TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

49

Hi, all. I was researching what I’m going through and I came upon the term “hypergamy”. Which then led me to the red pill and then here.

I want to preface this by saying I recognize that I’m being a bitch. I’m not at all proud of the way I feel.

I’ve been dating my boyfriend for almost 5 years. We’re each other’s first everything. I knew that he wasn’t exactly a catch appearance-wise but we had such a great connection and he had such a large heart that I ended up developing feelings for him.

He’s a great boyfriend. Goes out of his way for me and always makes sure I’m happy. Would never even dream of cheating or leaving. However, I’ve found myself starting to wonder if I can do better than him.

People always look at us crazy. Guys sometime pull him aside and ask him how the hell he got me. My friends (who I dropped) would never stop going on about how I stooped way below my league.

This didn’t affect me before. If anything it made me happy because I knew I could have him all to myself. Now though, I catch good-looking guys looking at me and I find myself getting more and more curious.

The worst part is, I’ve found myself kind of resenting him. It’s starting to annoy me that he’s going out of his way and doing all these sweet things. I think to myself “it’s not genuine. He’s doing all he can to keep me because he knows he can’t get anyone else.” When I used to feel secure and blessed in the fact that I trusted him 100% not to cheat or leave, I now think “of course he won’t. Who would cheat with him? He would if he could.”

I know, I’m a bitch. That’s why I’m here so I can get these thoughts in check. I know they’re natural for women but I want to rise above my shitty instincts so I can treat him the way he deserves to be treated and be happy together. He really is an amazing person and I don’t want to lose him. So what if he doesn’t have the best genes? We’re not cavemen anymore, that shouldn’t matter.

Please help.


[–]FriedNotStirred 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

My husband and I are also each other’s one and onlys (been together 17 years since high school). Many people have commented that I am way out of his league. And there was a point in time (late teen, early 20s) where I started to believe it. I was awful to him when my vanity got the best of my better judgement.

In retrospect, how he held his frame up against my nonsense with such maturity, grace and kindness whilst hustling to make leaps and bounds in his career, it was HIM that was way out of my league. I realised that I had so much to learn from him as a person. He’s taught me a lot about the world. When I started to admire and respect him for the man that he was, and taking note of what he brings to the table, I realised that I was incredibly lucky to be the woman by his side. No man who’s tried to intervene could ever be on his level in my eyes.

My advice is to either truly learn to appreciate and respect him or walk away. People outside of the relationship are not the wisest people to accept advise from.

[–]organicsunshine16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sage advice here.

[–]inthegarbageigo 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I’m staying and learning to truly respect him. He’s a way better person than I’ll ever be with intelligence and willpower. None of these hot guys have that and I know this. Beautiful story.

[–]readingwithcoffee0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Taylor Swift: "Nothing Good Starts in a Getaway Car" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqyA4o6c2NE I feel like guys have a very keen sense of when women have hurt other men, because male friendship is really strong. I think it would be much tougher to convince another quality guy to trust you as wife material if they know that you have done something like this in your past.

[–]loneliness-incEndorsed Contributor10 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

There are men that could be better than him sure, but you could always wonder that about the next great guy too.

There's a chance the men will be better and a chance they won't be better. What's for sure is that the branch swinging woman will be a much worse mate as a result of her branch swinging and that's the part that so many branch swinging women overlook. They think that they're just swinging to the next branch and that their own value will stay the same. Doesn't work that way. Your own value will drop dramatically.

[–]Ruinedgirl223 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very true, even in your own eyes. I haven’t truly respected myself since I did it. I was someone before, I had a light of uniqueness that I could take pride in. Now? I see myself as any basic bitch.

[–]BewareTheOldMan5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

So Tomassi is correct - "frame is everything."

[–]DelicateDevelopment0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

the "right" frame. You can break frame entirely by holding onto your frame too much. Consistency, clarity, calm are what makes frame so appealing. If you do all of it without the ability to flexibly adjust - show social intelligence - you will loose frame irrespective of how hard you hold onto it. It is the absence of emotional instability... we need clear signals such that we can adjust. If you are instable we don't find anything to adjust to. One can even adjust to an unfair system... so frame is nothing else than presenting an outer surface that is predictable and adjustable.

If you mess up and then hold frame without acknowledging that you lost it, it will result in lack of respect. It is all about consistency and clarity, clear leading signals, and for people who cannot think in those categories, or do not understand what it means, there is frame and they will probably lose frame by trying to hold onto it.

[–]BewareTheOldMan0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

the "right" frame...consistency, clarity, calm are what makes frame so appealing...the ability to flexibly adjust - show social intelligence...clear leading signals..."

I can support your analysis and corollary on "frame" - I always felt there has to be some level of flexibility without a man presenting himself as an emotionless android/cyborg.

Good point.

[–]DelicateDevelopment2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was with somebody for five years who attempted to hold frame under any circumstance.

What I remember from all of it was not the drama, but how I lost respect. It was so easy for him to point out every emotional irregularity on my side. Yet, he couldn't admit even one of his own. How can you trust, believe and respect the judgment of somebody who on the outside is so deluded about his own contribution to a situation? I probably wouldn't even remember the situations themselves and would just have learned that this guy is a normal human being.

[–]DelicateDevelopment0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you want her to trust, follow and respect you, then just lead with integrity. It exists and we acknowledge and admire it. While on the other hand not many things can emotionally destabilize a woman more than a guy with improper leadership skills. At some point you might end up either with a liveless slave or with a constantly rebelling bitch. Both might leave you at some point, or you them. It is the easiest way to loose frame... I have seen it in so many different relationships so many times. It is lack of consistency. It's not a one hundred percent thing... women also like men for being human.

If you lose frame, don't get entangled in negotiations afterwards and if you do just admit that both of you could have dealt better with the situation. It's usually not a big deal as long as it doesn't happen too often. A "healthy" (whatever that means ;) ) woman will trust you even more afterwards.

Just admit that maybe it wasn't the best reaction/move/whatever and then lead the situation to somewhere else. Smile, have a walk, have sex, whatever.

[–]chomponthebit60 points61 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

It’s starting to annoy me that he’s going out of his own way and doing all these nice things...

Here’s the flip side: you start banging the bartender/ musician/hockey player who has all the options in the world. He doesn’t give you shit. He isn’t nice. He’s banging other women. He won’t commit and might leave you with chlamydia, or something worse that sticks around forever. Then he’s gone, and now you’re that alpha widow who can never again attract a man with such high smv - and an alpha widow can never respect the lower-smv guys she attracts afterwards.

Maybe consider how you might convert your current mate into more of an alpha (that said, DO NOT show him redpill).

[–]TheLaughingRhino 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Maybe consider how you might convert your current mate into more of an alpha

No, just no. Everyone has right to an opinion and everyone sees the world differently and yadda, yadda, yadda, all qualifications made, and so forth, etc. But No.

You accept someone for who they are or you do not.

If you can't accept someone, then leave.

The OP is not debating whether she WANTS TO LEAVE. She's debating HOW TO LEAVE AND NOT FEEL BAD ABOUT IT. She's already left. She resents him and does not respect him.

Do any of you want to marry a guy who wishes you were 10 years younger? 20 pound lighter? As pretty as your best friend? Or would you want him to accept you, just as you, good parts, bad parts, all parts, and still love you until the world collapsed upon itself?

Then why is anything less acceptable for him or anyone else?

I keep seeing in this subreddit - Change him or Honey, wait for a bit and it will all change, he'll make more money/be more Alpha/do things you want differently!

Do any of you want to be looked at and have someone hope you would be and should be someone else? Something else? How would that make you feel?

If you can't accept a person for who they are, then walk. And don't add frosting on it. Be clean about it. He wasn't good looking enough for me. He didn't have the status I want. And accept what that might say or not say about you as a person.

Is this what you'd want to hear from a guy? He'd really be game to leave you and sleep with someone else he thought was more attractive, but he doesn't think she'd stay, so why bother. Since you are the "safe" option. How would that make you feel?

Am I the only one who finds this entire discourse plainly dehumanizing?

[–]sweetbutt2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well stated.

[–]bloobird089 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Ok, but she already doesn’t respect the low-smv guy, and lack of respect does not bode well for marriage prospects. I think there is a happy medium between low-smv and Chad that she can obtain commitment from. Hypergamy is only bad for women if you reach above your league, rather than across like you should. It’s only low smv men who think hypergamy is automatically awful in any situation, because they don’t want to lose their gf who is hotter than them.

[–]chomponthebit5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

She’s already stated he’s short and scrawny, but has an alpha personality and mind. If she’s just considering superficialities, she’s got a wakeup call coming when she hits the wall and he’s got another hottie on his arm.

If women’s strategy is supposed to be forming commitment, intelligence, personality, and will - the qualities that last - should be foremost on their minds.

So sure, a short alpha may prefer ltrs because he hasn’t got the superficial smv of a jock. But the grass isn’t always greener and that smv will only skyrocket with time, finances, and age.

[–]bloobird082 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Where does it say that he has an alpha personality? The way she’s described him is that he’s very kind and does nice things for her, that sounds pretty beta IMO. There’s not any guarantee he will attract another hottie if he has low smv. Unless he is in a certain percentile of wealth, of course, but that’s doubtful. I’ve dated a guy below my league because I fell into the idea that looks aren’t everything and all that. I don’t think he ever attracted anyone like me ever again. He actually contacted me a few years later saying he wasn’t that attracted to the girl he was dating and was unhappy (He was the type of guy who would just unload his thoughts on people, I thought this made him interesting but I learned that’s actually a beta trait and that maintaining frame doesn’t involve spewing your thoughts on everyone) I learned from that relationship that dating in your league is better because you have respect for them and will try harder to please him than a man below your league. It’s just the natural dynamic that happens when women are with a man they respect, it cannot easily be faked by women and his looks do have to do with it, whether these men like it or not. There are studies about it that say dating in your league leads to happier relationships as well.

[–]BewareTheOldMan1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"...dating in your league leads to happier relationships..."

Yep - "leagues" is a thing. I don't understand folks who fight against this reality. It's difficult to cover the (looks scale) points spread - especially if it's a 3-4 point variance.

Also - poor guy...Alpha Widower Syndrome. If he's smart, he'll snap out of it. The fact he contacted an ex-girlfriend to inform his unhappiness with subsequent women reflects that AWS can be a male issue as well - albeit rare.

Dude needs confidence and a boatload of self-improvement - it's a solid recommendation and best way for a man to overcome AWS.

[–]inthegarbageigo 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

This is precisely why I want to change. I know in my gut that if I go for the attractive, good-genes guy I think I want, I’ll end up heartbroken and ruined. And not to mention I’ll look like a complete idiot because I’d have thrown an amazing man away for a shell.

I don’t know if I can help him become more alpha appearance-wise. A lot of things he can’t change such as his short height, scrawny build (that doesn’t easily build muscle) premature balding signs and less-than-appealing facial features. He’s pretty “alpha” personality-wise I’d say as he’s a confident guy.

[–]chomponthebit14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So this is all about appearance? Tall & muscular mean absolutely nothing in the long run.

It’s a truism that once girls lose their beauty, if they haven’t worked on their minds and personalities, they lose their worth. Same goes for me (though much less so).

If he’s already alpha in mind and personality, and gets shit done, you’re going to be kicking yourself in 10 years when you see another beauty on his arm - because women are able to get past looks for the will beneath

[–]LateralThinker133 Stars2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Read Fascinating Womanhood

[–]throwawayflire 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

How short are we talking?

[–]BewareTheOldMan4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

So... there’s no real trick to "converting a man to Alpha." If he's not good enough "as is," he's NOT your guy. Set him free to be who he is with other, more appreciative, and accepting women. If a man seeks self-improvement it’s because he wants to be a better man, or a better husband and father, and wants to maximize his potential.

Women can offer encouragement but trying to "change him" into someone else is problematic – or worse…might produce opposite and undesired outcomes.

[–]chomponthebit2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Agree to a point. But there are several posts here on rpwomen documenting how wives are helping their husbands into the role of captain.

In her response to my comment, Op already stated he’s got many alpha qualities, he’s just not tall or muscular. So she’s probably got an alpha, just one who’s not superficially so

[–]BewareTheOldMan8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

OK - I can support that women can assist her man's Captain Role in some way, but the decision for self-improvement is on the man and based in his effort.

Although physical Alpha traits of height and muscles are seemingly a focus to many woman and are nice, it's more the intangible qualities (leadership, responsibility, accountability, smart decisions, intelligence, confidence, loyalty, dedication, etc.) that make a well-rounded and True Alpha.

Muscles, height, and good looks are great, but "intangibles" makes a man a more complete Alpha. It's one of society's common misconceptions and how the general term "Alpha" is often conflated to mislead many women and men as well.

I don't want to stray off-topic (from OP's hypergamy issues), but it's one of my personal observations.

[–]JamesMercer11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

100% my line of thinking on this. The idea that being alpha is based on appearance is ridiculous. Being a chad is just being good looking. You could be a 10/10 tall, ripped, stud, but in terms of personality traits, a beta bitch boy.

[–]chomponthebit-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, making up for what you superficially lack forces development and adds to a man’s resourcefulness

[–]Ruinedgirl2232 points33 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Hey, girl. I need to tell you my own story, just concise and to the point.

I swear we’re the same person. Are you 21? That’s how old I was when I dumped my first boyfriend of 5 years because I felt I could do better, because I let all the people saying I was out of his league inflate my ego.

So I dumped him. I dumped him and a month later, slept with the first hot guy who came onto me.

Let’s just get to the point. My user describes exactly what I am. I seriously don’t think I’ll EVER be happy again. I don’t think I’ll ever love or find love. Not truly.

You probably think that once you have your little “experience” with an alpha, you’d get it out of your system and be able to be happy with your amazing boyfriend again.

Nope. Just... nope. You won’t even be capable of it. Even if he wanted to get back together (which mine did) you’ll be too messed up to do it.

I’m not saying my experience will be yours. I just see WAY too many similarities.

EDIT: Oh, and not to mention you’ll have to live with the guilt of completely destroying another person (or other people because chances are more than just him will be affected.)

[–]IsaGuz9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you for your honesty. Many women tell other women that non-selective sex is the way to go, though most of us are very much wired for the opposite. I admire the women who dare say "I'd unfuck 80% of the guys I fucked". All of you help us remember why we stay with our "one and only" despite being sometimes curious. Thank you for the cautionary tale.

I wish you the best and hope you'll be happy in whatever path you choose to walk.

[–]ArcticFoxBunny5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Your remorse is a sign of wanting to get better. I don’t believe it’s ever hopeless for anyone. A long nun mode period may be in order for you.

[–]DelicateDevelopment14 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I’ve found myself kind of resenting him. It’s starting to annoy me that he’s going out of his way and doing all these sweet things. I think to myself “it’s not genuine. He’s doing all he can to keep me because he knows he can’t get anyone else.”

This is your thinking and your interpretation of his behavior. There are many other possible interpretations. Just think about it for some time and don't get confused with the distinction between beta and alpha. A good partner will always have both traits. He will lead in situations that require leading and he will be protective and caring in situations where he needs to.

Doing the sweet things might just show that he is appreciating to have you in his life and doing his best to make you feel comfortable as well. And trust me ;) if you were a horrible bitch, it were irrespective of your looks that you would loose him nevertheless. Looks matter, but looks don't keep anyone pleasing and thankful for five years.

Are you demanding those things? You do not blackmail or threaten him to leave if he doesn't, do you? So really, how do you come to this superficial conclusion that he just does it to keep you because he cannot do better? Do you really think that you could do better than with a partner that respects your needs and wishes and tries to lighten up your days with sweet things?

Maybe you have created that enormous amount of insecurity in him. Well, if that is so and you really want to stay with him, then stop whatever you do that causes insecurity in him.

You seem to look at it from a perspective of he is trying to please you... did you give him reason to think that he has to please you? How do you even come up with the conclusion that it is not genuine and that he is only doing those things to keep you because you are better looking? Think about it for 10 minutes and probably you will realize how silly this is ;) not what he is doing is wrong... your interpretation of it is wrong.

Do you see potential for the two of you to grow as people together? That is what you need in order to have a long lasting rewarding relationship.

Encourage his leading (more Alpha) side. He might react a bit insecure about it in the beginning, because nowadays men are told that everything in relationships should be democratic, so they feel like they are not allowed to make decision and be dominant. But all men have it in them in the same way as all women have some submissive side in them. If you let him lead, if you hand over decisions to him, he will grow into that role and maybe it will turn into something more beautiful than what you could have with anybody else.

Read the surrendered wife, much of it probably doesn't apply to you, because it doesn't seem as if your relationship is complicated, but the surrendered wife will give you some understanding about the dynamic and how you can contribute to him acting a bit more manly in your presence. To me it seems as if you perceive him as too obedient, too pleasing. Then just help him being a bit more dominant, by letting him and holding yourself back a bit more. Make his wishes the center of attention.

Almost anybody could cheat if he wanted to. There are only few people that are so utterly disgusting that they really don't have the possibility. It is all in your head... He could get you, do you really think that all other women were that superficial that they would reject a nice caring guy, even though he doesn't look perfect?

Go to the gym together, do some sports. There are really plenty of possibilities how you can grow with each other and improve... we live in a society where looks are overestimated. Reading RP at first contributes to that as well. Don't get deluded. I think you are on the right track.

[–]inthegarbageigo 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I do sound incredibly silly now that I think about it. He’s been this way for 5 years, getting better and better with time. This clearly who he is. And you’re right- he was able to get me. What makes me think I’m so special and different than every other girl that I’m the ONLY one who could like him? I was so delusional.

[–]IsaGuz8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Beware of "cleanse of corruption by proxy". People who drink alcohol don't want to drink alone, they try to get others into it. People who do drugs don't want to do it alone. And people who screwed their lives and chances to have a decent long-term relationship, would love if all of us who are with our first loves screwed. People who smoke offer cigarettes to those who are trying to quit. People who are fat offer donuts to those who are slim... It's not all people, mind you, but some people, after realizing they've screwed, would rather have everyone else screw just as badly. Trying drugs, having careless sex. Among those who are telling you he's not good enough, someone wants to pump and dump you, and some others want you to be pumped and dumped so they don't feel that their lack of selection in sexual partners was their choice.

Don't beat yourself about it: just, in case you feel like cheating, think about the results: 1. You will be forced to hide, and lie to your best friend, the person you love the most. And the sex might be absolutely crappy. 2. Eventually, either he'll find out, or you'll feel so guilty you'll tell him. 3. You'll lose him for... what? A fling. Someone who doesn't care for you.

This is like trying heroine by injection. Satisfying your curiosity is not worth it. Just think about his face once you tell him you're leaving him, or after he finds out you cheated.

And once you cheat, you're a cheater. Forever. You not only fail to him, you fail to yourself . The people who want you to leave your boyfriend are asking for the destruction of your character.

And... if you have girl friends who are telling you you can do better... find other girl friends. Preferably, some with long-term boyfriends.

[–]DelicateDevelopment1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I do sound incredibly silly now that I think about it.

You got influenced by the comments of your environment. If you have the possibility try to find friends that will have the honesty and courage to tell you what most people won't tell you, namely you are a human being, with flaws as everyone else and not some perfect high school queen that deserves the most handsome chad ;)

Don't turn into a woman that resents herself and all men because she wasn't able to be thankful ;)

I would give you a different advice if it seemed as if you didn't like him. But you want to be together with him and are unhappy about your thoughts of deserving somebody better. So I think the mistake really lies in your assumption that you would really deserve somebody better....

So to me it seemed as if you perceived him of being of lower value than yourself because of the comments of your friends. In that case I would say that you probably misinterpret his actions. SMV (sexual market value) has something to do with looks. RMV (relationship market value) has little to nothing to do with looks.

SMV just allows you to have sex or to get somebody... RMV allows you to keep and maintain somebody. Don't confuse the two.

[–]out_looking_in 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I catch good-looking guys looking at me and I find myself getting more and more curious

I’ve found myself kind of resenting him.

Sounds like you want to ride the cock carousel for a while and fuck some Chads. You can't control him but it would probably help if your boyfriend started lifting weights and being more dominant because clearly you are not attracted to him. When a woman resents her man is because she sees him as beta.

You didn't mention your age but you're probably young since you get attention from men and seem to only recently be noticing it.

Keep in mind that after about 23, your SMV will begin dropping. You probably won't notice until 25+, but by the time you hit 30 your SMV will likely be lower than his, assuming of course that he isn't super short, stays in shape, and has his career and finances in order. Your SMV is your most valuable asset. Whether you decide to stay with him or to move on, make sure you use it wisely. You can cash in now by partying and spreading your legs for men who aren't committed to you, or you can invest it into securing commitment from a man and build a relationship that will make you happy and fulfilled later in life.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor15 points16 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

The ages you list for a decline in SMV starts way too young. It's true that men become more appealing as they get their shit together and have potentially higher SMV as they age. This isn't a guarantee at all though and any man who thinks that it's simply the aging process that makes him more appealing is making a huge miscalculation.

You are also making assumptions about the OP because they fit into your idea of what women are like, rather than an actual reading of her post. She's asking how to curb hypergamy which doesn't indicate at all that she wants to go out and be with other men.

[–]bloobird087 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Lol, right? Those are the young ages that incels list when they talk about smv decline.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor12 points13 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I mean, it's not unfair to say that peak SMV is in the 22-25 ranges but it's variable from woman to woman depending on how well you take care of yourself and what you do with your life. I read this as a suggestion that the wall is at 23 and that'd be quite a stretch. I bet the answer to this is in the OKC data set.

My bigger issue is the idea that a man will automatically be better as he ages. Men have to work to become men and fewer are doing that these days. So an undesirable man at 20 who does nothing in the interceding years, isn't going to suddenly be desirable at 30. If he works for it, sure, his market value peaks later than ours. But that's not because he gets more physically attractive. If the OP's guy is a great guy with interesting hobbies and a good career, then he'll potentially have a higher SMV than she does at 30. If he doesn't, he'll still be ugly and unless she's drinking, smoking, and blowing through men, by 28 she'll still be fairly attractive.

And breaking up with him to look for someone more attractive, especially if she's still young, doesn't automatically mean she's going to slut it up and make bad decisions. This whole post and comment section is too textbook RP for me.

[–]bloobird080 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think we can rely so heavily on the OKC study about age, because it was an online study. It’s like trying to apply what men look at in porn to the women they date. People quote the study as if to say that women above 22 (or whatever age) are being ignored by men, and it’s just not true. There’s also another layer in that some men are using dating sites mainly looking for hookups, and they might message the youngest women because they think younger = dumber and they can “fool” them more easily into casual sex. It doesn’t always mean they are looking to commit to the youngest women possible. I think many women start to wisen up as they get further into their 20’s, so some player’s “game” doesn’t work as well, and men know this. It’s also pretty easy to lie about your age online when you’re more anonymous. I wonder how many women subtract a few years to see if they can get away with it, I mean many women just use dating sites for the ego boost and don’t bother meeting the men, so who knows if they’re being honest in their profiles.

Either way, when a man meets a woman IRL, you don’t see her age first and foremost, you see the way she looks and carries herself. I think women who are older (but look younger than their age) have the advantage IRL, whereas online they may not.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

So this is a big part of where RPW needs a little more nuance (than other subs) I believe. If your SMV is high but your RMV is low, then you are going to struggle to lock down the man into a committed relationship, which is what most RPW are looking for.

We can talk about the importance of attracting him, and that is important, but as the men like to say...they'll have sex with anyone, commitment is much harder to acquire. Even if your SMV is technically on the decline, as long as it's not in the toilet, RMV is going to play a much bigger role in getting the LTR.

[–]bloobird083 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I guess I didn’t explain that well, I think my whole point is that if you’re really having trouble attracting men when you’re like 28 or whatever age, then you have done something really wrong. You shouldn’t have trouble attracting good men unless you’re like 35+ with kids. Women who complain about how they’re too old and men don’t like them is usually not their age, it is cause they got fat or they haven’t taken care of themselves, but no one in their life wants to be honest with them. We need to stop coddling women’s views that they’re “old” when they’re 26 and start telling them their smv is a bit more in their control than they think. I’ve seen plenty threads on here of women saying they’re post wall when actually it comes out later that they’re just fat (“well, I could stand to lose about 30 lbs”) or they don’t wear any makeup or do their hair and take care of themselves. It seems like some use their age as a way to get out of taking responsibility for their smv.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You made me think of one of my favorite post titles of all time:

The Fear of the Wall and Why I'm Sick of Hearing It

I actually think that at a certain point (late 20s through 30s) kids contribute more to losing your looks than actual aging. That's an opinion formed comparing myself to my younger sister (who has kids while I do not) and some FB stalking of old sorority sisters.

I don't think we coddle women when they are 26 and calling themselves old, it's not always an issue of SMV. Fertility plays a big role in telling women that they should lock down a man sooner rather than later. Dispense with all the stuff that men say about looks and SMV decline and just realize that if you want to have kids, sooner is statistically better. That's seriously downplay by a lot of people.

Big BUT there is a flip side too - your personality isn't fully developed until into your 20s. So I'm not a huge fan of the 19 year olds who are looking to meet their perfect 30 year old and settle into kids and a family either. I have concerns about the long term viability of some of those relationships.

But I agree with you that the wall can be a rationalization to not grow your SMV. I think that we're seeing the same phenomenon with "alpha widows" this week as well. I've seen altogether too much jargon in general lately and I think that the jargon sometimes just hides the actual discussion and reality of what is going on.

Plus the men like to believe that age alone makes us less attractive and them more -- but those same men will complain that they don't want to be "a success object" and you can't have it both ways.

[–]bloobird081 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think some select members do coddle women though about how their problem with dating HAS to be their age when they post about how they’re 26 and post wall. I find it a little ridiculous, lol. It’s not everyone, just a 1 or 2 people on here. It comes off more like negging than real advice.

[–]out_looking_in 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

The ages you list for a decline in SMV starts way too young.

I understand this is a harsh reality for women and there is a lot of denial in this area. But, my numbers are good. Generally, a woman's sexual attractiveness will begin declining after about 23. If she takes care of herself (stays in shape, stays out of the sun, doesn't drink, etc.) then ithe decline might not be very noticeable.

It's true that men become more appealing as they get their shit together and have potentially higher SMV as they age. This isn't a guarantee at all though

I never said it was guaranteed and in fact implied the opposite. A man's SMV can grow with age (at least into his 40s), but only if he stays fit and continually develops his finances, status, etc.

She's asking how to curb hypergamy which doesn't indicate at all that she wants to go out and be with other men.

Nice hamster. When a woman flat out says that she resents her man, and that she is "curious" about more attractive men who are showing signs of interest, that's exactly what she's indicating. Her "rational" mind might be telling her it's a bad idea, but her tingles (or lack thereof) are telling her otherwise.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Her "rational" mind might be telling her it's a bad idea, but her tingles (or lack thereof) are telling her otherwise.

There is a big difference between branch jumping and wanting to ride the CC.

[–]red_matrix4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Nice hamster. When a woman flat out says that she resents her man, and that she is "curious" about more attractive men who are showing signs of interest, that's exactly what she's indicating. Her "rational" mind might be telling her it's a bad idea, but her tingles (or lack thereof) are telling her otherwise.

Yeah I thought this was obvious as well. The worst part is how her friends and media will tell her to have fun and be independent - free bottle service and free love! 5 years from now she'll be wondering where it all went. The problem isn't her though, it's her SO, he's turning her off and she needs to start hinting that he needs to be lifting weights and take charge. It sounds to me like he is repulsing her.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I'm not entirely convinced this OP is real. Her post history is deleted and it's a very on the nose story that fits perfectly with RP theory and an OP who is not rationalizing in any of the comments at all.

But if we can't tell her how to get a mental lockdown on hypergamy, then every women is just fucked. Saying "you are going to do this because you can't control yourself" isn't useful if she's asking how to control herself.

[–]red_matrix2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean that's basic self control. Everyone suffers with self control in one way or another, hypergamy is just one example.

[–]bloobird081 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

If she’s considerably out of his league, why would him lifting weights be a bad thing?

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It's not. I was referring to the idea that she will break up with him and hop on the cc and that is an undeniable result of breaking up.

Her telling him to lift so that she'll find him more attractive is a conversation to tread lightly with imo. It could go well or really not well.

[–]subgirl1825 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I told my husband I was going to start lifting and I did. He started lifting. I cooed over how much better at lifting he was than me and how much stronger he was looking, other women started to notice him too, voila! One large muscular husband (and much improved wife) haha

[–]bloobird080 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think I meant to respond to redmatrix, he said something about lifting weights, I think I read it wrong though lol.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ha, I was so confused :-P

[–]bloobird083 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

A man's SMV can grow with age (at least into his 40s), but only if he stays fit and continually develops his finances, status, etc.

What percentage of men do both of these things though? Just like women, many men get fat as they age, and they don’t grow much in their careers..

[–]BewareTheOldMan2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If a man desires and expects access to a certain class of women he will improve as needed to achieve desired results - even non-TRP Aware Men are acutely aware of this fact.

My young adult son is very aware he needs to continue on his path to ever-increasing self-improvement and personal achievement in order to attract and generate interest from women who are willing and eager to be an outstanding wife and mother to his future children. It’s not gonna happen by luck, osmosis, or wishful thinking. Dude’s got to put in the work EVERY DAY.

He made this point to me on his own in a general discussion on women, relationships, and expectations for a girlfriend/eventual wife.

Notably, we keep it real and raw when discussing women. He’s already tracking very well and is observant of women’s behavior and nature in addition to picking up solid advice by virtue of my example.

[–]out_looking_in 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

A woman can increase her SMV and so can a man, but the difference for a woman is that is that she will have a ceiling to how high her SMV can be as she approaches her later twenties. There isn't anything a pretty and fit 28 year old woman can do that can make her as desirable to a man as a pretty and fit 23 year old, generally speaking. For a man, there is no such ceiling until much, much later in life - again, generally speaking. Put another way, a woman's SMV is determined almost entirely by her genetics and age, whereas men have more control over their SMV and more time to work with before it drops off.

[–]bloobird080 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I am 28 and I barely look any different from 23 to 28. I am starting to think I am some kind of outlier but like.. I don’t feel like I am? Lol. I mean I know there are women my age who also look younger. people tell me it all the time when meeting me, they assume I’m a college kid because I am not fat and I have nice skin then I tell them my age and they’re surprised (It’s not just men doing this to hit on me). i don’t know how people come to these conclusions that 28 year olds all look much older than 23, maybe looking at women who are like 35 and assuming they’re 28? Or just looking at women who partied hard their whole 20’s? It’s just that the red pill advocates staying away from those types of women, so I’m wondering why we are using those women to prove a rule on this sub? Shouldn’t we be mainly taking into account the women who take care of themselves, maintain their looks, and aren’t huge party types who smoke and tan their skin to shit? lol. Cause I feel like most women on this sub probably aren’t or weren’t hard partiers.

[–]Ironchar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I know a mate who's 32, two kids, (going thru divorce process sadly) experience...she still looks amazing! like she is 22-26 but with much more maturity thru time.

[–]Ironchar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

23... what the fuck..

23-24 these days is when she transitions out of the girl phase into a woman!

strongly disagree... YMMV though

[–]BewareTheOldMan0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

For men - aging is problematic even as his looks may or may not improve, but if he improves in other general areas of life (career, finances, fitness and health, stability, maturity, leadership, confidence, etc.), looks become less a focus and value/RMV is emphasized in those areas. It’s the base reason an older man is viewed as more attractive in general versus simply just based on looks.

If a woman develops good fitness and health habits early in life it slows her decline in looks. SMV (attractiveness) will eventually take a hit and all the other qualities that make men as interesting much later in life are not as important to men in general if a woman has those same qualities. This is especially true if the man becomes more High Value as he ages. I say this to young women ALL the time. Women's initial attraction to men is related to her SMV and potential for increased RMV, but a woman’s general, long-term value to men is based on increasing her RMV and relative to declining SMV…to which most young women respond – "what’s RMV?" I usually present an example of an older couple where looks are less an issue, but the body of accumulated work between the two reflects huge significance and life-importance.

I agree with u/out_looking_in – the rationalization hamster is beginning to develop (as indicative of many young women), but this is where women have a decision point – either play "man-hopping carousel roulette" or remain committed and loyal to a great husband-father archetype who demonstrates excellent potential and High Value based on his demonstrated and predictive behavior, and demonstrated loyalty, dedication, and commitment.

It’s unfortunate but women have to decide early in life to opt for either the carousel OR wife-status. Pick ONE.

It’s difficult to do both and later make up the difference in life. I can account for the rare exception, but most women will be faced with scraps and "leftover men" if they make bad, early life-choices.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I simply do not understand why the assumption is that her realization that there are hotter men out there automatically leads to riding the CC.

Just this piece alone because I don't have a measure of the man she is with other than his looks. We don't know how old they are. We don't know much else about their relationship. I'm making no arguments for what she should or should not do.

She could take it as a sign that there is something amiss in the relationship, break up, go into nun mode to heal and then intentionally date to find the right man. We are not limited to the wrong relationship just because it's the first man we date. And she's not automatically going to go have sex with dozens of men just because she breaks up with her first boyfriend.

[–]BewareTheOldMan0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're correct - a lot of specifics about the relationship are missing and presuming OP's behavior or intentions is not my area of expertise.

It's just that's how this mostly plays out...many women use the time on the CC versus productive time in Nun Mode - which would make OP an exception. She made reference that she understands Pretty Boys/Bad Boys will likely leave her in the dust, provide meaningless sex, and nothing more. I give her credit for awareness.

However, the general format is "hot dudes for sex when young" and responsible and more reliable men for later in life - it's the dual-mating strategy despised by many men and observed in many of today's women.

I don't disagree with your assessment that OP could be on alert for warning signs and later find an equally good or better man after time in Nun Mode. It's a practical and sensible approach for a year or two, but most men are going to question a relationship time-out as many are acutely aware that celibacy and self-improvement sans a relationship, meaningless or otherwise, is an unlikely tactic for most women - most men will fill in "blank spaces" on this behavior and see it as questionable.

RPW understand the importance of Nun-Mode/Relationship Time-Outs - most others not so much.

Anyway - good points from you all-around...

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

How old are you OP? It sort of makes a difference here.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I’m shocked at the advice that you’re getting! I recognize men’s and women’s brains differ, but why don’t you try thinking like a man?

Create a pro and con list to leaving him. Keep your mind open and be carefully about the negative aspects of both.

I say this because you will trade a lot of certainty for uncertainty. Maybe that’s worth it, but you should really consider what you’re giving up and what you’d gain.

[–]red_matrix-1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Guys don't make pro/con lists about women: it's "can I trust her?" if yes then keep her, if not sure then dump her.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Trust me, we do. Maybe you don’t but we do. Every girlfriend is going to be a headache, but some are worth it for X reason. That’s CBA.

[–]red_matrix-3 points-2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Lmfao guys don't do this. It's either a FUCK YES or a FUCK NO. If you have to make a list it's over.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Do you often do things that are a mystery to you? Do you gets some feelings and find yourself swept up in them? Are you unable to vocalize the reason for your desires?

Men can do all these things. It’s why on the men’s side, we talk about making sure she adds value to your life. It’s because we do an analysis based on the value of the relationship. All women are a pain to men in some way. There are no perfect women. The question for relationships is whether she adds enough value to be worth the shit tests.

There’s a post about promoting plates if they earn it by adding value.

Maybe you shouldn’t tell a man how we think.

[–]red_matrix-1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Plates are one thing, LTR is something different. If you have to make a list for an LTR then you already know the answer. Don't over complicate things.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, I have an analytical brain. I can’t help it. Most men think analytically. This is why considering CBA is central to male thought.

[–]red_matrix-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You're also making things more complicated than it needs to be: 80/20 principle

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not to open this discussion back up but you are two men arguing about how men think on the women's sub.

We're all in trouble if you can't even agree with each other!

tag: u/leftandred

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha. Fair enough. I’ll leave the reader to decide if there’s any insight here or... just two guys bickering in an unlikely sub.

[–]BewareTheOldMan2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I am rolling on the floor over here observing these two "experts" on male behavior. This is funny.

Realistically - most men conduct a cost-benefit analysis to determine if a woman is worth the effort or not. I presume women have a similar method, but with some female variation regarding logic/line of reasoning.

[–]LateralThinker133 Stars1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would say that, if you AREN'T making a list, you aren't prepared for an LTR. Pro/Con lists are important for any management decision, negotiation, or compromise you'll ever make. Quite likely, you don't do these things (young, male, footloose and not tied down). But for men who do, who plan long-term, lists are essential.

Maybe you do them subconsciously, and only the conscious YES or NO pops out of your hindbrain and you only think you have lists. But all humans function from them. If you think you don't, then you're only doing it on an instinct-level, and that means you're living your life on biological autopilot.

[–]LateralThinker133 Stars0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Not every man thinks with his small head. It's not all about sex.

[–]red_matrix0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just my opinion.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed110 points11 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

You will never have your hypergamy in check - any more than a decent looking man has his libido in check. It is something that you can manage, but in the long run biology tends to win. That is, of course, unless you have a strong culture that supports and helps you manage those base instincts; or a tremendous amount of self-discipline.

Assuming you are American, you will likely get nothing from our culture other than encouragement to "explore" or some other euphemism for the hedonistic version of "YOLO".

These feelings will never leave you. There are entire websites and countless other blogs, books, videos, and other resources dedicated to this aspect of the human condition. This sub is a great example of one facet of the discussion. And while those sites and blogs are growing in popularity, the far left, along with traditional media, pushing hard in the other direction. Unfortunately you are caught in the crossfire.

So, my advice. Please leave this guy before you cheat. Just end it cleanly. Do not let your feelings or empathy cloud your judgment. If you do not handle this well, I will be hearing from him on one of the other sites I visit and he will be angry, bitter, and maybe even hateful. And when that happens, no one wins.

Good luck

[–]IsaGuz5 points6 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

You don't need tremendous amounts of self-discipline. If you have self-discipline enough to stay at a healthy weight (not with a sick-pack, just healthy), you can very simply keep your base desires under control. You just have to think about losing the man of your life, about how you would hurt the person you love most, how terribly you will feel afterwards. You eat some ice cream, feel guilty about that, do some sports, and then ask for vast amounts of sex from your partner. It's not that hard, it's not like learning to play the violin at Paganini levels or becoming a Olympian athlete, it's not those levels of self-discipline. It's "these donuts will make me fat" level of self-discipline.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed11 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

In theory, I agree with you. In practice however, the statistics beg to differ...BIG time.

[–]IsaGuz1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

The statistics differ because we live in a society that's going to 30% of obesity and beyond (let's not get started with simply very overweight people). So, it's not that you need superhuman self-discipline, is that many societies are getting to a point where many citizens have sub-par levels of self-discipline. We removed forced discipline from school (and that's OK), but we destroyed the teaching of self-discipline, and it shows in all areas of life.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed12 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I can concede that this is a matter of framing. But anyone (men anyway) who have been in a LTR, knows that I am talking about. In order to stay married, it takes a very special sort of person and a LOT of self discipline. Is this societal? Perhaps. I could agree with that. But that does not remove the reality that porn, women's sexual openness, and a whole host of other changes have made true long- term commitment virtually impossible.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[M] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

If you do not trust women's ability to marry, this may not be the sub for you to be posting in. Marriage is one of the most common goals here and to give advice on RPW you must be able to advise women on achieving their goals.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed1-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

There is no need to engage in gender sniping. It is my expectation that the women who read my words are smart enough to glean their own meaning from it. Every thing that I write has deep meaning to me, and I put a lot of thought into much of what I write. I was responding to someone else, so it was not intended to "advise" anyone of anything other than to explain what was asked.

Are you implying that women are not smart enough to sort this out for themselves?

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl[M] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I said nothing of your gender. Had you been a woman, you would have received the same warning. If you can give good advice then your gender is irrelevant. If you find yourself questioning women's ability to successfully marry, I merely think you should also question your goals and motivation for being on this sub.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed1-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Try to spin this if you wish, but the readers here saw what you did and I am merely pointing it out. The original question was about hypergamy - asked by a woman no less.

What you are now implying is that because I am a man, I have no right to respond (even to a remark about my own comment) or else I am "questioning women's ability to successfully marry" when that is the very nature of the Female OP's question to begin with.

I hope you see how bad this just got. Thanks for posting this publicly - the more people see how this works, the better for all of us.

[–]pearlsandstilettosModerator | Pearl3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I responded with a warning to your entire comment thread. We escort (with bans typically) BP or feminist women out all the time. We also hold men to a higher standard as is noted in the rules for male participation.

You seem to believe that you are entitled to post here. I gave you a warning to consider based on your comments. I did not delete your posts and I did not ban you. But I agree it is good that you are debating me publicly. Not enough people stop to understand the rules or the tone of the sub before posting.

[–]IsaGuz0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I guess it depends on the country, I'm not American. If people there lead their romantic lives according to examples like Sex and the City, Gossip Girl or Girls, I understand that the frame is not conducive to successful long-term relationships. Then again, I think most people (men and women) are not ready, mature, self-aware o self-disciplined enough for LTRs, let alone marriage.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said. Thanks for this.

[–]LateralThinker133 Stars0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

But that does not remove the reality that porn, women's sexual openness, and a whole host of other changes have made true long- term commitment virtually impossible.

I think replacing impossible with unnecessary would have been a better, more accurate word choice. Marriage/LTR isn't close to impossible - plenty of people still do it, happily and successfully. It's just falling out of fashion, for both good and bad reasons which aren't germaine here.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed10 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

"Virtually Impossible" was my choice of words and I stand by them.

You make a claim that plenty of people still get married happily and successfully. That may or may not be true, but the overwhelming evidence I see is that this is not true. First you would have to define "happily" and for which /gender partner. Few people would deny that there are countless men suffering miserably in marriages, for example, but no one cares. Find a source that does something about this - go ahead. I will wait.

The expected response to this is the usual "Yeah, but there are also plenty of women suffering too" - to which I would say 1. You just proved my point, and 2. This is a big part of why this is still a problem - mention men suffering and people will hate you for it.

Continuing on, you would also have to define "successfully" and identify which gender/partner etc.

Statistics show that same sex marriages for women have a divorce rate that is double that of male same sex marriages. In the UK,62% of such dissolutions are women. This is true [internationally - or at least throughout Europe] -(http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1117893/pg1) as well.

You can read these for yourself, but this does point to some gender differences in the longevity question. It is extremely hard to dismiss all of these sources - although that is what usually happens on reddit when someone does not like the data.

Thanks for the assist though.

[–]LateralThinker133 Stars1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

the overwhelming evidence I see is that this is not true.

The plural of anecdote is not data.

Few people would deny that there are countless men suffering miserably in marriages,

And nobody here is arguing against this. In fact, RPW strives to make the woman's traits and behavior ideal for a stronger marriage, because making the husband (Captain) happy makes for a better marriage. RPW isn't selfish because it seeks relationships - unlike, I might add, the bulk of male RP which seeks sexual hookups with women without regard to their long-term well-being (because relationships aren't the point).

Continuing on, you would also have to define "successfully"

Not at all. A successful marriage is one that doesn't end in divorce, just as a successful pregnancy is one that doesn't end in abortion/miscarriage. Just as you aren't "a little bit pregnant", you aren't a little bit married. Either you are married, or you aren't.

this does point to some gender differences in the longevity question. It is extremely hard to dismiss all of these sources

No one is arguing that there aren't gender differences, or dismissing anything. You've got a chip on your shoulder and are tilting at windmills while at sea - stop trying to pick a fight with people who at worst don't care and at best agree with you.

EDIT: I'd like to add that the women in this sub are MUCH more likely to find a successful marriage than the average. So are the RP men who choose marriage, as they aren't in denial about woman's nature. Successful marriage rates are also higher in places that are more patriarchal, or more traditional, because RP truths haven't been driven out by SJW/western idiocy. After all, why do the champions of RP love dating eastern Euro women? They understand what femininity is, maintaining your looks and being submissive. They get, on a cultural/subconscious level, things that RPW is trying to bring back to women.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed10 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Okay. Have a good day. I trust readers to make up their own minds.

[–]LateralThinker133 Stars2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You too. Good luck to you. May you find the relationship(s) you deserve.

[–]DelicateDevelopment3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

You will never have your hypergamy in check - any more than a decent looking man has his libido in check.

This also means that hypergamy will always occur in almost any relationship. So should all women leave their partner as soon as they start to have doubts? Or better, because of potential hypergamy, never have a relationship in the first place?

[–]BewareTheOldMan1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

So... in a word - "No." However, everyone must be aware of their own nature and propensity to seek a better deal or presume the "grass is greener." It's a matter of personal control, respect for your partner, and managing expectations.

Assuming awareness, it’s not impossible to check one’s own hypergamy.

[–]DelicateDevelopment0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

That is what I was trying to point at. It is possible to resist any seduction. It depends on awareness, will power, general value of the relationship and and and.

Does the "dangers of hypergamy" will always (always as in AWALT) occur in almost any relationship sound more correct?

[–]BewareTheOldMan0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can support that phrasing.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed10 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

That is a non-sequitur. One does not follow the other. You can have hypergamy operating in the background, and still not leave. Just like men could have desires and not act on them.

And...because of hypergamy, one can have all the relationships one wants, but never EVER get married. Hoping that it won't happen is one thing, betting your entire life on it an another thing altogether.

Living in that gray area in some sort of balance without too much tension is the secret.

[–]DelicateDevelopment0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Then why do you advice her to break up?

What she experiences is natural, the outcome of the situation depends only on how she will develop, right now she is struggling, but she tries to do the right thing, which is why she has posted her. Nothing is decided, yet.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed10 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

My take on this is as follows:

When one has reasonable doubts, one lets them go. You focus on your partners good qualities.

When one has NAGGING doubts, you talk to a mom, sister, or friend and get advice and commiserate.

When one has SERIOUS doubts, you go on the internet looking for support for your next move.

Is this a law of nature? Certainly not. But the pattern is pretty solid.

She will leave him. This is academic at this point.

[–]RubyWooToo3 Stars1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What journal do you publish in?

[–]DeeplyDisturbed10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know I meant that in the colloquial sense - or maybe not. But I am confident that others get the meaning.

[–]bloobird083 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If we are being honest, leaving wouldn’t be that bad of an idea. She doesn’t respect the guy. She can go into monk mode, then find a guy in her league, or just find another guy below her league again that she doesn’t respect, just like this guy. I don’t think she has as much to lose as people are claiming.. she will most likely end up in a future relationship that is the same or a little better.

[–]DeeplyDisturbed10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the most pragmatic and honest answer I have seen in a while - related to these emotionally charged topics. Thanks

[–]stacysmom4010 points11 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

You don’t mention your age, but I’m assuming you are young. 21ish tops?

It really sounds like you’re just not that into him anymore. What you want at 16 isn’t always right for you at 21. And you will be a completely different person at 30.

I think it would be wise for you to wait until you are in your later 20s before you commit to anyone for life.

I know this isn’t the advice you want. Forcing yourself into a box that isn’t comfortable isn’t a good long term solution in my opinion.

[–]WhatIsThisAccountFor3 Star7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think it would be wise for you to wait until you are in your later 20s before you commit to anyone for life.

I disagree. I think around 23 should be the time women search for serious life partners (if they haven't already found one). Late 20’s is when you near the wall

[–]stacysmom404 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Statistically, marriages that occur at or after 28 years of age are less likely to end in divorce.

Yes, start seriously vetting at 23. Have a long engagement. Make sure he is established in his career and able to provide. Commit for life at 28.

[–]Ironchar2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've heard successful marriages are most so around the 28 to 32 age range and that young marriages are MORE likely to fall apart due to lack of immaturity.

one example http://time.com/3966588/marriage-wedding-best-age/

[–]WhatIsThisAccountFor3 Star0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You are right from a statistical standpoint, but I’d be more interested to see statistics from a conservative standpoint (since “red pill” is not really measurable.

I think divorce is more common among people who do not subscribe to our way of thinking.

[–]out_looking_in 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I think it would be wise for you to wait until you are in your later 20s

Translation: wait until your SMV has declined along with your chances of gaining commitment from a high-value male.

It's not a popular opinion in our post-feminism, "you go gurl," "spend your twenties having fun and finding yourself" world. But, by the time thirty rolls around, a woman should be happily married with three children and a husband who provides for his family, not going out on dates and meeting guys on Tinder while she has two cats and a closet full of pantsuits back at her one bedroom condo.

The optimal strategy is to secure commitment from the highest value man possible, which means she should have that ring on her finger before her own SMV starts to decline in her early-to-mid twenties.

[–]stacysmom402 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think there is a huge disconnect on this sub about when women near the wall and when their SMV begins to decline. It’s not uniform.

Regardless, OP never states her age, never indicates that this man is capable of being a good provider, and (in the comments) she details all the ways she finds him unattractive. Indications are he probably isn’t a high value male. He sounds like a super nice guy, but is that enough?

[–]02537-4110110 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You don’t sound like you’re attracted to him, let alone possess any sort of respect; do yourselves both a favour and cut this loose.

I don’t imagine you’ll reconcile this emotional blockade with the justification of ‘hypergamy’ — in your case, it’s situationally untrue. So, do the right thing and talk about wanting to let this thing go.

[–]DelicateDevelopment3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

in your case, it’s situationally untrue

why do you say it is untrue? Hypergamy refers to the fact that women want to be with someone whom they consider above themselves or better than their current match. Both applies to her situation.

[–]girlwithabikeEndorsed Contributor5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I was confused by this as well. Not sure how hypergamy can be 'situationally untrue'. It's a drive, not a rational decision.

[–]02537-41101-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but I’m interpreting the causality of her resentment differently.

She’s forcing an artificial connection with somebody she claims to love, but cannot socially fathom to be her superior. That’s as much a short-sighted emotional examination than it is a case of hypergamy.

[–]Honey_Mommy_821 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It sounds like what you need is him to be more assertive and dominating. My husband finally said to me one day:

"I finally get it now. Men have a strong physical reaction to looking at a woman in a bikini. Women have a strong physical reaction to male assertiveness/leadership/dominance."

I just about smacked him and said, "DUH! Took you this long?"

My recommendation is, as others have said, keep him away from the nasty redpill groups on the internet. Ugh. Much as I'm glad ***now*** that my husband starting looking this stuff up, it messed with his head for a couple years and he was very unpleasant.

These books really helped out my husband and I recommend them to you:

https://www.amazon.com/What-Women-Want-When-They/dp/1515234045

Sex God Method:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ghqyx3c8t6bq69b/SGM.pdf?dl=0

[–]lionliver2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair women will always get complimented more than their male partners unless the guy is way more attractive.

[–]IsaGuz3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

First of all: you're a good person trying to do the right thing and that's good.

What you probably need is excitement. In Erin Pizzey's book "Prone to Violence", she states that some women are hooked into abusive relationships because the sense of danger before a beating felt good. And that is probably because of the adrenaline surge that went with the violence. Now, this is not your case... but it basically means you can try to cheat the system by telling your boyfriend you'd like the adrenaline boost.

More than making him an alpha, maybe you can try to become an alpha yourself, with him. Maybe you can go to the gym together? Martial arts in couples can be super sexy. If you feel like you'd like to be thrown on the bed, tell him. If you feel like you'd like to be carried away in his strong arms, tell him: you can go to the gym together, he'll get strong, you'll get an even harder ass (you seem pretty hot already).

I think the best way of defeating temptation is creating memories together. If you don't want him to do tender things, but actually, harder, more traditionally masculine stuff... Ask for it. Explain what the problem is. Odds are he'll give you what you want, as long as you're brave enough to admit what it is and tell him.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for your post. This is an example of exactly why men need theredpill.

I just witnessed a girl I work with leave her fiancee, destroying him in the process, due to branchswinging. The guy made all the "right" moves: commitment, owns a house, proposed to her, etc. She used to gush over this guy all of the time.

Once she caught a little bit of feelings for this other guy, however (who is only 18, btw), she all of a sudden dropped all feelings for her fiancee, and tossed him aside as if he never existed.

Guess how long it'll take that guy to ever trust a woman ever again?

You have the right to leave your boyfriend if you wish, for "someone hotter." Just stay aware of the risks of pursuing men who have access to multiple women because of their attractiveness. It may work out wonderfully, or you could be entering a world of hurt, and end up as a lonely, bitter alpha widow.

After leaving your boyfriend, he will never see you the same way, ever again.

[–]wefsix0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

> It’s starting to annoy me that he’s going out of his way and doing all these sweet things.

When I find myself feeling this way, I explicitly tell the guy I'm dating to stop doing the nice thing because I am not appreciating it but rather becoming starting to feel entitled about it. In one relationship, I explicitly told them that there were aspects of Red Pill I agreed with and we should discuss it.

> People always look at us crazy. Guys sometime pull him aside and ask him how the hell he got me. My friends (who I dropped) would never stop going on about how I stooped way below my league.

I dated a very short man once. People looked at us like that. And instead of interpreting it as evidence I had made a mistake, I rephrased it to myself as evidence that I wasn't shallow, they were shallow, and I was a higher quality person than them because I valued who someone WAS rather than how they looked. This effectively made those looks/comments strengthen my commitment to the relationship and the man rather than hurting us

> “it’s not genuine. He’s doing all he can to keep me because he knows he can’t get anyone else.”

> “of course he won’t. Who would cheat with him? He would if he could.”

This is an unhealthy thought. Why are you being so mean to him your mind? Your actively sabotaging your relationship by letting your mind say things like that to you. It's one thing for those thoughts to pop up...but then you need to SHUT them down with thoughts like "That's untrue. He's never shown himself to be anything but a kind, generous man even to other men. Why am I pretending he only treats ME well? He's a great guy." or "He's firmly against cheating. He would drop a girl or guy friend who cheated on their significant other. He has standards."

Now, if the above isn't true about him...well, then, maybe you have been bamboozled a bit and he isn't that great a guy.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Goes out of his way for me and always makes sure I’m happy. Would never even dream of cheating or leaving. However, I’ve found myself starting to wonder if I can do better than him."

what, youre problem is you are trying to hamster, dont listen to other people and take him for granted, from what i have seen, you will almost always regret it... unless hes literally going no where or putting in no effort. You wont be happy no the CC.

[–]mewoo94-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you are wondering whether you could be doing better, it is a clear sign that you can. Improve the man besides you or start stealth looking for other options while you can.

[–]red_matrix-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

OP if your SO starting lifting weights would that make him more attractive to you? Men should all be lifting all the time, its healthy both physically and mentally, makes you look good, etc. Maybe nudge him in this direction. Guys get comfortable and kind of let themselves go and wonder why their SO left them. Have home read The Iron and The Soul by Henry Rollins.

The Iron

Also you say you're now just noticing attractive men looking at you? Come on, this has been happening your whole life the only reason you notice this now is because you're turned off by your SO and your looking to monkey branch. Hypergamy is really the failure of a man, once it kicks in that means the man has failed, and the relationship is on the rocks.

[–]openoids-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you considered the idea that you might be placing too much emphasis on the "highs" of mating? Yes...it is one of the most important decisions you ever make. But I get the feeling many people put too many of their eggs in the "coupling basket."

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter