws aren't as strict as mine

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Let me make some corrections:

Texas women have legitimate rights to claim you as the husband if you live with them for 6 months

This is not fully correct. to have a common law marriage, you must do three things:

(1) Agree to be married

(2) Live together as husband and wife, and

(3) Told others (hold yourselves out) that you are married.

Texas women cannot just claim you as the husband.

Sources: http://statelaws.findlaw.com/texas-law/common-law-marriage-in-texas.html


[–]1Entropy-7[🍰] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In Canada it is two years and I don't recall it being tested very much in court. The problem is that she will behave wifey and then threaten drama if you shut that shit down, especially in public. I think too many guys just let it slide until the relationship ends and they realize she has been building a case against them and they were complicit in allowing her to do so. Divorce rape ensues.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

No, we do not have common law in my state

[–]a3akbari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No common law marriage in Tennessee either.

[–]Redasshole 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I wont disagree with you because having sex available at almost any time is great

You kidding right? When you begin to live together, the sex frequency drops fast.

[–]Moneyley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on how my comment is taken. I'd like to assume that the girl that gets with me would be down to have sex at any time. If she's not then its time for her to move on. I've had a couple of chicks live with me for a while and am on board with you. The sex usually stops...it stops fast. When they say about how difficult it is to swallow the red pill; I mean sometimes I still find it amazing on how you HAVE to apply dread game just to keep a chick. These same girls that mysteriously dry up after you commit to them, suddenly end up as drenched as the soaked as fuck when they find out you got a side piece or that you've cheated. I've been caught cheating twice, both chicks cried their eyes out.. "how could you do this Juan Thundercock (Im hispanic).. you all are all the same... blah blah blah" then guess what they did at night? Yep... we fucked, they wanted it bad. I never understood why until now. I dont agree with it, absolutely dont agree with doing this, but you have too

[–]JohnnyHammerstickz 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You can tell that we're getting overrrun by BP's when some shit like this gets ~100 upvotes

[–]Moneyley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yea, thats a fuckton. I wasnt expecting that in this community. He got more upvotes in that one comment post than I've gotten as OP on long, thought out pieces. Maybe its because I called his post ballsy, but the truth is, is the only way cohabiting would be good is if the chick is down for fucking at any given time and literally brings zero drama into your place. She agrees with what you watch, when you watch it, how you watch it. She agrees and joins you at the gym, you stay as long as you want, she stays with you. You want to go have a drink with your friends? If she's cool maybe she can join you, if not then she can stay at your place and have some "her" time and when you come home she's ready to please you. If I could find a chick like this, Id have no problem cohabiting, hell, id even pay all the bills, I already do anyways. But, thats why we call them unicorns

[–]knightSwolaire 9 points10 points  (13 children)

Until that person finds you as the next source of resentment

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (7 children)

They did, so I kicked her out.. Like I kicked out the ones before her..

Relationships are a cycle, enjoy the company and help with bills while it lasts then move to the next one

[–]knightSwolaire 2 points3 points  (6 children)

not bad. I wouldn't mind 50/50 rent.. I'd save a shit ton. But I'd lose my independence...

[–]benuntu 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Why would you lose your independence? Only move in with someone you have a lot of trust in, and control over. You are the man of the house and make the rules while they pay rent. Be confident that if things don't work out, they will leave no questions asked and not fuck up your home. It seems obvious to me to say this, but it's surprising how many men allow batshit crazy women into their homes.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Gotta be careful charging rent if your the owner.. I always just told them to pay electric, water, etc.

[–]Starcruiser28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't Marry and don't cohabitate, if you decide to cohabitate do not co mingle funds and each pays their own way and their own bills.

Just make sure they have their own room if they are cohabitating, thus they are room mates not a SO.

[–]intuition25 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I think rent is essential. You never want them to stay with you because it would be more expensive to find their own place. I had a girlfriend do this. I was only charging her $250 rent to be nice. We had a great thing, but moving in together was not working out and I told her that things would probably be better if she had her own place. I overheard her on the phone with a girlfriend saying that she wasn't financially ready to move out. I let it slide. Two months later I had to give her the boot because things were just getting worse. She moved out and our relationship greatly improved. Even she was willing to admit it. It goes to show that women dig in their heels and won't go backwards in commitment. Not without a lot of fuss anyhow.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Charging rent can open up legal and tax issues.. By paying utilities you are not a landlord

[–]ModeratorPaperStreetVilla 9 points10 points  (4 children)

high quality men aren't the kind of people who get resentment.

And if the off chance it happens, they move on and get the next girl who is more than willing to take her place.

funnily enough, knowing that the latter is an option is usually enough to keep a woman acting right

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

While I agree, it should be said that treating relationships with women as terminal is a good idea.

[–]ModeratorPaperStreetVilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

everything is terminal, just bringing it up to speed with the rest IMO

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

I can confirm UHNWIs trend to have that mentality.

They are more likely have family lawyers who prepare prenut and postnut, background check, drug history and blood test to prevent HDN(Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn).

When their girlfriend refuses to sign prenut, she is no longer welcomed in the family. DUI is automatically dump since she has no sense of responsibility, especially she is the one who will raise the next generation where the wealth and the god damn empire will pass on.

edited: grammar

[–]Theophagist 6 points7 points  (1 child)

It is comfortable, too comfortable. I tend to stagnate as a person when domesticated. Having learned my lesson I won't even let a woman leave any of her shit in my place.

[–]nothere_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you break this state of comfort in an LTR.Is there specific material in the sidebar to refer to?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You say that now, but what made you come and stay here at trp?

Cohabitation for me was a huge drain, it turned me into a zombie. The benefits where 100x outweighed by the shit.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Musta just been you. I kept all my hobbies

[–]plein_old 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"I don't like to discuss my marriage, but I will tell you something which may sound corny but which happens to be true. I have steak at home. Why should I go out for hamburger?" —Paul Fucking Newman

Course I think Paul avoided a lot of "beta" behavior patterns. Would be interesting to see a writeup about his marriage from a RP perspective.

"Husbands and wives should have separate interests, cultivate different sets of friends — and not impose one upon the other." —P.N.

[–]downvotesanimals 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Sadly, in some places (such as the province of British Columbia) there are common law limits imposed for cohabitation. 2 years in my case. 2 years of living together and, with no legal agreement in place, she can decide to cheat and take half of your amassed assets from the time you moved in together.

Edit: Lesson is.... sign your cohabitation agreements, kids!

[–]1Entropy-7[🍰] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Or you have to make it clear in public communications that you are covivants rather than spouses. I suspect guys fuck themselves when they add girly to their employer's group insurance or some such thing.

I practiced family law in BC but left a half dozen years ago or so. Judges keep coming up with new legal tests. The statute says "marriage-like relationship" but the courts interpret and reinterpret that so I don't know what the actual test is now.

[–]Magnum256[🍰] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure marriage-like consitutes sharing an address and having any kind of sexual relationship. In BC if you have a girl come live with you for 2+ years, shes getting her mail delivered to the address, all your friends/family know you're "together"/dating (as opposed to her being a rental tenant or something) she can basically sue you and take half your shit when the relationship ends.

[–]2popthatpill 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Men are more reluctant these days to get married, so sure enough, the cuntocracy superstate starts defining marriage downward, to the ludicrous extent that in BC, just cohabiting for two years makes you "married", for some indecipherable reason.

As usual, this is enabled by women voting in the interests of women, and fathers voting in the interests of their daughters. The rest of us get screwed.

[–]dickcomments 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This allows you to keep things as room mates in the eyes of the law.

Woah, there... that's very dangerous to throw around.

About 20% of the United States has common law marriage laws, and what constitutes a common law marriage varies from state to state.

It could be as simple as this: let's say one is stringing a woman along, living with her, and has said they will get married. He has no intent to do so, but that is what he is telling her. This COULD be considered a common law marriage depending on the state.

Another example: one lives with a woman for a set period of time - literally just living - could also be considered a common law marriage.

If you are not going to marry the person, do not live with the person. Period.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)


In fact, on average, researchers found that couples who cohabited before marriage had a 33 percent higher chance of divorcing than couples who moved in together after the wedding ceremony.

[–]dick_long_wigwam 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Enterprise makes more money selling their used cars than they do renting them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha definitely advice to consider

[–]gonorealover 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Don't marry a woman with ...

No. DON'T MARRY . Period.

Stop propagating the idea of marriage . It is a blue pill men's creation. Marriage is not natural or sustainable . It is a blue pill man's naive fantasy . Wishful thinking .

[–]vitringur 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything is natural. Except for the supernatural.

Marriage is an institution as old as civilization.

[–]TokyoXtreme 20 points21 points  (12 children)

What if she's only had one other partner, but he's drilled her over 2,000 times in the ten years they were together?

[–]rubrikTaco 66 points67 points  (1 child)

Certainly better than 2000 partners that have each drilled her once.

  • less chance of STDs
  • considerably less SMV (no validation from 2000 men)
  • considerably less experienced with manipulating guys
  • almost certainly less sex-experienced than someone who's had multiple partners

Being in a relationship for ten years also suggests character traits that lean towards compromise or servitude (both good options for a starting point).

[–]Tim_Pollard 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Heck, it's better than 20 one night stand. It's not how much sex she's had as how many men she's had sex with.

(It might even be better than a single one night stand, assuming that she's the same age, since the fact that she's managed at least one ten year relationship suggests she'll be able to manage moderate term relationships in the future)

[–]aDrunkenWhaler 7 points8 points  (4 children)

A used car sold by the first and only owner has a higher price. Many sellers advertise even if they are the second owners. If you buy it new, you tend to take much better care than if you buy it second-hand, so it ends up in a better condition. The analogy stands.

[–]Tim_Pollard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep, the last time I brought a car the seller went out of his way to clarify that he was only the second owner.

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The average male ejaculates about a teaspoon of semen.

That's 4.9 liters of cum/slut over 1000 guys.

Cum/slut is measured in Amanda which is an SI unit. 1 Amanda = 4.9 litres of cum/slut.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Simple. You just have to be better than him. If you arent, she will never stop putting his dick in her mouth

[–]MuhTriggersGuise 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Marrying is like buying a car that will burn your house down when it comes time to trade it in

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (7 children)

And like a car, they lose value after you finalize your contract with them.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (5 children)

Walking down the aisle and driving it off the lot are pretty similar in that regard. How many stories have you heard where the woman was great up until the wedding?

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (4 children)

What's the food that lowers her libido by 90%?

Her wedding cake.

[–]KartagoPill 2 points3 points  (3 children)

wedding makes women disgust about their hubbies. It's like magic.

[–]Newdist2 20 points21 points  (2 children)

How can a woman be attracted to a man who was dumb enough to marry a whore?

[–]KartagoPill 1 point2 points  (1 child)

so it works like that eh. GIANT SHITTEST.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh snap, wish I thought of that for the original post haha.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can buy one car or rent five at the same time, just up to you.

don't forget cars get old really fast and required lots of cash to maintain. scratch? $500. oil leak? lol $500 for the labor.

Just rent them and give them back once you had enough.

[–]Maximazed 8 points8 points [recovered]

I dig the analogy but I worked for a car rental service and we auctioned them off at around 40k miles.

[–]detachedbymarriage 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Yeah, I get the analogy...its not bad and I don't want to ruin the message he is trying to get across.

But in the literal sense, I have bought a few cars from Enterprise over the years, they tend to be in great shape, 1-2 years old and below 40k miles.
Price is usually better than what a normal dealer lot ask also.

[–]AzN1337c0d3r 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree, rental vehicles from reputable places are some of the best maintained vehicles in the world, they have impeccable service records (but they might not show it to you) not to mention rental companies have the data to pick the most reliable vehicles too.

Unreliable POS cars don't make rental companies money if they spend more time in the garage than they are on the road.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I actually drive a former rental car and it drives like a dream. This analogy came to me because of it...somehow haha

[–]slutfaxadmin 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Have you ever wished that there was a way to check a person's relationship history like we do with vehicle history reports? That way you could find out if a girl is a cheater, liar, or has STDs?

GayLubeOil once talked about such an idea and it got me thinking.

Usually, before two people begin any long term relationship there is an inquiry into the past. Creditors run credit checks. Employers ask for references. Leasers ask about past evictions. In contrast, there is a certain stigma about doing this with regard to sexual relationships. Many men feel uneasy listening to their wife or girlfriend talk about how she got skeeted up by a parade of dudes. Women in general are very sensitive about their reputation and will often avoid the subject with "the past is the past.

The past isn't the past, it's an indicator of the future. Just ask any insurance company. If a person drives around town like he's in a bumper car, his insurer would rightfully consider him a liability. Likewise, if a woman has a string of drunken hookups and short term relationships that pussy is a liability. You wanna be known as that dude whose girlfriend publicly jerked off a marine to Calvin Harris on her girl’s night? No? Then you should probably get the Ho-Facts.

What if I told you such a thing exists? It's called Slutfax.

What is Slutfax?

Slutfax is a user-contributed site where anyone can share the sexual history of a woman. The format of this site is inspired by wikis and textboards. The site has its ideological roots in the Manosphere and Redpill movements.

How do I access Slutfax?

Get the TOR Browser Bundle from the tor project.


Then navigate to slutfaxx5p3m33g5.onion

Signup with an email and password. Currently, you do not need to activate using a verification email (you a fake email if you wish). Just immediately sign in with the password and email you used to sign up.

How do you prevent falsified information?

Users can reply to others posts and verify factual information. It is up to the user to do more investigation based on information contained in dossiers. Nevertheless, an algorithm is in the works that can estimate how trustworthy a user is but it requires a large userbase to be effective.

[–]Kumrag -1 points0 points  (0 children)

deleted What is this?

[–]mehdreamer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I once asked my ex...if she could remember the names of all her sexual partners. She said no way..

I, on the other hand...could remember all their names.

It was a huge red flag...I should have walked away that day.

[–]joshbohorquez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My uncle once said "Buying a rental car is like marrying a women who worked in a brothel"

[–]yayalorde 3 points4 points  (18 children)

Should the reverse be the same? Should a woman not marry a guy who has slept with a bunch of different women?

[–]Newdist2 12 points13 points  (10 children)

She sure will want to fuck him. Preselection at work.

[–]yayalorde -4 points-3 points  (9 children)

I don't know about that. Many of the women I know would think a guy who has slept with a lot of women is gross.

[–]Newdist2 13 points14 points  (8 children)

Are they Amish?

Also... look at what women do, not what they say.

[–]uncommonstupidity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm putting my money on fat

[–]yayalorde -1 points0 points  (3 children)

They aren't Amish lol.

In most of these cases they are married and they are married to guys who did not sleep around much before getting married.

[–]tuzki 2 points3 points  (2 children)

How could you possibly know that

[–]yayalorde -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Because they are the wives of my best friends. I have literally known these guys since we were in the 5th grade and we don't have many secrets between us.

[–]tuzki 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And none of them went to college?

[–]leinaD-Backwards -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

So you're Amish? You won't set up with a woman on a high count but expect them to with you and insult their morals if they don't?

A lot here is true but...what

[–]Newdist2 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Men and women are not the same. Men and women are not attracted to the same things.

Welcome to TRP. Hope you learn something here.

[–]leinaD-Backwards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are laughable. You're going to completely hate your self in a few years time and I hope you remember me saying it when you do

[–]askmrcia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can ask women this question. How many women you know want a guy that's a virgin past 20 years old?

[–]Joseph_the_Carpenter 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What feminists will shrilly state is "double standards" is actually "different standards." Sexual history matters to women and men, but for men the more women you have slept with the better.

[–]yayalorde 0 points1 point  (1 child)

So are you saying that if a guy sleeps with a lot of different women that the women they date won't care and will see that as a positive?

[–]Theophagist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Without a doubt, provided they get the info the right way. Countless field reports demonstrate that when you plow one or two girls in a social group the rest become easy pickings. They will line up to share one alpha rather than enjoy the dogged loyalty of a beta.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Up to the woman. Some could argue that men will value relationships less after being in so many. Could possible not be as interested in average sex when there's a long list to compare it to.

[–]leinaD-Backwards 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This double standard makes me chuckle hard here. The subs good for confidence and job advice but damn.

Last month the top post was about how to keylog your sex interest. Can't get more alpha than that!

But this weird concept that women, who have a brain, two arms and two legs are inferior in everyway and deserve worse just because is crazy. The only reason it wouldn't be crazy is because the crazy women are crazy because of these crazy opinions. Of course women will be on the defensive with preaching like this comparing them to used cars and plates.

Even worse! I've seen posts ragging on successful business women who are undoubtedly fucking good at their job, better than most men. But ohhhhh no, they are there out of pitty etc.

There are just as many dumbbasic bastards as there are bitches. A lot here screams damaged goods.

And a shit analogy, best car I've had is a Volvo 8 previous and 160 on the clock.

[–]voltagenic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is terrible advice.

Firstly, as someone who worked at a car rental company for 3 years at an international airport, I can tell you for a act that not 1 single car rental company would rent out a car with that many miles on it.

It was standard practice for our company to "pull" cars out of our inventory after 25k and then they get resold and are replaced with newer model cars.

Secondly, a rental car is usually always taken care of - regardless of how many people rented it. You must consider that every time it comes back, it is checked by a return agent. If the customer who just rented it brought it back makes any complaints, the car is flagged to be looked at by a mechanic before it is deemed rentable again. Also, all fluids, oil, recalls and regular maintenance is done on time and never skipped. This is key IMO because you can't always say that this is being done on a privately owned car.

TL;DR all rental cars are an investment of the companies that own them, so they take care of them. Once a car shows any sign of age, or starting to have issues, it is usually always pulled for safety and QA. Also, no rental car company I have ever heard of would rent out a 180k car.

[–]PlanB_pedofile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like buying used cars. You can get luxury for cheap. I will never pay New price for a used car. I go by the market value or slightly below value.

The used car will do what i want it to do for a few years. I know it has a lot of miles on it, but hey, a 2 seater convertible sports car with 100k miles in it feels great. It's fun, though i know I won't be able to take it to 200,000 miles.

There's rust on the underbody, and some wear and tear from other owners, but nobody knows that when I'm pulling up.

Thing is, i am rough on cars. I too put a lot of mileage on them. But something i don't do is sink a lot of money back into the car.

When the car starts acting up or breaking down, it's time to trade it in. Sadly I don't get a lot in trade in because I've driven it a lot, but when another used car comes along with less miles than my current one, i make the jump.

Sure i could buy brand new, but there's a huge price to pay on a new car and why pay for premium on something that I will wear out over time when I can just keep cycling used cars?

Guys, spin plates, rotate gals, fuck sluts, but don't keep one for too long. If you can afford a premium for a low partner count young, and able to take care of it for a long time, then go ahead and invest in that. You may need to consider an import. But if you are rough on your rides, I suggest cycle them out and don't forget the discount on used ones. (Easy fucks)

[–]BetterBadIdeas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice metaphor, but literally speaking, used rentals are often damn good buys, as they often spent the vast majority of their "pre owned" life in a lot or parking structure.

[–]harsha_hs 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You could have skipped the last paragraph and this post would have been legend- wait for it - DARY!! LEGENDARRY

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thanks for the input. I definitely considered it, but thought it would just make it relevant to this sub.

[–]harsha_hs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you skipped that paragraph, then it would have been more beautiful for long time lurkers in this sub

[–]TattiBoy 0 points1 point  (4 children)

How much is 'high' according to you, OP? 10, 100, or a thousand?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To me? 5-10. That would be for a long term partner though. For a one night stand? Who cares. Thrash the car, blow the tires out

[–]spuriousacademy 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I wouldn't tolerate a partner count over 3. I've been in a LTR with a girl in double figures and trust me, there's a huge difference between 2/3 N Count, and 7+. The thousand cock stare is real, but it's more like the 10 cock stare.

Now i'm in LTR with a girl who was previously N=0

[–]Tyler_Gatsby 0 points0 points [recovered]

Ha- I don't sleep with women who've had less than 3. The first guy to take the nasty virginity, and by the third guy she's figured out what and how she likes it, and maybe even gets her tricks. I'm not interested in playing teacher in the bedroom. To each his own though.

[–]ether_reddit -3 points-2 points  (10 children)

Would you agree the same principle applies to men? That men with high partner counts are not a good risk?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (5 children)

Men with high partner counts are studs. It takes effort to afford and drive all those different cars, it takes no effort on the car's part to be driven. If anything, a driver with more miles and vehicles under his belt is a safer and more experienced driver, provided he's never wrecked one. A driver with a million miles looks way better than any car with a million miles on it.

[–]harsha_hs 0 points1 point  (4 children)

This is wonderful analogy. As my partner count increased, I became better with women and more women liked me for my behavior with them. Infact, even before knowing any RP truths, initially I was chasing girls, but after 4-5 girls, girls chasing me for my extremely nice and attractive behavior with them. I was confident, I was settled with all logistic issues like which restaurant to go, do what, what to talk, how to make them feel nice etc..

[–]leinaD-Backwards -3 points-2 points  (3 children)

It's the same with women though...

Why do you expect it to be any different? You slept with more girls and got better at gaming girls and think you're the best. A woman does the exact same and gets better at gaming men. But that makes her untrustworthy.


All that shows is youve been beaten at your own game and can't handle looking in the mirror. If you wouldn't date or be interested with someone that has the same count as you...well... That's pathetic

[–]harsha_hs 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Well, I have had LTR, I can assure you women don't give as much shit as men about n-count

[–]leinaD-Backwards 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what's TWP interpretation of that

[–]manwhowouldbeking 4 points5 points  (1 child)

A key that opens all locks is a master key a lock that opens for all keys is a shitty lock. There is a difference and its sexist and hypocritical but accurate.

[–]skywreckdemon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A pencil that is sharpened by many pencil sharpeners is a stubby, useless pencil. A pencil sharpener that sharpens many pencils is a good sharpener.

It's very easy to make shitty analogies.

[–]Tim_Pollard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but not to the same extent.

There's research that shows that women with even fairly small partner counts (by modern standards), have a significant effect on marital happiness. While male partner counts don't matter nearly as much.

It's a risk thing, a woman who's been "partying" for the last ten years may potentially make a decent wife, but it's so extraordinarily unlikely that I wouldn't recommend taking that risk. The chances of a male player making a good husband are comparatively large, but still low enough that I wouldn't recommend my female friends or family to pursue them either.

[–]smokecheck1976 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First, every rental fleet I can think of takes cares past about two years old out of rotation, three at the latest. So where do I find a rental car with 180K on it to begin with.

Second, while some customers may treat a rental car like shit, most of them use it no worse than a car they own. A better analogy might be like the town prostitute or crazy chick that let's a lot of guys do whatever they want with her.

Third, you are missing an entire class of used vehicles that were fleet lease vehicles, which may have been treated more roughly than any Privately Owned Vehicle as well as privately owned vehicles that only had one owners that took good care of them.

The modern car, with a octane petroleum powered engine, is designed to run for about 250K miles before major maintenance is needed.

If you want to say "don't wife up a mental chick" just say that.

[–]vitringur -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why the fuck are you comparing machines to people? I'm all for the red pill, but this kind of bullshit is just stupid.

Never take metaphors seriously. The art behind metaphors is that they are made up. You can make them up about anything.

[–]JohnnnyOnTheSpot -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is the most beta/nice guy post in history lol