Men's RightsBBC Fires Guy for Being a White Man - Why Men Lose (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Sdom1

Link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3817609/BBC-sacked-white-man-Radio-4-comic-told-need-women-minorities.html

tl;dr - Guy gets fired for being white. His reaction shows why men have been losing. We don't take care of each other, despite popular belief.

Basically, the article details the firing of a comedian from the BBC because he's a fucking white male. This is outright racism, and bad enough in and of itself, but his reaction is even worse - "wait, this wasn't supposed to affect me, just the people who come after me."

And this, gentlemen, is why we've been getting our fucking clocks cleaned for 50 years; because of simpering little turds like Mr. Holmes, who only gives a fuck about himself. He was more than happy to sit by while young guys who are trying to claw their way into the industry are prevented from getting their start due to racial and sexual discrimination.

What's funny is that Holmes is in an infinitely better situation than those young guys -- he has built his name and reputation, his career isn't over -- but he couldn't care less about that, or them, or even any egalitarian principles I'm sure he'd insist he holds.

This is especially funny in that SJWs will insist that white men all belong to some skull and bones society with secret handshakes where we all take care of each other. If you doubt this, ask one. They can be a surgeon and you an Uber driver, and they'll tell you all about how much more privilege you have.

Of course, white men are the only group that doesn't help each other, and men in general help each other less than women. And that, gentlemen, is why we are losing. They work together, and we don't.

Enjoy the decline - well, until you get spit roasted in one way or another.

Lessons Learned -

  1. Outright discrimination isn't coming - it's here.

  2. The older, more established men are gladly selling us the fuck out.

  3. When your demographic group doesn't practice in-group preference and other groups do, you will lose every single time, even if you started in a position of power.

[–]diomedes777 147 points148 points  (114 children)

Part of me is happy to read this, this guy was a drooling, mindless, pro refugee leftist parrot to the BBC. Nice to see him reap what he's sown.

On the other hand, this is basically more proof (like we needed it at this point) that the white, straight male is at this point in no uncertain terms the enemy of the West. There is a literal war against them. The left is and is continuing to dismantle any semblance of societal cohesion and culture through the demonization of the white male. They want us replaced and gone. This guy was literally fired on the grounds of being a white man. Please let that sink in. Let the gravity of that sink in.

Sadly, even as a red pill man, there is nothing you can do in the face of this but go completely MGTOW, live and work for yourself, and watch the world crumble. The West is long dead, and if Hillary wins in November stories like these won't even make the news, they will just be commonplace every-day occurrences until the white male is the most downtrodden and obsolete demographic on the planet, having completely checked out from a society that offers them nothing but condemnation, hatred and ridicule.

Who do these fucking idiots think is going to fight and die in WWIII? Who is going to pick up the scraps of a civilization that has allowed itself to die? Because I sure as fuck won't be.

Fuck these people, I want to watch every limp wristed, self loathing, estrogen filled nu-male and disgusting fat feminist progressive at the BBC vaporised in the inevitable nuclear war on the TV while i sit back on the beach in my recliner in Western Australia with a cold beer, my dog and a whore who worships me licking the sweat off my abs and biceps

[–]1nzgs 23 points24 points  (3 children)

He was the archetypal "useful idiot". When the marxists gain positions of power some of the first people to face their wrath are fellow leftists not pious enough or tainted with "privilege".

[–]Sdom1[S] 15 points16 points  (2 children)

It's not even that - the useful idiots are killed after the revolution because you can never trust someone who will betray their own.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are the betas. The snarky. The weak. The first to go. The beta male (this tool) will defend the alpha female (the BBC and neo-racist culture) to the ends of the Earth, all the while completely oblivious to her disgust with him.

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is the pointed threat but I think that more generally they don't want people around who can be motivated to agitate. The risk is that if those people were to get access to better information that they could then agitate against the new order. They must first break a system in order to create a new one.

So I think that it is impossible for a healthy society to be broken in this way and so those who would seek to subvert a society need to work on a multi-generational plan to implement long term changes. When the subversive are able to realize an unwell society then it means that there is a large potential (social) energy well there like an earthquake ready to happen. Then they use useful idiots to hit the streets in large numbers to actually break the last remnant of the effective society. Humans only have a certain capacity for stress and especially when they don't understand the nature of the threats then they can feel quite hopeless. When this happens a new order can be quickly imposed while the controllers are telling their leftist/communist street disturbers to stand down. Then the new order takes over and people are able to relax and get used to the new normal and to figure out the new pecking order. Then shortly after this the most rambunctious of the agitators need to be disposed of because they are the people who could one day be capable of creating the sort of chaos that could repeat the cycle. So the most loyal and motivated people are disposed of and what is left is increasingly just the cynical power hungry sociopaths.

So in Ukraine in a very cynical turn of events I saw people that were railing against a corrupt Kiev government and putting their life on the line (I was not as I am foreign to Ukraine) go to immediately sign up to fight against the foreign Russian enemy. Many of these people were immediately sent off to their deaths against the separatists. The thing is that nobody wanted them around; not Kiev, not Moscow and not the two oblasts that broke off. Nobody likes these types and so nobody but their mothers miss them. That is cynical life.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (24 children)

this guy was a drooling, mindless, pro refugee leftist parrot to the BBC. Nice to see him reap what he's sown.

Kind of reminds me of this white BLM supporter who got beat up by black hooligans. I wonder if both the guy in article and in this pic slowly became redpilled.

[–]Sdom1[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nah, he's way too old. If you're demonstrating for leftist causes at that age, you're a fucking moron.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Haha, it is amazing

[–]thetotalpackage7 4 points5 points  (21 children)

Considering we all know that liberalism is a mental disorder, I would not be surprised if the hamstering that went on in this losers brain spun up a reason why his attack was the fault of white people.

[–]Spidertech500 8 points9 points  (3 children)

These aren't liberals. There's nothing liberty minded about them. They're statists

[–]Gorech1ld 1 point2 points  (2 children)

They're liberals, but not 100% true liberals. You can't say they're not liberals when they repeatedly call themselves that.

The problem is that they don't know what liberalism is. They're not pure liberals, but instead, Liberal-Progressives. You often see them saying that it's "2016" and people need to "Get with the times", as a way of saying that society needs to be more progressive and tolerant as a way to gain more liberty.

[–]Spidertech500 3 points4 points  (1 child)

So progressives, not liberals

[–][deleted] 9 points9 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]thetotalpackage7 18 points19 points  (6 children)

Liberalism in John Lockes times meant something entirely different than it does is 2016. IN recent past like the Kennedy administration, you had a liberal like him saying, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." Even Bill Clinton passed welfare reform and gave stump speeches about illegal immigration and abortion being legal, but rare. Does this sound ANYTHING even close to the message you get from liberals now?

Their entire platform has been taken over by radicals who openly support cannabilizing successful people's wealth, SJWs, handouts to minorities, open borders, YOOOGE government, abortion at any stage of fetal development, and are outright hostile to white males.

[–]Hjalmbere 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I woudn't call that liberalism, that is what is best described as contemporary academic leftism. Oddly this beast somehow escaped the asylum that is Western universities and is now at large terrorizing the population.

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of those old school founding fathers and even the Federalists would be considered Libertarians now. Today Liberals (they like to be called Progressives) are very different from Libertarians. The terms evolved from one root to mean very different things.

[edit] I'm from California and I've spent three years in Ukraine and during the Maidan dealy and I now call them baby Bolsheviks. Just look how they shout down people in such a stupid fashion. If there were 20x more of them then we would have a shitty communism-v2.0-us_en on our hands. People are waking up but the Baby Bolsheviks are being pumped out of the universities at an increasing rate. Things will come to a head. Fortunately we have a very different history in the US and we also know where these thought patterns lead to.

[–]Hunterogz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should look into Neoliberalism. It will clear up some confusion.

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]juliusstreicher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, you didn't understand a blamed thing that he wrote, did you?

[–]Sdom1[S] 4 points5 points  (7 children)

Locke was a classical liberal, as opposed to neoliberal. In the modern West, liberal is what a Marxist calls himself because socialism and Marxism are dirty words.

[–]jav253 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indeed. The commies know they still can't call themselves what they are. Some people are still half educated, and know how many people the Communist killed in the 20th century. Communism is a dirty word. They had to infiltrate, and hijack Liberalism. But the Liberals deserve blame here for letting it happen.

[–][deleted] -1 points-1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Sdom1[S] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I said "in the modern West" because liberal was used in a much different context in the past (Classical Liberalism is more like libertarianism), and was never a concept outside the West. It sounds like you are a leftist and you don't like that this sub leans a bit to the right. You should understand that this is inevitable as the left is the source of our society's current anti-male bias.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]juliusstreicher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Then, he doubled down on his demonstrating for BLM because, since he was white, he never understood the black experience. He'll help bring down the bastion of White Privilege, tho!

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (21 children)

Serious question - as a young white male with a lot of life left to live, where do you go? It's increasingly likely that the USA will not be a favorable place to live in 50 years - I'm curious where, with the resources to relocate, you'd recommend a white male goes.

[–]ragnarok73[🍰] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Don't go to Sweden.

[–]rigbed 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Either work your ass up into positions with older established white males and prosper off the pathetic plebeians or do something you like doing and work your way into living in Tijuana

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Fucking Tijuana is the deepest that you can offer?

[–]rigbed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No plane ticket required, not far from the us border, and in Mexico

[–]1PantsonFire1234 6 points7 points  (2 children)

I'm planning on securing myself an archipelago island. There I would reinstate law and order, transport bitches and generally rule with an iron fist.

Before I depart I'll make sure I've got the 500 year life enhancing treatment that Soros been using. Once there I will guide humanity forward as my ancestors did. Weak babies will be thrown of a hill, strong babies learn to fight at the age of seven, women get mandatory squats.

After a couple centuries of breeding my modern red blooded army of killers and fucking badonkdonk sluts I will depart on my hovercraft and reinvade Europe where I will cast every eastener in the fiery pit of Hades.

Then I will repair the broken architecture and infrastructure making Europe a livable place again which the barbarian horde tried to fuck up. Once done I will depart again with my warriors to my sunny island because fuckity fuck fuck- turns out Europe's really cold.

[–]RedMoonAscendant 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I will vote for you in 2016.

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soros looks like shit and for the love of humanity let him die until he is dead dead dead.

[–]rockymountainoysters 1 point2 points  (10 children)

I'm 38, and I have learned Spanish and am planning to relocate to Colombia which is a place where I've actually felt that my alleged white privilege is real. I have accumulated US-based income producing assets (two homes) I can keep for my entire life which may produce most or all of what I'd need to live on while abroad.

[–]blue_27 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Serious question: Why Colombia? I know it's safer than it used to be (aka no longer the kidnap capital of the world), but there is Belize, where they speak English. Costa Rica, where people are a lot more chill. Uruguay, where you will want steak for all three meals (I think it's even better than in Argentina). Those would probably be my top three based on security and geopolitical stability. Colombia just had a massive influx of 80,000+ Venezuelans fleeing their country, and that situation is only going to get much, much worse, before it gets better.

[–]rockymountainoysters 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Regarding the refugee situation, Colombians and Venezuelans are about as culturally and linguistically similar as Americans and Canadians, and Colombia is as large as California + Texas so I imagine they should do a pretty good job accommodating the Venezuelans, there is room.

Costa Rica is more expensive and more gringo-infested, Belize holds no advantage to me for being English speaking as I am bilingual, and Uruguay is probably awesome I just haven't been there.

Colombia's women, though, are fucking AMAZING. I've been accused here of letting my AWALT principles slip, but Colombian women are well-trained by their mothers to make appealing wives. The ones I've met appear utterly unaffected by feminism, they openly declare their traditional feminine roles with pride, and they make a man feel like a man. I've got a plate down there who's helping me recover from my BP upbringing just by showing me respect and being my first mate when I visit. Colombia is not the sort of place that would give birth to a TRP counterculture movement because TRP runs fluidly throughout the culture already.

Colombia's unstable regions are located far from the urban population centers, so Colombians see the violence on TV from those places and it looks to them like Vietnam war footage looked to Americans, just a faraway unstable place in the middle of some jungle somewhere.

So I can stay in the US and look far and wide for a respectful RP woman, or I can go to Colombia where it's the default. Colombia's SMP is the opposite of the US's in supply vs demand, so the women keep fit and feminine to maximize their odds. Very hard to find any who think they're princesses and shit test you all day. You just have to not let them use you for citizenship reasons.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I couldn't put it better myself. The dollar is very strong in Colombia although the banking situation and American tax and reporting requirements stink.

Marriage is a bad proposition but I would certainly consider it with a Colombian woman.

[–]rockymountainoysters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'd rather the fleas of a thousand camels infest my goatee than marry in the US, but Colombian family law makes divorce a thousand times less perilous than the US, and their divorce rate is in the single digits anyway.

Worst thing I could probably do to her would be to expose her to the company of any American women. They might become friends. But even then, a good number of Colombian women are so die-hard RP that they'd try to teach an American woman how to submit!

[–]squeezemymindgrapes 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Does it get easier to pick up and leave at 40? Don't you have any family to worry about? Siblings, Parents, Cousins? I would guess family ties and money are the biggest impediments stopping everyone from doing this.

[–]rockymountainoysters 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, there is family in the picture, including an autistic older brother who requires round the clock supervision by state funded caretakers and whose caretakers' performance requires family review to ensure he isn't abused. But my mom currently does this admirably from almost 1000 miles away already, so I can probably step up when the time comes even if I'm abroad.

That situation aside, my family has had to come to terms with the likelihood that I may leave. This is something that has happened all throughout history: my great grandparents were immigrants to this country who sought a better life, so it is no less reasonable that I might emigrate for the same. There has been no shortage of fits thrown over the mere prospect, but my great GREAT grandparents' reaction was undoubtedly similar.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Funny, I'm mid-thirties and have the exact same plan. Getting a credula is difficult without buying it.

[–]rockymountainoysters 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Which part of Colombia? Medellín is where it's at, if you ask me...

[–]Shotgun_Sentinel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Running is the problem. Eventually there will be nowhere left to run.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Repopulate the earth like a champ, Diomedes

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"> Fuck these people, I want to watch every limp wristed, self loathing, estrogen filled nu-male and disgusting fat feminist progressive at the BBC vaporised in the inevitable nuclear war on the TV while i sit back on the beach in my recliner in Western Australia with a cold beer, my dog and a whore who worships me licking the sweat off my abs and biceps."

Brings a tear to my eye and a smile to my face:')

[–]AmeriStasi 10 points11 points  (39 children)

"there is nothing you can do in the face of this but go completely MGTOW"

Wtf, get some balls and fight back. I wouldn't want to be stuck in the trenches with someone who gives up and MGTOW's while the enemy is advancing.

[–]2Bait4Me 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Go fight, put your life on the line, for the freedom of beta-cuck's-self -hating males and their feminist handlers.

No, Thanks.

The more the old values are lost to the ever degenerating society, the more MGTOW is the only realistic option.

[–]Windryder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for the freedom of beta-cuck's-self -hating males and their feminist handlers.

I am 100% sure he is not advocating to fight for those groups of people. He wants to fight against them.

[–]diomedes777 22 points23 points  (23 children)

I'm not gonna be in any trenches in the first place and neither should you. We had no part in this mess and i'll be damned if I fight in a war I saw coming, for people who brought this entire situation not only on themselves but the rest of civilization and failed to do something when they could. Fuck that noise

[–]destructuring 15 points15 points [recovered]

Western civilization was subverted by malicious outside influence and cultural warfare that we are only just beginning to understand. Clearly much of it happened post-WWII, but some would say this war goes back hundreds of years.

Surrendering to the enemy just because they blindsided you with a well-timed attack is behaviour of the most cucked kind. Fight to the end.

[–]Solistx 15 points15 points [recovered]

I'm not sure if humans have a "blood-lust" that is innate to them. However, recently I've been filled with that type of feeling. I'm just itching for a good fight (And I'm talking blood spilled here). Every time I see one of these blue haired commandos running around, I have this urge to just pummel them into the ground. They look like an enemy, and they feel like an enemy.

Surely I'm not the only one around here who feels this way?

[–]SaiHottari 9 points10 points  (9 children)

The urge and the feeling you describe are definitely relatable. I doubt I would act on it, however. That bloodlust is tempered by a sense of being above it all. Feminism, leftists, SJWs, BLMs, all seem more like misbehaving children then an invading army. They need discipline, not so much a beatdown.

[–]theONE843663 5 points6 points  (5 children)

My bad bro I'm on phone. What I'm saying is, us viewing retarded libtards as little confused children is the wrong mentality. What if that view was socially engineered by the elites? We can only win this war if you (ironically) view them as equals. We can't underestimate them. Machiavelli said not to underestimate your enemy.

[–]SaiHottari 7 points8 points  (4 children)

You make a fair point. But don't conflate my view of them for a belief in superiority. A child with a gun is still a serious threat. Since they have the government control, they have the gun. Im not underestimating them, I'm just saying treating them like adults is the wrong combat tactic. That won't get through to them like scolding and shaming will. Most SJWs are what they are not out of malice but out of ignorance. They say "everyone's a liberal until they meet the real world".

[–]Windryder 1 point2 points  (3 children)

That tactic still assumes there's a redeemable person on the other end though. I agree with the other guy; fuck em. They're useless with useless ideas. Don't have any level of acceptance for them unless they change to a more productive way of thinking.

[–]SaiHottari 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Eh, I guess I'm more of an optimist. To each their own I suppose.

[–]juliusstreicher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Their little tantrum s, however, affect what the courts and Congress do.

It wouldn't hurt for masculine interests to give their asses a tanning when these "children" step out of line. Think of the Star Trek series episode where the kids were grouped together and were kicking the fuck out of the adults.

[–]theONE843663 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

What if us viewing them as children is a Machiavellian tactic? That makes their wrongs not true 'cuz they're children they don't know any better?' Men have killed Kids all the time on the past. Kill men, kill the children, rape women and breed your bastards. That's how we do. They're not to be spared thinking they're children cuz even children shouldn't be spared. They can grow on top resent your empire. Women just go along with whomever is more alpha.

[–]SaiHottari 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I want you to stop. Take a moment to look at what you just posted. Do you see what went wrong? When you unscramble that word salad get back to me, because right now I can't decipher any of that.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Your urge is totally normal. Sometimes I fantasize about just sucker punching one of these fucking aids skrillex types on my campus if he ever lectures me about my "white privilege".

I can understand an actual poor black man who has faced police brutality or some authority over-exerting its boundaries talking about these dynamics.. But I'm not going to listen to some cuckhold trust fund fuckboy whipping himself and trying to bring down every other guy around him with his white guilt.

[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

But I'm not going to listen to some cuckhold trust fund fuckboy whipping himself and trying to bring down every other guy around him with his white guilt.

They're doing that because they, being from wealthier families, understand social positioning very well - who controls access to advancement, and how to meet their criteria. It's all just signaling.

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yesterday I had a moment of clarity that in simple terms Westerners have a signaling issue and ex-Soviets have a paranoia issue.

[–]Windryder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the kind of talk I'm looking for. I'm sick of hearing people say "just focus on yourself while the world burns".

[–]thetotalpackage7 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I'll give you one guess as to the "tribe" pulling the strings and financing all the subversion. There's a reason they have been kicked out of 109 countries in the past two milllenia.

[–]LandoChronus 0 points1 point  (3 children)

MGTOW isn't surrendering, it's taking your ball and going home.

They want us to play their game by their rules, and thank them for the opportunity from the mud they've stomped us into? Fuck that.

I will not stand by, watching someone dig themselves into a hole, that they ignored my warnings to dig, only for them to ask me to step on my head to get out when they've realized their mistake.

[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are confusing "fighting them" with "jumping through their hoops."

[–]AmeriStasi 0 points1 point  (1 child)

So when a bunch of aggressive men from the Middle East come to your homeland and assault your women, MGTOW is running away. Got it. This is why you don't get pussy. Women don't fuck men who are too afraid to fight. Your goal should be to dominate, and win.

[–]LandoChronus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did we get from a man being fired for being a white male, and letting feminists continue to ruin "their" society, to World War 3?

How'd you jump from "I'm going to let them dig their own hole because I'm done trying to stop it" to "Youre a pussy who won't fight invaders"?

We're not taking about defending our home, we're talking about not playing women's stupid game just to get laid. If you feel the need to get amped up and start throwing out assumptions because you have some inner disdain for mgtow, then I guess whatever makes you feel better, but at least get the conversation right.

[–]AmeriStasi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happens when the war comes to you, because countless men acted like you beforehand, and now there's no where to run. MGTOW is a cop out. Go take up boxing or something, and learn to stand your ground.

[–]JorixKienu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"there is nothing you can do in the face of this but go completely MGTOW"

Wtf, get some balls and fight back. I wouldn't want to be stuck in the trenches with someone who gives up and MGTOW's while the enemy is advancing.

Dude, please, for your own shake and interest : face the fact that it is you that feel the need and urge to figh but nobody else value that need.

Modern society will only exploit this need of yours, and then will laugh at you.

Personally I feel this too but I feel more the need to not be exploited for nothing.

[–]FlintShaman 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Why fight the enemy when you can let them destroy themselves? A smart man lets his enemies destroy each other before coming in to collect the spoils.

[–]juliusstreicher 1 point2 points  (4 children)

A stitch in time saves nine, tho; guess what? Nobody has a needle and thread.

Platitudes from Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, or fucking Tony Robbins are worthless unless they are relevant. The left is 1000 times more united than the forces of freedom-just witness howthe Repubs losers had deserted Trump till they figured out that that the party wasn't going to revolt and demand that their worthless asses be the nominee.

Then see how the Left sucks ass of their candidates, from Carter till Obama. The obnoxious prick from The Young Turks was clucking about what a wonderland the world would be when Bernie got elected. Then, when he found out that the DNC fucked ol' Been, he went on a rambling monologue about how it was a literal boon to humanity that they fucked him, stirring up antisemitic elements of the DEMOCRATIC party against the old boy. One of his Jr. Hosts tried to moderate his nonsensical claims, but, he shushed her and went on ad infinitum, ad nauseum. Bill Clinton had Carter go as a representative some years to go as an emissary of peace to Haiti, iirc!!! Fucking Haiti!!!! Rehabbed Carter in the public eyes, somewhat...the man who was a joke in every aspect of the word! But, they stuck together, and afterwards Carter, who should be mocked universally, is quite often quoted by the media! Oh, and the Left is unified and controlling the nation.

[–]jav253 0 points1 point  (1 child)

They wont simply destroy themselves though. Eventually they are going to tax you for not marrying. Which if history is indication will result in society collapse. But probably not within your lifetime. So don't think you can just run, and hide from this fight.

[–]FlintShaman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they keep up with this they just might but sadly you are probably more accurate. Now really isn't the time sit back is it? They've created a situation in which we can't just "take our ball and leave" anymore so to speak.

[–]centipede76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Never interrupt you're enemy when he is making a mistake“ - Napoleon Bonaparte

[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yeah. MGTOW = "Run away." I've always said there's a reason why MGTOW guys never got laid - they're pussies who have no fight in them.

[–]JorixKienu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. MGTOW = "Run away." I've always said there's a reason why MGTOW guys never got laid - they're pussies who have no fight in them.

This is always a great fun.

It seems that you do not have any knowledge about pre-selection of targets.

Such as avoiding waste landfills only according to the stink that anyone can smells from far, far away.

I'll let you go ahead and fight in your own landfill. Then please write back if you managed to clean it up: we are all eager to hear good news.

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a traditional "The Mongels are Coming!" sort of conflict then sure but if the society is being brought down through subversion then I'm not convinced that simply following the leader's orders to attack whatever enemy is always going to be the right course of action. A subverted society basically means a confused society that has lost the ability to differentiate friend from foe. That shit isn't worth dying for and as a soldier you really by nature of that arrangement don't get much say in the matter. That is a problem.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

This is exactly like a woman being fired for doing a shit job, but because she cried sexism, shes getting attention for it. Except this is a white straight male appealing to Alt-righters

BBC was probably looking for a way to get rid of this bloke, and they used 'diversity' as an excuse.

Really nothing to see here.

[–]Sdom1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you read my post, the real point of it was not the firing, but his reaction to it - "wait, it wasn't supposed to be ME that got fucked." More just pointing out a traitor hoist on his own petard.

[–]poochman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going to WA in January, maybe I shouldn't come back.

[–]Shotgun_Sentinel 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Sadly, even as a red pill man, there is nothing you can do in the face of this but go completely MGTOW, live and work for yourself, and watch the world crumble. The West is long dead, and if Hillary wins in November stories like these won't even make the news, they will just be commonplace every-day occurrences until the white male is the most downtrodden and obsolete demographic on the planet, having completely checked out from a society that offers them nothing but condemnation, hatred and ridicule.

Fuck that, why don't we just fight back?

[–]CAPS_4_FUN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly, even as a red pill man, there is nothing you can do in the face of this but go completely MGTOW, live and work for yourself, and watch the world crumble.

oh yeah... more individualism, less tribalism among whites against billions of tribal races. Yeah, that will help.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question I want to know is why are they waging the war against the white males? The people at the top who are allowing this are white males them selves.

[–]Zunscriii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

f you don't fight for the western world, you are worse than a pro-refugee cuck. You're a defeatist loser. The lowest of lives, you abandon your people in the hour of their greatest need.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who do these fucking idiots think is going to fight and die in WWIII?

Better question, who is going to start it with civil war? Nope, won't be Europe, they're pacified.

[–]H1GraveShift -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Honestly dude this just sounds like We Wuz Kangz! logic for white people.

I'm pretty sure this same thing has happened in the other direction.

[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

How exactly is this "we was kangz!" logic? What does that even mean?

[–]1nzgs 33 points34 points  (7 children)

The BBC has been openly racist for a while.


I don't remember them being so brazenly extremist when I was younger, the organisation seems to have been hijacked at some point in the last 20 years. Needless to say I haven't paid the licence fee in 15 years and always remind friends and family not to do so either.

[–]samenrofringslikeLBJ 11 points11 points [recovered]

As a European, what worries me the most is that the development of the BBC mirrors 1:1 the development of all other national news outlets in Europe. The Swedish SVT, The Austrian ORF, etc etc all follow the exact same political trajectory of ever increasing Marxism. I think Sweden has it worst though, nowadays SVT can just post an article like "Company X posts profit" , and immediately I know that as a reader I´m supposed to scream and yell. It is utterly sick.
I´m not one for conspiracies, but clearly there is some form of exchange between these media-outlets.

[–]Sdom1[S] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

all follow the exact same political trajectory of ever increasing Marxism.

This is why I like Europeans. None of this "liberal" bullshit. You're calling them just what they are - Marxists.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Well, we had half of Europe under communist rule up untill the 90´s so the scars are still open and visible, eastern Germany is still a shithole mostly from the damages of marxism for 40 years. As a toddler my parents had to go through Checkpoint Charlie with me while on vacation in Germany. A lot of slavic countries like Hungary and Czechia are extremely sensitive about EU-laws for that exact reason.

The funny thing is though, I had a convo with a cellular biologist professor about this the other day, and most of the marxist stuff today is not coming from Moscow, it is from Harvard and the Ivy´s. 5-10 years after that, it reaches Europe, but we take it further than you guys because there is still some support for conservative values and liberty in the US.

[–]Sdom1[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Marxism is largely done in Russia. Remember, the Bolsheviks were Jews and other ethnic minorities for the most part, which is why they viciously oppressed the ethnic Russians once they gained power, starving, murdering and deporting massive amounts of people - the Cossacks, the Kulaks, the Ukrainians, etc. It was retaliation for the oppression they had suffered in the past.

Now, the ethnic Russians are back in control of Russia. This is partly why Western Europe and the US have such a hard on for Putin - he is a nationalist who imprisoned and otherwise broke the power of the western-linked oligarchs who were raping the country in the aftermath of the USSR's fall.

Sure, he is a shithead semi-dictator himself, but ask yourself - how many of those are out there today that we leave alone or outright work with? There has to be more to it, right?

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

western-linked oligarchs

internationally-minded Jews

Fixed that for you.

I'll add that Ukraine is what Russia would look like if the Jews weren't restrained in any way whatsoever.

[–]Papahoff25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't that the point of a company SVT?

[–]Sdom1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They were hijacked a lot longer ago than that. Shit, 20 years ago was the mid '90s, player. The BBC has been converged since the 50's or before that.

You have to remember when dealing with a utopian ideology like Marxism -- because that's what they really are -- they are measuring time with a calendar, while we do so with a watch. They are incrementalists. They are happy to move an inch closer. What you don't see is them ever, EEEEVER giving that inch back.

That's how suddenly, you're wondering how we got to this state. It has been going on so long nobody really notices.

[–]batfish55 21 points22 points  (3 children)

That's not racism. If you're white, you can't be a victim of racism! It's just like, how if you're a woman, you can't be sexist! /s

[–]RedMoonAscendant 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Unsure why you put /s. This is literally what they believe and preach. And because it's being perpetrated by the mass media, it will eventually be true, since definitions are as they're commonly used.

In general, a victim class is defined, and members of that class are not able to commit the crime that makes them the victim class.

Example: I am part of the marginalized TRP class. If a woman says "AMALT" then that is misandrist and can get her fired, but since I'm a TRP victim, if I say "AWALT" that is not misogynist.

You can see thousands of examples of this everywhere today. "Niggers" can call a white man "cracker" or "whitey" or any number of racial epithets and not be racist, but I am racist, because I said "nigger." A woman can complain that a festival lineup is 75% male, and that we must choose more females, regardless of merit, and not be sexist.

Get used to the newspeak. It is not going away.

[–]batfish55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The short answer why /s? Because sometimes morons don't realize the point I'm trying to make and honestly believe I'm a troll.

[–]1nzgs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He put /s because he was sarcastically imitating what progressives typically believe, not because they don't believe it.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I couldn't agree more with OP, this is happening all over and it is ridiculous that people are still denying it. Corporate America is one of the worst offenders, I constantly see ill-prepared "diversity" candidates being hired and also promoted.

There is actual, illegal, discrimination going on in our faces and no one (save the few of us) appears to even have a problem with it.

BTW, per the EEOC


Job Advertisements

It is illegal for an employer to publish a job advertisement that shows a preference for or discourages someone from applying for a job because of his or her race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.

For example, a help-wanted ad that seeks "females" or "recent college graduates" may discourage men and people over 40 from applying and may violate the law. Recruitment

It is also illegal for an employer to recruit new employees in a way that discriminates against them because of their race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.

For example, an employer's reliance on word-of-mouth recruitment by its mostly Hispanic work force may violate the law if the result is that almost all new hires are Hispanic. Application & Hiring

It is illegal for an employer to discriminate against a job applicant because of his or her race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. For example, an employer may not refuse to give employment applications to people of a certain race.

An employer may not base hiring decisions on stereotypes and assumptions about a person's race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.

If an employer requires job applicants to take a test, the test must be necessary and related to the job and the employer may not exclude people of a particular race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, or individuals with disabilities. In addition, the employer may not use a test that excludes applicants age 40 or older if the test is not based on a reasonable factor other than age.

If a job applicant with a disability needs an accommodation (such as a sign language interpreter) to apply for a job, the employer is required to provide the accommodation, so long as the accommodation does not cause the employer significant difficulty or expense.

[–]haxurmind 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem with the law is that they are just words on paper, it is the force, used to uphold the rights defined by these words, that gives power to them.

When that force is diverted, diluted and subjugated; those words become ultimately meaningless.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (5 children)

The irony.

Quota's, or whatever they call it, is basically fighting racism by being racist. employment based on race is racist, employment based on gender is sexist, period. by demanding a percentage of employment to be based on race is as racist as it can ever get, doesn't matter what purpose it serves, the base is discriminatory.

the government should protect the right to choose, not choose for people.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

That's the catch with racism. It only applies to white people. If you are anti white, pro anything else, its not racist, its just diversity!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

yup, stuff like pro-black hashtags all over twitter.

I agree that pro-anything based on race/ethnicity is irrational, its neither wrong or right, its just way too emotion-based, and not practical.

its just the hypocrisy when society turn a blind eye to other groups doing it, because they are a minority, out of sympathy.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I don't think its the intention of people to do the right thing for all of humanity, typically. Most just want to do whats right for themselves. Being pro-Black to fight the supposed humanitarian plight of the black people is oxymoronic to me. That's why, I think at least, when you hear intelligent transcendent Black scholarly and intellectual type people speak about the race issues, they don't agree with special treatment of minorities, but just promoting unconditional cooperation and camaraderie among all, regardless of the past/ancestry.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeh that's pretty much it. the ones advocating for racial supremacy or whatever "pro", mostly do it for their own collective benefit. They are the ones that say stuff like "oh we have our own shit to worry about" when a major crisis happens to other groups/races within their nation.

Edit: added a few words

[–]RebuildRed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing is, sexism and racism against white males is now state sponsored.

[–]TheChestGuy 17 points18 points  (33 children)

if we do get over these dark times, when our children look back at this they will be ashamed. this is racist McCarthyism.

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (25 children)

this is racist McCarthyism.

First of all, McCarthy was right in what he did and widely popular. There was massive support for communism among hollywood and the media. He understood that was a threat to american values. It was only later that those same institutions tried to change his legacy.

Secondly, every group but whites is racist. Every single one. Every jewish person in the world will hire a fellow jew over a european. Every turk will do the same with turks. Racism in the form of discriminatory hiring is a group survival strategy that everyone employs except whites. Rather than complaining, we should just do the same thing. When every other ethnic group is playing as a team, whites will be destroyed if we don't do the same thing.

[–]Gorech1ld 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Secondly, every group but whites is racist. Every single one. Every jewish person in the world will hire a fellow jew over a european. Every turk will do the same with turks. Racism in the form of discriminatory hiring is a group survival strategy that everyone employs except whites

This is so true. Many whites do not seem to realize that racial preference is very much a thing. There's a reason why Obama got an overwhelming amount of blacks voting for him in the elections, and it's based on simple tribalism. His policies, stance, character, etc didn't even matter. It was a simple thinking of "This guy is part of my tribe, and I want him to gain more power for my tribe".

[–]grewapair 1 point2 points  (10 children)

I grew up Jewish and I've hired exactly one Jewish employee in the last 20 years. My dad and uncle were small business owners for longer than that and neither of them hired any Jews ever.

There are some who do that, but Every Jewish person in the world? No.

[–]Sdom1[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Jewish ethnocentrism and in-group preference are legendary. Hell, most Jews won't even deny it. I'm actually OK with it, as long as I'm allowed to be ethnocentric as well.

That's not an accusation or a charge - Jews would never have survived if they weren't tight-knit, and persecution is proven to tighten group bonds further.

[–]TrumpSEXYMAN 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Well - Jews are certainly the ones pushing the open borders, 'diversity,' anti-White agenda in Europe and America.

As a Jew, why do you guys promote all this stuff?

[–]Jedy_hacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not all jew's mostly talmudists.

[–]Sdom1[S] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

McCarthy's claim was that Marxists had influenced the State Dept and were working with the Soviets. We now know from declassified KGB documents that this claim was 100% correct. In fact, McCarthy's various claims were overwhelmingly correct. There is documentary proof of that.

[–]gnutgnut 5 points6 points  (7 children)

Yeah but possibly the whole 'not being even a little bit funny' might have come into the decision to let him go from a comedy show?

[–]Hjalmbere 13 points14 points  (6 children)

Yes, let's replace him with an Amy Schumer clone, that'll do it.

[–]Unripe_rp 12 points13 points  (3 children)

Women are funny, get over it...mah vagiiiinnaaa

[–]Hjalmbere 3 points4 points  (2 children)

A Muslim transgendered lesbian with cerebral palsy would be even funnier!

[–]iamirishpat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People would be laughing at her before she even said a word!

[–]playingwithfyre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In their defense, that would pull bigger numbers than he was. I mean we all know its Carlos Mencia v. woman, but whatever.

[–][deleted] 6 points6 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess positive or negative discrimination are all relative depending on what side the the equation you fall.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm so sick of this "straight white male" bullshit.

If it wasn't for straight white males, queers wouldn't get to have their gay pride parades and might possibly face some kind of punishment for their sexuality. Straight white males are the ones who fought to pass legislation and tolerance for gays.

Straight white males built a society that defends personal freedoms and independence as its national way of life. So that people who are ACTUALLY oppressed and discriminated against can live with the freedoms of a true citizen.

I go to an art and design college. In a lot of my classes, I am the only guy. Most of the guys here are gay and a lot are transgender/crossdressers. I see fliers for "women only" "queer only" "people of marginalized background only" artist submissions for shows. It's fucking ridiculous. They might as well come out and say it "No white men allowed". They don't want white men in their shows because they don't want to have to compete in style.

Do you see rappers saying "no white rappers allowed in my genre"? I'm sure there might be a few, but you don't see the top dogs like Dre telling Eminem to go fuck himself.. Or even when Macklemore cuck'd himself talking about white privilege, Drake said "Why do you feel guilt for your hard work?" (quotes not exact, but you get the picture).

Most white men don't give a shit what you do with your life as long as you obey the law and generally contribute positively in some way to society. Whether that's working 40 hours a week at Stop and Shop or being a conglomerate CEO.

All of this outrage toward white men is manufactured and based on the 1% of white men who come out and say something blatantly racist or ignorant. White men mostly just want to live in peace and quiet and their neighbors to be happy/decently satisfied with life.. Just like black men, latinos, gays, and muslims.

It's the triggered PC idiots who scream and stomp their feet over every little "micro aggression" (AKA oversensitivity) that are the real oppressors.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAFPJ 11 points12 points  (3 children)

Of course, white men are the only group that doesn't help each other,

Not quite so. All female startups? Mostly minorities? Mixed gender? You've probably never heard of them. Two white guys in a garage resulted in Google. Twelve white guys in a room resulted in the United States of America. White men have relatively abnormal capacity for altruism as an evolved trait - when this isn't checked by mixing their group with minorities or women, the amount of momentum & force for achievement that quickly builds when multiple people are trained, capable of and biologically inclined to putting the collective above themselves quickly becomes overwhelming.

When women or minorities help only women or minorities & peacefully exclude whites or minorities, that's OK. But should white men express a preference to do much the same among themselves, that's a threat to the status quo.

[–]Sdom1[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I'm not saying no two white men ever work together. I'm saying that we have no in-group preference. You're not going to give a guy a shot just because he's white. You see that kind of stuff among various other ethnic groups all the time, though.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAFPJ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It ain't like I'm trying to put words in your mouth. Personally, that's exactly what I do. By the time I see the resume of a Lead or Senior Engineer or Architect, the amount of shit they've had to put up with to get that if they're not only a male but also not a minority has led them to perform at a substantially higher level than their token counterparts.

Sure, in-group favoritism is real, but at this point it's just statistics. When a whole gender is protected & so are most minorities, the only unprotected demographics, who actually have to compete, are pretty much Asian & White males.

They're also very easy to fire, unlike women/minorities, and they know it, which further increases their performance and is part of the reason that once you get to a level in your profession or field where concerns other than the value you deliver to your team evaporate because of the insane competitive pressure, we begin to see mostly white teams.

[–]RedMoonAscendant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You and sdom1 are talking past each other. I humbly suggest you're both right.

You just said you hire white people because they're objectively better. Do you give them a fair interview to make sure they're as competent as their résumé would indicate? I bet you do.

I've seen some really shitty racist outcomes with non-whites. I think there really is a stronger tendency for non-whites to just same-race hire without doing any basic vetting.

[–]Hjalmbere 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Political Correctness is a bigger threat to comedy than religious conservatives. This will kill mainstream comedy. Is Western Civilisation on auto destruct?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Was he fired or was his contract just not renewed?

[–]TheRealMewt 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Well, unless his contract expired the day of this policy change where white straight males could never expect to work at BBC ever again, I would say that this is indeed a firing.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cynic in me says it's possible this happened as he said, but it's also possible that they wanted to replace him with someone cheaper and used this to virtue signal.

[–]redartist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

he article details the firing of a comedian from the BBC

It's funny when the joke's on him.

Make a BP career choice by working for the ultimate cucks - suffer the consequences.

[–]harsha_hs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Welcome. This is real and BBC is outright about it. Thank BBC, at least they were honest about it. They could have told something like 'his performance was not matching the new expectations at BBC' and what not.

Get ready for tough times and learn to put NOTHING on pedestal. Women, Job etc.

[–]segagaga 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Britain is lost. The Brexit is too late imo. I should really emigrate.

[–]goldnhorde 2 points3 points  (6 children)

"When they came for the socialist .... I did nothing ... because I was not a socialist." you can look up the rest of this saying.

I work in banking. And you know what is hilarious about banking is the crazy hypocrisy.

example: The Banking industry which is heavily regulated by congress screams constantly: "identity theft is a huge issue and one of the biggest problems that bank customers face today. We need to make the best efforts to make sure this information is kept out of the open. The Banking industry then outsources everything entry level audit to India, sending entire files of personal information to a foreign country, known to be involved with identity theft and paying the guy dirt wages .....

.... I wonder if that guy will memorize any information?

Another hypocrisy in this "racism" thing is also in banking. Obviously racist behavior is ignorant. but banks keep all kinds of tabs on who they lend to, where it is lent. but let's look at a loan application. there is an entire section making sure that the bank knows what race you are, then actually goes a step further into Hispanic ethnicity. What's more, if I take the application on web or by phone and you REFUSE to tell me ..... I am supposed to guess and fill out your race and ethnicity ANYWAY!!!! THAT'S RIGHT!!!! I JUST GUESS AND PUT IT DOWN!!! When it seems pretty reasonable that if you wanted equality, that you wouldn't put your race or ethnicity at all. That even a sex affirming name should be removed to ensure no sexist treatment. But nope, this rule is enforced. In some banks it is automatically assigned to a minority category to ensure numbers are met. So who is getting serviced in any equitable manner?

But it gets better. After that, you have the community reinvestment act (CRA). this is supposed to ensure that if a bank is doing business in an area (taking deposits and other higher profit activities) that they reinvest in the community with a certain quota of loans and other more low profit, community driven activities. Hey, this sounds right. Give what you get and so forth. But hold it .... the big banks ... the big boys that is .... they all press together CRA portfolios and sell them to one another.

So yes .... if bank A sells that portfolio to bank B and Bank B sells that portfolio to Bank C. Bank A, Bank B, and Bank C all can take CRA credit for that one loan. I know this article started with a comedian, so here comes the funny part. NONE OF THEM DID ANYTHING WRONG OR EVEN A LITTLE SHADY!!!!! The auditors will walk out smiling. This system is working as intended.

So there you go with the weirdness of big banking.

As for employment, I work at one of these huge banks. I have a mixture of skill sets and experience that give me a little bit of luxury that I find myself pretty secure in my position. That being said, there is a lot of diversity .... shoved at me everyday and on the sites for the company. And frankly I am all about diversity as long as the best person gets the job and we are a better and stronger team because of it. and frankly, I have always been more attracted to Asian, indian, middle eastern women than white women ..... so I can't say I don't love having them walking around everywhere. but when trying to be diverse leads to blatant racism ... it's sad. I have seen plenty of women or minorities get hired into a position of power and hiring .... only to have their entire department slowly become completely un-diverse. white woman who then hires only white women under her. An indian guy who then only hires indian guys under him. a black woman who only hires black women under them. this has become common in my industry as "diversity" continues.

I've said it before, the second someone offers me the "awesome white straight guy get anything you want" credit card ..... I'm taking it. I grew up on a farm and my parents worked their asses off to get out of a small town, get educated, move to a place where they could get better employment, make sure I could get educated and progress me into a better life than them. But I've been paying for being a straight white male for most of my life. I will take the card gladly now .... and when I see these guys going to their diversity jobs, I will honk my yacht horn when I sail by, drunk as usual.

[–]Sdom1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I worked in banking - it's all kabuki theater. They just want the government to stay away from the shit that really matters (rigging markets, printing money to lend), so they play the game when it comes to "diversity," mostly in their retail arm where it doesn't really matter.

[–]logicalthinker1 3 points4 points  (3 children)

The system will eat itself. I've never read Atlas Shrugged but I know the general concept of the story. Eventually, the multiculturalists will push the envelope too far and the producers will just clock out. Trump is the beginning of that in that he is an emotional reaction to the "omg white people suck, and America is evil. I hate being white. Etc." crowd. Too bad he's a fucking idiot.

[–]highenergysanders 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It already is eating itself. not sure how familiar you are with the BBC but they have a show, top gear, that was a cash cow for for the better part of two decades. The show was basically 3 buddies (middle aged white males) chatting about cars and goofing around. It was insanely popular and was broadcast in over 200 countries and had a couple hundred million viewers per week.

Then they got rid of the hosts of the show and replaced them with a diversity check list. Female, black guy etc. The shows ratings are now at 15 year lows and viewership is more than halved. They decided diversity was more important than talent and it took 3 episodes to destroy Europe's most popular show.

[–]goldnhorde 0 points1 point  (1 child)

this guys says "eventually"?

Don't you think the window has been pushed too far as it stands? I am not saying this as a rhetorical affront. Please read this as a legit questions and answer it. tone is lost on the forum ....

[–]logicalthinker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but it's close. If you ever want to look into the future of America, just look at Europe. They're about 10 years ahead of us down this road.

[–]forallmyfans2 1 point2 points  (1 child)

for the first time in history, racism is real

[–]AnythingForSuccess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He can sue to hell and back you know.

[–]offthebeatmeoff 0 points1 point  (3 children)

On a slightly positive note, the same thing happened to Scott Adams, and he outlines in his book. Out of the many companies he worked, he quickly climbed the corporate ladder, and he was stopped because they were no longer looking to promote men of his demographic at the time. The man went on to create Dilbert and become a millionaire. I'm not hear to jerk the guy off, but male ingenuity is strong, and some guys don't take getting fucked in the ass in silence. They eventually turn around and fuck the world back with a much fatter cock

[–]Sdom1[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Yeah, great, but not everybody is capable of that. If you can do it, more power to you, but again, this gets down to the heart of the matter. We do not help each other. Your reaction is "well, just figure out another way" instead of realizing that this is just the start of something really bad that will one day affect you.

[–]offthebeatmeoff 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I just wanted to have a mild positive look. I agree with you that we should work closer together so that good qualified men get the positions they deserve or get fucked over by the color of their skin alone. MLK is rolling over in his grave, because apparently character doesn't matter anymore. I also just wanted to say that as men, there are many among us, who despite being beaten down by stupid bullshit like this. I and many people I know were affected by it. We still persist and overcome.

[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Grandma used to say, "wish in one hand and shit in the other, and see which one fills up first." Your hopefulness is a form of wishful thinking.

You can strive and overcome in a system that is somewhat biased against you, but once it is biased enough to discriminate openly you won't be able to overcome it. You can't get a job with spunk and determination when there's an overt rule against hiring you. Your business can be harassed or outright forced into failure by local or federal government. Don't think that can happen? Talk to the baker who didn't want to bake a cake for a lesbian wedding. Personally, I don't see why they gave a shit, but they were made an example of.

There are lots of ways governments can kill your businesses. Constant inspections, rule and zoning changes, fines and fees, and so on.

Come back to me in ten years and we'll see what has happened.

[–]SirBootyLove 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I don't think the bbc is without fault but can we use an article not as biased as daily mail? Even the comedian who got fired said he didn't give them this quote. http://radiotoday.co.uk/2016/10/jon-holmes-doorstepped-by-daily-mail-for-a-bbc-story/

[–]Sdom1[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Are you a weasel full time, or just as a hobby? They paraphrased him, but his quote was pretty fucking clear as to why they did it. This would be like me firing you "because we need to replace our staff with people who are 6' or taller," you telling this to someone else, and then getting angry because they paraphrased you as saying you were fired for being under 6' tall.

That's not being fraudulent or biased, they just rephrased to make it fit as a headline.

[–]SirBootyLove 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand why you called me a weasel. I'm not attacking you. This is a discussion.

[–]XABERFYRE 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Andrew Lawrence (Another UK comedian I like) came out and said that he's been complaining about this kind of thing at the BBC for a while:


[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The board of director thing is coming, it just takes longer for change to filter up that high. The elites never see it coming, either.

[–]Atavisionary 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Ya, this kind of crap goes on a lot. We talk about it a lot over on r / darkenlightenment. Our "leaders" are actively importing millions of new voters so they can make discrimination against white men permenant and have troops when we eventually rebel. There isnt much time left until the west repeats the experience of the congo, south africa and rhodesia. Whites will have everything forcably taken from them and be forced to live in ghettoes. The clock is ticking.

[–]Sdom1[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes, we're being transformed into a despised minority. It's amazing what is possible when you seize control of the educational system.

[–]highenergysanders 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the media. Nobody ever fact checks outlets like CNN so when they air some blowhard spouting off about the wage gap the public takes it as fact

[–]thekingmaker88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone on here says white males are being attacked and are discriminated against but as a white male, what race/gender would you honestly want to switch to? We have it great, despite the occasional bump in the road.

[–]Limekill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, white men are the only group that doesn't help each other,

This is so true. In many cultures (like lebanese or Asian) a group of friends will support each other, in life, business, etc. It is completely the opposite for a group of white guys - everyone is on their own and nobody gives a fuck...

[–]fuckniggerscum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nigger lover gets fired? Cry me a river.

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]solidsnork 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah but Black Panthers and and Black Terrorists Matter are a religion of peace.

[–]Noolaw 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Western civilization is in decline. There isn't much that can be done because the damage has been done. Your best bet is to find greener pastures or something like that.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

With an attitude like that, no wonder we're losing.

[–]NotInsane 2 points2 points [recovered]

What do you suggest? Race war nao?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I understand your frustration, and there is no question we are facing an uphill battle. Whites are villainized and hated in our own countries.

But we built this. It is ours. Fight for it by fighting for white interests and white people. We have to come together as a people, like every other group has done. Saying "fuck it" and going your own way is selfish and will guarantee the continuing decline of our people. If they divide us, they can - and will - conquer us.

[–]fakenate1 0 points1 point  (4 children)

So my takeaway should be that I'm happy I am not white?

Sorry lads, it looks like it's my turn to get mine.

[–]j3nbu 6 points7 points  (1 child)

It's good for you in the short term. In the long term is turns the country you live in into the same kind of place you or your family left.

[–]fakenate1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know. West Africa is pretty rad.

[–]F_Dingo 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Good for you in the short term but bad beyond that. Sure, you got the position but do you have the background knowledge to do the job effectively? Chances are many of these people won't because they were hired only because of skin color, gender or sexual preferences.

This is a poison pill that will harm everyone.

[–]fakenate1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, I'm smart as fuck and I'm cute too.

[–]anooblol -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

He got fired because he wasn't funny. Guys, now a days, women are actually funny. Just get over it. When Amy Schumer talks about her vagina, I literally lose my shit.

[–]Sdom1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

See, I prefer it when she talks about all the guys she fucks and what a slut she is.

[–]SgtBrutalisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sexist, you think female anatomy is laughable, ugh. Kappa

[–]TrumpSEXYMAN 0 points1 point  (1 child)

White people built the modern world.

Yet now, under Jewish influence, are actively working to destroy their race, culture and people.

No other race of people is so suicidal.

[–]Jedy_hacker -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's the Illuminati not the jews, "jews" are just an "Agentur".

[–]alecesne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is this a red pill issue? It belongs in Mens Rights, sure, but doesn't exactly align with RP.

[–]ChildOfTheLostTribes -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

You allowed this to happen in your society. Blame yourselves.

[–]Sdom1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't like that expression - "blame yourself." Implicit in that is to accept this outcome as permanent, when we can change things.

[–]j3nbu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stuff like this is why I am so glad that Obama won the Presidency twice. White sellouts like McCain and Romney have made a career of being politically anti-White at every opportunity.

They are the types of cuckservatives who were happy to sellout White racial interests to prove to leftists how "not racist" they are. Then is came back and bite them on the ass when THEY lost out on a job to a minority instead of just peasants like us.

load more comments (12 replies)