494
495
496

Men's RightsHarvard Men's Soccer Season Cancelled for ranking girls' team by looks (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by useyourmouth

From a school that is on the front lines of the war on male sexuality:

The school cancelled the rest of the men's soccer season because one of the players "created a nine-page document in 2012 with numeric ratings, photos and lengthy evaluations of the freshman recruits of the Harvard women’s team based on their physical appearance. Men on the team referred to the document as a "scouting report.""

Welcome to the bizarro world where "cis white males" (and in the case of Harvard's soccer team, a few Asians, too) must be flogged and have their futures compromised because of their private banter about women's looks, but twats like Lena Dunham are celebrated for publically spouting shit exponentially more vile.

Feel bad for the bros on the team, but you know that half the girls on the scouting report (those ranked highly) moistened at the thought of being sized up by some BMOCs. Can't have that! Shut it down! before they realize a conflict between their natural human sexuality and our gender-studies indoctrination.

Anyway, think twice before going and/or sending your sons to one of these formally great institutions.


[–][deleted] 167 points168 points  (16 children)

For those curious, check out this story about a female Duke student who rated one night stands with guys: http://deadspin.com/5652280/the-full-duke-university-fuck-list-thesis-from-a-former-female-student/

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    Who or what institution is being hypocritical in this situation?

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Was that girl on any teams that she could have been kicked off of?

      [–]Returnofthemack3 51 points52 points  (0 children)

      this is magnitudes more fucked up than the stupid soccer list could ever be.

      [–]EllesarisEllendil 36 points37 points  (2 children)

      https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--nejmWhNt--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/17nfsdoqkkllpjpg.jpg

      Here she details enjoying "being grabbed by the shoulder and pushed against the wall".

      Hmmmmmmmmm

      [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 36 points37 points  (0 children)

      Her parents must be so proud.....

      [–]AceBenedict23 12 points13 points  (0 children)

      I mean its fucked up but I wouldn't even have that big a problem with it if there weren't double standards. Interesting to see the female perspective in that kind of detail

      [–]2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      That was one hell of a read. This is the best thing you could send to a kid who asks "what do women want in a man?". Well, in college anyway.

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Exactly this. The PowerPoint literally spells out the fact that women love sleeping around when they are young and in their prime or better years. I mean in that PowerPoint, she listed that she slept with 13 dudes. I'm pretty sure she only listed the athletes in that list. No telling how many other dudes she has slept with.

      [–]misterwhippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      It's very telling that she includes her emotions that the guy literally has no control over (such as her insecurity due to not being prepared to have sex.) in the guy's rating. This shows how much emotions count, even when guys have 0 control

      [–]fakenate1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I bet she was prevented from playing sports at duke after publishing that.

      [–]newName543456 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      LOL, that was the first thing I thought about when I read about that 2012 report.

      And I pity any sap who did/will marry her.

      [–]Tie5o11 104 points105 points  (8 children)

      Wait- ONE guy FOUR YEARS AGO?

      I would maybe understand- maybe- if the entire team collaborated on the project this year and then publicly shared it on facebook or posted it on campus or something. But one player four years ago? Are you f'n kidding me?

      [–]newgrounds 17 points18 points  (1 child)

      Harvard should be shut down and sold off for that young misogynist's actions. Oh, wait, being attracted to women suggests the opposite of misogyny?

      [–]Wanderwow 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      Harvard went FULL CUCK a while back.

      Also remember they hired Fauxcahontas because she claimed to have high cheek bones therefore native american LOL, need to get their virtue signaling points right? and for the first time in decades 'disavowed' the republican nominee for president because he doesn't treat women with kid gloves.

      [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (4 children)

      The OP misrepresented what actually happened. One player made the document, but the entire team was contributing to it. Members of the team continued to contribute to the document and to spread the document around up until this year. So no, the team is not being punished for the actions of one person from four years ago. They are being punished for their own actions.

      [–]Temperfuelmma 8 points9 points  (2 children)

      Because finding women sexually attractive is obviously a crime /s

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      You're not being honest with yourself if you think that's the issue that got this team punished. That, or you're just misinformed.

      [–]Laterally_Cant_Even 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      "Get educated shitlord!"

      • any SJW

      [–]Tie5o11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I appreciate the correction. It does change it. Particularly if they publicly spread the document.

      [–]royal_fucktard 193 points194 points  (12 children)

      Wasn't facebook created in the same manner? Ranking campus girls by hot or not? I'm surprised the feminists didn't try 2 recommend castration over cancelling the soccer season. Who knows? Maybe they did.

      [–]aanarchist 112 points113 points  (5 children)

      funny thing is the women do the exact same thing yet it's ok

      [–]Quancreate 55 points56 points  (0 children)

      Society inherently views women as the weaker sex in need of protection. Harvard decided these women could not protect themselves, that they did not have full agency of their own lives and acted to protect them as one would protect a child from a bully.

      [–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (3 children)

      Some girl from Duke made a powerpoint explicitly detailing her sex life with a long list of athletes and it went viral. People just laughed, and she endured 0 negative consequences.

      The above situation isn't a problem, it's that for some reason it's not funny anymore when the shoe is on the other foot. Well, all they're doing is confirming what we've been saying all along. Women's value is in their looks, and men's value is in their accomplishments. Why else would an affront on women's looks be taken so much more seriously?

      The message feminists are sending is quite clear: It's worse to make fun of women for their looks, because looks are inherently a much larger part of who they are.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Yep. Check out my comment where I included the link to the story of that Duke student who rated guys.

      [–]goldnhorde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I am so tired of sleeping with women and being called a slut ..... and women can sleep with tons of men, publish their findings and be called things like "Stud".

      so hypocritical.

      [–]useyourmouth[S] 25 points26 points  (2 children)

      That was 2004. It is now the current yearTM.

      While the goofy misandrists can't score a kill shot against Trump, they will at least attack what easier targets they can find, i.e., boys at their institutions who would dare assess and rank a girl's looks a-la Trump.

      [–]Wanderwow 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      I remember a big talking point against Trump is, "he's the kind of man who walks into a room and rates the women there from 1-10."

      lol? We all (male and female) make note of the opposite sex, gimme a break. They're literally just mad because they're at the bottom of every man's list.

      [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      We all do it. Alphas are just honest about it. Orbiters lie and shame their own sexuality.

      [–]xinihil 8 points9 points  (0 children)

      At the same school, no less.

      [–]NakedAndBehindYou 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      Facebook was started as an online yearbook.

      [–]1ItsTheHomeWrecker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      deleted What is this?

      [–][deleted] 132 points133 points  (6 children)

      If the women soccer players were ranking the men by future earnings power..nothing would happen. Same thing if they ranked the men by attractiveness. No action would be taken.

      Also, Id bet the top 3 ranked women on that list have absolutely no problem with the list. The outrage is from beasts who dont like their relative position on that list.

      SJWs then join in out of sympathy as they too were never top of any such fucklists. The ones writing articles cant give their pussy away

      [–]alpha_n3rd 31 points32 points  (2 children)

      Can confirm. I've been to a Harvard soccer party. It's exactly like every other college party. A bunch of drunk horny kids sizing each other up. And all the people who liked it on facebook are old, ugly, or sjw.

      [–]fakenate1 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      The difference is that the Harvard players were idiots and wrote that shit down.

      [–]alpha_n3rd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      yeah probably not the smartest thing given the prevailing PC atmosphere

      [–]askmrcia 6 points7 points  (2 children)

      Ehh similar thing happened to us when I played football in college. Except it was the other way around and no where near as detailed as the post.

      The cheerleaders came into our locker rooms while we were at practice one day and placed a piece of paper with a number on (1-10) on each football player's locker.

      They ranked us. Of course some players complained (I swear to go I can't believe someone got offended over it, but it did happen) and the cheerleader coach made the cheerleaders write notes to each individual player and placed them on the lockers.

      That's all that happened. No suspensions or anything. But at the same time it wasn't as bad (detailed) as the post mentioned.

      If some football players got offended over that (*rolls eyes) then I'm sure some women would too.

      [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (1 child)

      As we know here, playing football does not make one immune to being a pussy:

      Living in a feminine primary frame.

      If I was ranked, Id be damn curious who was ahead of me and Id be looking to make whatever changes I could

      [–]evilbuttmunkeh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      If I was ranked I wouldn't give a shit.

      Oh no I was scored a one by someone that can't count any higher than that, my life is ruined.

      [–]Mckallidon 39 points40 points  (5 children)

      I wonder how many of these dolls have tinder accounts, skanky FB pics and vids on the Internet.

      [–]zboo1h 9 points10 points  (3 children)

      Every single girl (not necessarily single) has a Tinder account. All of them.

      [–]Mckallidon 2 points3 points  (2 children)

      These poor upstanding women are victims of sexism and misogyny. I am so triggered. Quick! Get to the safe space!

      [–]goldnhorde 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Mac ..... put your pants back on ... for the last time ... your penis is not a (air quotes) "safe .... place".

      and it never has been.

      [–]Mckallidon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I like putting it in safe places.

      [–]Flaming_DragonMan 25 points26 points  (3 children)

      I don't get why Harvard has to cowtow to this kind of nonsense. Isn't the university stupidly rich and privately run? They could basically tell the whole rest of the world to fuck off if they wanted.

      [–]alpha_n3rd 22 points23 points  (1 child)

      it's run by rich feminists

      [–]Strongproudwoman 21 points22 points  (0 children)

      "Hunny, as the dean of Havard you don't have to stand for this. You should make it clear that objectifying women is wrong"

      "Yes dear"

      [–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 13 points14 points  (0 children)

      Harvard doesn't "cowtow". They LEAD. They, amongst other Marxist institutions, promulgate this degenerate bullshit.

      [–]ChrisBenRoy 19 points20 points  (3 children)

      This is hilarious to me due to the fact that during the World Series my TL was flooded w/ comments like "I wish Kris Bryant and Jake Arietta played these games naked."

      Your typical double standard gentleman.

      [–]alpha_n3rd 24 points25 points  (2 children)

      Nobody expects women to behave because women are children

      [–]PipBoyTInkerer 9 points10 points  (1 child)

      "Women and children can afford to be careless, but not men"

      • The Don

      Back in the bluepill days, I always found that offensive, but understood it was from a different "era." Nowadays, it's more true than ever.

      [–]Askada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Once you swallow the pill you start seeing RP truths literally fucking everywhere. In music, literature, movies, everyone's behavior and everyday life.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

      [–]uhhthelonious 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Reference to the story? I'm curious.

      [–]jerlasvegas 13 points14 points  (3 children)

      Isn't there a national competition that ranks how hot women are? Something called ... Beauty Paegant?

      [–]Limekill 6 points7 points  (2 children)

      Thats the wrong narrative - shut up....

      [–]jerlasvegas 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      I was just being a devil's advocate. It's just that there is so much hypocracy in the matter. Everyone is beautiful, but America places importance on physical beauty in media. America then has beauty competitions. But when men start rating women, its wrong. Idk, isn't it hypocracy?

      [–]LasherDeviance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      The problem that these nutcases have isn't that the women were rated for their looks, but that it was done privately and they didn't receive the validation and attention in the same manner of a pageant.

      [–]Docbear64 25 points26 points  (15 children)

      Maybe you guys can explain this to me who wins when we stop acknowledging how attractive women are / can be? Is it just that the wave of whales and ugly women need to feel good about themselves and therefore need to destroy any inkling of Beauty recognition toward women ? Is it that women have been so brainwashed to believe their looks collectively shouldn't be ranked because they are more valuable than their beauty ? Or is this just a blue pill reaction to the possibility of maybe someone out there possibly being offended that young attractive male athletes enjoyed looking at and comparing young attractive female athletes ?
      It just makes no sense to me , Women individually love to look sexy and be admired by men they find attractive , what the hell are all these collective mental pushbacks to feminine attractiveness though ?

      [–]FractalFactorial 18 points19 points  (4 children)

      The idea is that evaluating looks is "shallow" and "objectifying". i.e. for some reason its impossible to talk about how fantastic a woman's tits are while still seeing her as a person.

      Not that even that matters. It shouldn't' matter whether or not you only see women as a walking pussy. People objectify one another all time: some men are just walking wallets.

      [–]OmegaMan2 12 points13 points  (1 child)

      For me pussy was only one consideration. My girlfriend and later my wife had to have big tits as well. Third come a nice tight rear. Fourth were her long toned legs and fifth her charming wit. I really couldn't ask for anything more.

      [–]TryDoingSomethingNew 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      :) I like how you think, amigo.

      [–]alpha_n3rd 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      you know who liked this story on my facebook feed?

      uglies, oldies, and SJWs

      [–]TryDoingSomethingNew 10 points11 points  (1 child)

      I believe Rush Limbaugh made a pretty good quote about feminism and it's relation to unattractive women wanting power they otherwise wouldn't have.

      Probably that would be oversimplifying it, and I used to not believe it, but now I'm reconsidering.

      My educated guess is that envy of the power that attractive women have motivates the SJWs/dumpies to want to tear down conventional social order.

      I base my comment on real-world examples of how obese and ugly, less-feminine women will verbally tear down cute, petite women and women who are with desirable men. In addition to actively harassing them or attempting to obstruct their careers & insult their family lives.

      Therefore, there's definitely evidence this could be why.

      Regardless, it's toxic and destroying the west.

      [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 12 points13 points  (0 children)

      feminism and it's relation to unattractive women wanting power they otherwise wouldn't have.

      Feminism is a trade union for fugly women.

      [–][deleted]  (5 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 12 points13 points  (4 children)

        Don't delude yourself. That is not their aim.

        Read up on Cultural Marxism and globalism. That is their goal.

        And in between they'll have some Spirit Cooking sessions.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          I agree. But being ignorant or stupid or a true believer (the SJW cucks) doesn't make the aggregate goal any less than what I've stated.

          The average foot soldier is just a useful idiot.

          [–]2wiseclockcounter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          He's right when he says SJW's are useful idiots. More accurately though, they are purpose-molded tools to advance an agenda of securing control via demonization. When jailing people and firing people for saying offensive things or having certain opinions becomes the norm, power is maintained through the fear of enforced ostracization.

          http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/arrests-for-offensive-facebook-and-twitter-posts-soar-in-london-a7064246.html

          Words and thoughts are being criminalized. Worse so- very normal words and thoughts.

          The CIA funded Ms Magazine, and apparently the Rockefellers et. al. have been behind the women's lib movement. The former is public record, the latter is probably more difficult to track. This article, which explains that the RP dissolution of family values is also happening in India, outlines the overall plan http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/05/the-rockefeller-foundation-funded-womens-lib-for-the-same-reason-the-cia-funded-ms-magazine-2173980.html

          [–]hores 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          +1 for that fresh reference

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–]Docbear64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            Ego boost ? irresponsible guys shooting themselves in the foot sure, it wasn't handled great and due to their irresponsibility they got caught but in what way could comparing women on a tam be insulting ? I have never and never known the men around me to compare women for the sake of criticizing them unless it's playing Marry , Fuck, Kill : ugly edition . In fact that's exactly my point in what world is acknowledging that some women look better than others an insult to women kind collectively or as a specific group ? I don't personally understand that perspective. If Jessica is perceived as fucking hot and Melissa is ranked as average you mean to tell me that Jessica and Melissa should be offended ? please explain ?

            [–]synaptic_misfires 7 points8 points  (2 children)

            have you seen the women's team? they're not even good looking

            http://www.gocrimson.com/sports/wsoc/2016-17/roster

            [–]2wiseclockcounter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            lmao, some of them weren't that bad. the rest were your typical dude's-face-with-tits femmejock.

            [–]RPthrowaway123 6 points7 points  (0 children)

            Good god this is pathetic. I can't believe people used to aspire to go to Harvard when this is the kind of bullshit getting pushed down those kids' throats.

            [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

            Man I can't wait for the men of America to get uppity and riot over the annual People Magazine 100 Sexiest Bachelors list.

            Oh, wait...

            [–]Daddie0 15 points16 points  (12 children)

            Just saw this on FB from a girl I graduated with in high school, she is a lesbian. Of all people you would think she would have been somewhat understanding?

            "Would a better, longer lasting solution be to make them read aloud the scouting report to their mothers, grandmothers, and aunts? Don't want to? You don't play."

            That was her FB comment.

            Someone responded to her:

            "Is this not just what testosterone -riddled young guys do? I know plenty of ladies rugby teams who quite openly check out the boys."

            I get the point, they got caught with their pants down, should they apologize to the girls? Probably, but cancel their whole soccer season?

            Hate to have to explain this to people, but guess what? If guys didn't think this way, none of us would be here!

            I just saw this a few days ago and wanted to throw up:

            What's the Deal With "Healthy Masculinity"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAhDC0TC7hs

            Every fucking guy on there is a fucking White Knight that has zero chances of getting laid. A bunch of Mangina faggot pussies. The idiot riding the unicycle should put the seat back on.

            [–]skankhunt-yon-juu-ni 17 points18 points  (2 children)

            I get the point, they got caught with their pants down, should they apologize to the girls? Probably...

            This is beta nonsense. Under no circumstances should they apologize because they did nothing wrong. The problem is that "men" started to apologize for completely natural behaviors like this and if you give these people an inch, they will take a mile. Our species exists because of the male sex drive and as men become further devalued due to offshoring of labor and advances in technology that render men disposable, our societies will collapse. You see it across the rust belt in the US. You see it across socialized Western Europe and you see it across developed Asian nations like Korea and Japan that have lived under US rule and lost their industries to China. Men in all of those places are waving the white flag and surrendering en masse.

            [–]Daddie0 1 point2 points  (1 child)

            I agree to a point, because obviously this should have never been given the light of day. Someone didn't keep their mouth shut and let the cat out of the bag, that is the source of the whole problem. Probably a White Knight that thought doing so would get him some pussy.

            [–]2wiseclockcounter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            my money is on some paranoid cunt who just HAD TO SEE the list so she pressured her cuck of a boyfriend into giving it up. Not out of righteousness, but out of vanity because every girl wants to know where she ranks.

            [–]greencrack 2 points3 points  (1 child)

            Mother, grandma and aunt would have already dione the ranking of both teams.

            [–]Daddie0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            I think the Mother and female relatives would probably be embarrassed to some degree, but they would also be thinking that they were "boys being boys". Which for some reason is never a good thing anymore.

            Locker room talk will never die out, just like bulling will never die out. I did see another news article, and I think someone posted on here a while back showing boys (White Knights) in a locker room pledging their allegiance to feminism to make sure that locker room talk comes to a complete end. So now White Knights will be there ready to tell on you if you think a girl is hot, and you want to fuck her.

            Years ago you could count on people to keep their mouths shut, and you didn't have all the technology like today. Times have changed and not for the better.

            [–]wadebarlow 1 point2 points  (4 children)

            Jesus Christ that video. We need to reintroduce some kind of predator that eats people so people can man the fuck up or be eaten.

            [–]skankhunt-yon-juu-ni 4 points5 points  (3 children)

            The kid with the bowl cut has orbiter written all over him. He may land a post wall alpha widow when he's 32, but he thinks that if he walks the walk now, he will be slamming dime pieces on Sorority Row. Though he has no natural predator, his low SMV will likely ensure his beta gene is not spread, but if it is, it will be to a very low caliber female and I shudder at the world his son will grow up in.

            [–]wadebarlow 1 point2 points  (2 children)

            All they kept saying was basically be yourself and be lazy. Being the best version of yourself is the key. That takes hard work. Which seems to be misconstrued with toxic masculinity these days.

            [–]2wiseclockcounter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            Ben Shapiro: "Any time you put a modifier in front of a term that is inherently good, you turn it into a perversion of itself."

            Following his point, where masculinity represents the quintessential male drive behind strength, aggression, competitiveness, protectiveness, and independence... healthy masculinity essentially coddles any male into thinking he is no less masculine despite not achieving or pursuing any masculine traits whatsoever.

            It's classic brainwashing word play. Just divorce a word from it's inherent meaning and relabel the new words with moral triggers so you can make people think what you want them to think. Who in their right mind would defend toxic masculinity after all? The cutting edge of the strategy is that it tricks people into defending a stance that can be easily criticized and ridiculed.

            I've been watching a lot of Ben Shapiro's videos and talks lately, he outlines very well the tactics and flaws of the sjw left. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5FeZE4O_XU

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANvQRDwgu7c

            [–]skankhunt-yon-juu-ni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Agreed. That kid with the bowl cut is the direct result of everyone gets a ribbon crap. I'm fine with rewarding my kids, if I can tell they tried their absolute best. Not everyone is gonna be LeBron James or Derek Jeter, but you better at least give it your all. The internal drive has been beaten out of so many people and as our nation becomes further beta-fied, it will get worse.

            [–]juliusstreicher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            Apologize to the women? Turn in the card.

            [–][deleted]  (1 child)

            [removed]

            [–]UndecidedThrownaway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            The funny part is this whole scenario sounds like the program Mark Zuckerberg made at Harvard -- or at least how it was portrayed in the Social Network...

            [–]AceBenedict23 4 points5 points  (2 children)

            I remember in the movie "The Social Network" about Facebook this is how Mark Zuckerberg got the original idea for starting the website. At the exact same school, Harvard no less.

            [–]8n0n 0 points1 point  (1 child)

            how Mark Zuckerberg got the original idea

            Winkelveii actually, hence the settlement.

            [–]AceBenedict23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Yeah I think in the beginning he started something called Facesmash or something like that which was a voting system on rating girls.

            Then those two twins came to him with an idea for a site called Harvard Connection exclusively for Harvard Students and he took that and ended up making it for not only Harvard, but other schools like Stanford, Columbia and eventually grew it to what it is now.

            [–]TankVet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

            In 2012

            For fuck's sake, these people are morons. "Hey, something happened almost five years ago that nobody cares about but let's make ourselves look like idiots for it!"

            Dumb.

            [–]DRUNK_Trump_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Lol. Pussy generation at its finest. When did we become so weak?

            [–]jerlasvegas 4 points5 points  (0 children)

            If this happened to Alabamas Football Team, nobody would have gotten in trouble.

            [–]jerlasvegas 4 points5 points  (0 children)

            Isn't there a national competition that ranks how hot women are? Something called ... Beauty Paegant?

            [–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 6 points7 points  (0 children)

            Don't worry (((Lena Dunham))) will exterminate these white male vermin once and for all.

            [–]maximusgains420 4 points5 points  (2 children)

            I did this exact thing in high school. Ranked some girls in a scouting report and posted it to frame someone who was bullying me far worse. The left wing teachers could not handle it, they treated it like it was a murder. Speeches were made in front of the whole school for weeks till I was forced to turn myself in. These people can not punish men properly, nor can they handle any sort of joke, the school was a safe space before safe spaces existed. We have to break away from cultural Marxist schools.

            [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

            sounds like you suck at framing people

            [–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Maybe one day you'll be fired for using Tinder. Can't let those vile heterosexual males having sexual preferences!

            [–]red_question 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Such an uproar for what naturally takes place in the thoughts of every red-blooded male alive. It was a foolish thing to document this reality for others to see, and these guys will sadly pay a hard price for it.

            "Think as you like, but behave like others."

            [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            when i was a sophomore in high school, i came up with a similar evaluation method based on the 20-80 scale used by baseball scouts. where's my harvard acceptance letter?

            [–]jmartn23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Their futures are certainly not being compromised. They still go to Harvard, bud.

            [–]pisspoordecisions 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Saw this a few days ago and was thinking about posting it, glad you did OP

            [–]NeckbeardVirgin69 1 point2 points  (1 child)

            Do men at Harvard still have sex with the women there?

            [–]mattizie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Get the boys together and go play soccer anyway but in plain clothes. Fuck 'em.

            [–]TyrannyVengeance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Ah modern college. Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

            [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            What a bunch of horseshit. Since time immemorial, men have been visually evaluating women and their sexual characteristics. Will men succumb to shaming and just stop doing this? Will repressing the natural male instinct to size up potential mates backfire on you? And do you think this flows only one way, as if men are the only ones checking out women, and the inverse, women evaluating men, is just unthinkable? Do you think this will stop over a cancelled soccer season? Also, what legal and moral implications might there be in punishing a group of men over their private correspondence from five years ago? Fuck, such ideological blindness at play here.

            [–]dking168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            As Trump says "it was just some locker room talk"

            [–]ek1995 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            As if the women's team isn't doing the same thing.

            [–]GMack17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            If I had a dime for how many times chicks post pictures of Kris Bryant on facebook....

            [–]128bitworm 0 points1 point  (2 children)

            Perhaps a good idea would be to absolutely ignore the women for the next season. No talk, no support, no nothing.

            [–]teragrm 1 point2 points  (1 child)

            why should the women be ostracized for something they never asked to be involved in?

            [–]128bitworm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            No one is ostracising them. I just want the men to avoid them as a topic, is all.

            [–]Fedor_Gavnyukov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            can we not link to paywalls?

            [–]A_Typical_Talifan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            Any one have the document itself or a link to it?

            [–]SuckMyFist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            Feminism is the new religion of the West.

            [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            I can't believe that harvard would stop a team playing, how much money do they have to burn exactly?

            [–]WeeItsNookies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            It's nice knowing that in 2016 America rating girls is now sexist and can get you fired or suspended. What complete and utter nonsense. It makes it even more painful when you have "who wore it better" on fashion and celebrity news outlets. Worst part is, you know damn well girls also have lists for men's teams. Hell getting laid is the main reason you want to join a sports team.

            Let's just be clear here. We are now punishing people for stating women are attractive. It really doesn't matter how crude or shallow the list was either.

            [–]vin789 0 points1 point  (0 children)

            Hetero male sexuality in its totality is deemed sexist by the left. Meanwhile no feminist woman has ever slept with a beta who treated her like an equal and asked for her consent to escalate physically like hold her hand or kiss her.

            [–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

            Alright so this thread is a bit sensationalist.

            Drew Faust, Harvard’s president, indicated in a statement on Thursday that she had learned the practice was not isolated to 2012 and had continued into this year.

            In addition, there were only two games left in the season.

            I think it's worth remembering that sports are truly 'extracurricular' at Harvard, they do not award athletic scholarships and maintain their academic standards for athletes.

            It's not unreasonable to expect their code of conduct would require generally not bringing disrepute to the school. These students did that, and as nothing more than a glorified club, their activities were suspended for the year.

            Play stupid games win stupid prizes. They get to continue school as usual, frankly I don't see reason for an uproar on either side.